<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sajal - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Sajal' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal</link>
    <item>
      <title>Shanghai Index as Leading Indicator of U.S. Markets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/155402-shanghai-index-as-leading-indicator-of-u-s-markets?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">155402</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Back in early April, <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/shanghai-exchange-50-day-200-day-moving.html">I had written</a> about the 50 day - 200 day Moving Average crossover in the Shanghai stock market. I think we should look at the Shanghai index as a &lsquo;leading indicator&rsquo; to gauge US markets. This crossover happened a good 2 months before the US markets did. We also got an early non-confirmation of the March lows when the Shanghai index failed to make a new low at that point of time.</span></p> <p>Since I believe this is a cyclical rally in a secular bear, I wanted to use Fibonacci analysis to gauge the retracement levels in the Chinese markets. This basically gets you an idea of how far this bear market rally retracement should go. While you might not believe in Fibonacci or technical analysis, it's still useful to keep these levels in mind as selling and buying pressure would appear around these levels from people following these trends. As can be seen from the chart below, we&rsquo;ve already crossed the 38% retracement level, which means the 50% retracement at 3800 on the Shanghai Index is in play. This suggests further upside ahead.<em><br></em></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:20:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p><span>Back in early April, <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/shanghai-exchange-50-day-200-day-moving.html">I had written</a> about the 50 day - 200 day Moving Average crossover in the Shanghai stock market. I think we should look at the Shanghai index as a &lsquo;leading indicator&rsquo; to gauge US markets. This crossover happened a good 2 months before the US markets did. We also got an early non-confirmation of the March lows when the Shanghai index failed to make a new low at that point of time.</span></p> <p>Since I believe this is a cyclical rally in a secular bear, I wanted to use Fibonacci analysis to gauge the retracement levels in the Chinese markets. This basically gets you an idea of how far this bear market rally retracement should go. While you might not believe in Fibonacci or technical analysis, it's still useful to keep these levels in mind as selling and buying pressure would appear around these levels from people following these trends. As can be seen from the chart below, we&rsquo;ve already crossed the 38% retracement level, which means the 50% retracement at 3800 on the Shanghai Index is in play. This suggests further upside ahead.<em><br></em></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/155402-shanghai-index-as-leading-indicator-of-u-s-markets?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pgj">PGJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blockbuster Chinese June Loan Growth: Is the Final Stock Surge Ahead?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/149431-blockbuster-chinese-june-loan-growth-is-the-final-stock-surge-ahead?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">149431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It is widely accepted that a big reason for the Chinese equity rally was  the massive increase in banking loans and money supply. Thus when the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/5a022164-6b96-11de-9320-00144feabdc0.html"><em>Financial  Times </em></a>reported a blockbuster June loan growth, I wondered if this would lead  to a July-August surge in the stock markets, the last one.  Looks like we might be getting one.</p> <p>Here are two charts showing the  credit and money supply surge:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:15:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>It is widely accepted that a big reason for the Chinese equity rally was  the massive increase in banking loans and money supply. Thus when the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/5a022164-6b96-11de-9320-00144feabdc0.html"><em>Financial  Times </em></a>reported a blockbuster June loan growth, I wondered if this would lead  to a July-August surge in the stock markets, the last one.  Looks like we might be getting one.</p> <p>Here are two charts showing the  credit and money supply surge:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/149431-blockbuster-chinese-june-loan-growth-is-the-final-stock-surge-ahead?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pgj">PGJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 600 Year Silver Bear Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143970-the-600-year-silver-bear-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143970</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The book &quot;The Ascent of Money&quot; actually talks in depth about the discovery of the New World Potosi mines by the Spaniards. Apparently, a great metal shortage was solved by this discovery. The Spanish &lsquo;pieces of eight&rsquo; became the global reserve currency.</p><p>But obviously this did not make the Spaniards wealthy in the long term. The increase in money supply merely increased the prices of all goods and services. The period from 1540 to 1640 was the only period where annual inflation of about 2% per annum actually existed before the era of fiat currencies. Check out my <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/06/ascent-of-money-by-niall-ferguson.html">earlier  post</a> on interesting quotes from the book.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:12:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>The book &quot;The Ascent of Money&quot; actually talks in depth about the discovery of the New World Potosi mines by the Spaniards. Apparently, a great metal shortage was solved by this discovery. The Spanish &lsquo;pieces of eight&rsquo; became the global reserve currency.