Latest Comments on Steve Waldman's Articles

1. Carlos Lam on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: On Dec 17 09:12 AM User 353732 wrote: > Strategic default is... more »
2. my_etrade_account on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: More upside to come? probably good read:... more »
3. swissfrank on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: Good thread. Milton Friedmann simply wanted clarity between the... more »
4. jimmy46 on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: In the corporate world there are "non recourse" loans, BUT THE... more »
5. Radardoc on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: On Dec 17 09:12 AM User 353732 wrote: "Strategic default is... more »
6. Moon Kil Woong on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: This issue has more to do with the lenders than the borrowers.... more »
7. woollyB on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: Default is a breach of contract. The acceleration clause is the... more »
8. cadoggy on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: Just to clarify for everyone... when you walk away via strategic... more »
9. cadoggy on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: You obviously have never owned a home. You remind me of the... more »
10. retfldoc on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: Morality can cut so many ways. One of the causes of the housing... more »
11. Andy Harless on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: You make one of those points that is obvious once someone has... more »
12. ctjaeger on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: Personally, I understand that being underwater on my home/mortgage... more »
13. Tom Armistead on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: The discussion is about field ethics: if all participants in a... more »
14. nym on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: An alternative to walking away is bankruptcy, a Constitutional... more »
15. woollyB on Strategic Default and Duty to Shareholders: The Constitution is assuredly not crumbling when people exercise... more »