Seeking Alpha
View as an RSS Feed

Stephen Faulkner  

View Stephen Faulkner's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest comments  |  Highest rated
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    No, you posted when you sold SIRI and bought Pandora. SIRI was in the $3.70's and Pandora was over $17 at the time.
    Aug 4, 2015. 07:29 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Is Sirius XM Setting Up For A Significant Move? [View article]
    Why? Who cares where it goes between when you buy and when you sell?

    Wouldn't it be great if it went to 20 cents a share and SIRI was able to buy back 5 billion shares with $1 billion cash?

    And you held?

    And they posted EPS of $0.35 in a quarter?

    And the share price jumped to $40 a share?

    And instead of selling at $5 you sold at $40?

    Or would you rather it play around between $4 and $4.75 for a couple years and you sell at $5? Just so it all looks good from now to then?


    Yeah yeah I know LMCA owns 3.X billion shares and SIRI isn't gonna buy back 5 billion shares and the share price is not going to drop to 20 cents and ... but to want the share price to go up mid buyback when one has another two years to hold doesn't make one shred of sense.
    Aug 4, 2015. 05:23 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    Well people would know more if they took the time to read / understand or simply do their own research and teach themselves without taking other's opinions into consideration.

    Don't worry about how much other people have made or lost.
    Aug 4, 2015. 05:17 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    There's a guy that wrote an EXCELLENT article about this a few days ago. David in NV linked it below.

    Nobody commented on it though. It's so far above the typical "huh huh it's manipulated" comments or 100 comments attacking Crunching Numbers.

    Why spend time reading and understanding :

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    When that time can be spent shotgun blasting SIRI articles with useless commentary?
    Aug 4, 2015. 04:43 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    All of this "manipulation" talk and trying to find reasons the stock went 1 penny this way or that every few hours is absolutely stupid.

    The constant commentary about what the stock does every day or every few hours is similarly stupid.

    Quick... better search the google headlines for a "reason" and make up an excuse! Right? It must be that basic. That trivial.

    Can't have anything to do with the severe discount to NAV LMCA / LMCK holds, the fact that those two tickers are nearly all SIRI, and the fact that it is currently, still, much cheaper to purchase SIRI by buying either of those stocks?

    Nah must be "the market."

    Funny how LMCA / K is bucking the market trend, isn't it?

    Or not funny at all. Perhaps taking time to educate yourselves in these issues instead of spouting off "manipulation" and "it's the market" or "weak hands!" every other comment would pay off?
    Aug 4, 2015. 04:39 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    Prove what? Explain to me how two entities swapping the same shares back and forth "hold the price down"?

    It would not be great to prove it because it doesn't make any sense. Just like it wouldn't be great to prove that clouds are made of cotton candy.
    Aug 4, 2015. 03:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    Why was it flat yesterday? Market closed down.

    Why was it down 6 days ago? Market closed up.

    Why was it up less than the market 4 days ago?

    Why was it down 5 days ago? Market closed up.

    Aug 4, 2015. 02:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Is Sirius XM Setting Up For A Significant Move? [View article]
    Why would you be afraid of that unless you expect it to remain there until two years from now when you intend to sell?

    What, exactly, is there to fear if you intend to hold the stock for two years? Why not set an alert for $5 and do something else?
    Aug 4, 2015. 02:32 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    Nope. Not that either.
    Aug 4, 2015. 01:37 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Why I Sold Sirius XM After Earnings For A Zero Gain [View article]
    "Sirifair6, I like you also believe they are holding it down, I think they are using high speed computers, company "A" buys the shares and immediately sells them to company "B" for a half cent less holding down the price and frustrating retail into selling. the next day company "B" buys shares and sells them to company "A" for a half cent less so neither "A" or "B" lose money. Some will call me a conspiracy theorist but this is what I really feel is going on."

    You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Think about what you just typed.
    Aug 4, 2015. 01:12 PM | 5 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Is Sirius XM Setting Up For A Significant Move? [View article]
    Yes you posted similar 2 days ago just above this :

    "Siri has hit 4.00 about a dozen times in the past four months and sold off each time, all based on two quarters of excellent results and positive forecasts and upgrades by anaysts. So, who knows what it will take to finally get the price above 4.00 and start moving higher.If this is the price action to good news and a good market just think where the price will go if Siri doesn't meet anaysts forecasts or the market has that big correction many are forecasting."

    If this is torturing you, the stock is offering opportunity to exit at $4 per share over and over again.
    Aug 4, 2015. 10:29 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Is Sirius XM Setting Up For A Significant Move? [View article]
    This is the rate. This has been the rate. This will likely continue to be the rate.