</p><p>But obviously this did not make the Spaniards wealthy in the long term. The increase in money supply merely increased the prices of all goods and services. The period from 1540 to 1640 was the only period where annual inflation of about 2% per annum actually existed before the era of fiat currencies. Check out my <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/06/ascent-of-money-by-niall-ferguson.html">earlier  post</a> on interesting quotes from the book.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143970-the-600-year-silver-bear-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slv">SLV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman Sachs Predicts Speedier Return to Growth for Emerging Markets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143407-goldman-sachs-predicts-speedier-return-to-growth-for-emerging-markets?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143407</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><br><strong>Goldman Sachs  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) is essentially predicting a lost decade for most of the developed world. </strong></div><div><div> </div>The graphs below are from the Goldman Sachs Global Economics  team (<a href="http://www.fullermoney.com/content/2009-05-26/document.pdf" target="_blank">Full report</a>): <br><em><font>Click images to enlarge</font></em><font><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513511581507-Sajal_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513511581507-Sajal.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a><br><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513514319678-Sajal_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513514319678-Sajal.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></font></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:09:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><div><br><strong>Goldman Sachs  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) is essentially predicting a lost decade for most of the developed world. </strong></div><div><div> </div>The graphs below are from the Goldman Sachs Global Economics  team (<a href="http://www.fullermoney.com/content/2009-05-26/document.pdf" target="_blank">Full report</a>): <br><em><font>Click images to enlarge</font></em><font><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513511581507-Sajal_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513511581507-Sajal.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a><br><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513514319678-Sajal_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/16/160728-124513514319678-Sajal.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></font></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143407-goldman-sachs-predicts-speedier-return-to-growth-for-emerging-markets?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewh">EWH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewt">EWT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs">GS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Google Won't Replace GM in the Dow</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/140329-why-google-won-t-replace-gm-in-the-dow?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">140329</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p> It&rsquo;s almost a foregone conclusion that General Motors (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>) is going to be  replaced from the Dow. People have started speculating on possible replacements: </p><div><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bankruptcy-filing-by-GM-would-apf-15361620.html;_ylt=AiAL0VxHH27T4_WopAOyzM.7YWsA?sec=topStories&amp;pos=2&amp;asset=&amp;ccode=" target="_blank">From  Yahoo Finance: </a><br> <blockquote><p>In a research note last month, Nicholas Colas, chief market  strategist for BNY ConvergEx Group, laid out seven possible replacements for GM:  bankers Goldman Sachs Group Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) and Wells Fargo &amp; Co.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc' title='More opinion and analysis of WFC'>WFC</a>); high-tech  firms Cisco Systems Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='More opinion and analysis of CSCO'>CSCO</a>), Apple Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>), Google Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) and Oracle  Corp.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>); and agricultural products maker Monsanto  Co.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon' title='More opinion and analysis of MON'>MON</a>).</p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:51:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p> It&rsquo;s almost a foregone conclusion that General Motors (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>) is going to be  replaced from the Dow. People have started speculating on possible replacements: </p><div><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bankruptcy-filing-by-GM-would-apf-15361620.html;_ylt=AiAL0VxHH27T4_WopAOyzM.7YWsA?sec=topStories&amp;pos=2&amp;asset=&amp;ccode=" target="_blank">From  Yahoo Finance: </a><br> <blockquote><p>In a research note last month, Nicholas Colas, chief market  strategist for BNY ConvergEx Group, laid out seven possible replacements for GM:  bankers Goldman Sachs Group Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) and Wells Fargo &amp; Co.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc' title='More opinion and analysis of WFC'>WFC</a>); high-tech  firms Cisco Systems Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='More opinion and analysis of CSCO'>CSCO</a>), Apple Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>), Google Inc.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) and Oracle  Corp.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>); and agricultural products maker Monsanto  Co.(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon' title='More opinion and analysis of MON'>MON</a>).</p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/140329-why-google-won-t-replace-gm-in-the-dow?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvs">CVS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs">GS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hon">HON</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mo">MO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon">MON</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pep">PEP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pm">PM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wag">WAG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc">WFC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did GM Really Bring Down the Dow?