The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
market authors
selected for publication
»
Comments
» AAPL
You are currently following TraderMark
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following TraderMark
-
294
)
Apple Has a Genuine Green Shoot [View article]
Not everyone is an apple investor or reads the WSJ who reads this article. Was just making a point that some little hives of activity are actually out there and are positive... we need more.
On Nov 13 09:19 AM User 401295 wrote:
> this just summary of the story from wall street journal yesterday.
> no new insight.
Not Everyone in China Wants to Buy an iPhone [View article]
On Nov 04 09:13 AM John Galt wrote:
> You could buy iphones in America, unlock them, and then sell them
> for more money in Europe, Asia, Russia etc. People are already doing
> this...
Good News from the Semis [View article]
probably a miscue on my part - I type countless things a day ;)
I added small stakes of TQNT and RFMD this morning and will be adding on dips, hopefully of the 10-20% variety!
So I own all 3, only missing ANAD.
On Jul 24 09:08 AM bike 05673 wrote:
> I do not understand how you say SWKS has broader exposure than TQNT.
> In my judgement TQNT seems to sell into a broader market than SWKS.
> Could you please explain this.
Apple Upgrade Not Groundbreaking [View article]
On May 27 09:34 AM AlD wrote:
> top_tier - I believe the title of this article was referring to the
> Morgan Stanley upgrade, not the rumored features of the upcoming
> iPhone refresh.
Where's the Tech? [View article]
On Apr 22 11:35 AM winindthedust wrote:
> You may be able to get a shot at Apple tomorrow. Historically, there
> is a sell off after Apple earnings, no matter how good it is. Tonight's
> earnings call is known to be very good... so if you plan on buying
> Apple, tomorrow EARLY would be good. However, to play it safe, get
> in NOW. Like you said, drops will be very short in nature. We will
> see a steady rise to June, August, and also December. Apple stock
> will NOT take a major dip again this year, until perhaps after January
> of 2010. You'll see a 15%-30% upside from todays price to June,
> and a 30%-50% upside by December. If you want to build a steady
> Apple position, buy on the dips and hold until January 1. We will
> see a repeat of 2007.
Where's the Tech? [View article]
On Apr 22 09:06 AM kagame wrote:
> Might check out PWRD as it is cheaper than SNDA. SNDA just had a
> huge move and historically experiences massive price volatility after
> big moves. Also, there was no actual earnings data that caused Shanda's
> recent runup, it was all due to speculation they may have a hit game
> on their hands. Possibly either hype or a case of buy on the rumor
> and sell on the news.
Where's the Tech? [View article]
yes, thanks - that is incorrect
On Apr 21 08:06 PM Roger Knights wrote:
> Typo?:
> "They've gone a long way in a long time and I hate chasing;"
>
> Shouldn't that be, "... in a short time ..."?
Leaving Google in No Man's Land [View article]
for the other comment - buying above $500 is a technical breakout - thats why... it doesnt make sense for those who dont use TA.
Consumers Will Continue to Buy Apple's Fashionable Gadgets [View article]
Simply enough the stock is below both major moving average, 50 day and 200 day. In fact the 50 day crossed below the 200 day mid March which is another negative trend. But 50 day is about $140 and falling daily and 200 day is $144
It sounds counterintuitive to newer investors but a lot of technical traders like to buy stocks at higher prices once the momentum is back. Bargain hunters prefer to buy lower. Most technical traders will latch onto Apple once it breaks free of both those 2 trading resistance areas. Hence why I said mid $140s.
You can buy now (or lower) but your timeline to hold will be longer. So you can buy cheaper but for all we know Apple sits in this range area for 1 more day, 1 more week, 1 more month, or 1 more quarter. Etc. So it is simply a strategy to buy on a "breakout" - you pay more but you should have a quick return at that point.
Either way I like Apple for the long run - and agree with some of the comments above re: Conversion. Also there will be a consumer spending retrechment in this country but its all relative. Spending is not going to zero and I also am a big proponent of the cache factor. People just dont realize what a benefit it is; when I was growing up people were paying $120 for Nikes when Adidas were available for 25% of the cost, just as good of a shoe. Here one could make the technical arguement Apple is superior but even if it weren't they have created a brand that people are willing to pay more for. That is invaluable, and its global and its the type of cache that very few companies have. Sony used to be one 2 decades ago.
Again, not IMMUNE to consumer spending crunch I believe is happening and will continue to worsen but its a relative commentary. HP, as fine of a company as it is (or Dell or Lenovo), has no real cache among teens/20s, etc. And those people set the trends.
12 Stocks to Buy on a Pullback [View article]
Think Tech is a Safe Haven? Think Again [View article]
13 Predictions for 2008 [View article]
But if there is a major terrorist attack on US soil in summer, people will flee to experience. And "hope" of Obama will be an afterthought. Both parties are ineffective, the things you listed could apply to both parties - they are too busy fighting to do anything for the American people. That is why the two people who actually seem willing to work across the aisle are attracting attention.
13 Predictions for 2008 [View article]
Seeking Alpha usually has some delay before they bring things over from the blog to SA.
www.fundmymutualfund.c...
In retrospect we had a lot of almost identical predictions which is interesting :)
13 Predictions for 2008 [View article]
13 Predictions for 2008 [View article]