<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Shirish Jamthe - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Shirish Jamthe' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/shirish-jamthe</link>
    <item>
      <title>The Risk/Return Tradeoff For Technology Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/44717-the-risk-return-tradeoff-for-technology-stocks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44717</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Can I make 20% returns consistently in technology stocks? I was posed with this very simple looking question, but the more I thought about it the more I realized that the answer was not simple.<!--more-->

<p> The problem here is how do we define ‘consistently’? We know it is cannot  be ‘guaranteed’ because that would be ‘risk-free’. So it boils down to how much risk (read - portfolio fluctuation) you are willing to take before you bail out of your stocks. To answer this question I looked back last 10 years and collected 506 tech companies that satisfy the following criteria
</p>
<p>   1. The company is in the ‘Technology Sector’
<br />
   2. The stock was trading from Jul 1997 till Jul 2007, That means no new IPO companies like Google (GOOG) were considered.
<br />
   3. The stock was traded in NASDAQ, NYSE or AMEX market (no OTC).
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Shirish Jamthe</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can I make 20% returns consistently in technology stocks? I was posed with this very simple looking question, but the more I thought about it the more I realized that the answer was not simple.<!--more-->

<p> The problem here is how do we define ‘consistently’? We know it is cannot  be ‘guaranteed’ because that would be ‘risk-free’. So it boils down to how much risk (read - portfolio fluctuation) you are willing to take before you bail out of your stocks. To answer this question I looked back last 10 years and collected 506 tech companies that satisfy the following criteria
</p>
<p>   1. The company is in the ‘Technology Sector’
<br />
   2. The stock was trading from Jul 1997 till Jul 2007, That means no new IPO companies like Google (GOOG) were considered.
<br />
   3. The stock was traded in NASDAQ, NYSE or AMEX market (no OTC).
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/44717-the-risk-return-tradeoff-for-technology-stocks?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acs">ACS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adbe">ADBE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/anss">ANSS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/anst">ANST</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aph">APH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arxx">ARXX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/axe">AXE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cada">CADA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cai">CAI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cdii">CDII</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cdwc">CDWC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmtl">CMTL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctxs">CTXS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dakt">DAKT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/diod">DIOD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dst">DST</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erts">ERTS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fisv">FISV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/inod">INOD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intu">INTU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mana">MANA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mcrs">MCRS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mscc">MSCC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nati">NATI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nssc">NSSC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/plcm">PLCM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prgs">PRGS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qsii">QSII</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimg">RIMG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsti">RSTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scsc">SCSC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/silc">SILC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/symc">SYMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/thqi">THQI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/shirish-jamthe">Shirish Jamthe</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