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/139319-did-gm-really-bring-down-the-dow?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">139319</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>The headlines were screaming: <em>Dow closes in the red Friday after GM's  late-day skid.</em> Perhaps a more appropriate headline should have read: <em>A  25% decline in GM barely budges DOW</em>. (After all, Dow was only down 0.18% Friday). The massive 25% decline in <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a> stock contributed only about 0.04% to  Dow&rsquo;s decline (or about 25% of the day&rsquo;s decline). So much for the adage,  &quot;<em>as GM goes, so goes America&quot;. <br> </em><br> <font>The Dow is  a price weighted index, so as the price of a stock goes to zero, the impact on  the index becomes increasingly insignificant. The upshot is that GM&rsquo;s  contribution to Dow is basically non existent. If GM were to file for  bankruptcy, and GM stock goes to 0, (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/40730/000119312509100053/dpre14c.htm" target="_blank">or  $0.01 as detailed in this SEC filing</a>), Dow would only be down by 0.1%  because of it. That&rsquo;s noise basically. <br> <br> Just for fun, I decided to  calculate the Dow Jones index with various components removed:  </font></div><div><font><br> <em>click to enlarge</em><br> <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/22/160728-124304300330526-Sajal_origin.PNG" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/22/160728-124304300330526-Sajal.PNG" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></font><font></font></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:28:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><div>The headlines were screaming: <em>Dow closes in the red Friday after GM's  late-day skid.</em> Perhaps a more appropriate headline should have read: <em>A  25% decline in GM barely budges DOW</em>. (After all, Dow was only down 0.18% Friday). The massive 25% decline in <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a> stock contributed only about 0.04% to  Dow&rsquo;s decline (or about 25% of the day&rsquo;s decline). So much for the adage,  &quot;<em>as GM goes, so goes America&quot;. <br> </em><br> <font>The Dow is  a price weighted index, so as the price of a stock goes to zero, the impact on  the index becomes increasingly insignificant. The upshot is that GM&rsquo;s  contribution to Dow is basically non existent. If GM were to file for  bankruptcy, and GM stock goes to 0, (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/40730/000119312509100053/dpre14c.htm" target="_blank">or  $0.01 as detailed in this SEC filing</a>), Dow would only be down by 0.1%  because of it. That&rsquo;s noise basically. <br> <br> Just for fun, I decided to  calculate the Dow Jones index with various components removed:  </font></div><div><font><br> <em>click to enlarge</em><br> <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/22/160728-124304300330526-Sajal_origin.PNG" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/22/160728-124304300330526-Sajal.PNG" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></font><font></font></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/139319-did-gm-really-bring-down-the-dow?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmgmq.pk">GMGMQ.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smart Money on Market Direction: Bears Caught Flat-Footed?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138914-smart-money-on-market-direction-bears-caught-flat-footed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138914</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>With an almost ~40% equity markets rally behind us, this bull market may still have some upside left. The bears sure got caught flat-footed on this one.</p> <p>It&rsquo;s always interesting to collate responses from different strategists. I find that recurrent themes makes it easier to filter out the noise. (Consider this to be similar to the &quot;most widely held&quot; consensus stock portfolio. Only in this case we&rsquo;re trying to divine the &quot;most widely held&quot; very-smart money strategy.)</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:10:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>With an almost ~40% equity markets rally behind us, this bull market may still have some upside left. The bears sure got caught flat-footed on this one.</p> <p>It&rsquo;s always interesting to collate responses from different strategists. I find that recurrent themes makes it easier to filter out the noise. (Consider this to be similar to the &quot;most widely held&quot; consensus stock portfolio. Only in this case we&rsquo;re trying to divine the &quot;most widely held&quot; very-smart money strategy.)</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138914-smart-money-on-market-direction-bears-caught-flat-footed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dollar's 20th Century Decline </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/137051-the-dollar-s-20th-century-decline?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">137051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>So Zero  Hedge posted this incredible <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/annihiliation-of-dollars-purchasing.html">chart</a> showing that the US dollar has lost 94%  of its value over the past 76 years.</p><p><em>click to enlarge</em></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:31:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>So Zero  Hedge posted this incredible <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/annihiliation-of-dollars-purchasing.html">chart</a> showing that the US dollar has lost 94%  of its value over the past 76 years.</p><p><em>click to enlarge</em></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/137051-the-dollar-s-20th-century-decline?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett's Omaha, by Jeff Matthews </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/136086-book-review-pilgrimage-to-warren-buffett-s-omaha-by-jeff-matthews?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">136086</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/9/saupload_0buffett.