Seeking Alpha

The Green Investor's  Instablog

Andreas Schreyer, Founder and Editor of The Green Investor, is a longtime investor and student of the markets and has been a financial newsletter editor since 2003. At Fraser Partners, the publisher of the TimingCube, TradeGuru, and ETFTide investment services, he authored the acclaimed Trend... More
My business:
The Green Investor
  • Opportunities in the Wind Value Chain
    After having introduced the wind energy market and established why it has such a very promising future in “Wind Energy: Now Is the Time to Invest”, we explored ways to invest in this space, from the broad industry index approach of the specialized wind ETFs (FAN) and (PWND) to the targeted method of focusing on top wind turbine manufacturers such as Vestas (VWDRY.PK) outlined in “FindingOpportunities in Wind Energy ”. For all practical purposes, this latest article could have been entitled “Investing in Wind Energy, Part 3” and it takes us to mostly unsuspected ways to invest in this vastly untapped source of renewable energy.

    When it comes to the selection of wind energy stocks, a look at the value chain beyond turbine manufacturers reveals what are, in our opinion, some of the best ways to play this market. With the turbine manufacturers located approximately in the middle of the value chain, we first look downstream to where the demand is coming from.

    Demand for electricity ultimately comes from the consumers, industry and individuals, but the demand for renewable energy mostly originates with the utilities that are forced by regulatory mandates to gradually decrease the percentage of their energy mix coming from fossil fuels. Utilities seldom develop their own wind farms; instead they acquire them from project developers or simply buy the electricity from Independent Power Producers (IPPs). Table 1 below lists some of the key downstream wind market participants: the project developers, Independent Power Producers and utilities.

    Table 1: Project Developers, Independent Power Producers, Utilities
    More »
    Nov 11 08:38 am | Link | Comment!
  • How to Invest in Wind Energy
    Last Wednesday I published “Wind Energy: Now Is the Time to Invest” as an introduction to wind energy markets and a review of the reasons for which I believe wind offers a bright future to informed investors over the next few years. This year, an estimated 28,000 Megawatts (MW) of capacity are being installed worldwide, and by 2013 the new annual installed capacity will have more than doubled to 58,500 MW. The U.S. Department of Energy also projects dramatic growth with wind energy’s contribution to U.S. electricity supply to increase to 20% by 2030.

    Probably the single largest challenge for a U.S.-based individual investor looking to participate in the growth in wind power is that the vast majority of pure play or significant industry players are foreign companies whose stocks are listed on foreign stock exchanges. A perfect illustration of the dilemma can be found in the list of wind turbine manufacturers in Table 1 below. The list represents the worldwide top 10 market share rankings in 2008.

    Table 1: Wind Turbines Manufacturers


    General Electric is the only U.S. manufacturer to make the list. GE manufactured over 50% of the wind turbines deployed in the U.S. last year and grew their global tower market share to 18.6% and is now nipping at the heels of Vestas of Denmark, the world’s largest supplier of wind turbines at 20% market share. Still, as we pointed out previously, GE makes a rather poor wind investment. For starters they are nowhere near a wind pure-play and their participation outside the U.S. market is minimal. For example, in what is expected to become the largest wind market this year, China, GE holds only a 2% share and ranks #10.


    If you could only buy one wind company it would have to be Vestas Wind Systems (VWDRY.PK) as the clear leader in the wind power industry. Vestas has a truly global reach having installed wind turbines in 63 countries and is one of very few industry players that can provide complete end-to-end wind power solutions. Vestas’ wind turbines account for nearly one-third of total installed global wind power capacity. Of the top 8 country markets, Vestas is the #1 or #2 supplier of wind turbines except in China where they are a strong #4 with 10% market share, behind 3 Chinese manufacturers.

    The list highlights the difficulty for the U.S. investor, as most companies are either private or traded on foreign exchanges. Just like the Vestas stock, a few others are also traded on the pink sheets as over-the-counter (OTC) American depository receipts (ADRs). This means they are not required to make the financial filings in the U.S. that are required for a listing on the major U.S. stock exchanges, and OTC stocks can present other dangers for the casual investor, such as very low volume and high bid/ask spreads which can erode profits.

    For anyone only interested in taking a small wind position without investing time and effort, one way to simplify the process is to buy into the wind market as a whole via exchange traded funds (ETFs). Table 2 below lists the two specialized wind funds currently available in the U.S.

    Table 2: Wind ETFs


    Investing in ETFs presents the benefit of owning an entire basket of stocks in one shot, with the inherent diversification this represents, and the ability to easily participate in hard to reach foreign stocks. We wrote about the advantages of ETF investing in “A Guide to Investing with Green ETFs”. On the downside, investing in a broad static index tends to water down the best performers and results will typically lag a portfolio of handpicked stocks assembled by a knowledgeable and specialized analyst.


    The good thing about stock picking is that there are dozens of great companies to choose from, including some long-term keepers from the top 10 wind turbine makers listed above. Even more exiting are the prospects one can find elsewhere in the wind supply chain. Upstream are the suppliers of the many critical components which the turbine makers generally outsource, such as blades, bearings, transmissions, generators, towers, power electronics and other key ingredients. Downstream are the wind farm project developers, independent power producers and utilities. Our next article in the wind series will explore the most promising companies in the extended wind value chain.

