I agree timing the business cycle is a difficult exercise. But I can say with certainty that two years from now most of these companies would be trading at higher valuations. MU for instance.. I see a downside of say 5, and an upside of 15+.. that's an attractive risk-reward tradeoff.
RB9652: That's an interesting trade. Except STX and WDC trade at really low multiples. Mr. Market may be pricing a bit of that already. Also, there's nothing stopping STX from getting into the SSD business. I believe STX has a fair amount of patents in the drive industry which they intend to use aggressively. Refer to arstechnica.com/news.a... and arstechnica.com/news.a...
omitsure, I think you'll find that with M&A activity, more companies would be collaborating on the R&D expenses in developing newer process fabs. It's already happening on the PC side with the IBM led consortium. Mergers are the only way to reduce supply and increase pricing power.
Contrarian Pick: Flash Memory Vendors [View article]
I agree timing the business cycle is a difficult exercise. But I can say with certainty that two years from now most of these companies would be trading at higher valuations. MU for instance.. I see a downside of say 5, and an upside of 15+.. that's an attractive risk-reward tradeoff.
RB9652: That's an interesting trade. Except STX and WDC trade
at really low multiples. Mr. Market may be pricing a bit of that already.
Also, there's nothing stopping STX from getting into the SSD business. I believe STX has a fair amount of patents in the drive industry which they intend to use aggressively.
Refer to
arstechnica.com/news.a...
and
arstechnica.com/news.a...
omitsure, I think you'll find that with M&A activity, more companies would be collaborating on the R&D expenses in developing newer process fabs. It's already happening on the PC side with the IBM led consortium. Mergers are the only way to reduce supply and increase pricing power.