<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rick Sherman - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Rick Sherman' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman</link>
    <item>
      <title>Enterprise Software Titans: Who Should Buy Whom</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/164207-enterprise-software-titans-who-should-buy-whom?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">164207</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our post <a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/data_doghouse/2009/09/enterprise-software-is-there-any-one-left-to-buy.html.html">Enterprise Software: Is there any one left to buy?</a> we listed the best candidates to be acquired within the lucrative Business Intelligence &#40;BI&#41; and Data Warehousing &#40;DW&#41; industry:</p><ul><li>SAS (Private)</li><li>Informatica (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa' title='More opinion and analysis of INFA'>INFA</a>)</li><li>MicroStrategy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr' title='More opinion and analysis of MSTR'>MSTR</a>)</li><li>Netezza (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz' title='More opinion and analysis of NZ'>NZ</a>)</li><li>Teradata (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc' title='More opinion and analysis of TDC'>TDC</a>)</li></ul> <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a604e482970c-pi"><br></a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:11:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our post <a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/data_doghouse/2009/09/enterprise-software-is-there-any-one-left-to-buy.html.html">Enterprise Software: Is there any one left to buy?</a> we listed the best candidates to be acquired within the lucrative Business Intelligence &#40;BI&#41; and Data Warehousing &#40;DW&#41; industry:</p><ul><li>SAS (Private)</li><li>Informatica (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa' title='More opinion and analysis of INFA'>INFA</a>)</li><li>MicroStrategy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr' title='More opinion and analysis of MSTR'>MSTR</a>)</li><li>Netezza (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz' title='More opinion and analysis of NZ'>NZ</a>)</li><li>Teradata (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc' title='More opinion and analysis of TDC'>TDC</a>)</li></ul> <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a604e482970c-pi"><br></a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/164207-enterprise-software-titans-who-should-buy-whom?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr">MSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spss">SPSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enterprise Software Acquisitions: Who's Next?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/163485-enterprise-software-acquisitions-who-s-next?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163485</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p> <div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59665c6970b-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59665c6970b-320wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="Big_fish_multiple_small" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></p> The high tech Titans - IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Hewlett-Packard (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) , Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) , Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) and EMC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc' title='More opinion and analysis of EMC'>EMC</a>) &ndash; have been buying software firms at an amazing pace over the last half decade. According to BusinessWeek the tally is: Oracle $30 billion for 56 companies, Microsoft 79 companies, IBM 60 companies, EMC 40 and HPQ 34. Many of these acquisitions have been &ldquo;tuck-ins&rdquo; where the Titans have added the purchased company&rsquo;s product capabilities into their product portfolio. This is a time honored practice the Titans, and their smaller brethren, have used to expand beyond organic growth and tap the innovative ideas of entrepreneurs.  <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59685da970b-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59685da970b-320wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="Titans" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></p></div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:03:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p> <div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59665c6970b-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59665c6970b-320wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="Big_fish_multiple_small" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></p> The high tech Titans - IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Hewlett-Packard (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) , Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) , Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) and EMC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc' title='More opinion and analysis of EMC'>EMC</a>) &ndash; have been buying software firms at an amazing pace over the last half decade. According to BusinessWeek the tally is: Oracle $30 billion for 56 companies, Microsoft 79 companies, IBM 60 companies, EMC 40 and HPQ 34. Many of these acquisitions have been &ldquo;tuck-ins&rdquo; where the Titans have added the purchased company&rsquo;s product capabilities into their product portfolio. This is a time honored practice the Titans, and their smaller brethren, have used to expand beyond organic growth and tap the innovative ideas of entrepreneurs.  <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59685da970b-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20120a59685da970b-320wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="Titans" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></p></div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/163485-enterprise-software-acquisitions-who-s-next?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr">MSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spss">SPSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fastest? Best? Software Titans Don't Realize Good Enough Is It </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/162424-fastest-best-software-titans-don-t-realize-good-enough-is-it?