<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Stacey Higginbotham - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Stacey Higginbotham' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/stacey-higginbotham</link>
    <item>
      <title> Ready for 4G? Ericsson Expects LTE Deployment in 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/65454-ready-for-4g-ericsson-expects-lte-deployment-in-2012?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65454</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Just when the
average consumer was learning to take advantage of the 3G network
(while perhaps noticing the limits of the 2.5G Edge network on the
iPhone), it’s time to prep for 4G. <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/29/verizon-picks-lte-as-4g-standard-for-wireless-broadband/">Verizon</a> and Vodafone are already testing 4G equipment that relies on the Long-Term Evolution standard.</p>
<!--more-->
<p>Arun Bhikshesvaran, VP of business strategy and CTO for Ericsson
North America, said the equipment maker has launched a trial of its LTE
baseband equipment with an unnamed carrier. He expects it will be
completed toward the end of the year.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:13:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Stacey Higginbotham</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/">Stacey Higginbotham</a> submits: </strong><p>Just when the
average consumer was learning to take advantage of the 3G network
(while perhaps noticing the limits of the 2.5G Edge network on the
iPhone), it’s time to prep for 4G. <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/29/verizon-picks-lte-as-4g-standard-for-wireless-broadband/">Verizon</a> and Vodafone are already testing 4G equipment that relies on the Long-Term Evolution standard.</p>
<!--more-->
<p>Arun Bhikshesvaran, VP of business strategy and CTO for Ericsson
North America, said the equipment maker has launched a trial of its LTE
baseband equipment with an unnamed carrier. He expects it will be
completed toward the end of the year.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/65454-ready-for-4g-ericsson-expects-lte-deployment-in-2012?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eric">ERIC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/stacey-higginbotham">Stacey Higginbotham</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Dell Family Reunion: Ticket $165m</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/64254-a-dell-family-reunion-ticket-165m?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64254</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Is Michael Dell rescuing his little brother, or does Dell (Nasdaq: DELL) spending $165 million to buy email continuity firm <a href="http://www.messageone.com/">MessageOne</a>
make sense? MessageOne has a good product, but without the sexy
security component offered by Postini or FrontBridge, buyers never
picked up the 10-year-old company. So the deal has more than a hint of
nepotism. </p><!--more-->
<p>Adam Dell was a co-founder, the former chairman and a financial backer of MessageOne.  A <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080212/dell8-k.html">filing</a>
with the SEC points out that many Dells stand to gain from the
transaction, thanks to $45 million that will go to Adam Dell’s venture
funds:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:49:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Stacey Higginbotham</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/">Stacey Higginbotham</a> submits: </strong><p>Is Michael Dell rescuing his little brother, or does Dell (Nasdaq: DELL) spending $165 million to buy email continuity firm <a href="http://www.messageone.com/">MessageOne</a>
make sense? MessageOne has a good product, but without the sexy
security component offered by Postini or FrontBridge, buyers never
picked up the 10-year-old company. So the deal has more than a hint of
nepotism. </p><!--more-->
<p>Adam Dell was a co-founder, the former chairman and a financial backer of MessageOne.  A <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080212/dell8-k.html">filing</a>
with the SEC points out that many Dells stand to gain from the
transaction, thanks to $45 million that will go to Adam Dell’s venture
funds:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/64254-a-dell-family-reunion-ticket-165m?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell">DELL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/stacey-higginbotham">Stacey Higginbotham</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Memory Breakthrough by Intel, STM Could Replace Flash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/63221-memory-breakthrough-by-intel-stm-could-replace-flash?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Intel (INTC) and STMicroelectronics (STM) have managed to produce a <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20148/">breakthrough</a> in a new type of memory technology that could replace flash. Members of their joint venture <a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20070719corp.htm">Numonyx</a>, which is trying to develop memory chips reliant on phase-change memory [PRAM] to store information, <a href="http://www.isscc.org/isscc/index.htm">will present a paper today</a>
demonstrating how they’ve used it to double the amount of information
they can store. It’s good news, but it still means it will cost twice
as much to store the same amount of data on PRAM chips compared with
the competing flash technology.</p>
