Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)

Robert Allan Schwartz

View as an RSS Feed
View Robert Allan Schwartz's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • What Is More Valuable? Dividend Yield, Or Capital Appreciation? [View article]
    Sheldon, I wish you and your wife a long and healthy and happy retirement, with few times that a sale of assets is necessary.

    Robert
    Jun 17 09:03 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Safety Valve Of Dividend Growth Investing [View article]
    "R.A. Schwartz, the sex-alcohol joke was a good one; I laughed."

    Thanks, Elle!
    Jun 17 02:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • The Safety Valve Of Dividend Growth Investing [View article]
    "Measure your success through your total return, not your increasing div income."

    That might be what works for you, but it might not work for everyone else (including me).

    "Those investors in the financial sector saw excellent growth in their div flow in the early 2000's. Those investors don't post much here anymore."

    I was an "investor in the financial sector". I lost money in 2008. I have not owned a bank stock since then. I post here all the time.
    Jun 17 02:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is More Valuable? Dividend Yield, Or Capital Appreciation? [View article]
    "In the purest sense, it should not matter whether the earnings are paid out as dividends or reinvested in the business."

    Perhaps, but to me, it matters, as the former gives me current income, whereas the latter does not.
    Jun 17 02:19 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is More Valuable? Dividend Yield, Or Capital Appreciation? [View article]
    "However, it is wrong, IMHO, to ignore appreciation driven by earnings growth."

    I don't "ignore" appreciation. It is a secondary goal for me, after the primary goal of a reliable, dependable, and rising income stream produced by dividends.

    "To your original point, if an investor held only HON, MMM, UTX, or even KO and JNJ, wouldn't he or she have to sell appreciated stocks to support a life style determined by the 4% withdrawal guideline?"

    I don't use the word "withdrawal", as (to me) that implies "sales of assets". I prefer to fund my retirement entirely from dividends. I would rather support a slightly reduced life style, that can be afforded entirely from dividends, rather than a slightly enhanced life style, that requires sales of assets. But that's me, and I respect the right of each person to make a different trade-off.
    Jun 17 02:19 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Safety Valve Of Dividend Growth Investing [View article]
    "Morningstar has a "portfolio X-ray" that let's you input all the stuff you own, and then it gives you back your holdings broken down."

    I don't need Morningstar. If I wanted something of mine to be broken down, I would give it to my brother. :-)

    A related joke:

    One government agency sends a request to another government agency for a list of its employees broken down by sex.
    The response is:
    "Our problem is alcohol."
    :-)
    Jun 17 10:32 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Trade-Off Between Dividend Growth, Current Yield And Price Appreciation [View article]
    Part-time, you're right, but as the saying goes:

    "History might not repeat itself.
    But it does rhyme."

    http://bit.ly/11jrjam
    Jun 17 10:30 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Trade-Off Between Dividend Growth, Current Yield And Price Appreciation [View article]
    "it is much more likely to find stocks that increase their dividend over a 20 year period at a rate of 11% rather then 22%."

    You can use my chart:

    http://bit.ly/rCDtjJ

    to find out which companies have raised their dividends by X% (or more) over Y (or more) consecutive years.
    Jun 17 09:32 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Waste Management, Inc. Dividend Stock Analysis [View article]
    "it is just as important to consider dividend-paying stocks to avoid as it is to consider those deserving of a deep-dive into d-d."

    I emphatically agree.
    100 articles with reasons to buy a company, do not give me as much useful information as 1 article with reasons to NOT buy a company.
    Jun 17 09:27 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Not Starting Your Net Worth Over [View article]
    "Buffet likes to keep at least a 20 billion cash cushion for use in such situations."

    I currently have a $20 cash cushion.
    I guess I'm a "nano-Buffett". :-)
    Jun 17 09:23 AM | 11 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Safety Valve Of Dividend Growth Investing [View article]
    "dividend diversion" - I wanna do that! :-)
    Jun 17 08:33 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is More Valuable? Dividend Yield, Or Capital Appreciation? [View article]
    Sheldon, perhaps I misunderstood the use of "total return" in your comment:

    "HON yields 2.1% and its dividend has a five-year growth rate of 8.3%. T yields 5.0% with a five-year growth rate of 2.4%. It will take 17 years for the annual dividend on HON to pass that of T. However, even after 25 years, cumulative dividends on HON will still be less than those of T. On a current basis, structuring my retirement portfolio to yield over 4% enables a trip to Europe this summer and another one in 2014. Were I relying strictly on dividend growth stocks without regard to total return"

    When you choose high current yield low dividend growth companies over low current yield high dividend growth companies, you enjoy the benefits of higher income, but this seems to me to be unrelated to "total return".

    Is this interpretation accurate?
    Jun 17 08:28 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is More Valuable? Dividend Yield, Or Capital Appreciation? [View article]
    "Were I NOT to consider their total return aspect, they make no sense as investments for long-term or current purposes.

    I have backed up my conclusions with a spreadsheet. HON yields 2.1% and its dividend has a five-year growth rate of 8.3%. T yields 5.0% with a five-year growth rate of 2.4%. It will take 17 years for the annual dividend on HON to pass that of T. However, even after 25 years, cumulative dividends on HON will still be less than those of T. On a current basis, structuring my retirement portfolio to yield over 4% enables a trip to Europe this summer and another one in 2014. Were I relying strictly on dividend growth stocks without regard to total return, my wife and I might be shopping AARP bus tours."

    Sheldon, should I understand this to mean that you regularly and predictably sell appreciated stocks, because the dividends you receive provide you with less income than you need?
    Jun 17 07:55 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Case Against Buying Low And Selling High [View article]
    "The value of those cash reserves is not in having them, it is in what you are able to do with them when an opportunity arises."

    Christine, you're right; but what about the opportunity cost of having them even if no opportunity arise? :-(
    Jun 16 01:56 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Case Against Buying Low And Selling High [View article]
    Thanks, Tim!

    Robert
    Jun 16 01:55 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
9,752 Comments
20,591 Likes