Stephen Yu is an investment strategist with over 10 years of experience investing in a wide range of asset classes including equities, fixed income securities, commodities, and currencies. From 1997 through 2008, his portfolios returned an average of 11.2% per year vs. 1.1% for the S&P... More
Yesterday, a good friend showed me his insightful analysis of gold in an email. His email goes something like this:
“It is interesting to see that global investment demand is now larger than jewelry demand. I have said for a long time that the investment sector will have a HUGE effect on the price of gold, since only about 2,700 tons are produce each year, which translates to 0.0126 oz/person/yr. If only 1% of the people buy gold globally, then the number is 1.26 oz/person/year, which is not much. Then consider that the 2,700 tons produced each year is already spoken for. So where will the gold come from when investors want to buy it? The answer is that there will not be much of it to go around. May be only another 500 tons per year will float out of hoards into investor's hands. So instead of 2,700 tons, only 500 tons are available, which is about 0.00233 oz/person/year. Again, if 1% of the population is to buy gold, they can get only 0.233 oz/person/year. That is very interesting. It seems like the price of gold has a HUGE sensitivity to investor demand.”
The ratio of oil/natural gas price is near 18. According to Bespoke, each of the three times this ratio topped 18 in 1990-'91, it proved a good time to bet on gas relative to crude. Twice, the subsequent outperformance of gas was dramatic, the other time merely impressive. On a BTU per dollar basis, a proper ratio (I call it the energy-equivalent ratio) is closer to 6. So at the present price of $72 oil, gas should be at $12 per MMBTU. But gas is under $4 per MMBTU now. Granted, oil and gas are not the same. Oil is used mostly in transporation, whereas gas is used in power plants. Also, the infrastructure for gas is not as well developed as it is for oil. So it is not a surprise that gas trades at a discount to oil. Yet, these characteristics do not explain the wide gap between the present oil/gas ratio of 18 and the energy-equivalent ratio of 6. Furthermore, while oil has retrenched about 50% from peak, gas has fallen nearly 75%. It is quite obvious that the plunge in gas price cannot be justified by a slowing economy. Finally, production costs at some natural gas producers are now above the current gas price. So if natural gas price stays at current level, producers will cut back production thus reducing supply and pushing price up.
In March, I wrote about the win-win situation for commodities. In an article, I argued that commodities are going to rise whether the economy turns up or down. This time, I am writing about an opposite asset class – long-term U.S. Treasuries. No matter what the economy does, I believe that long-term Treasuries are in a lose-lose situation.
As the latest Barron’s points out, the 30-year Treasury has fallen 20% year-to-date. Despite this sharp fall, however, the long-dated Treasury is still yielding 4.1%, or about 50% below its average yield between 1977 and the present. Therefore, if the economy shows the slightest sign of recovery, long-term yields are almost guaranteed to rise from the recent lows toward more normal levels. When yields rise, Treasuries fall! No rocket science there!
But then again, with so many structural problems in the world’s economy, who really believes that the economy will heal any time soon? So suppose we stay in this trough for a while longer, and suppose the Keynesians continue to rule the world, a likely scenario, the government will spend, spend, and spend even more to get things going again. With dwindling tax revenues, the government will then have to issue more Treasuries to finance new spending. The liability side of the government’s balance sheet will then bloat; and debt ratios will deteriorate. Natu... credit ratings, and hence prices, of U.S. Treasuries will plummet! Is that how it will end? Not necessarily. There is an alternative, but similarly tragic, ending. The FED may emerge to make a desperate rescue attempt. But we already know this rescue will be in vain, because we have already seen this movie before. Back in March, the FED announced that it was going to buy $300 billion worth of long-dated Treasuries. Treas... jumped for a day or two after the announcement, but then they have resumed falling since. And even if the FED succeeds at propping up Treasuries, it will only be because of the printing press. In the end, Treasuries will be repaid with paper that, may not exactly be worthless, but will definitely be worth less. Long-term Treasuries buyers, choose your poison!
While the recent stock market rally may seem to signal that the worst is past, a look at the big picture tells us otherwise. Look at the following obstacles, and you will know what I mean.
1.The economy is deleveraging. Not long ago, we were leveraging up. Growth was fueled by debt and was further boosted by the multiplier effect. For every dollar borrowed, the economy expanded by several dollars. Economic expansion thus went on steroid. Now, the reverse is happening. Consumers and businesses are reducing debt. And for every dollar of debt reduction, a few dollars are withdrawn from the economy. Therefore, we are now in a hang-over state in which activities will shrink, putting pressure on revenues.
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Investor demand drives gold scarcity and price
Yesterday, a good friend showed me his insightful analysis of gold in an email. His email goes something like this:
An Opportunity in Natural Gas
The ratio of oil/natural gas price is near 18. According to Bespoke, each of the three times this ratio topped 18 in 1990-'91, it proved a good time to bet on gas relative to crude. Twice, the subsequent outperformance of gas was dramatic, the other time merely impressive. On a BTU per dollar basis, a proper ratio (I call it the energy-equivalent ratio) is closer to 6. So at the present price of $72 oil, gas should be at $12 per MMBTU. But gas is under $4 per MMBTU now. Granted, oil and gas are not the same. Oil is used mostly in transporation, whereas gas is used in power plants. Also, the infrastructure for gas is not as well developed as it is for oil. So it is not a surprise that gas trades at a discount to oil. Yet, these characteristics do not explain the wide gap between the present oil/gas ratio of 18 and the energy-equivalent ratio of 6. Furthermore, while oil has retrenched about 50% from peak, gas has fallen nearly 75%. It is quite obvious that the plunge in gas price cannot be justified by a slowing economy. Finally, production costs at some natural gas producers are now above the current gas price. So if natural gas price stays at current level, producers will cut back production thus reducing supply and pushing price up.
More »A Lose-Lose Situation for Long-Term U.S. Treasuries
In March, I wrote about the win-win situation for commodities. In an article, I argued that commodities are going to rise whether the economy turns up or down. This time, I am writing about an opposite asset class – long-term U.S. Treasuries. No matter what the economy does, I believe that long-term Treasuries are in a lose-lose situation.
But then again, with so many structural problems in the world’s economy, who really believes that the economy will heal any time soon? So suppose we stay in this trough for a while longer, and suppose the Keynesians continue to rule the world, a likely scenario, the government will spend, spend, and spend even more to get things going again. With dwindling tax revenues, the government will then have to issue more Treasuries to finance new spending. The liability side of the government’s balance sheet will then bloat; and debt ratios will deteriorate. Natu... credit ratings, and hence prices, of U.S. Treasuries will plummet! Is that how it will end? Not necessarily. There is an alternative, but similarly tragic, ending. The FED may emerge to make a desperate rescue attempt. But we already know this rescue will be in vain, because we have already seen this movie before. Back in March, the FED announced that it was going to buy $300 billion worth of long-dated Treasuries. Treas... jumped for a day or two after the announcement, but then they have resumed falling since. And even if the FED succeeds at propping up Treasuries, it will only be because of the printing press. In the end, Treasuries will be repaid with paper that, may not exactly be worthless, but will definitely be worth less. Long-term Treasuries buyers, choose your poison!
More »Stock market outlook
While the recent stock market rally may seem to signal that the worst is past, a look at the big picture tells us otherwise. Look at the following obstacles, and you will know what I mean.