<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Trade Radar Operator - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Trade Radar Operator' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator</link>
    <item>
      <title>Nonfarms Payrolls: Surprisingly Bad - Or Was It?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171825-nonfarms-payrolls-surprisingly-bad-or-was-it?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171825</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_bread_lines1.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_bread_lines1_1.jpg" /></a></div>How awful was today's non-farm payrolls report?<br> <br> Let's start with the bad news:<br> <ul><li>Nonfarm payrolls for October fell 190,000, which is worse than the decline of 175,000 that had been widely forecast. </li><li>Job losses for the previous month were upwardly revised to reflect nonfarm job losses of 219,000. </li><li>The unemployment rate surged to 10.2%, which is up from 9.8% and higher than the 9.9% that was widely forecast. It also marks the highest unemployment rate since 1982.</li><li>The manufacturing sector saw payrolls drop by 61,000. This is worse than the 45,000 jobs lost in the prior month. </li></ul>But not everything was awful. There was some good news buried in there as well:<br> <ul><li>A drop of 190,000 is bad but it is still an improvement over the previous month's 219,000</li><li>Average weekly hourly hours were unchanged at 33.0, which is a bit below the 33.1 that had been forecast. At least there was no decrease.</li><li>Average hourly earnings increased 0.3% month-over-month, which is stronger than the 0.1% monthly increase that had been expected.</li><li>Less jobs were cut in October than the previous month in the following sectors: builders, financial firms and service industries which include banks, insurance companies, restaurants and retailers</li><li>Temporary workers rose by 34,000, the first gain since December 2007. Temp workers are the first to be brought back after a downturn so we can hope this signals that we are nearing the beginnings of a recovery in the job market.</li></ul>Today's report confirms that it will be a tough slog before the job market fully returns to health.</div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:24:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_bread_lines1.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/6/saupload_bread_lines1_1.jpg" /></a></div>How awful was today's non-farm payrolls report?<br> <br> Let's start with the bad news:<br> <ul><li>Nonfarm payrolls for October fell 190,000, which is worse than the decline of 175,000 that had been widely forecast. </li><li>Job losses for the previous month were upwardly revised to reflect nonfarm job losses of 219,000. </li><li>The unemployment rate surged to 10.2%, which is up from 9.8% and higher than the 9.9% that was widely forecast. It also marks the highest unemployment rate since 1982.</li><li>The manufacturing sector saw payrolls drop by 61,000. This is worse than the 45,000 jobs lost in the prior month. </li></ul>But not everything was awful. There was some good news buried in there as well:<br> <ul><li>A drop of 190,000 is bad but it is still an improvement over the previous month's 219,000</li><li>Average weekly hourly hours were unchanged at 33.0, which is a bit below the 33.1 that had been forecast. At least there was no decrease.</li><li>Average hourly earnings increased 0.3% month-over-month, which is stronger than the 0.1% monthly increase that had been expected.</li><li>Less jobs were cut in October than the previous month in the following sectors: builders, financial firms and service industries which include banks, insurance companies, restaurants and retailers</li><li>Temporary workers rose by 34,000, the first gain since December 2007. Temp workers are the first to be brought back after a downturn so we can hope this signals that we are nearing the beginnings of a recovery in the job market.</li></ul>Today's report confirms that it will be a tough slog before the job market fully returns to health.</div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171825-nonfarms-payrolls-surprisingly-bad-or-was-it?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Have Chip Stocks Turned Around Already?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171808-have-chip-stocks-turned-around-already?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171808</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On Monday I asked if <a href="http://blog.trade-radar.com/2009/11/is-semiconductor-sector-bargain-yet.html">semiconductors were a bargain yet</a>. I proposed that very soon they would be and then the sector would be a clear Buy.<br> <br> Quite frankly, the sector didn't quite fall as far as I thought it would and now today, in the midst of a tech resurgence based on Cisco's better than expected results, semiconductors appear to running again.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>On Monday I asked if <a href="http://blog.trade-radar.com/2009/11/is-semiconductor-sector-bargain-yet.html">semiconductors were a bargain yet</a>. I proposed that very soon they would be and then the sector would be a clear Buy.<br> <br> Quite frankly, the sector didn't quite fall as far as I thought it would and now today, in the midst of a tech resurgence based on Cisco's better than expected results, semiconductors appear to running again.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171808-have-chip-stocks-turned-around-already?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/usd">USD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chips: Are Semiconductor Stocks a Bargain Yet?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170691-chips-are-semiconductor-stocks-a-bargain-yet?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Semiconductors led the market up and now they are leading the market down. What gives?<br><br>First, let's look at where we've been and where we are today. The chart below covers the period from the March low to yesterday, November 2, 2009.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:25:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Semiconductors led the market up and now they are leading the market down. What gives?