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />The &quot;Woodstock for Capitalists&quot; occurred over the weekend. To capture the  mood, I read the book <a href="http://mhprofessional.com/search/results.php?init=1&amp;sort=relevance&amp;search_terms=pilgrimage&amp;x=29&amp;y=13"><em>Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett's Omaha: A Hedge Fund  Manager's Dispatches from Inside the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting</em></a> by Jeff  Matthews. Living in tumultuous financial times has increased the relevance of receiving sage financial advice, and who better to turn to than the &ldquo;Oracle of Omaha&rdquo; himself?</p> <p>The book covers the 2007 and 2008 Annual Berkshire Hathaway (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>) (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.B'>BRK.B</a>) shareholder meetings. It&rsquo;s basically a collection of blog posts which Jeff wrote on his website. The book is divided into two sections (for 2007 and 2008). Jeff&rsquo;s perspective as an outsider rather than a &ldquo;Buffettologist&quot; is valuable as he takes a more critical look at the events and adulation surrounding the firm and the man.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:21:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/9/saupload_0buffett.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />The &quot;Woodstock for Capitalists&quot; occurred over the weekend. To capture the  mood, I read the book <a href="http://mhprofessional.com/search/results.php?init=1&amp;sort=relevance&amp;search_terms=pilgrimage&amp;x=29&amp;y=13"><em>Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett's Omaha: A Hedge Fund  Manager's Dispatches from Inside the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting</em></a> by Jeff  Matthews. Living in tumultuous financial times has increased the relevance of receiving sage financial advice, and who better to turn to than the &ldquo;Oracle of Omaha&rdquo; himself?</p> <p>The book covers the 2007 and 2008 Annual Berkshire Hathaway (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>) (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.B'>BRK.B</a>) shareholder meetings. It&rsquo;s basically a collection of blog posts which Jeff wrote on his website. The book is divided into two sections (for 2007 and 2008). Jeff&rsquo;s perspective as an outsider rather than a &ldquo;Buffettologist&quot; is valuable as he takes a more critical look at the events and adulation surrounding the firm and the man.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/136086-book-review-pilgrimage-to-warren-buffett-s-omaha-by-jeff-matthews?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a">BRK.A</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b">BRK.B</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market Direction: Top Strategists Weigh In </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/135284-market-direction-top-strategists-weigh-in?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">135284</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks back, I <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/bear-or-bull-market-gurus-weigh-in.html">wrote a post</a> summarizing what the experts were saying on the bull vs. bear market debate. (This article is <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/05/top-strategists-weigh-in-on-market.html" target="_blank">also taken from my blog</a>.)The S&amp;P500 just broke out of resistance at 875, and the yields on the  10 year look to be rising straight to 3.7-3.8%.  Here's what the gurus have been  saying these past few days:</p> <div><font> <ul>     <li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Several-sentiment-indexes-showing-too/story.aspx?guid={A823BBAA-6529-4E82-8AF8-A966ADA9C307}" target="_blank"><strong>Mark  Hulbert</strong></a>: <strong>That bullish bandwagon. Commentary: Some sentiment  measures showing too much optimism </strong></li></ul></font></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:55:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>A couple of weeks back, I <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/bear-or-bull-market-gurus-weigh-in.html">wrote a post</a> summarizing what the experts were saying on the bull vs. bear market debate. (This article is <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/05/top-strategists-weigh-in-on-market.html" target="_blank">also taken from my blog</a>.)The S&amp;P500 just broke out of resistance at 875, and the yields on the  10 year look to be rising straight to 3.7-3.8%.  Here's what the gurus have been  saying these past few days:</p> <div><font> <ul>     <li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Several-sentiment-indexes-showing-too/story.aspx?guid={A823BBAA-6529-4E82-8AF8-A966ADA9C307}" target="_blank"><strong>Mark  Hulbert</strong></a>: <strong>That bullish bandwagon. Commentary: Some sentiment  measures showing too much optimism </strong></li></ul></font></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/135284-market-direction-top-strategists-weigh-in?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gary Shilling Continues to See Deflation on the Horizon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/134494-gary-shilling-continues-to-see-deflation-on-the-horizon?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">134494</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>There&rsquo;s been considerable debate on the inflation versus deflation issue.  Last year, this was a little more contentious. (The deflation camp has been  right so far and it looks to continue that way).</div><div>The biggest deflation  prognosticator has been &quot;Mr. Long Bond&quot; Gary Shilling. In fact, <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/06/on-bond-yields-treasuries-and-inflation.html" target="_blank">there  was a link to an earlier interview on this blog</a>. If you shorted commodities  and went long bonds around then, you would have done well. <strong>For the  record, </strong><a href="http://www.agaryshilling.com/" target="_blank"><strong>he had a 100%  accurate record for 2008. </strong></a>Shilling's forecasting an annual  deflation of about 2% over the next few years, as consumers save more and the  &quot;overall supply of goods and services exceeds demand.