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">162424</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A recent flurry of news articles in the database industry has reinforced my perception that the software titans have lost touch with current market needs.</p><p>The PR machines from IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) and Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) have been each claiming to have the fastest database and hardware platform on the market today. Database vendors battling each other on who has the fastest or the most features is nothing new and has been going on for a couple of decades. But what has changed is &ldquo;who cares?&rdquo;  Of course it does matter if you are a techie and you are evaluating which platform has those characteristics. It also matters to industry analyst and consultants that are evaluating and recommending the &ldquo;best&rdquo; database platform one can buy.  But maybe the key criterion for future database market share growth is not the best but what is the &ldquo;best buy.&rdquo;</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:17:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A recent flurry of news articles in the database industry has reinforced my perception that the software titans have lost touch with current market needs.</p><p>The PR machines from IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) and Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) have been each claiming to have the fastest database and hardware platform on the market today. Database vendors battling each other on who has the fastest or the most features is nothing new and has been going on for a couple of decades. But what has changed is &ldquo;who cares?&rdquo;  Of course it does matter if you are a techie and you are evaluating which platform has those characteristics. It also matters to industry analyst and consultants that are evaluating and recommending the &ldquo;best&rdquo; database platform one can buy.  But maybe the key criterion for future database market share growth is not the best but what is the &ldquo;best buy.&rdquo;</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/162424-fastest-best-software-titans-don-t-realize-good-enough-is-it?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Next Acquisition Wave: Enterprise Software?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/152236-the-next-acquisition-wave-enterprise-software?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">152236</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201157150ecc4970c-popup"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201157150ecc4970c-250wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="6a00d8345444f069e200e54f9bcb358834-800wi" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" /></a> The high tech titans<span> &ndash; </span>IBM (<span>IBM</span>), HP (<span>HPQ), Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>), Microsoft (</span><span>MSFT</span>), SAP (<span>SAP</span>) and EMC (<span>EMC) &ndash; and their<span>  </span>smaller software brethren have been nibbling at tuck-in acquisitions. Still, they have been building their cash hoards and watching on the sidelines to determine the extent of the recession (it did not turn out to be </span>the 2nd coming of the Great Depression) and IT spending cutbacks.</p> <div> </div> <p>Some have speculated that they<span>  </span>were waiting for the valuations of their acquisitions to bottom out before they pounced. If that was the primary factor, the buying binge would be in full swing since software valuations have rebounded significantly since the market lows.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201157150ecc4970c-popup"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201157150ecc4970c-250wi" align="right" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="6a00d8345444f069e200e54f9bcb358834-800wi" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" /></a> The high tech titans<span> &ndash; </span>IBM (<span>IBM</span>), HP (<span>HPQ), Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>), Microsoft (</span><span>MSFT</span>), SAP (<span>SAP</span>) and EMC (<span>EMC) &ndash; and their<span>  </span>smaller software brethren have been nibbling at tuck-in acquisitions. Still, they have been building their cash hoards and watching on the sidelines to determine the extent of the recession (it did not turn out to be </span>the 2nd coming of the Great Depression) and IT spending cutbacks.</p> <div> </div> <p>Some have speculated that they<span>  </span>were waiting for the valuations of their acquisitions to bottom out before they pounced. If that was the primary factor, the buying binge would be in full swing since software valuations have rebounded significantly since the market lows.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/152236-the-next-acquisition-wave-enterprise-software?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Has IBM Beat the Recession?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/149527-has-ibm-beat-the-recession?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">149527</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20115711d43d9970c-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20115711d43d9970c-250wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; width: 240px;" alt="Data-center-iStock_000001759899XSmall" /></a> IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) released their quarterly results yesterday. They easily beat earnings estimates and raised their full-year earnings guidance (see <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/149337-ibm-q2-2009-earnings-call-transcript">earnings call transcript</a>). Revenue was down but margins improved significantly. Business headlines are very favorable extolling the results. </div>  <br>   <div> </div>  <div>IBM&rsquo;s results should solidify its stock and overall tech leadership in the market. But before getting too excited about press praise we should look at the results.