<br><br>First, let's look at where we've been and where we are today. The chart below covers the period from the March low to yesterday, November 2, 2009.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170691-chips-are-semiconductor-stocks-a-bargain-yet?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amd">AMD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psi">PSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smh">SMH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/usd">USD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xsd">XSD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why OPNET Plunged While the Market Rallied</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170400-why-opnet-plunged-while-the-market-rallied?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170400</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Major market averages fell roughly 2.5% Friday but not everything went down. OPNET Technologies (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/opnt' title='More opinion and analysis of OPNT'>OPNT</a>) gained 4.7% today in the face of relentless selling in most other stocks. What gives?</p><p><strong>Background --</strong></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:25:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Major market averages fell roughly 2.5% Friday but not everything went down. OPNET Technologies (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/opnt' title='More opinion and analysis of OPNT'>OPNT</a>) gained 4.7% today in the face of relentless selling in most other stocks. What gives?</p><p><strong>Background --</strong></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170400-why-opnet-plunged-while-the-market-rallied?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/opnt">OPNT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durable Goods Headlines Hide Weakness in Tech</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/169821-durable-goods-headlines-hide-weakness-in-tech?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">169821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div>The advanced report for Durable Goods for September came out Wednesday. The headline number for new orders showed a 1% month-over-month improvement after a surprisingly poor showing in August. How did things go in the tech sector?</div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div>The advanced report for Durable Goods for September came out Wednesday. The headline number for new orders showed a 1% month-over-month improvement after a surprisingly poor showing in August. How did things go in the tech sector?</div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/169821-durable-goods-headlines-hide-weakness-in-tech?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/usd">USD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OmniVision: Can It Reverse the Downward Trend?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/169641-omnivision-can-it-reverse-the-downward-trend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">169641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>OmniVision Technologies (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ovti' title='More opinion and analysis of OVTI'>OVTI</a>) has seen its stock price decline roughly 40% since mid-September. Can we expect things to turn around?<span></p><p><strong>Background --</strong></p></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>OmniVision Technologies (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ovti' title='More opinion and analysis of OVTI'>OVTI</a>) has seen its stock price decline roughly 40% since mid-September. Can we expect things to turn around?<span></p><p><strong>Background --</strong></p></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/169641-omnivision-can-it-reverse-the-downward-trend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ovti">OVTI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/star">STAR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Down Week for Stocks: Small Blip or the Start of Something Bigger?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/168809-down-week-for-stocks-small-blip-or-the-start-of-something-bigger?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">168809</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Should investors be worried?</p><p>Stocks actually closed with losses last week. This is something we haven't seen much of lately so every time it happens, I begin to think maybe this is finally the long awaited pullback.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:24:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Should investors be worried?</p><p>Stocks actually closed with losses last week. This is something we haven't seen much of lately so every time it happens, I begin to think maybe this is finally the long awaited pullback.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/168809-down-week-for-stocks-small-blip-or-the-start-of-something-bigger?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nasdaq Getting Shaky: On Thin Ice or in Thin Air?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/168805-nasdaq-getting-shaky-on-thin-ice-or-in-thin-air?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">168805</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Another day when a bellwether couldn't save the market. Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) couldn't do it last week and Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) couldn't do it this week. Even Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) earnings beat Friday didn't help.</p><p>You can see in the chart below that the NAZ was up nicely on Friday but couldn't hold on.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:16:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Another day when a bellwether couldn't save the market. Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) couldn't do it last week and Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) couldn't do it this week. Even Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) earnings beat Friday didn't help.