&quot;</div><div><font>I came across a recent Bloomberg interview by Gary  Shilling. Here's what he had to say (<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?N=video&amp;T=Shilling%20Favors%20Disclosure%20of%20Bank%20Stress-Test%20Results%20&amp;clipSRC=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/v_YQAR6Ausv8.asf" target="_blank">click  here</a>). </font></div><div><font><strong>Outlook:</strong> His outlook is for a continuing  weak economy: <br><ul><li>Consumer spending in recessions even in real terms seldom declines. We&rsquo;ve  had the worst decline in consumer spending since any post world war  recession.</li> <li>PPI numbers clearly suggest we&rsquo;re in deflation</li> <li>Inventories are only beginning to be liquidated. Going to take economy down  for at least next 2 quarters.</li></ul><strong>On being asked to choose  between deflation or inflation</strong>, he is sticking to his deflationary  thesis: <br> <ul> <li>Economy will experience slow growth in the long run.</li> <li>Consumers are on a savings spree after 25 years.</li> <li>The corporate sector is deleveraging.</li> <li>Commodity producers will have less money to spend.</li> <li>Government involvement will slow us down further because of inefficiencies  and protectionism.</li> <li>No strong loan demand for a long while. Lenders are not going to  lend.</li> <li>So much liquidity has been destroyed in the private sector. Credit default  swaps have been cut in half, taking them from 60 to 30 trillion. The total money  supply M2 in the G-7 is 25 trillion. So much liquidity is being destroyed in the  private sector that it dwarves what the central banks can do and have  done.</li></ul>On the new normal for the US economy: </font></div><div><font>The 1982 &ndash;  2000 period was a solid up phase with a big 3.6% average annual growth. He&rsquo;s  looking at 2% for the next 5-10 years, which is basically the secular down phase  of the supercycle. </font></div><div><font><strong>His recommendations:</strong> <br> <ul> <li>Still likes long treasuries offering 3% yield on a 2-3% deflation for a 5-6%  real return.</li> <li>Likes US dollar as a safe haven.</li> <li>Recommends high quality corporate and muni bonds.</li></ul>I&rsquo;ll be especially interested in  following him and watching when he stops recommending long bonds. This is  something he&rsquo;s been doing for over 25 years. It&rsquo;s been the call to define a  lifetime. <strong>Long bonds outperforming equities in the great equity bull of  1982-2000 has been a solid sucker punch to the &ldquo;stocks for the run&quot; camp in my  opinion.</strong></font><a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/gary-shilling-inflation-or-deflation.html" target="_blank"><br></a></div><p><em><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions</em></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:27:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><div>There&rsquo;s been considerable debate on the inflation versus deflation issue.  Last year, this was a little more contentious. (The deflation camp has been  right so far and it looks to continue that way).</div><div>The biggest deflation  prognosticator has been &quot;Mr. Long Bond&quot; Gary Shilling. In fact, <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/06/on-bond-yields-treasuries-and-inflation.html" target="_blank">there  was a link to an earlier interview on this blog</a>. If you shorted commodities  and went long bonds around then, you would have done well. <strong>For the  record, </strong><a href="http://www.agaryshilling.com/" target="_blank"><strong>he had a 100%  accurate record for 2008. </strong></a>Shilling's forecasting an annual  deflation of about 2% over the next few years, as consumers save more and the  &quot;overall supply of goods and services exceeds demand.&quot;</div><div><font>I came across a recent Bloomberg interview by Gary  Shilling. Here's what he had to say (<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?N=video&amp;T=Shilling%20Favors%20Disclosure%20of%20Bank%20Stress-Test%20Results%20&amp;clipSRC=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/v_YQAR6Ausv8.asf" target="_blank">click  here</a>). </font></div><div><font><strong>Outlook:</strong> His outlook is for a continuing  weak economy: <br><ul><li>Consumer spending in recessions even in real terms seldom declines. We&rsquo;ve  had the worst decline in consumer spending since any post world war  recession.</li> <li>PPI numbers clearly suggest we&rsquo;re in deflation</li> <li>Inventories are only beginning to be liquidated. Going to take economy down  for at least next 2 quarters.</li></ul><strong>On being asked to choose  between deflation or inflation</strong>, he is sticking to his deflationary  thesis: <br> <ul> <li>Economy will experience slow growth in the long run.</li> <li>Consumers are on a savings spree after 25 years.</li> <li>The corporate sector is deleveraging.</li> <li>Commodity producers will have less money to spend.</li> <li>Government involvement will slow us down further because of inefficiencies  and protectionism.</li> <li>No strong loan demand for a long while. Lenders are not going to  lend.</li> <li>So much liquidity has been destroyed in the private sector. Credit default  swaps have been cut in half, taking them from 60 to 30 trillion. The total money  supply M2 in the G-7 is 25 trillion. So much liquidity is being destroyed in the  private sector that it dwarves what the central banks can do and have  done.</li></ul>On the new normal for the US economy: </font></div><div><font>The 1982 &ndash;  2000 period was a solid up phase with a big 3.6% average annual growth. He&rsquo;s  looking at 2% for the next 5-10 years, which is basically the secular down phase  of the supercycle. </font></div><div><font><strong>His recommendations:</strong> <br> <ul> <li>Still likes long treasuries offering 3% yield on a 2-3% deflation for a 5-6%  real return.</li> <li>Likes US dollar as a safe haven.</li> <li>Recommends high quality corporate and muni bonds.</li></ul>I&rsquo;ll be especially interested in  following him and watching when he stops recommending long bonds. This is  something he&rsquo;s been doing for over 25 years. It&rsquo;s been the call to define a  lifetime. <strong>Long bonds outperforming equities in the great equity bull of  1982-2000 has been a solid sucker punch to the &ldquo;stocks for the run&quot; camp in my  opinion.