<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Turley Muller - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Turley Muller' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller</link>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Weaker Dollar Will Benefit Revenue Growth and Margins</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/170860-apple-weaker-dollar-will-benefit-revenue-growth-and-margins?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">170860</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple Inc. (nasd:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</strong> Rising gross margins stemming from increased recognition of deferred iPhone revenue has been a key factor in propelling Apple&rsquo;s share price and EPS. I believe the next major tailwind will be increased revenue growth and higher margins arising from the falling U.S. Dollar.</p> <p>In 2009, 46% of Apple&rsquo;s total revenue came from overseas, up from 43% in FY08 and 41% in FY07. Including European Apple retail stores, revenue generated in Europe was roughly 30% of total revenue in FY09. International markets are a key source of Apple&rsquo;s revenue and growth, and a declining dollar is beneficial for the firm. Apple&rsquo;s performance for the past several quarters was challenged by headwinds from the strengthening USD. Going forward, Apple should benefit from the dollar&rsquo;s decline. This will lift international revenue growth and boost margins. Alternatively, Apple could choose to lower prices abroad to stimulate product demand to drive volume. I believe many investors overlook the fact that Apple derives nearly half its revenue outside the U.S., thus don&rsquo;t consider the considerable impact coming from a weaker USD.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:01:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><strong>Apple Inc. (nasd:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</strong> Rising gross margins stemming from increased recognition of deferred iPhone revenue has been a key factor in propelling Apple&rsquo;s share price and EPS. I believe the next major tailwind will be increased revenue growth and higher margins arising from the falling U.S. Dollar.</p> <p>In 2009, 46% of Apple&rsquo;s total revenue came from overseas, up from 43% in FY08 and 41% in FY07. Including European Apple retail stores, revenue generated in Europe was roughly 30% of total revenue in FY09. International markets are a key source of Apple&rsquo;s revenue and growth, and a declining dollar is beneficial for the firm. Apple&rsquo;s performance for the past several quarters was challenged by headwinds from the strengthening USD. Going forward, Apple should benefit from the dollar&rsquo;s decline. This will lift international revenue growth and boost margins. Alternatively, Apple could choose to lower prices abroad to stimulate product demand to drive volume. I believe many investors overlook the fact that Apple derives nearly half its revenue outside the U.S., thus don&rsquo;t consider the considerable impact coming from a weaker USD.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/170860-apple-weaker-dollar-will-benefit-revenue-growth-and-margins?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Current Valuation Is Still Reasonable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/155561-apple-s-current-valuation-is-still-reasonable?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">155561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><strong>Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $162.83- </strong>Despite Apple shares rising more than 100% from its 2009 low of $78, the stock still appears to be attractively valued especially as a long-term holding. Using cash-flow and non-GAAP earnings, AAPL trades at less than 15x on a trailing 12-month basis. Since sales and cash flows were likely significantly depressed over that time period due to the sharp economic contraction, demand should improve considerably in the quarters ahead. Thus, forward multiples would be even lower given the anticipated rebound in sales and earnings growth.</div><div> </div><div>The modest price multiple at which AAPL currently trades leads me to conclude that investors are: 1) Attributing the slowdown in Mac and iPod segments to a permanent secular decline, rather than temporary weakness consistent with economic contractions. 2) Ignoring / under-appreciating the growth potential of the iPhone and products yet to be introduced.</div><div><strong><br></strong></div><div><strong>Non-GAAP Earnings &amp; Cash Flow: </strong></div><div>Apple has reported $5.72 GAAP EPS for the past 4 quarters combined [ttm]. However, over the same period, Apple has earned $9.23 in non-GAAP EPS [ttm]. The non-GAAP figures are a better representation of Apple's earnings power since iPhone revenues are recognized in the period sold and not deferred over a 24 month time frame as is the case with GAAP EPS. The GAAP EPS numbers grossly understate Apple's profitability and cash-flow generation.