Seeking Alpha

Sandy Lighthouse's  Instablog

Sandy Lighthouse
Send Message
Self employed for 35 years in construction. PHD from school of hard knocks. Tend to have a macro macro perspective.
View Sandy Lighthouse's Instablogs on:
  • A Macro View Of Apple

    Something like 70% of Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) revenue comes from Iphone sales. China sales of Iphones accounted for a lot of the increase in quarterly sales, with pent up demand for larger screen Iphones accounting for the rest. The smart phone market is getting to be a crowded space. Even the superior closed ecosystem of the Iphone may not be immune to pricing pressures. So where is "The Iphone Company" headed from here?

    The Iwatch is Apple's latest product release. It's basically just another build out of the Iphone ecosystem. And that's the biggest innovation Apple has brought to market of late, incremental improvements to the Iphone ecosystem. Which is becoming less and less price competitive. Are there any massively disruptive products in the Apple pipeline?

    The thing that set Steve Jobs apart as a true genius was his ability to synthesize smaller technological trends into "insanely great" products that were years ahead of the competition. To "Skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been.", as Jobs liked to quote Wayne Gretzky. In about 2004, Jobs recognized that cell phones were about to integrate MP3 players into their functions, and the market for the Ipod would be decimated. Jobs also recognized the potential for a new cell phone that synthesized five major tech trends into one product:

    1. The decreasing power usage per computing unit of ARM micro-processors.

    2. The increasing bandwidth and lowering costs of cellular networks.

    3. The increasing power to weight ratio of lithium ion batteries.

    4. The improvements in reliability and performance of touch screen technology.

    5. The miniaturization of electrical sensors and components: GPS, motion, proximity, etc.

    That product was the 2007 Iphone, which set off the smart phone revolution and destroyed major competitors like Nokia and Blackberry.

    Apple no longer has the genius of Steve Jobs at it's disposal. Tim Cook is super competent, but he is no product visionary like Jobs.

    Apple appears to be getting into the self-driving electric car business. I believe it will do so through a smart phone accessed transportation service like Uber, rather than retail sales of vehicles. This is a massively disruptive business of the future that synthesizes many tech trends into one product:

    1. Smartphones, GPS, and mapping software.

    2. Social networking software.

    3. Improvements in battery cost per KWH, which moves the source of power generation pollution from the streets of cities to remote locations or eliminates it because of:

    4. The rapidly declining cost of solar photo-voltaic electricity.

    5. The improvements in sensors and software that make self-driving vehicles possible.

    The fly in the ointment for Apple's entry into this business is that it's entering the business late, behind some tough competitors: Google, Uber, Mercedes, and other legacy auto makers. Apple does have some major advantages:

    1. Huge capital reserves.

    2. Deep experience in integrating software and manufacturing into global scale closed ecosystems.

    3. Experience in implementing large scale solar farms. (as does Google)

    I think Apple will succeed in the transportation as a service business. The questions are how profitable it will be and how soon it will be up and running.

    This is not investment advice. You would be crazy to base investment decisions on the opinions of a nobody like me.

    Tags: AAPL
    Apr 05 4:11 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Where Are The Economy And Markets Headed 3-19-15?

    Where is the US economy at? Things will never be like the good old days of '95 - '05 because of a massive debt overhang, demographics, and the last "low hanging fruit" stage of the industrial revolution (the info tech revolution) being at a mature stage.

    But, with that in mind, things are going to be OK for the next five years. Low oil and commodity prices and the economic sweet spot of the commodity super-cycle set the stage for the US economy to hit top gear. Granted, the new top gear won't be even close to what it once was, but it's as good as things will get.

    Where are markets at? Stocks and junk bonds are at bubble tops, driven by the Fed's policies of low interest rates and quantitative easing. Market players have leveraged up and taken irrational risks to increase returns. If and when the Fed starts increasing rates, watch out!

    Even if the Fed doesn't increase interest rates, watch out! Because things are already spinning out of control and breaking apart. FX rates are rapidly resetting, undermining the assumptions that form the foundation of a huge number of bonds worldwide. The drop in commodity prices (particularly oil) has put everything associated with them, from sovereign debt to venture capital, into extreme risk territory. My personal opinion is that this process is hitting critical mass as I write this.

    So what are the investment implications if I am correct? Identify market bubbles, and look for ways to short them. Tech has been my primary area of investment for 25 years, and IMHO, is in a classic bubble right now. Private equity is throwing money at anything digital and hoping it sticks. IPO's are priced past perfection, then get a first day bump of 60%. Public companies that have consistently lost money and may always lose money (anything "cloud" or "social" for instance) have valuations as if they will start printing money tomorrow. Also, I'm not strong on my understanding of biotech, but it sure has gone up a lot.

    But shorting may not be the real opportunity here. Shorting is problematic at best, mainly due to the necessity of perfect timing. If I'm right, and critical mass is reached, and high leverage investments unwind, the real opportunity will be to then pick up assets on the cheap. Because over-leveraged investors will be selling like the world is ending, as the headlines will probably be proclaiming. But as I noted at the beginning, the US economy may still be just fine, as it was in 2002 after the tech wreck. This will be a judgment to be made at the time, but the pieces are in place right now for this to be a possibility. If all this transpires and we replay 2002, then the next leg up might set up a 2007 replay down the road.