</strong></font><a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2009/04/gary-shilling-inflation-or-deflation.html" target="_blank"><br></a></div><p><em><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions</em></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/134494-gary-shilling-continues-to-see-deflation-on-the-horizon?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bnd">BND</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Missing the Early Bull Market Can Be Costly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/133567-missing-the-early-bull-market-can-be-costly?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">133567</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>The bull-market versus bear-market-rally debate has been going on for a  while. A few analysts have been advising caution and riding out the current  uncertainty, suggesting investments in gold, TIPS or some fixed income /cash  variant. For instance, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/235642/Mauldin-Don" target="_blank">this Yahoo video featuring John  Mauldin </a>has him suggesting that new bull markets go on for years and years  (suggesting we&rsquo;ll have plenty of time to be sure). Thus, it&rsquo;s better to be a few  months late than a few months early. <br><br>Here&rsquo;s what he says: <br> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The great bull markets last for decades, so you'll have plenty of  time. Those who bought at &quot;the bottom&quot; in 1974 had to suffer through the rest of  the 1970s. So stop sitting on the edge of your seat waiting for that perfect  moment to buy and just remain cautious for a while.</p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:07:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><div>The bull-market versus bear-market-rally debate has been going on for a  while. A few analysts have been advising caution and riding out the current  uncertainty, suggesting investments in gold, TIPS or some fixed income /cash  variant. For instance, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/235642/Mauldin-Don" target="_blank">this Yahoo video featuring John  Mauldin </a>has him suggesting that new bull markets go on for years and years  (suggesting we&rsquo;ll have plenty of time to be sure). Thus, it&rsquo;s better to be a few  months late than a few months early. <br><br>Here&rsquo;s what he says: <br> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The great bull markets last for decades, so you'll have plenty of  time. Those who bought at &quot;the bottom&quot; in 1974 had to suffer through the rest of  the 1970s. So stop sitting on the edge of your seat waiting for that perfect  moment to buy and just remain cautious for a while.</p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/133567-missing-the-early-bull-market-can-be-costly?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spx">SPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Apple Stuck in a Trading Range?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/131955-is-apple-stuck-in-a-trading-range?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">131955</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Background: </strong></p> <p>I&rsquo;m an Apple fan. I own multiple Apple products, and am a regular visitor to the Mac store. I&rsquo;ve thought of owning Apple stock (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>), but have not done so because everyone I know is so admittedly smitten by them. When a company is that well known and loved, a lot of its growth is already baked in.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:34:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p><strong>Background: </strong></p> <p>I&rsquo;m an Apple fan. I own multiple Apple products, and am a regular visitor to the Mac store. I&rsquo;ve thought of owning Apple stock (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>), but have not done so because everyone I know is so admittedly smitten by them. When a company is that well known and loved, a lot of its growth is already baked in.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/131955-is-apple-stuck-in-a-trading-range?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bear or Bull Market? The Gurus Weigh in</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/130973-bear-or-bull-market-the-gurus-weigh-in?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">130973</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, given that everyone's been trying to decipher the market trend, I&rsquo;ve tried to cull together predictions from famous market investors and technicians. (Caution: lengthy!). A number of credible strategists have called this a bear market rally and not a new bull, with an intermediate term price target around 875-880. The markets could rollover in the next week or so.</p><p>So let&rsquo;s see what they have to say:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:27:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>Well, given that everyone's been trying to decipher the market trend, I&rsquo;ve tried to cull together predictions from famous market investors and technicians. (Caution: lengthy!). A number of credible strategists have called this a bear market rally and not a new bull, with an intermediate term price target around 875-880. The markets could rollover in the next week or so.</p><p>So let&rsquo;s see what they have to say:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/130973-bear-or-bull-market-the-gurus-weigh-in?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Substantial Currency Losses Among Indian Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/128892-substantial-currency-losses-among-indian-stocks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">128892</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Until sometime last year, betting on Indian rupee appreciation seemed like a sure shot one way bet. The BRICs 2050 hoopla certainly helped ignite the animal spirits. Corporations who should have been <b><i>hedging</i></b> currency risks actually started <b><i>speculating</i></b> instead, trying to <em>&ldquo;benefit&rdquo;</em> from their currency exposure. (See this <a href="http://www.nipfp.org.in/nipfp-dea-program/PDF/SP2008_onewaybets.pdf" >paper</a> and <a href="http://www.nipfp.org.in/nipfp-dea-program/PDF/22_3sl_Shah2008_OneWayBets.pdf" >presentation</a> which further explore the existence of one way currency bets amongst private sector companies in India.)