    It's a long term issue, and should not be expected to yield much, if any, short term benefit.
    Aug 3, 2015. 11:43 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Wi-Fi In Autos, A Sirius Problem [View article]
    "Until today, Sirius has been THE only alternative to terrestrial radio. That is changing."

    Why do you say things which you know are completely false?

    Today I have NUMEROUS alternatives to terrestrial radio that are NOT SIRI.

    CDs (though these are on the way out)
    USB / MP3
    Streaming (Spotify, Youtube, Pandora, insert 100's of other services that do the same thing here)

    And a software enabled dash stack is not going to change that. It simply moves the phone to a screen on the dashboard (as far as this issue is concerned, I realize it offers other options / connected vehicle services for instance)

    You are so wrapped around this idea that a software driven dash is going to destroy Sirius XM that you have these massive blinders on or something... (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are just poorly researched on this space or you are simply unable to see the periphery because you formed a thesis and are rejecting anything that disagrees with it...)

    I'd say you would do well to take a step back and re-evaluate this or at least take the time to research it more thoroughly but you have absolutely no need to do so as you have not taken and do not intend to take a position long or short this issue.

    You're dangerously close to falling into the trap of arguing with the perma bulls and trying to "open their eyes" so to speak to see your side. It would be much better to spend more time understanding the facts so that you do not make mistakes that cause false support to your thesis.
    Aug 1, 2015. 06:52 PM | 6 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Wi-Fi In Autos, A Sirius Problem [View article]
    "That's how they get new subscribers as they aren't picking them up from people taking in used cars and saying "add Sirius, please"."

    First problem. Sirius XM does get new subscribers from the used car channel and that will be affected by the increasing number of used cars with SIRI installed in them and how well the used channel is "pushed" as well as how well it converts. For some reason you have missed this and are under the idea that SIRI does not get subs from used sales... which is puzzling because the company has been quite vocal about this shift (which will eventually eclipse new car additions) as well as headlines and press releases which have explained various details around Sirius XM's used car, service lane, etc. programs.

    "If GM says, "you can have WI-FI in your car for $10 per month or Sirius for the same cost" which one are you going to choose?"

    Second problem. GM just had a contract shift with SIRI and it doesn't expire any time soon. GM will install SIRI and will not be saying "you can have X or Y". You can have X or Y or X and Y (or X, Y, Z). I'll choose whatever I want. As I have already said, I already have "wi-fi" in my car. I have had it since my first phone which was capable of this more than half a decade ago. For $10 a month I'd likely take the second connection in the car. I'd also subscribe to SIRI. $10 a month (and I am not trying to sound elitist here) is an absolute joke ... a pittance. I spend more on ONE lunch. Hell, a large diet Coke at McDonalds is what, close to $3 with tax absent any special deals (Sometimes they do $1 drinks around here). It's less than 3 gallons of gas. If you're buying a new car (responsibly, IE: no more than a 36 month loan) and you are buying a simple entry level vehicle your car payment is $750 a month or so. Add insurance, gas, etc. $10 a month? Really? I realize that there are people out there who will go to great lengths to think about $10 a month, or call SIRI and try to negotiate down or whatever... people post this stuff in comments all the time. It's why ARPU is lower than the base monthly rate. But if you are asking me, or the vast majority of those who pay for it? The cost is fine for what I receive. Exceed $50 a month and I may think twice but my personal usage level is certainly well worth whatever I pay (I think it's like $200 a year or something... I don't really know, but it's around that.)

    "I hear comments like "I like the 50's or 60's music on Sirius". You can get that for free elsewhere."

    Correct, you can, and you have been able to. It's called FM radio. Adding another source for "free" 50's and 60's music with ads is unlikely to change the choice for SIRI. I understand you prefer free. What you need to understand is that the millions who sub to SIRI have always had a choice of free, and they made the conscious choice to pay.

    "So, if you can get whatever you want in your car for the same cost as Sirius, would you choose Sirius or the alternative?"

    I can't. SIRI never cuts out for me. Ever. UNLESS I am going through a long tunnel or parked under a double overpass in traffic. This is not available with "Streaming" and won't be for a long time. I argued about this (even before I started writing here) way back to 2009. All these articles... streaming will kill SIRI, Pandora will kill SIRI, Spotify will kill SIRI, Apple will kill SIRI, MP3's will kill SIRI, CDs will kill SIRI blah blah blah blah. And here's another one. Same article, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015... and I am sure there will be more.