    Maybe critical mass for a market decline will not be reached. There could be a rolling sector correction as an ongoing process: precious metals and other commodities, 3-D printing stocks, oil, then other bubbles. The opportunity would not be as large, but the underlying soundness of the U.S. economy would be the basis of support for going long.

    This article is not investment advice. It is highly speculative in nature, and based on the opinions of a nobody. You would have to be crazy to invest on the basis of the opinions I have expressed.

    Mar 19 2:39 PM | Link | Comment!
  • The Size Of Apple's Electric Vehicle Ambitions Could Be Staggering
    • Competing directly with the existing automotive industry is a losing battle that doesn't play to Apple's strengths.
    • Building an on-demand transportation ecosystem that integrates hardware and software would leverage Apple's core competencies and financial might.
    • Think driver-less "cloud cars" on-demand transportation in major metropolitan areas world wide, that leverages BEV strengths and minimizes BEV weakness's. Think Uber + Google + Tesla= Apple.

    Trying to compete with the established automotive industry on their terms is a losing battle in general, but particularly when considering the weaknesses of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV's):

    1. Range-weight trade-offs. The bigger the range increasing battery the heavier the vehicle and the greater the cost and lower the efficiency. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) model S 60kwh weighs about 4450# compared to about 3200# curb weight for Honda (NYSE:HMC) Accords. BMW (BMW.DE) is going the smaller battery, lighter weight (about 2800#) and shorter range route with its I3.

    2. BEV costs. Tesla is having problems selling large volumes of 208 mile EPA range estimate Model S' 60KWhr cars partly because of high sales prices (about $70,000 not including some government subsidies). The 81mile EPA range estimate BMW i-3 retails for about $41,000 dollars, not including subsidies. Compare that to roughly $24,000 for a Toyota (NYSE:TM) Prius or $17,000 for a Honda Civic that have no "range anxiety" issues, and gasoline under $3/gallon.

    3. Charging infrastructure costs. Building out charging stations to cover vast geographic areas to provide comparable coverage to that of gas stations is a massively expensive proposition no matter how many partners are involved. It's also a "chicken and egg" problem. Private home charging stations cost several thousand dollars to install.

    4. BEV "refueling" time (30 minutes +) versus gasoline.

    5. Entrenched competition: GM (NYSE:GM), BMW (BMW.DE), Nissan (OTCPK:NSANY), Tesla , and miscellaneous Chinese manufacturers.

    This doesn't sound like anybody's idea of fun or trying to make a profit to me. Is Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) that desperate to find new markets? Are they that idealistic to commit massive sums of money toward an altruistic goal? Have they run out of innovative ideas?

    In 1996 Steve Jobs said " Picasso had a saying; 'good artists copy, great artists steal' - and we have been shameless about stealing great ideas." Maybe Apple is thinking of stealing Google's (NASDAQ:GOOG) self-driving car idea. Of course the devil is in the details for self-driving cars: software and sensors have to accommodate one off situations like construction zones, private driveways and garages, stop light outages, etc. Not to mention the need to accurately map every road, stop sign, and pothole in the freaking universe.

    But wait a minute. If you're going to steal, steal big. Uber and Lyft are smoking hot for a reason: they have the realistic possibility of reducing the cost of on-demand transportation to substantially below the cost of private vehicle ownership while reducing congestion, pollution, and wasted infrastructure like parking lots and garages. Current issues like labor costs will eventually be eliminated by self driving cars. The long term goal is, as Uber says, " transportation as reliable as running water, everywhere for everyone".

    So I'm Tim Cook and company looking for the next big thing, ideally even bigger than the mobile internet. I've got hundreds of millions of cash stashed around the globe, expertise second to none in managing global supply chains, and deep experience in integrating hardware and software into closed ecosystems. Nobody else can claim all these attributes. Not Google, not Uber or Lyft, not Tesla or BMW etc.

    Here's the plan. Create a worldwide urban transportation system where Apple controls the entire ecosystem. Design and contract manufacture driver-less BEV's for an on-demand transportation service. Waste not an ounce of effort or cost on building public charging stations or retail outlets. Perpetually driver-less-car-map only the urban areas you serve, while transporting the public. Build massive solar farms (as you have before) to power your transportation system as icing on the cake.

    You solve or reduce all five BEV problems listed above, the software problems associated with self-driving vehicles, and the labor problems associated with on-demand transportation. BEV range problems are solved by only serving urban areas. Your ecosystem integrates lighter vehicles with smaller batteries with high utilization rates garaged and charged in data crunched ideal locations at demand driven times, controlled by your central software and accessed by apps on smartphones.

    All aspects of vehicle design from interiors to exteriors to paint colors to battery size and chemistry to software, are optimized to serve one purpose and one purpose only: "transportation as reliable as running water, everywhere for everyone". Look out Google, Tesla, Detroit, and Uber. Look out world. Tim Cook is behind the wheel, and he's putting the pedal to the metal.

    This article is largely based on speculation, and is not investment advice. It would be crazy to base investment decisions on the speculative opinions of a nobody like me.

    Tags: AAPL, TSLA
    Feb 23 11:04 AM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.