</p> <p>Well, I came across an article which documents the extent of this activity. It discusses the possibility that the Indian companies could face currency translation losses of approximately 20% of their profits in the current quarter. This number might actually be on the low side as companies do not disclose their foreign currency borrowings separately. (Note that Indian companies only have to disclose their balance sheet once a year, and the Indian fiscal year runs from April - March.) I suspect a few sectors/companies could face the brunt of these losses. From the <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/news/column-the-power-of-11/439974/0#" >Financial Express</a>:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:20:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>Until sometime last year, betting on Indian rupee appreciation seemed like a sure shot one way bet. The BRICs 2050 hoopla certainly helped ignite the animal spirits. Corporations who should have been <b><i>hedging</i></b> currency risks actually started <b><i>speculating</i></b> instead, trying to <em>&ldquo;benefit&rdquo;</em> from their currency exposure. (See this <a href="http://www.nipfp.org.in/nipfp-dea-program/PDF/SP2008_onewaybets.pdf" >paper</a> and <a href="http://www.nipfp.org.in/nipfp-dea-program/PDF/22_3sl_Shah2008_OneWayBets.pdf" >presentation</a> which further explore the existence of one way currency bets amongst private sector companies in India.)</p> <p>Well, I came across an article which documents the extent of this activity. It discusses the possibility that the Indian companies could face currency translation losses of approximately 20% of their profits in the current quarter. This number might actually be on the low side as companies do not disclose their foreign currency borrowings separately. (Note that Indian companies only have to disclose their balance sheet once a year, and the Indian fiscal year runs from April - March.) I suspect a few sectors/companies could face the brunt of these losses. From the <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/news/column-the-power-of-11/439974/0#" >Financial Express</a>:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/128892-substantial-currency-losses-among-indian-stocks?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/icn">ICN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ifn">IFN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inp">INP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Current Financial Crisis: 100 Year Storm?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/91777-the-current-financial-crisis-100-year-storm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">91777</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The investing pantheon has been famously negative for more than a year now. Plenty of people have compared the current banking crisis to a 100 year storm. <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/francis/archive/2008/07/28/prem-watsa-fairfax-financial-s-homer.aspx">From a Prem Watsa interview.</a> :</p><blockquote class="quote"><p><em>History shows that there are 100-year storms and 50-year ones. In 1929, a 100-year storm, only 10% survived the market crash and it was only those who were negative in 1925 and did something about it.</em></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:12:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>The investing pantheon has been famously negative for more than a year now. Plenty of people have compared the current banking crisis to a 100 year storm. <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/francis/archive/2008/07/28/prem-watsa-fairfax-financial-s-homer.aspx">From a Prem Watsa interview.</a> :</p><blockquote class="quote"><p><em>History shows that there are 100-year storms and 50-year ones. In 1929, a 100-year storm, only 10% survived the market crash and it was only those who were negative in 1925 and did something about it.</em></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/91777-the-current-financial-crisis-100-year-storm?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ixg">IXG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyf">IYF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>India: The Bear Case </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/83815-india-the-bear-case?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83815</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>BusinessWeek is out with a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jul2008/gb2008071_743900.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5">great article</a> on the grim prospects for Indian equities and the economy over the next year.</p><p>To summarize:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:16:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>BusinessWeek is out with a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jul2008/gb2008071_743900.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5">great article</a> on the grim prospects for Indian equities and the economy over the next year.</p><p>To summarize:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/83815-india-the-bear-case?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ifn">IFN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iif">IIF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inp">INP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PIMCO Maestros: Bill Gross and Mohamed El-Erian on the Economy </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/83382-the-pimco-maestros-bill-gross-and-mohamed-el-erian-on-the-economy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83382</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Bill Gross is <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2008/IO+July+2008.htm">out again</a> with a no holds barred punch at the administration and the current state of affairs. He predicts a trillion dollar deficit for the next administration, and a severe inflationary uptrend.</p> <p>I had linked to his earlier excellent missive and CNBC appearance <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-gross-on-inflation.html">here</a>. There&rsquo;s also a discussion where I speculated that <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/04/market-insights-from-top-minds.html">a mean reversion in the price-earnings multiple to ~12</a> could be the fat tail PIMCO is watching out for.