</p><p>You can see in the chart below that the NAZ was up nicely on Friday but couldn't hold on.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/168805-nasdaq-getting-shaky-on-thin-ice-or-in-thin-air?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Semiconductor Makers: Bucking the Downtrend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/168145-semiconductor-makers-bucking-the-downtrend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">168145</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Wednesday the market sold off in the last hour and major indexes ended the day with losses. Semiconductor indexes were underwater pretty much the entire day and the iShares Semiconductor ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw' title='More opinion and analysis of IGW'>IGW</a>) ended down 1.72%.</p><p>Two well-known semiconductor companies were able to buck the downtrend and close with gains. Who were they and what were the reasons? Are there clues as to who else might benefit?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:52:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Wednesday the market sold off in the last hour and major indexes ended the day with losses. Semiconductor indexes were underwater pretty much the entire day and the iShares Semiconductor ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw' title='More opinion and analysis of IGW'>IGW</a>) ended down 1.72%.</p><p>Two well-known semiconductor companies were able to buck the downtrend and close with gains. Who were they and what were the reasons? Are there clues as to who else might benefit?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/168145-semiconductor-makers-bucking-the-downtrend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/athr">ATHR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brcm">BRCM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qcom">QCOM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsm">TSM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/umc">UMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can Stocks Keep Pushing Higher? Divergence Is a Threat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/167282-can-stocks-keep-pushing-higher-divergence-is-a-threat?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">167282</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/19/saupload_push.JPG"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/19/saupload_push.JPG" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>Stocks seem to have continued their winning ways last week. Or did they?<br><br>Major averages turned in varied results. The Russell 2000 barely managed a 0.2% gain while, on the other end, the S&amp;P 500 gained 1.5%. The first couple of days of the week stocks meandered. Wednesday saw a big jump. Thursday saw some consolidation and Friday was a definite down day.</div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:13:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/19/saupload_push.JPG"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/19/saupload_push.JPG" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>Stocks seem to have continued their winning ways last week. Or did they?<br><br>Major averages turned in varied results. The Russell 2000 barely managed a 0.2% gain while, on the other end, the S&amp;P 500 gained 1.5%. The first couple of days of the week stocks meandered. Wednesday saw a big jump. Thursday saw some consolidation and Friday was a definite down day.</div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/167282-can-stocks-keep-pushing-higher-divergence-is-a-threat?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwm">IWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Price Safety? Time to Desert Stable Value Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/165832-what-price-safety-time-to-desert-stable-value-funds?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">165832</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I have written several posts on stable value funds over the last year or two. With the financial crisis easing, the topic needs revisiting.<br><br>It is worth reviewing some of the issues around stable value funds a year ago and contrasting the situation with where we are today.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:24:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>I have written several posts on stable value funds over the last year or two. With the financial crisis easing, the topic needs revisiting.<br><br>It is worth reviewing some of the issues around stable value funds a year ago and contrasting the situation with where we are today.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/165832-what-price-safety-time-to-desert-stable-value-funds?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Software as a Defensive Sector?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/165018-software-as-a-defensive-sector?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">165018</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I often write about tech stocks on this blog. Yesterday read an interview with one of the most well-known managers of a technology mutual fund.<br><br>The Wall Street Journal had a conversation with Paul Wick, manager of the Seligman Communications and Information fund &#40;SLMCX&#41;. With 20 years as manager of this fund, he has consistently ranked in or near the top 10% among his peers.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:00:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>I often write about tech stocks on this blog. Yesterday read an interview with one of the most well-known managers of a technology mutual fund.<br><br>The Wall Street Journal had a conversation with Paul Wick, manager of the Seligman Communications and Information fund &#40;SLMCX&#41;. With 20 years as manager of this fund, he has consistently ranked in or near the top 10% among his peers.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/165018-software-as-a-defensive-sector?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igv">IGV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/igw">IGW</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market Sentiment Worse than Stock Performance?