</div>  <ul><li>Revenue of $23.3 billion, down 13 percent, or 7 percent adjusting for currency</li><li>Net income of $3.1 billion, up 12 percent; net margin of 13.3 percent, up 3.0 points</li><li>Free cash flow of $3.4 billion; cash balance of $12.5 billion</li><li>Pre-tax income margin of 18.3 percent, up 4.1 points; largest increase in more than 3 years</li><li>Gross profit margin of 45.5 percent, up 2.3 points; up 19 of last 20 quarters</li><li>Total expense &amp; other income -19% with SG&amp;A expense -19&amp; &amp; RD&amp;E expense -14%</li></ul> <p>A breakdown by business line:</p></div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:39:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20115711d43d9970c-pi"><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e20115711d43d9970c-250wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; width: 240px;" alt="Data-center-iStock_000001759899XSmall" /></a> IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) released their quarterly results yesterday. They easily beat earnings estimates and raised their full-year earnings guidance (see <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/149337-ibm-q2-2009-earnings-call-transcript">earnings call transcript</a>). Revenue was down but margins improved significantly. Business headlines are very favorable extolling the results. </div>  <br>   <div> </div>  <div>IBM&rsquo;s results should solidify its stock and overall tech leadership in the market. But before getting too excited about press praise we should look at the results.</div>  <ul><li>Revenue of $23.3 billion, down 13 percent, or 7 percent adjusting for currency</li><li>Net income of $3.1 billion, up 12 percent; net margin of 13.3 percent, up 3.0 points</li><li>Free cash flow of $3.4 billion; cash balance of $12.5 billion</li><li>Pre-tax income margin of 18.3 percent, up 4.1 points; largest increase in more than 3 years</li><li>Gross profit margin of 45.5 percent, up 2.3 points; up 19 of last 20 quarters</li><li>Total expense &amp; other income -19% with SG&amp;A expense -19&amp; &amp; RD&amp;E expense -14%</li></ul> <p>A breakdown by business line:</p></div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/149527-has-ibm-beat-the-recession?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analyst Tech Upgrades: Which Parties Are Over?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/148595-analyst-tech-upgrades-which-parties-are-over?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">148595</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Last week, Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey raised his rating for the hardware sector to attractive from neutral. He remains cautious &quot;although we are not calling for an immediate improvement in corporate IT spending&quot; but he does expect &quot;greater upside than downside to estimates into the seasonally stronger half of the year and in 2010.&quot; Next year he forecasts increased IT spending and corporate tech upgrades. With an eye towards the glass being half full rather than empty he states &quot;This, combined with a 25% decline in the Goldman Sachs Technology Index since the peak in August 2008, creates a compelling buying opportunity&quot;.</p></div>    <p>Also last week, Goldman Sachs software analyst Sarah Friar ups her rating on the U.S. software industry to attractive from neutral. She feels that the worse of the IT spending cuts or restraints is over ; IT spending surveys indicate software is a priority; and, like the other analyst, that the second on half of this year and 2010 will be see increased IT spending. And specific to software she sees that software has lagged telecom and media performance year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;; software valuations are in-line with the average S&amp;P valuations where they usually carry a premium; currency headwinds should abate or at least be less of a factor in year-over-year comparisons; and finally, M&amp;A activity in software is heating up.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:31:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Last week, Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey raised his rating for the hardware sector to attractive from neutral. He remains cautious &quot;although we are not calling for an immediate improvement in corporate IT spending&quot; but he does expect &quot;greater upside than downside to estimates into the seasonally stronger half of the year and in 2010.&quot; Next year he forecasts increased IT spending and corporate tech upgrades. With an eye towards the glass being half full rather than empty he states &quot;This, combined with a 25% decline in the Goldman Sachs Technology Index since the peak in August 2008, creates a compelling buying opportunity&quot;.</p></div>    <p>Also last week, Goldman Sachs software analyst Sarah Friar ups her rating on the U.S. software industry to attractive from neutral. She feels that the worse of the IT spending cuts or restraints is over ; IT spending surveys indicate software is a priority; and, like the other analyst, that the second on half of this year and 2010 will be see increased IT spending. And specific to software she sees that software has lagged telecom and media performance year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;; software valuations are in-line with the average S&amp;P valuations where they usually carry a premium; currency headwinds should abate or at least be less of a factor in year-over-year comparisons; and finally, M&amp;A activity in software is heating up.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/148595-analyst-tech-upgrades-which-parties-are-over?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/athn">ATHN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BI/DW Index: High Tech Industry Leads</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146115-bi-dw-index-high-tech-industry-leads?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146115</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p><div><div><div><div><div> </div>   <p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ">Business Intelligence [BI] index</a> continues to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD gains of 28.4%. The attached chart (click on the image to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs. High tech, as we has discussed, is currently the industry leader for the year and is likely to provide leadership with an upward market.</p></div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:51:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span></p><div><div><div><div><div> </div>   <p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ">Business Intelligence [BI] index</a> continues to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD gains of 28.4%. The attached chart (click on the image to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs. High tech, as we has discussed, is currently the industry leader for the year and is likely to provide leadership with an upward market.