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:28:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>Bill Gross is <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2008/IO+July+2008.htm">out again</a> with a no holds barred punch at the administration and the current state of affairs. He predicts a trillion dollar deficit for the next administration, and a severe inflationary uptrend.</p> <p>I had linked to his earlier excellent missive and CNBC appearance <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-gross-on-inflation.html">here</a>. There&rsquo;s also a discussion where I speculated that <a href="http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com/2008/04/market-insights-from-top-minds.html">a mean reversion in the price-earnings multiple to ~12</a> could be the fat tail PIMCO is watching out for.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/83382-the-pimco-maestros-bill-gross-and-mohamed-el-erian-on-the-economy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great 2008 European Bear Parade </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/83367-the-great-2008-european-bear-parade?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83367</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/1/saupload_classicbearparadelogo.png"><img width="258" height="212" alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/1/saupload_classicbearparadelogo_1.png" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: right;" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5217626916116570114" /></a><br /> Over the past two weeks, the commentary from Europe has gotten decidedly bearish. And none of them are talking of a run of the mill bear market. The most cheerful of the lot is forecasting a 30% global equity markets correction; the others are warning of a once-in-a-century doomsday scenario. So without further ado, here&rsquo;s the European bear market parade:</p> <p>The parade really started with Royal Bank of Scotland (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rbs' title='More opinion and analysis of RBS'>RBS</a>)  <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/06/18/cnrbs118.xml&amp;CMP=ILC-mostviewedboxc">coming out</a> with a warning about a full-fledged global stock market crash. With a call for the worst bear market in the last century, Bob Janjuah warned us that &quot;a very nasty period&quot; was soon to be upon us.<br /> <span id="fullpost" /></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:24:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/1/saupload_classicbearparadelogo.png"><img width="258" height="212" alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/1/saupload_classicbearparadelogo_1.png" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: right;" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5217626916116570114" /></a><br /> Over the past two weeks, the commentary from Europe has gotten decidedly bearish. And none of them are talking of a run of the mill bear market. The most cheerful of the lot is forecasting a 30% global equity markets correction; the others are warning of a once-in-a-century doomsday scenario. So without further ado, here&rsquo;s the European bear market parade:</p> <p>The parade really started with Royal Bank of Scotland (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rbs' title='More opinion and analysis of RBS'>RBS</a>)  <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/06/18/cnrbs118.xml&amp;CMP=ILC-mostviewedboxc">coming out</a> with a warning about a full-fledged global stock market crash. With a call for the worst bear market in the last century, Bob Janjuah warned us that &quot;a very nasty period&quot; was soon to be upon us.<br /> <span id="fullpost" /></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/83367-the-great-2008-european-bear-parade?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcs">BCS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iev">IEV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rbs">RBS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scgly.pk">SCGLY.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did IMF Pop the Emerging Markets Bubble?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/82832-did-imf-pop-the-emerging-markets-bubble?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">82832</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sometime in late 2007, a &lsquo;new paradigm&rsquo; seemed to have emerged; that of fast-growing developing markets to trade at a premium to the developed world. I was in India in December 2007, and was often befuddled at some of the articles and conversations I came across. Indeed, brokerage houses pompously proclaimed the dawn of a new era in emerging markets. Investors, it seemed, would pay up for the faster growth, disregarding country risk, currency risk, inflation risk, home bias, etc. Truly, a &lsquo;structural change&rsquo; seemed to have occurred.</p> <p>Fast forward six months, and it&rsquo;s a completely different cup of tea. A lot of ink has been spilled on the under performance in the emerging markets YTD. Some reasons discussed include:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:53:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sajal</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://financialjoyride.blogspot.com'>Sajal</a> submits:</strong><p>Sometime in late 2007, a &lsquo;new paradigm&rsquo; seemed to have emerged; that of fast-growing developing markets to trade at a premium to the developed world. I was in India in December 2007, and was often befuddled at some of the articles and conversations I came across. Indeed, brokerage houses pompously proclaimed the dawn of a new era in emerging markets. Investors, it seemed, would pay up for the faster growth, disregarding country risk, currency risk, inflation risk, home bias, etc. Truly, a &lsquo;structural change&rsquo; seemed to have occurred.</p> <p>Fast forward six months, and it&rsquo;s a completely different cup of tea. A lot of ink has been spilled on the under performance in the emerging markets YTD. Some reasons discussed include:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/82832-did-imf-pop-the-emerging-markets-bubble?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewj">EWJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewz">EWZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inp">INP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sajal">Sajal</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