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/164810-market-sentiment-worse-than-stock-performance?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">164810</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A second week of declining markets has investors questioning whether stocks have come too far too fast. A week of disappointing economic reports has bears saying &quot;I told you so.&quot; Is the rally over?<br><br>We look for clues in some of the charts that follow.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:00:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>A second week of declining markets has investors questioning whether stocks have come too far too fast. A week of disappointing economic reports has bears saying &quot;I told you so.&quot; Is the rally over?<br><br>We look for clues in some of the charts that follow.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/164810-market-sentiment-worse-than-stock-performance?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Semi Equipment Makers: Rising from the Dead?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/163849-semi-equipment-makers-rising-from-the-dead?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163849</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/29/saupload_a_zombie_hand_sticking_out_grave_royalty_free_080904_115190_001047.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/29/saupload_a_zombie_hand_sticking_out_grave_royalty_free_080904_115190_001047_1.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>One of the hardest hit sectors in the downturn has been semiconductor equipment. With plunging demand for semis and rampant over-capacity, manufacturers of chip making equipment have been the zombies of the tech world. Are the dead beginning to come back to life?</div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:05:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/29/saupload_a_zombie_hand_sticking_out_grave_royalty_free_080904_115190_001047.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/29/saupload_a_zombie_hand_sticking_out_grave_royalty_free_080904_115190_001047_1.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>One of the hardest hit sectors in the downturn has been semiconductor equipment. With plunging demand for semis and rampant over-capacity, manufacturers of chip making equipment have been the zombies of the tech world. Are the dead beginning to come back to life?</div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/163849-semi-equipment-makers-rising-from-the-dead?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amat">AMAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/klac">KLAC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durable Goods Report: So Far, Just a Speed Bump for Tech</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/163503-durable-goods-report-so-far-just-a-speed-bump-for-tech?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163503</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/m3/">Durable Goods report for August</a> came out Friday and landed with a thud. The headline number for new orders fell a surprising 2.4% month-over-month after a better than expected July. How did things go in the sector?<br><br><strong>Shipments </strong></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:23:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>The <a href="http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/m3/">Durable Goods report for August</a> came out Friday and landed with a thud. The headline number for new orders fell a surprising 2.4% month-over-month after a better than expected July. How did things go in the sector?<br><br><strong>Shipments </strong></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/163503-durable-goods-report-so-far-just-a-speed-bump-for-tech?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ign">IGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iih">IIH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyw">IYW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psi">PSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pxq">PXQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgt">VGT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citi Cautiously Bullish on Economic Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/163073-citi-cautiously-bullish-on-economic-growth?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">163073</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in June of 2008, I featured the opinions of well-known <a href="http://blog.trade-radar.com/2008/03/citis-levkovich-buy-banks-now.html">Citigroup strategist Tobias Levkovich</a>, who at the time was declaring that it was time to buy banks. He was 9 months early in that call. What does he have to say these days?<br><br>It seems that Mr. Levkovich is reasonably positive on the state of the U.S. economy. He is projecting GDP growth a hair over 1% in the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2009 and 2.1% in 2010.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:06:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Back in June of 2008, I featured the opinions of well-known <a href="http://blog.trade-radar.com/2008/03/citis-levkovich-buy-banks-now.html">Citigroup strategist Tobias Levkovich</a>, who at the time was declaring that it was time to buy banks. He was 9 months early in that call. What does he have to say these days?<br><br>It seems that Mr. Levkovich is reasonably positive on the state of the U.S. economy. He is projecting GDP growth a hair over 1% in the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2009 and 2.1% in 2010.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/163073-citi-cautiously-bullish-on-economic-growth?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysts Missed the Downturn: Can They Be Trusted Now? </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/162700-analysts-missed-the-downturn-can-they-be-trusted-now?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">162700</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>If you've ever distrusted the earnings estimates of stock market analysts, it looks like you've had good reason to be skeptical.