Is the Newspapers' Shift in Focus to the Web Too Late? [View article]
your right. It should have said "to" not "by".The actual numbers are correct.
On Mar 19 09:14 AM jay fredrickson wrote:
> This article has some bad numbers in it. If revenue has fallen 67% > in 3 years, how could it fall another 20% and then have a four year > decline of 50%. If this story would have run in a newspaper, an editor > would have caught the gross miscalculations in the second papragraph, > the three year revenue has fallen by 40% and not the 67% cited.<br/>Does > the writer of this story want to post a corrected version, or should > we wait for the error correction to run tomorrow>
Is the Newspapers' Shift in Focus to the Web Too Late? [View article]
On Mar 19 11:41 AM Ron Shuttleworth wrote:
> your right. It should have said "to" not "by".The actual numbers
> are correct.
Is the Newspapers' Shift in Focus to the Web Too Late? [View article]
On Mar 19 09:14 AM jay fredrickson wrote:
> This article has some bad numbers in it. If revenue has fallen 67%
> in 3 years, how could it fall another 20% and then have a four year
> decline of 50%. If this story would have run in a newspaper, an editor
> would have caught the gross miscalculations in the second papragraph,
> the three year revenue has fallen by 40% and not the 67% cited.<br/>Does
> the writer of this story want to post a corrected version, or should
> we wait for the error correction to run tomorrow>