    Understand this simple fact. I can't get everything on SIRI, in the car, for the same cost as SIRI. I can't. "If" is a "maybe" and an "I think perhaps but am not quite sure but if it does then well maybe this might ...." And you're still focusing on the "or" here. Like I have to choose one or the other... and am not allowed to choose both. Why can't I choose wi-fi and take SIRI internet only and use the app to get Howard Stern? Why is that not a choice? Why do I HAVE to choose SIRI or NO SIRI?

    "There are several trends of the last few years that will continue. Data gets cheaper. Connectivity increases. Content is king. Tell me how Sirius survives in that world?"

    Data does get cheaper. Connectivity does increase.

    And yes, content is king.

    As is ease of use, lack of commercials, all content in one place, 100% connectivity today, no data cost today, certain exclusive content, etc.

    SIRI survives in that world because it's no different from the world we live in today. AM/FM offers commercial based "free." USB drives offer commercial free "free." Phones offer streaming, and you can download 40 different apps and switch between them to get all the content you want, or go home and spend an hour or two each night picking what you want to listen to the next day on your commute, or whatever it is people do to save $10...

    The problem here is you seem to be a $10 guy. You'll use SIRI for free but won't pay $10 a month for it and instead you'll choose to download a bunch of apps and / or load up a USB drive or grab some CDs and whatever else is needed to get the same stuff for "Free" no matter the cost of your time. Median income in the country is approaching $60k or $30 an hour. $10 a month = 20 minutes, or let's say 30 minutes since it is after tax dollars.

    If I have to spend more than 30 minutes to get what I can get on SIRI for "Free" and I make the median salary, I'd be better off working a little longer and just getting SIRI. If I have to listen to more than 30 minutes of commercials to get what I can get on SIRI for "free" and I make the median salary, I'd be better off choosing SIRI and not wasting my valuable time listening to commercials.

    I fully understand not everyone is in that position and I don't mean to belittle those who find $10 a month to be a significant consideration.

    But the guy that frets over $10 is not the target audience for SIRI.
    Aug 1, 2015. 06:35 PM | 8 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Wi-Fi In Autos, A Sirius Problem [View article]
    "When I read articles like this, http://tinyurl.com/prr...., I get the sense that you and other Sirius bulls are too caught up in subscriber churn to see the giant panda in the room."

    But it won't be connected by 2020 unless I purchase a new car. And then only if I am not the 1 in 4 that buys a new car that is not connected. And only if the author's assumption of a 75% penetration rate holds true. And then only if I decide to pay for a wi-fi subscription in the car and do not choose to use the very same thing that I have on my phone and have had on my phone for years. If sales rate stays the same that is a sliver of the number of actual cars on the road.

    It's also speculation.

    It's also not really a paradigm shift. I drive around all day with a cell phone and thus a wireless hot spot. Been doing it for years. What does a redundant access point in the car (that is already there, unless we are talking about someone without a phone but with an access point) do to increase "threat"? Ease of use perhaps but then you have the content hurdle to overcome. The dashboard is not going to suddenly have a personal computer in it with a bunch of distractions for the driver. It will be limited to (unless the car companies do not care about liability...) passive activity such as listening, maps, etc, when the vehicle is in motion.

    That's all that matters. If the kids in back (that are rarely in back because they don't go to and from work or on all errands) and use this "hotspot" (that they can already use from their phone or mom or dad's phone) then again they are not consequential. SIRI is not targeted towards kids, for good reason.

    But I wrap back to the article you linked here... :

    "Why your car will be connected to the Internet by 2020" is the title.

    But the author goes on to write why not ALL cars will be connected to the internet by 2020.

    First he goes into only "new" cars and then says only 75% of "new" cars will be connected to the internet. The title, his thesis, is proven false in the first few lines. If everyone's car will be connected to the internet by 2020 it would require 100% of vehicles made before 2020 to be connected to the internet and for all cars made before 100% of vehicles are connected to the internet to be off the road by 2020.

    I realize I am picking the thing apart and well... it's a sensational title and he's just using it as clickbait and that's standard practice but if you read what he is actually saying then the threat MIGHT BEGIN in 2020 if one considers the connected car to be a threat, as that is when it MIGHT reach the penetration rate required to distribute into the used base going forward from that point at a fast enough rate to possibly matter.

    What's more important is his, again, assumption that is sort of grayed out at the beginning of the article :

    "There will be about a million autonomous cars on roads by 2035"

    When the driver doesn't have to drive and can do other things, the driver shifts from being a passive only individual to a potentially active individual.

    I'll look at 20 years out when another 18 years go by.... or if that assumption there appears to be coming sooner. For right now it's too far off.
    Jul 31, 2015. 12:38 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
9,146 Comments
7,916 Likes