</p></div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146115-bi-dw-index-high-tech-industry-leads?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prgs">PRGS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BI and On-Demand Indexes: Tech on a Run</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144928-bi-and-on-demand-indexes-tech-on-a-run?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144928</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Our business intelligence &#40;BI&#41; and on-demand software stock indexes have been on a strong run this year. As discussed, this has accompanied an overall market bounce from March lows and support high tech in its current leadership role in year-to-date performance.</p> <p>MarketWatch in its market snapshot Monday <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/column/Market%20Snapshot">&quot;Technology the brightest, most volatile star of stock market&quot;</a> commented on the tech sector. The article substantiated our earlier observations that tech is often an early stage leader but that the market, and tech, may have gotten ahead of itself. Caution in the near term is advised in this sector but long-term growth should be strong as we emerge from this recession.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:07:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Our business intelligence &#40;BI&#41; and on-demand software stock indexes have been on a strong run this year. As discussed, this has accompanied an overall market bounce from March lows and support high tech in its current leadership role in year-to-date performance.</p> <p>MarketWatch in its market snapshot Monday <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/column/Market%20Snapshot">&quot;Technology the brightest, most volatile star of stock market&quot;</a> commented on the tech sector. The article substantiated our earlier observations that tech is often an early stage leader but that the market, and tech, may have gotten ahead of itself. Caution in the near term is advised in this sector but long-term growth should be strong as we emerge from this recession.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144928-bi-and-on-demand-indexes-tech-on-a-run?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questioning Current Assumptions for Business Intelligence and On-Demand Indexes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144732-questioning-current-assumptions-for-business-intelligence-and-on-demand-indexes?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144732</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><span>The Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) and On-Demand Software indexes continue to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD returns of 27.8% and 35.3% respectively as of June 19. The attached chart (clink on to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs that have also outpaced. </span></p><p><strong><em>BI &amp; On-Demand Software Indexes versus Broader Market Indexes &amp; High Tech ETFs</em><em> </em></strong><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:00:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><span>The Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) and On-Demand Software indexes continue to outpace the broader market indexes with YTD returns of 27.8% and 35.3% respectively as of June 19. The attached chart (clink on to see a larger version) compares these indexes with broader market indexes along with a select set of high tech ETFs that have also outpaced. </span></p><p><strong><em>BI &amp; On-Demand Software Indexes versus Broader Market Indexes &amp; High Tech ETFs</em><em> </em></strong><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144732-questioning-current-assumptions-for-business-intelligence-and-on-demand-indexes?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qtec">QTEC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ryt">RYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tech: Business Intelligence Index Should Continue to Outperform</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143414-tech-business-intelligence-index-should-continue-to-outperform?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143414</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>The Dow Jones Index &#40;DJIA&#41; moved into positive territory for the year on Friday, June 12 with the S&amp;P 500 at 4.79% year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;. Although much has been written about the broader indexes bouncing off their lows and the state of the various industries being bailed out, it has been the tech sector that has been one of the leading industry groups this year from a stock performance perspective. The NASDAQ 17.87% YTD gains leaves the broader indexes in the dust.</p> <p>There are several reasons for technology sector&rsquo;s performance.  First, tech companies are generally in better financial shape than many other industries.  Many tech companies, especially those in business intelligence and data warehousing, have little if any debt and are therefore not directly impacted by the credit crunch (of course their customers are so that impacts sales.)  Software companies are often cash flow positive even in lean times with maintenance and service revenue offsetting slowing new license sales. The <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:IGV" target="_blank">iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), is up 24.3% YTD illustrating investors fail in software potential.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:24:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>The Dow Jones Index &#40;DJIA&#41; moved into positive territory for the year on Friday, June 12 with the S&amp;P 500 at 4.79% year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41;. Although much has been written about the broader indexes bouncing off their lows and the state of the various industries being bailed out, it has been the tech sector that has been one of the leading industry groups this year from a stock performance perspective. The NASDAQ 17.87% YTD gains leaves the broader indexes in the dust.</p> <p>There are several reasons for technology sector&rsquo;s performance.  First, tech companies are generally in better financial shape than many other industries.  Many tech companies, especially those in business intelligence and data warehousing, have little if any debt and are therefore not directly impacted by the credit crunch (of course their customers are so that impacts sales.)  