</div><div> </div><div>Looking at the difference between GAAP revenue and non-GAAP revenue for the past 4 quarters, GAAP revenue would be $7.7B higher, or 22.3% if Apple were not required to account for iPhone sales using the subscription method. Reported EPS [ttm] would have been $3.51, or 61.4% higher as well. The most noticeable difference is the effect iPhone sales have on profit margins. Since the iPhone carries the highest margin for Apple hardware, there is a dramatic impact on gross and net margins when subscription accounting is reversed. Gross margin rises from 35.5% to 39.6%, and net margin increases from 15.0% to 19.7%.</div><div> </div><div>From June 2008 to June 2009, Apple's cash holdings increased $10.35B, from $20.77B to $31.12B. On a per share basis, cash / share increased $11.38, or 50% from $22.85/share (June 2008) to $34.24/share (June 2009). Apple generated $10.26B in free cash flow over the last 4 quarters, or $11.28/share.</div><div> </div><div>GAAP Revenue [ttm] has increased 10.9% compared to the prior trailing 4 quarters, yet non-GAAP sales increased 22.9%, more than double the rate of GAAP revenue growth. GAAP earnings growth [ttm] versus the prior 4 quarters was 10.5% ($5.72 vs. $5.12). However, non-GAAP EPS [ttm] increased 39.9% ($9.23 vs $5.55) compared to the same period for the prior year.</div><div> </div><div>It is clearly evident that the reported GAAP figures widely understates Apple's true performance. Therefore, investors should focus on the non-GAAP numbers and cash flow when evaluating Apple.</div><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_105_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_105_3.png" /></a></p><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_106_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_106_3.png" /></a></div><div><br><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_108_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_108_3.png" /></a></div><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_109.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_109_1.png" /></a></div><div> </div><div><div><strong>Valuation Metrics:</strong></div><div>Even though stock values reflect future cash flows, we can examine Apple's performance over the last 4 quarters [ttm] to use as a conservative proxy since the recessionary backdrop has most likely depressed revenue and earnings. Apple's GAAP EPS [ttm] of $5.72 translates into a historical P/E [ttm] of 28.5x. That would appear to be quite a rich valuation, especially given the multiple compression that has occurred in the overall equity market. Or, at least, imply significant future growth.</div><div> </div><div>However, investors should know that evaluating AAPL based on GAAP accounting is completely flawed. To compare apples to apples, investors must gauge Apple using its non-GAAP figures relative to peers / market. Apple uses subscription accounting methods to account for iPhone sales which spreads handset revenues over 24 months by accruing unrecognized revenue in a deferred revenue account that is stated on its balance sheet. Apple's non-GAAP EPS [ttm] is $9.23 which equates to a trailing P/E of 17.6x. That is a stark difference than the misleading GAAP P/E of 28.5x.</div><div> </div><div>Considering that Apple has $34.24/share in cash and securities that could theoretically be distributed to shareholders, Apple trades at even a lower multiple based on non-GAAP EPS ex cash. If we strip out $34.24 cash/share from AAPL's $162.83 share price, we are left with $128.59/share, which essentially reflects the value of Apple's operating assets. In addition, interest income must be stripped out of earnings before calculating a P/E multiple due to the assumption that the cash stockpile would be distributed, hence no longer contributing interest income to EPS. For the trailing 4 quarters, Apple earned 33 cents per share (after-tax) in interest income. Apple is trading 14.4x ex-cash [ttm] based non-GAAP EPS ex-interest income of $8.90.</div><div> </div><div>When there is a large disparity between interest yield (interest income/cash) and earnings yield (EPS/Price or 1/PE), the large cash balances can skew the value of the (non-cash) operating assets. When short-term rates were over 5% (pre-tax) and Apple traded at 20+ multiple, the earnings yield was roughly equivalent to the cash yield. Therefore, there was little or no difference between the standard P/E and P/E ex-cash and interest. Now that current short-term rates are near zero, Apple's cash holdings contribute very little income to total company earnings.