Full index of posts »
StockTalks
-
$CRM Billings growth (rev + def rev) has tanked from 28.5% YOY to 17%! This should fall fast! Even Bend-my-ear-off Benioff cant change that! 2 days ago
-
$CRM Billings growth (rev + def rev) has tanked from 28.5% YOY to 17%! This should fall off a cliff! Even Bend-my-ear-off Benioff cant up it 2 days ago
-
$CRM remember this classic video. I want to buy Salesforce.com "I dont care" http://bit.ly/15T4uhK May 17, 2013
Latest Comments
-
alphaRAJU on Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map And now Here is here!
-
Sunil Shah on Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map @tony one more thing (as someone would have sai...
-
Sunil Shah on Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map and by the way, the Lumia was sold out in pre o...
-
Sunil Shah on Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map @Toni Maroni, Capital markets aren't an extensi...
-
ToniMaroni on Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map Nokia bought Navteq something like 10 years ago...
Most Commented
- Why Apple (AAPL) Should Suck Nokia (NOK) Onto Its Map (7 Comments)
- CRM At 40X Opertating Cash Flow, Price Target Of 101$. 40X Cash Is A Huge Multiple And Still Downside! (6 Comments)
- Rumour Mongering on EBIX (4 Comments)
- WDC: An end to carnage and a reprieve to the HDD industry (3 Comments)
- The Cloud and Hot Air and Frogs that dance with Dolphins (2 Comments)
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.















View Sunil Shah's Instablogs on:
Currency wars, the dollar and my question:
I can see the emerging rationale that QE2, a sharp jump in broad money supply, should depress the dollar, but two questions:
-why didnt QE1, where the fed bal sht went from $1tr to about $2tr in the space of 2ish years have a dramatic effect on the dollar? Isnt this in simple terms, a doubling of supply which should on a unitary elastic demand curve (keeping it naively simple) lead to a halving in the $ price? IS the answer 'there was a concommitant shift in the demand curve' to result in same'ish price? Is that evident from foreign ownership in $ assets?
-Of the $1 or $2 tr that was QE1, how much found its way in an increase in broad money. My thinking is this: there was so much impairment in assets on bank bal sheets and non-bank finance cos, that a major part of the credit creation simply filled the holes left by the impairments, leading to a far smaller increase in M1 or M3, whatever is the deviant aggregate today.
-it may well become more explicit in the FED's thinking, that a weakening dollar is in the national interest. But to what extent is this thinking beyond their control: if the rest of the world continues to demand dollars (cos there aint no realistic alternative!) why should the $ necessarily decline, even if the FED desires it? So the new world order is such that a sovereign govt DOES NOT have autonomy over its currency, even if they do own the printing press!! Anyone got an answer to that?
I would really appreciate thoughts on the above.
Thank you
Disclosure: no positions
WDC Some rationality re-entering the market!
Disclosure: long WDC, short CRM
Disclosure: long wdc
No Brainer CRM buys Ebix
IF Raina could accept to work 'under' Bend-my-ear-off Benioff, this acqtn makes perfect sense.
CRM would have a lot more weight and gravitas to their hot air, a perfect leg in the insurance vertical and on a eps share basis, it would look like pure genius, even if the offer was a 100% premium.
Disclosure: Long Ebix, Short CRM