Software companies are often cash flow positive even in lean times with maintenance and service revenue offsetting slowing new license sales. The <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:IGV" target="_blank">iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), is up 24.3% YTD illustrating investors fail in software potential.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143414-tech-business-intelligence-index-should-continue-to-outperform?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/forr">FORR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/it">IT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing: What's Next?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/136074-business-intelligence-and-data-warehousing-what-s-next?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">136074</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Market headlines have noted the milestone of the S&amp;P 500&rsquo;s year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41; performance moving into a positive gain with Tuesday&rsquo;s market gains. That is terrific news but the <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ" target="_blank">Business Intelligence &amp; Data Warehouse (BI/DW) Index</a> and <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank">On-Demand or SaaS (software as a service) software index</a> have posted approximately 20% YTD gains (as of yesterday&rsquo;s market close.)</p> <p>These indexes have been swept up in the general surge of high technology stocks with the NASDAQ up 11.2% YTD and software companies, as represented by the iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), are up 16.3% YTD. However, both the business intelligence and on-demand software indexes have outpaced these high tech benchmarks.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Market headlines have noted the milestone of the S&amp;P 500&rsquo;s year-to-date &#40;YTD&#41; performance moving into a positive gain with Tuesday&rsquo;s market gains. That is terrific news but the <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ" target="_blank">Business Intelligence &amp; Data Warehouse (BI/DW) Index</a> and <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank">On-Demand or SaaS (software as a service) software index</a> have posted approximately 20% YTD gains (as of yesterday&rsquo;s market close.)</p> <p>These indexes have been swept up in the general surge of high technology stocks with the NASDAQ up 11.2% YTD and software companies, as represented by the iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), are up 16.3% YTD. However, both the business intelligence and on-demand software indexes have outpaced these high tech benchmarks.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/136074-business-intelligence-and-data-warehousing-what-s-next?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/actu">ACTU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dwch">DWCH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/forr">FORR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/it">IT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java">JAVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr">MSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prgs">PRGS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psj">PSJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pvsw">PVSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qsft">QSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spss">SPSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/swh">SWH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sy">SY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ttgt">TTGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Due Diligence on Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence Tools</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/129499-due-diligence-on-data-warehousing-and-business-intelligence-tools?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">129499</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The publishing of <a href="http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=131166" >Gartner&rsquo;s Magic Quadrants</a> or <a href="http://www.forrester.com/wave" >Forrester&rsquo;s Waves</a> is eagerly awaited by vendors in many IT categories, particularly those who scope in the &ldquo;top&rdquo; quadrant or wave. I know when the latest data warehousing &#40;DW&#41;, data integration or business intelligence &#40;BI&#41; reviews are published because the companies who are category leaders start issuing press releases about their accomplishments. Congratulations, we are the best!</p><p>In our industry (DW and BI) the core group of products has remained the leader for many years. The companies have changed because of acquisitions, but the underlying products listed stay the same. The top two data integration or ETL (extract, transform and load) products and top three BI (business intelligence) toolsets are perennial winners. And because the market is mature, at least there is a core set of functionality (but there is much innovation and expansion possible), and the leaders pack has been expanding in recent years.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:12:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The publishing of <a href="http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=131166" >Gartner&rsquo;s Magic Quadrants</a> or <a href="http://www.forrester.com/wave" >Forrester&rsquo;s Waves</a> is eagerly awaited by vendors in many IT categories, particularly those who scope in the &ldquo;top&rdquo; quadrant or wave. I know when the latest data warehousing &#40;DW&#41;, data integration or business intelligence &#40;BI&#41; reviews are published because the companies who are category leaders start issuing press releases about their accomplishments. Congratulations, we are the best!</p><p>In our industry (DW and BI) the core group of products has remained the leader for many years. The companies have changed because of acquisitions, but the underlying products listed stay the same. The top two data integration or ETL (extract, transform and load) products and top three BI (business intelligence) toolsets are perennial winners. And because the market is mature, at least there is a core set of functionality (but there is much innovation and expansion possible), and the leaders pack has been expanding in recent years.