</p><p>The following chart shows an interesting pattern. At the top left, we see global stock prices plunging roughly three months before earnings estimates began to come down. Doesn't inspire confidence in analyst opinions, does it?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:54:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>If you've ever distrusted the earnings estimates of stock market analysts, it looks like you've had good reason to be skeptical.</p><p>The following chart shows an interesting pattern. At the top left, we see global stock prices plunging roughly three months before earnings estimates began to come down. Doesn't inspire confidence in analyst opinions, does it?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/162700-analysts-missed-the-downturn-can-they-be-trusted-now?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eem">EEM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eet">EET</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmm">GMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pxh">PXH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vwo">VWO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did Oracle Whiff?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/162019-did-oracle-whiff?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">162019</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) released earnings after the close Wednesday. The stock immediately fell several percent after hours. Was the sell-off justified?<br><br>The company indicated that profit rose 4% which was in line with analyst estimates. The top line, however, was a source of concern for investors.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:39:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) released earnings after the close Wednesday. The stock immediately fell several percent after hours. Was the sell-off justified?<br><br>The company indicated that profit rose 4% which was in line with analyst estimates. The top line, however, was a source of concern for investors.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/162019-did-oracle-whiff?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Caution: Plenty of Event Risk on the Horizon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161288-caution-plenty-of-event-risk-on-the-horizon?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161288</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Running late tonight but I wanted to publish the two weekly Alert HQ charts, especially since I skipped last week.<br><br>By way of background, this past week had no news events of special importance but stocks returned to their winning ways. Looks like we are only allowed one bad week in a row before the bulls return.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:55:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Running late tonight but I wanted to publish the two weekly Alert HQ charts, especially since I skipped last week.<br><br>By way of background, this past week had no news events of special importance but stocks returned to their winning ways. Looks like we are only allowed one bad week in a row before the bulls return.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161288-caution-plenty-of-event-risk-on-the-horizon?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investors Fled out of Leveraged ETFs at Exactly the Wrong Time</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161169-investors-fled-out-of-leveraged-etfs-at-exactly-the-wrong-time?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161169</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Saturday's Wall Street Journal has an article titled &quot;Investors Pull $2.1 Billion out of Leveraged ETFs.&quot; What's going on?<br><br>The article says assets in ETFs increased by $20.1 billion in August but declined in only two asset classes: leveraged and inverse ETFs.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:24:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trade Radar Operator</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TradeRadarOperator.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1"/><strong><a href="http://traderadar.blogspot.com">Trade Radar Operator</a> submits: </strong><p>Saturday's Wall Street Journal has an article titled &quot;Investors Pull $2.1 Billion out of Leveraged ETFs.&quot; What's going on?<br><br>The article says assets in ETFs increased by $20.1 billion in August but declined in only two asset classes: leveraged and inverse ETFs.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161169-investors-fled-out-of-leveraged-etfs-at-exactly-the-wrong-time?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bgu">BGU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bgz">BGZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ddm">DDM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dog">DOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dxd">DXD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mvv">MVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/myy">MYY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mzz">MZZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/psq">PSQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qid">QID</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qld">QLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rms">RMS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rrz">RRZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsw">RSW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rwm">RWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/saa">SAA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sbb">SBB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sdd">SDD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sds">SDS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sh">SH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sso">SSO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tna">TNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twm">TWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tza">TZA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uwm">UWM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trade-radar-operator">Trade Radar Operator</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
