Seeking Alpha

SL Advisors'  Instablog

SL Advisors
Send Message
Following 23 years with JPMorgan, Simon Lack founded SL Advisors, LLC, in 2009. Prior to that, Simon was CEO and founder of the JPMorgan Incubator Funds, two private equity vehicles that took economic stakes in emerging hedge fund managers. From the late 1980s through 1999 through several bank... More
My company:
SL Advisors, LLC
My blog:
In Pursuit of Value
My book:
The Hedge Fund Mirage – The Illusion of Big Money and Why It’s Too Good to Be True
View SL Advisors' Instablogs on:
  • Why Not Many Investors Get Rich From Hedge Funds
    Here's a link to an article I wrote for AR Magazine.

    bit.ly/gnIk5O


    Disclosure: None
    Tags: Hedge Funds
    Nov 24 9:23 AM | Link | Comment!
  • Are Hedge Funds as Good as they Seem?
    A couple of months ago I wrote a short piece on Seeking Alpha (http://seekingalpha.com/article/214169-evaluating-hedge-funds) highlighting the difference between calculating hedge fund returns based on the value of a $ invested on Day 1 versus the return on the average $ invested. Returns are generally higher when a hedge fund is small, and in most cases when the bulk of the investors show up the results are disappointing.

    An article in today's Financial Times highlights this (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/981a7710-bcff-11df-954b-00144feab49a.html) by calculating how much actual profit some of the best hedge fund managers have generated for the clients, and so by extension how poorly most of the rest have done. An academic piece is apparently coming out soon that examines this more thoroughly. It should be an interesting read.

    Disclosure: None
    Sep 11 8:48 AM | Link | Comment!
  • The Bond Market’s Forecast

    Studying America’s long term budget outlook, as depressingly laid out in the Administration’s 2011 Budget, is hopefully not how readers spend their free time. The unsustainable fiscal path it dryly describes is supported with numerous very similar charts showing debt levels reaching escape velocity from what is prudent and possible. The thrust and direction of the Federal finances are familiar to everyone; further details are not necessary. Ronald Reagan once quipped that the budget deficit was big enough to take care of itself, and it’s grown up enough for this writer.

    Reconciling spiraling budget deficits with a 4.0% 30 year bond yield isn’t easy. Anybody who invests in long term U.S. treasuries after contemplating America’s fiscal future is unlikely to be planning a long stay. And yet, the dire U.S. fiscal outlook combined with the ongoing low cost of continued fiscal deterioration is perhaps the biggest conundrum facing investors today. Research has shown that the average estimate of an outcome is often more accurate than the vast majority of individual guesses. Barton Biggs in his 2008 book “Wealth, War and Wisdom” develops this idea and points to key turning points during World War II when stock markets (representing the collective assessment of future economic prospects) identified military turning points not recognized by contemporary commentators. UK equities bottoming prior to the Battle of Britain in 1940, and German equities peaking just as German troops viewed the Kremlin in 1941 are two examples. By this yardstick, the bond market’s collective wisdom looks beyond a fiscal crisis and anticipates a solution. Today’s fiscal worriers might as well preach about global warming while temperatures are falling. However, dramatic Congressional action requires a crisis, in this case presumably a bond buyers’ strike, and bond yields are silent on how exactly we will get from here to there.

    Although much discourse with little action is applied to America’s finances, what’s largely unspoken is the staggering moral failure of one generation in its obligation to the next. Whatever your political beliefs and voting history, what we have witnessed and perpetrated together is a fiscal cognitive dissonance with consequences shifted to the next generation. As voters, we have in aggregate almost always rejected spending cuts and tax hikes, because the people who would ultimately close the fiscal gap were too young to vote or not yet born. Demographics assure that tomorrow’s taxpayers are destined to pay more than today’s would ever accept, to pay for the great heist. What is true at the Federal level is also often true at the state level, and applies in varying degrees to most developed countries.

    While there is no bright delineation from one cohort to another, the stage is inevitably set for an epic inter-generational struggle between Baby Boomers who promised themselves senior benefits without saving for them, and the next generation. This is likely to represent an inconveniently loud crosscurrent in the politics of achieving fiscal balance as the bill comes due. In a reversal of roles, the taxpaying generation will remind the older but not wiser boomers that chores come before the X-box.

    Two of my children are already voters, and for many years I have been educating them about the trap we Baby Boomers have laid. While both higher taxes and entitlement reform will be part of our future, our collective, abject moral failure is surely deserving of much more of the latter.  “Smaller, later pensions for most, and for some none at all,” should be a soundbite in future elections. The old versus young struggle over who pays the bill has not yet begun, and like most family fights over money it will not be pretty. But it is the only plausible outcome, and perhaps sanguine Asian investors in U.S. treasury bonds reached the same conclusion a long time ago.




    Disclosure: No Positions
    Aug 02 10:32 AM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.