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/129499-due-diligence-on-data-warehousing-and-business-intelligence-tools?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On-Demand Software Up, Short-Term Issues Remain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127747-on-demand-software-up-short-term-issues-remain?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127747</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank" >On-Demand Index</a> spiked even higher than the jubilant market yesterday gaining 8.43%. With yesterday&rsquo;s gain the On-Demand Index moved into a positive territory for YTD (year-to-date) returns just as it did for two days last week. The index has matched the broader S&amp;P Software Index with a 3.88% YTD.</p> <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b-popup" ><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b-320wi" class="at-xid-6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b" alt="ODI 2008-03-23"  /></a></p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:42:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank" >On-Demand Index</a> spiked even higher than the jubilant market yesterday gaining 8.43%. With yesterday&rsquo;s gain the On-Demand Index moved into a positive territory for YTD (year-to-date) returns just as it did for two days last week. The index has matched the broader S&amp;P Software Index with a 3.88% YTD.</p> <p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b-popup" ><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b-320wi" class="at-xid-6a00d8345444f069e201156f463912970b" alt="ODI 2008-03-23"  /></a></p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127747-on-demand-software-up-short-term-issues-remain?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/athn">ATHN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbbb">BBBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnqr">CNQR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm">CRM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctct">CTCT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dman">DMAN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/knxa">KNXA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/loop">LOOP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/n">N</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/omtr">OMTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rnow">RNOW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sfsf">SFSF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slry">SLRY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tleo">TLEO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trak">TRAK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ulti">ULTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vocs">VOCS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Look at the Business Intelligence Index Performance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/125576-a-look-at-the-business-intelligence-index-performance?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">125576</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ" target="_blank" >Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) Index</a> has outperformed the major stock indexes YTD on a relative basis but lags behind the S&amp;P Software Index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>). The BI Index kept pace with the NASDAQ Wednesday. <em>Click to enlarge:</em></p><p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c-popup" ><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c-320wi" align="left" class="at-xid-6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="BI-DW 2009-03-10 copy" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:59:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkVv82-xmY-QQ" target="_blank" >Business Intelligence (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bi' title='More opinion and analysis of BI'>BI</a>) Index</a> has outperformed the major stock indexes YTD on a relative basis but lags behind the S&amp;P Software Index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>). The BI Index kept pace with the NASDAQ Wednesday. <em>Click to enlarge:</em></p><p><a href="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c-popup" ><img src="http://datadoghouse.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c-320wi" align="left" class="at-xid-6a00d8345444f069e2011168d3db69970c" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" alt="BI-DW 2009-03-10 copy" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/125576-a-look-at-the-business-intelligence-index-performance?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/actu">ACTU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dwch">DWCH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/forr">FORR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/it">IT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java">JAVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr">MSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nz">NZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prgs">PRGS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pvsw">PVSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qsft">QSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spss">SPSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sy">SY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ttgt">TTGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BI/DW Index: Dragged Down by Hardware</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/122532-bi-dw-index-dragged-down-by-hardware?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">122532</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Software companies, as represented by the iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), continue to outperform the overall market indices (see table). Although these companies and their stocks have been negatively impacted by the recession, IT spending and the bear market, they are in a stronger position than other industries and companies to weather the economic storm.</p> <p>First, in general, these companies are relatively debt free and generate a positive cash flow even in hard times. Second, although new contracts and upgrades may be delayed, many software firms have a steady stream of &ldquo;maintenance&rdquo; fees and professional services. Finally, you could consider these firms the &ldquo;consumer staples&rdquo; of the business world. Most of these firms sell software that businesses use to operate, improve productivity and manage/improve performance.