iShares Asia Region ETFs Weekly and YTD Returns [View article]
Thanks Frank!
The U.S. has been outperforming NE Asia, esp. since the Feb. sell-off -- except recently in the case of S. Korea. Note U.S. outperformance of China (referring to FXI, as surveyed above) is misleading, because the main Chinese benchmarks are up around 70% last count, even with the latest drop. FXI is nowhere near that in '07.
One idea why the U.S. is outperforming Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan perhaps relates to the correlation and interdependence of the three, limiting capital flows on concerns of a U.S. slowdown.
Other reasons relate to valuation and sentiment, since Hong Kong already had a nice run last year and investors/traders appear quick to lock in profits as they do in Japan.
There's also political risk and more direct spillover from items related to China as these countries are closer in proximity and have the deepest economic ties. For example, following the late Feb. sell-off, Japanese stocks fell more than any other country, even China!
Also and most interesting is the fact that Asian countries keep buying up U.S. assets. Japanese in particular are net buyers of overseas equities, whereas they are frequently net sellers of domestic equities.
iShares Asia Region ETFs Weekly and YTD Returns [View article]
Hi Michael,
I don't follow CEFs as closely as I do the iShares country-based funds. However, I am aware of the big gains last week for The Korea Fund (KF) and The Korean Equity Fund (KEF). In fact, CEFs paced advancers among Japan funds as well. I now see JOF is trading at a premium, whereas until recently, it was trading at a discount and if I remember correctly, it wasn't too long ago at double-digits.
I believe the gains in the CEFs have a lot to do w/ two main points: (1) discount/premium -- obviously in this case, the discount is creating buy interest, shortening the market-NAV gap; (2) composition of funds -- but in the case of S. Korea, you really don't see much difference in the names and %s of the top-10 and 25 positions, but there is some, which could explain. Also, EWY is shown as having 91 holdings, versus 62 for KF and 33 for KEF. This is per Morningstar, but note the last updates for each were scattered with 4/30/07 for EWY and 10/31/06 for KEF.
Despite last week's gains, I'm still seeing both Korean CEFs trade at discounts, -5.8% for KF and -9.3% for KEF, according to Morningstar.
A recent article by Mark Hulbert focused on the N. Korean nuclear threat and its impact on valuation.
In general, S. Korean stocks have more attractive valuations than those in China, Japan and assumingly than those in high flying markets in SE Asia.
Interestingly, the S. Korean won has strengthened against the dollar, while the yen has been weakening, which negatively impacts the competitiveness and financials of export-oriented South Korean companies -- however, the stronger won is a plus for American investors.
Lastly, put up a ytd chart of EWY, KF and KEF and you'll see EWY is clearly outperforming. It is also has more liquidity and lower fees.
Goldman Warns China Correction Possible; Shanghai Renews Record High [View article]
Regarding your comment about a shortage of Chinese ETF shares to short, I've heard about problems related to shorting country-based ETFs in general in the past and related to EWJ specifically, which I follow more closely. I don't short stocks/funds, but do trade options. I can tell you with experience trading EWJ that despite it being the most actively traded country-based ETF and very active in general, its options action leaves something to be desired.
Goldman Warns China Correction Possible; Shanghai Renews Record High [View article]
Curt, thank you for your questions.
The direct impact of the larger trading band announced today for the yuan is rather limited at this point for FXI. Reason being, 23/25 (approx. 40% of fund) of its top holdings and 87+% of its components are Hong Kong-listed. Also, due to the HK$ peg to the US$, there is limited forex-based impact, however this could change in the future. Note there are plenty of possible macro effects following the PBoC's actions. A sell-off in the mainland will likely spillover, hurting FXI, as we've already seen.
iShares Asia Region ETFs Weekly and YTD Returns [View article]
The U.S. has been outperforming NE Asia, esp. since the Feb. sell-off -- except recently in the case of S. Korea. Note U.S. outperformance of China (referring to FXI, as surveyed above) is misleading, because the main Chinese benchmarks are up around 70% last count, even with the latest drop. FXI is nowhere near that in '07.
One idea why the U.S. is outperforming Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan perhaps relates to the correlation and interdependence of the three, limiting capital flows on concerns of a U.S. slowdown.
Other reasons relate to valuation and sentiment, since Hong Kong already had a nice run last year and investors/traders appear quick to lock in profits as they do in Japan.
There's also political risk and more direct spillover from items related to China as these countries are closer in proximity and have the deepest economic ties. For example, following the late Feb. sell-off, Japanese stocks fell more than any other country, even China!
Also and most interesting is the fact that Asian countries keep buying up U.S. assets. Japanese in particular are net buyers of overseas equities, whereas they are frequently net sellers of domestic equities.
iShares Asia Region ETFs Weekly and YTD Returns [View article]
I don't follow CEFs as closely as I do the iShares country-based funds. However, I am aware of the big gains last week for The Korea Fund (KF) and The Korean Equity Fund (KEF). In fact, CEFs paced advancers among Japan funds as well. I now see JOF is trading at a premium, whereas until recently, it was trading at a discount and if I remember correctly, it wasn't too long ago at double-digits.
I believe the gains in the CEFs have a lot to do w/ two main points: (1) discount/premium -- obviously in this case, the discount is creating buy interest, shortening the market-NAV gap; (2) composition of funds -- but in the case of S. Korea, you really don't see much difference in the names and %s of the top-10 and 25 positions, but there is some, which could explain. Also, EWY is shown as having 91 holdings, versus 62 for KF and 33 for KEF. This is per Morningstar, but note the last updates for each were scattered with 4/30/07 for EWY and 10/31/06 for KEF.
Despite last week's gains, I'm still seeing both Korean CEFs trade at discounts, -5.8% for KF and -9.3% for KEF, according to Morningstar.
A recent article by Mark Hulbert focused on the N. Korean nuclear threat and its impact on valuation.
In general, S. Korean stocks have more attractive valuations than those in China, Japan and assumingly than those in high flying markets in SE Asia.
Interestingly, the S. Korean won has strengthened against the dollar, while the yen has been weakening, which negatively impacts the competitiveness and financials of export-oriented South Korean companies -- however, the stronger won is a plus for American investors.
Lastly, put up a ytd chart of EWY, KF and KEF and you'll see EWY is clearly outperforming. It is also has more liquidity and lower fees.
Goldman Warns China Correction Possible; Shanghai Renews Record High [View article]
Goldman Warns China Correction Possible; Shanghai Renews Record High [View article]
The direct impact of the larger trading band announced today for the yuan is rather limited at this point for FXI. Reason being, 23/25 (approx. 40% of fund) of its top holdings and 87+% of its components are Hong Kong-listed. Also, due to the HK$ peg to the US$, there is limited forex-based impact, however this could change in the future. Note there are plenty of possible macro effects following the PBoC's actions. A sell-off in the mainland will likely spillover, hurting FXI, as we've already seen.