</div><div> </div><div> </div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_110.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_110_1.png" /></a></div><div> </div><div><div>If Apple used its $31.1B for a stock buyback, it could reduce share count by 191M to 718M. Non-GAAP EPS (adjusted for interest income) would rise to $11.21 translating into a P/E [ttm]  of 14.5x.</div><div> </div><div>In the past year, Apple's cash position has increased by $10.35B or $11.38/share giving a P/CF [ttm] of 14.3x. Trailing free cash flow was slightly less at $10.26B giving a P/FCF [ttm] multiple of 14.4x. Removing the value of cash and interest income (from share price &amp; FCF), the P/FCF multiple drops to 11.7x.</div><div> </div><div>Recall that this valuation exercise has been based on historical earnings, not expected future earnings which is more appropriate since investors only care about future cash flows. However, I used trailing earnings since those figures are known while future earnings are not. I am confident that Apple's next 4 quarters will be better than its previous four. The economy has been in a deep recession for the past year, but has begun to improve. Apple has managed to withstand the downturn reasonably well; and with the success of the iPhone/App Store, along with the possibility of new products, Apple's growth should accelerate moving forward. Thus, I am reasonably confident that Apple's valuation multiples are even lower on a prospective basis.</div></div><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_111.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_111_1.png" /></a></div><div><strong><br></strong></div><div><div><strong>Price Implied Expectations:</strong></div><div>Trading for less 15x trailing earnings and ~12x expected earnings, AAPL on the surface appears cheap. Historically AAPL has traded at much higher valuations, yet expected growth was much higher too. In addition, investors are demanding a higher required rate of return on equities by paying lower price multiples. The increase in equity risk premium inherent in all stocks has led to the decline in P/E ratios. Investors perceive greater risks and are less sanguine about the long-run prospects of equity returns. This accounts for a portion of Apple's low valuation relative to its historical premium.</div><div> </div><div>The primary reason why the investors are assigning a paltry price multiple is due to expected declines in Apple's growth rate. In my opinion, the current share price reflects the expectation of Mac growth commensurate with the industry average, declining iPod growth, and iPhone growth that will peak and rapidly decline to the industry average in a couple years. In short, Apple is priced as if its growth is quickly maturing, such as Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) or <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='More opinion and analysis of DELL'>DELL</a> who both saw their margins compress as growth stalled. All firms eventually fall victim to the industry / firm life cycle. However, is this expectation likely for Apple's future? That is the key question.</div><div> </div><div>I don't believe that overly optimistic or unrealistic expectations are priced-in AAPL shares. I believe the current outlook implied by the share price is conservative, but not entirely unlikely. The future of Apple's growth hinges on innovation and new products / services, as it does for most firms. Many firms are unsuccessful at being able to continue to innovate, staying relevant and avoiding being commoditized. In short, Apple's share price doesn't give much value to its ability to innovate and reignite growth. In my opinion, it's the belief whether or not Apple can continue to introduce products that wow consumers that determines if AAPL is over or under valued.</div><div> </div><div><strong>Apple's Record of Successful Innovation and Execution:</strong></div><div> </div><div>1) iPod's Dominant Market Share-</div><div>Apple's unit market share has exceeded 70% in the U.S. for years as it has successfully continued to ward off competition leaving carcasses by the wayside. Many powerful companies such as Dell, Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>), and Microsoft have attempted dethrone the iPod, only to fall short or outright fail. Apple has been able to keep iPod prices relatively high as its revenue share of the U.S. PMP market is higher than 90%.</div><div> </div><div>2) Apple's iTunes store is largest music retailer-</div><div>iTunes surpassed Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='More opinion and analysis of BBY'>BBY</a>) and Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) to take the top spot in sales volume. Apple should increase its lead as bricks and mortar stores cutback on music selection due to high inventory cost and required floor space. Demand for physical music continues to decline as consumers shift to buying digital music online. Competitors have followed with online music download stores, yet they have made little dent in iTunes' market share.