YEP the mistake was lehman only if your circle was too small. Draw the circle larger it was the bailout of Bear.
By the time lehman came around - since they were bigger they did not prepare for bankruptcy - why should they Bear got bailed out.
The bankruptcy of Lehman could of been better managed but it was a result of not preparing due to the anticipation of a bailout per Bear.
So if Bear did not get bailed out - can you let lehman collapse to - and my answer would be yes. You would do something similiar to S&L it would be orderly and backed by US govt. temporarily - it would not be a bailout but would be an orderly bankruptcy. All players would of prepared well in-advance. All said that was another dimension.
Another hindsight would be Lehman was GS biggest competitor - GS rules our govt. how convenient Paulson didnt save Lehman. Funny I was watching Star Wars Episode 2 with my kids how interesting the Chancellor reminded me of Paulson - played both sides in the end to ultimately put him on top.
Lehman's Collapse, Revisited [View article]
By the time lehman came around - since they were bigger they did not prepare for bankruptcy - why should they Bear got bailed out.
The bankruptcy of Lehman could of been better managed but it was a result of not preparing due to the anticipation of a bailout per Bear.
So if Bear did not get bailed out - can you let lehman collapse to - and my answer would be yes. You would do something similiar to S&L it would be orderly and backed by US govt. temporarily - it would not be a bailout but would be an orderly bankruptcy. All players would of prepared well in-advance. All said that was another dimension.
Another hindsight would be Lehman was GS biggest competitor - GS rules our govt. how convenient Paulson didnt save Lehman. Funny I was watching Star Wars Episode 2 with my kids how interesting the Chancellor reminded me of Paulson - played both sides in the end to ultimately put him on top.