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:33:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Software companies, as represented by the iShares S&amp;P North American Technology-Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>), continue to outperform the overall market indices (see table). Although these companies and their stocks have been negatively impacted by the recession, IT spending and the bear market, they are in a stronger position than other industries and companies to weather the economic storm.</p> <p>First, in general, these companies are relatively debt free and generate a positive cash flow even in hard times. Second, although new contracts and upgrades may be delayed, many software firms have a steady stream of &ldquo;maintenance&rdquo; fees and professional services. Finally, you could consider these firms the &ldquo;consumer staples&rdquo; of the business world. Most of these firms sell software that businesses use to operate, improve productivity and manage/improve performance.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/122532-bi-dw-index-dragged-down-by-hardware?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/actu">ACTU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dwch">DWCH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/forr">FORR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/infa">INFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/it">IT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java">JAVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mstr">MSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nx">NX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prgs">PRGS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pvsw">PVSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qsft">QSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spss">SPSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sy">SY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tdc">TDC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tibx">TIBX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ttgt">TTGT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On-Demand (SaaS) Index: Can SaaS Weather the Recessional Storm?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/120436-on-demand-saas-index-can-saas-weather-the-recessional-storm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">120436</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week the <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" >On-Demand or SaaS (software as a service) software index</a> and the overall market have not reacted well to news of the stimulus and bailout packages. The on-demand software companies, though, closed out last week by outpacing a solid market with gains on Thursday (2/5/09) of 3.35% followed by Friday&rsquo;s (2/6/09) 4.29% advance. The macro environment continues to show worsening recessionary signs, but last week, traders, in sort of a reverse logic, figured the dire news would hasten the passage of the stimulus package.</p> <p>click to enlarge</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:03:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week the <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" >On-Demand or SaaS (software as a service) software index</a> and the overall market have not reacted well to news of the stimulus and bailout packages. The on-demand software companies, though, closed out last week by outpacing a solid market with gains on Thursday (2/5/09) of 3.35% followed by Friday&rsquo;s (2/6/09) 4.29% advance. The macro environment continues to show worsening recessionary signs, but last week, traders, in sort of a reverse logic, figured the dire news would hasten the passage of the stimulus package.</p> <p>click to enlarge</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/120436-on-demand-saas-index-can-saas-weather-the-recessional-storm?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbbb">BBBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctct">CTCT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spx">SPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Will SaaS Fare in 2009?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/113272-how-will-saas-fare-in-2009?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">113272</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>The On-Demand or <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw">SaaS</a> (software as a service) index started off the New Year with a gain of 3.9 percent. That is in relation to a gain of 3 percent for the S&amp;P 500 and the iShares S&amp;P GSTI Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>) daily gain of 4.2 percent on the first trading day (1/2/09) of 2009. That follows a gain for the last month of the On-Demand Index of 9.6 percent versus 5.7 percent S&amp;P 500 and 8.5 percent for the IGV.</p><p>The recent gains are great news and may indicate a bottom has been established. It is still uncertain whether that bottom will be retested. Keep in mind that it will be difficult to fight the market if it continues to be a bear market that is just pausing or a recession if it is severe or stretches though 2009. It is likely that the software industry sub-sector and On-Demand Index will maintain some correlation, especially if the stock market or corporate IT spending stays in the doldrums just as they have over the last month.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:09:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>The On-Demand or <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw">SaaS</a> (software as a service) index started off the New Year with a gain of 3.9 percent. That is in relation to a gain of 3 percent for the S&amp;P 500 and the iShares S&amp;P GSTI Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>) daily gain of 4.2 percent on the first trading day (1/2/09) of 2009. That follows a gain for the last month of the On-Demand Index of 9.6 percent versus 5.7 percent S&amp;P 500 and 8.5 percent for the IGV.</p><p>The recent gains are great news and may indicate a bottom has been established. It is still uncertain whether that bottom will be retested. Keep in mind that it will be difficult to fight the market if it continues to be a bear market that is just pausing or a recession if it is severe or stretches though 2009. It is likely that the software industry sub-sector and On-Demand Index will maintain some correlation, especially if the stock market or corporate IT spending stays in the doldrums just as they have over the last month.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/113272-how-will-saas-fare-in-2009?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sun Microsystems: Slowly Fading Away? 