<!--more-->
<p><span id="more-11408"></span>
Phase-change memory relies on changes in temperature to store data; it
competes with NOR flash, which is used to store the programs that run
your VCR, set-top box and cell phone. The other type of flash, NAND, is
used to store larger amounts of memory, such as the songs on an iPod.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:29:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Stacey Higginbotham</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/">Stacey Higginbotham</a> submits: </strong><p>Intel (INTC) and STMicroelectronics (STM) have managed to produce a <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20148/">breakthrough</a> in a new type of memory technology that could replace flash. Members of their joint venture <a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20070719corp.htm">Numonyx</a>, which is trying to develop memory chips reliant on phase-change memory [PRAM] to store information, <a href="http://www.isscc.org/isscc/index.htm">will present a paper today</a>
demonstrating how they’ve used it to double the amount of information
they can store. It’s good news, but it still means it will cost twice
as much to store the same amount of data on PRAM chips compared with
the competing flash technology.</p>
<!--more-->
<p><span id="more-11408"></span>
Phase-change memory relies on changes in temperature to store data; it
competes with NOR flash, which is used to store the programs that run
your VCR, set-top box and cell phone. The other type of flash, NAND, is
used to store larger amounts of memory, such as the songs on an iPod.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/63221-memory-breakthrough-by-intel-stm-could-replace-flash?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lexr">LEXR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sfun">SFUN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sndk">SNDK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spsn">SPSN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssti">SSTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stm">STM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tosbf.pk">TOSBF.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/stacey-higginbotham">Stacey Higginbotham</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Who Will Control Advertising on the Web?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/63079-who-will-control-advertising-on-the-web?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63079</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Two bits of news — <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/?epi_menuItemID=8529ea2ad8631dcd3bb97904c6908a0c&amp;epi_menuID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;epi_baseMenuID=384979e8cc48c441ef0130f5c6908a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsLang=en&amp;newsId=20080203005034">Ringleader Digital snagging</a> $6 million for its ad network, and <a href="http://blogger.goowy.com/">Goowy being acquired by AOL</a>
— started me thinking again about how exactly companies are going to
make money on the social web. The anticipated $80 million in online ad
spending cited by Microsoft as the rationale behind <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/">its bid for Yahoo</a> is a big number, but how that spending will be apportioned isn’t clear.</p>
<!--more--><p>Like the evolution of banner ads in the 90s, when startups touted
eyeballs and their site’s stickiness, or the transition to search
advertising in the early 00s (are we really calling this the aughts?),
the path to the next generation of online advertising is murky. In the
same way that radio and billboards are still hanging around, search and
display ads aren’t going anywhere, but what’s next?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:39:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Stacey Higginbotham</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/">Stacey Higginbotham</a> submits: </strong><p>Two bits of news — <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/?epi_menuItemID=8529ea2ad8631dcd3bb97904c6908a0c&amp;epi_menuID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;epi_baseMenuID=384979e8cc48c441ef0130f5c6908a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsLang=en&amp;newsId=20080203005034">Ringleader Digital snagging</a> $6 million for its ad network, and <a href="http://blogger.goowy.com/">Goowy being acquired by AOL</a>
— started me thinking again about how exactly companies are going to
make money on the social web. The anticipated $80 million in online ad
spending cited by Microsoft as the rationale behind <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/">its bid for Yahoo</a> is a big number, but how that spending will be apportioned isn’t clear.</p>
<!--more--><p>Like the evolution of banner ads in the 90s, when startups touted
eyeballs and their site’s stickiness, or the transition to search
advertising in the early 00s (are we really calling this the aughts?),
the path to the next generation of online advertising is murky. In the
same way that radio and billboards are still hanging around, search and
display ads aren’t going anywhere, but what’s next?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/63079-who-will-control-advertising-on-the-web?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx">TWX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/stacey-higginbotham">Stacey Higginbotham</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