    Disclosure: No positions.
    Oct 28 03:53 pm | Link | Comment!
  • Now is the Time to Invest in Wind Energy

    Just this month the largest wind farm in the world went into production in West Texas, featuring 627 turbines producing over 780 megawatts at full capacity, enough to power 230,000 homes. The Roscoe Wind Complex cost over $1 billion to develop and is owned by E.ON Climate & Renewables North America Inc., a subsidiary of the German energy company E.ON AG (EONGY.PK). This news highlights two critical issues for would-be wind energy investors:

    More »
    Oct 20 05:07 pm | Link | Comment!
  • First Solar to be added to the S&P 500 index tomorrow

    Standard & Poor’s just announced that First Solar Inc. (FSLR) will be added to the S&P 500 index after the close of the market tomorrow, October 15, 2009, and replace drug maker Wyeth (WYE) which is being acquired by Pfizer Inc. (PFE). The obvious question this raises is whether getting listed on the S&P 500 index is good for a company or bad. I have explained in a recent article “Picking Solar Energy Winners” why I am bullish on First Solar, so I will not repeat all the reasons here but rather focus on the topic at hand.

    The debate that follows index listing is typically divided along the bullish/bearish lines. Bulls cherish the added exposure from such a prestigious listing, and they suspect that because the numerous S&P 500 index funds will have to buy a lot of FSLR shares, it will be good, at least short-term. Well, it depends; maybe the company will have a secondary offering to cover the excess demand. Arguments about why it is bad are harder to come by and tend to be more creative, like two we’ve heard recently: “All the investors who correctly anticipated the listing will now sell their shares” and “Since the S&P 500 is poised to decline, it will be bad for FSLR”.

    Back to serious matters. What happens to a company’s stock price when it joins the S&P 500 is actually known as the “Index Effect” and has been studied for years. The answer is: yes, the Index Effect exists, it is positive (the median excess return of S&P 500 additions was 3.8% for the past five years) and the effect is shrinking over time. Read “The Shrinking Index Effect” at Standard & Poor’s for the details.

    The effect on FSLR’s share price may be small or inexistent but the listing broadly signals that solar technology has made it to the mainstream. People can dispute the future prospects of First Solar, or its attractiveness as an investment, but with the S&P 500 listing there remains no doubt that it is the leader in the solar market and maybe even of the renewable energy space.

    More »
    Oct 14 03:29 pm | Link | Comment!
  • Great news for Nevada Geothermal
    Earlier today, Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. (NGLPF.OB) announced it has mandated John Hancock Life Insurance Company to be the exclusive debt provider for an up to US$95 Million Term Loan Facility for the Blue Mountain, “Faulkner 1” geothermal project. The financing facility is expected to close in December 2009, subject to the usual legal due diligence and approvals. Read the full announcement.

    We first mentioned Nevada Geothermal in these pages in a comment to our September 08, 2009 article entitled Geothermal Is Getting Red Hot, Part II. Here at The Green Investor we generally focus on larger companies such as geothermal pure-play Ormat (ORA), but the reason we have been so excited about Nevada Geothermal is that it is about to graduate from being an exploration and development stage company to a revenue generating electricity producer, and if it makes the transition successfully, its valuation multiples will change dramatically.

    Since the uncertainty surrounding their financing was the main remaining dark cloud overhead, we now see Nevada Geothermal as a much less risky speculation, and looking at the recent share price appreciation it looks like the market agrees with us.

    Nevada Geothermal shares are up some 75% since early September
    More »
    Oct 13 03:18 pm | Link | Comment!
  • Picking solar winners
    When it comes to picking solar companies as investments, there is no shortage of opinions and metrics ranging from the technical analysis and charting disciplines used to spot trading opportunities, to speculations on potential future events such as big deals or acquisitions. While I like to include such information in the equation, I favor fundamental analysis to identify the winners. The business fundamentals and financials are critical, but when it comes to solar photovoltaic companies, the two primary measures I use to distinguish the leaders from the field are efficiency and cost/watt.

    Photovoltaic solar cells have been around for decades but they are still in the early commercial phase, with a great deal of evolving, maturing and growth ahead. By far the largest type of PV technology is based on polysilicon and manufacturing technology very similar to that of computer chips and other semiconductor devices. If you have something against acronyms or tech jargon we advise you to skip right over this section.

    There are two basic types of solar photovoltaic technology: 1) crystalline and 2) thin-film. The market is mostly multicrystalline silicon today but thin film is emerging. Efficiency is the percentage of the available light energy converted to electricity. The table below shows how the various technologies compare:


    Manufacturer power ratings are to be read as maximum output under ideal conditions, and to make comparisons even more tricky there are other factors affecting efficiency:

    -       Space utilization (it only takes half as much space when using panels with twice the efficiency), which means that higher efficiency technologies like crystalline silicon will have an advantage when there are space constraints such as urban rooftops
    -       Power temperature coefficient. Some solar cells lose more efficiency with higher temperature than others. Thin film technologies demonstrate substantial superiority in areas where the module operating temperatures are high year-round
    -       Light absorption properties. Again, thin film technologies maintain a much more constant output curve compared with traditional silicon modules which results in higher output under cloudy and diffuse light conditions such as dawn and dusk, or in higher latitudes
    More »
    Sep 22 04:54 pm | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Posts by Ticker
ABB, AMN, AMSC, APWR, ASO, CPN, EONGY.PK, EVX, FAN, FPL, FSLR, GCTAF.PK, GE, GEX, GRN, GWO, HTM, HXL, ICLN, KWT, MGMXF.PK, NGLPF.OB, NKWFF.PK, NLR, ORA, OTTR, PBD, PBW, PFE, PGTHF.PK, PKN, PUW, PWND, PZD, QCLN, RZ, SBGSF.PK, SI, SKFRY.PK, TAN, TKR, TRN, VWDRY.PK, WNDEF.PK, WYE, XEL, ZOLT

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.