</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/104427-sun-microsystems-slowly-fading-away?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">104427</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>What happens when a high tech loses its way to achieving long-term growth and profitability? It slowly fades away. Sometimes it is because a company does not keep up with the latest generation of whatever they sell and they become a &ldquo;has been.&rdquo; However, a new variation on this theme has emerged to latch on to a new generation even if you can&rsquo;t make money on it.<o:p></o:p></p>  <p>Is Sun Microsystems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java' title='More opinion and analysis of JAVA'>JAVA</a>) slowly fading away?<o:p></o:p></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:25:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>What happens when a high tech loses its way to achieving long-term growth and profitability? It slowly fades away. Sometimes it is because a company does not keep up with the latest generation of whatever they sell and they become a &ldquo;has been.&rdquo; However, a new variation on this theme has emerged to latch on to a new generation even if you can&rsquo;t make money on it.<o:p></o:p></p>  <p>Is Sun Microsystems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java' title='More opinion and analysis of JAVA'>JAVA</a>) slowly fading away?<o:p></o:p></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/104427-sun-microsystems-slowly-fading-away?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java">JAVA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The On-Demand (SaaS) Index: Have We Hit Bottom Yet?
</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/101962-the-on-demand-saas-index-have-we-hit-bottom-yet?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">101962</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span lang=""><p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank">On-Demand Index [ODI]</a> was down 3.65% on Thursday, October 23, 2008, down 52.75% year-to-date (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ytd' title='More opinion and analysis of YTD'>YTD</a>) and the stocks within the index are down an average of 63.5% from their 52 week highs. The</p></span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:02:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span lang=""><p>The <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pAE5Wf1n7kkkwon4QHfTMJw" target="_blank">On-Demand Index [ODI]</a> was down 3.65% on Thursday, October 23, 2008, down 52.75% year-to-date (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ytd' title='More opinion and analysis of YTD'>YTD</a>) and the stocks within the index are down an average of 63.5% from their 52 week highs. The</p></span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/101962-the-on-demand-saas-index-have-we-hit-bottom-yet?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/athn">ATHN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbbb">BBBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cnqr">CNQR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm">CRM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctct">CTCT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dman">DMAN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/knxa">KNXA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/loop">LOOP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/n">N</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/omtr">OMTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rnow">RNOW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sfsf">SFSF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slry">SLRY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tleo">TLEO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trak">TRAK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ulti">ULTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vocs">VOCS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On-Demand Software Index: Between Euphoria and Panic</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/99111-on-demand-software-index-between-euphoria-and-panic?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/59788-introducing-the-on-demand-software-stock-index">On-Demand Index </a>&#40;ODI&#41; was down 8.0% as of close Tuesday, October 07, 2008, down 43.2% year-to-date,&nbsp; and stocks within the index are down an average of 57.0% from their 52-week highs. This compares to the iShares S&amp;P GSTI Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>) - 6.7% Tuesday, -32.1% YTD, and -35.0% from its 52 week high. In comparison, the YTD performance of the Nasdaq Composite for the same period was -33.8%.</p><p>Even though many of the companies within this index have been performing quite well from a business perspective this year, it is not surprising that these stocks have been hit harder than their software peers for several reasons:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:13:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rick Sherman</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/59788-introducing-the-on-demand-software-stock-index">On-Demand Index </a>&#40;ODI&#41; was down 8.0% as of close Tuesday, October 07, 2008, down 43.2% year-to-date,&nbsp; and stocks within the index are down an average of 57.0% from their 52-week highs. This compares to the iShares S&amp;P GSTI Software Index Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv' title='More opinion and analysis of IGV'>IGV</a>) - 6.7% Tuesday, -32.1% YTD, and -35.0% from its 52 week high. In comparison, the YTD performance of the Nasdaq Composite for the same period was -33.8%.</p><p>Even though many of the companies within this index have been performing quite well from a business perspective this year, it is not surprising that these stocks have been hit harder than their software peers for several reasons:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/99111-on-demand-software-index-between-euphoria-and-panic?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbbb">BBBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm">CRM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rick-sherman">Rick Sherman</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
