Full index of posts »
StockTalks
-
Next year's CES offerings will be dictated by what Aapl develops in 2011. As always, Aapl tells BBRY, HPQ, DELL what they should develop. Jan 10, 2011
Latest Comments
-
Micah Dickson on Sticking My Neck Out: 4 Apple Predictions Hey this is an amazing article. Apple(AAPL) is ...
-
406597 on My Apple Eureka Moment: Notebooks Can't Fall Into The Toilet, Cell Phones Can. That's great! I thought it was a joke... but it...
Most Commented
Posts by Themes
Banking,
Base metals,
BDI,
BDTI,
BONDS,
Bonds,
CNY,
Consumer Goods,
Copper,
copper nickel,
DIVIDEND INCOME,
dividend-ideas,
Dividends,
DIVIDENDS,
earnings,
economy,
Economy,
INCOME INVESTING STRATEGY,
income-investing-strategy,
LONG,
Long and Short,
LONG AND SHORT IDEAS,
long ideas,
Long Ideas,
LONG IDEAS,
long-ideas,
Macro,
Macro view: Economy,
Market Outlook,
MARKET OUTLOOK,
market-outlook,
QUICK PICKS,
short,
short-ideas,
technology,
TECHNOLOGY,
Technology,
TOBACCO,
U.S. Market,
xhb
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.














View Stephen Rosenman's Instablogs on:
Which is rising fastest: Gold, Copper, Corn, Tankers?
Answer: Oil Tanker Charter Rates.
Oil tanker rates as measured by the DBTI (Dirty Baltic Tanker Index) are up 38% over the last 3 months. Wasn't the oil tanker business supposed to be dead with all the new ships. The DBTI kills the performance of everything else listed above. Corn futures gained 32%. Wheat rose 10%, oil by 18%, gold up 15%, copper climbed 21%. The Baltic Dry Index collapsed 25%.
You wouldn't know oil tanker rates are up big by looking at the companies. NAT is off 6%. FRO is down 9%. Traders haven't been looking at the recent boom in rates. Those rising charter rates will translate into higher earnings down the road. Investors need to look again at these companies.
Disclosure: I am Long NAT.
Apple's Roaring Operating Income Per Device
Devices Sold times Revenue/Device equals Revenue.
Devices Sold times Operating Income/Device equals Operating Income.
We'll look at devices sold and operating income/device, a metric no one follows.
1. Devices Sold
Apple has been on a tear selling its devices: iPods, iPhones, computers, and iPads. FY 2006, Apple sold 45 million devices. This year, the number climbed to 112 million. The company has been bringing on whole new categories, the iPad and iPhone, moving beyond its traditional computer and iPod business.
(Number of Devices in K units: for example, 60,000 = 60 million)
2. Operating income Per Device Sold
Equally impressive are Apple's climbing operating income per device and net income per device. Operating income per device rose from $56 in 2006 to $164 in 2010. A large share of the increase has to do with the mix of products sold: an iPhones brings in a lot more cash than one shuffle. Increasingly, some of this is coming from "added value" sales. For instance, Apple's sale of an iPad doesn't end there; the iPad goes on to generate ads, downloaded books, apps, and music. Thus, every device creates an earnings stream. Currently, this production is small but growing.
During Apple's most recent quarter, operating income/device blasted to $174. Here we see the impressive drive:
(Blue line represents Operating Income Per Device,
Red line represents Net Income Per Device)
In contrast, despite selling a ton of phones, RIMM lost ground with its operating income/device ratio. Its number came in at $125 in FY 2007 and dropped to $86 and $94 in FY 2010 and FY 2011 respectively.
(Number of Phones in Millions)
<a:> (Blue Line Represents Operating Income Per Device,
Red Line Represents Net Income Per Device)
(FY 2011 YTD: 23 million phones with OID $94)
RIMM has struggled in its OPD and NPD. It doesn't have Apple's ability of keep average selling prices high. It doesn't have the cross-selling abilities of Apple. It doesn't have the Apple ecosystem.
Apple will be able to produce more income out of every device it sells. Currently, most of the increasing OPD and NPD has to do with selling higher ASP and margin products. In the future, these number will accelerate because of the "added value" of ads, Ebooks, music, or apps that is occurring. My prediction: Apple makes $190 and $150 with its OPD and NPD respectively in FY 2011.
Disclosure: Long AAPL No position RIMM
Disclosure: Long AAPL
The Nasdaq Goes Golden
Disclosure: none needed