</div><div> </div><div>3) Retail stores generate highest revenue/sq.ft. and foot traffic-</div><div>It's quite indisputable that any retail strategy has been as successful as Apple's retail stores. Apple leads in performance metrics such as revenue/sq.ft. and visitors/store etc, but its retail strategy also has been extremely successful in promoting its brand and introducing customers to its products. Other computer makers' retail efforts have failed, such as Gateway and Dell. Many third-party computer and electronics resellers have also disappeared, such as CompUSA and Circuit City. It's quite evident that it's a very challenging environment to navigate. Apple continues to open new stores and is expanding considerably abroad.</div><div> </div><div>4) Turn-around of Mac business and domination of premium segment:</div><div>Mac unit sales increased 38% in FY08 and 40% in FY07, which was more than 3x the PC industry as a whole outpacing the industry in 18 of the last 19 quarters. Even though Mac unit growth has slowed to single-digits, its share of the premium price segment has exploded. According to NPD, Macs made up 91% of sales for PCs priced $1000 and above for June 2009, up from 88% in May. This compares to 66% share Mac had in Early 2008. I believe Apple had about 40% share of the premium market in 2007. It is quite evident that Apple is the only PC manufacturer than can command a premium for its products.</div><div> </div><div>5) Large and increasing share of smartphone market-</div><div>Even with the experience and industry footing incumbent mobile handset makers possessed, Apple was able to enter the market and quickly gain share. According to several surveys, the iPhone has the highest satisfaction rates by a considerable margin. Industry competition is very intense, yet Apple is the one to catch in the smartphone segment.</div><div> </div><div>6) iTunes  App Store-</div><div>One year after launching, the iTunes App Store offers 65K applications and has seen over 1.5B downloads. Other firms have followed with their own mobile app stores, yet haven't been able to duplicate nearly as  much developer and consumer interest. Nintendo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of NTDOY.PK'>NTDOY.PK</a>) mentioned last quarter that Apple's App Store is impacting its handheld gaming business.</div><div> </div><div>These remarkable achievements illustrate a common theme. Apple has been able to enter new product markets and become the leader that others must chase. Even though many competitors have attempted to duplicate Apple's strategy, most have hardly had much success, at least in terms of stealing business from Apple.</div><div> </div><div>A popular concern among Apple investors is the increasing competition from the number of firms following in Apple's footsteps. They believe that others will eventually catch up with Apple (iPhone, App Store, iTunes Music), hence its lead is only temporary. However, this has been a concern for ages and yet to come to fruition. That is not to say it won't happen, as there is a real possibility that it will eventually. But given Apple's proven track record of disrupting, dominating, and defending its new endeavors, it's likely Apple will remain the innovative leader for sometime.</div><div> </div><div>Apple's share price may reflect declining iPod growth and decelerating Mac growth, but it doesn't reflect potential new products which are a certainty. The success of those new products are less certain, but Apple makes products / services that are complementary to its others, rather natural extensions. Basically, Apple products help drive sales of other products as well as increasing switching costs creating customer &quot;lock-in.&quot;</div><div> </div><div>Apple's products elicit the some of the highest customer satisfaction scores for their respective categories which has created immense loyalty and a powerful brand.</div><div> </div><div><strong>Conclusion:</strong></div><div>On a non-GAAP basis ex-cash, Apple is trading at less than 15x trailing EPS. Considering the economy has been going through the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, Apple's trailing earnings are depressed. As the economy turns up, earnings will normalize at a higher level. In addition, iPhone sales should continue to exhibit strong growth and drive free cash flow. Therefore, investors should be highly confident that future earnings will be considerably higher.</div><div> </div><div>On a forward earnings basis, AAPL's price multiple is 10-12x, a valuation representative of maturing growth. However, Apple has a long track record of innovation and using products to promote and attract consumers to its other offerings. Looking at the many remarkable achievements by Apple and the many stumbles by competitors, it can be argued that AAPL deserves a premium multiple, not a multiple reflective of ordinary growth.</div><div> </div><div><em><strong>Disclosure: Long AAPL</strong></em></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:51:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><div><strong>Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $162.83- </strong>Despite Apple shares rising more than 100% from its 2009 low of $78, the stock still appears to be attractively valued especially as a long-term holding. Using cash-flow and non-GAAP earnings, AAPL trades at less than 15x on a trailing 12-month basis. Since sales and cash flows were likely significantly depressed over that time period due to the sharp economic contraction, demand should improve considerably in the quarters ahead. Thus, forward multiples would be even lower given the anticipated rebound in sales and earnings growth.</div><div> </div><div>The modest price multiple at which AAPL currently trades leads me to conclude that investors are: 1) Attributing the slowdown in Mac and iPod segments to a permanent secular decline, rather than temporary weakness consistent with economic contractions. 2) Ignoring / under-appreciating the growth potential of the iPhone and products yet to be introduced.</div><div><strong><br></strong></div><div><strong>Non-GAAP Earnings &amp; Cash Flow: </strong></div><div>Apple has reported $5.72 GAAP EPS for the past 4 quarters combined [ttm]. However, over the same period, Apple has earned $9.23 in non-GAAP EPS [ttm]. The non-GAAP figures are a better representation of Apple's earnings power since iPhone revenues are recognized in the period sold and not deferred over a 24 month time frame as is the case with GAAP EPS. The GAAP EPS numbers grossly understate Apple's profitability and cash-flow generation.</div><div> </div><div>Looking at the difference between GAAP revenue and non-GAAP revenue for the past 4 quarters, GAAP revenue would be $7.7B higher, or 22.3% if Apple were not required to account for iPhone sales using the subscription method. Reported EPS [ttm] would have been $3.51, or 61.4% higher as well. The most noticeable difference is the effect iPhone sales have on profit margins. Since the iPhone carries the highest margin for Apple hardware, there is a dramatic impact on gross and net margins when subscription accounting is reversed. Gross margin rises from 35.5% to 39.6%, and net margin increases from 15.0% to 19.7%.</div><div> </div><div>From June 2008 to June 2009, Apple's cash holdings increased $10.35B, from $20.77B to $31.12B. On a per share basis, cash / share increased $11.38, or 50% from $22.85/share (June 2008) to $34.24/share (June 2009). Apple generated $10.26B in free cash flow over the last 4 quarters, or $11.28/share.</div><div> </div><div>GAAP Revenue [ttm] has increased 10.9% compared to the prior trailing 4 quarters, yet non-GAAP sales increased 22.9%, more than double the rate of GAAP revenue growth. GAAP earnings growth [ttm] versus the prior 4 quarters was 10.5% ($5.72 vs. $5.12). However, non-GAAP EPS [ttm] increased 39.9% ($9.23 vs $5.55) compared to the same period for the prior year.</div><div> </div><div>It is clearly evident that the reported GAAP figures widely understates Apple's true performance. Therefore, investors should focus on the non-GAAP numbers and cash flow when evaluating Apple.</div><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_105_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_105_3.png" /></a></p><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_106_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_106_3.png" /></a></div><div><br><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_108_2.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_108_3.png" /></a></div><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_109.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_109_1.png" /></a></div><div> </div><div><div><strong>Valuation Metrics:</strong></div><div>Even though stock values reflect future cash flows, we can examine Apple's performance over the last 4 quarters [ttm] to use as a conservative proxy since the recessionary backdrop has most likely depressed revenue and earnings. Apple's GAAP EPS [ttm] of $5.72 translates into a historical P/E [ttm] of 28.5x. That would appear to be quite a rich valuation, especially given the multiple compression that has occurred in the overall equity market. Or, at least, imply significant future growth.</div><div> </div><div>However, investors should know that evaluating AAPL based on GAAP accounting is completely flawed. To compare apples to apples, investors must gauge Apple using its non-GAAP figures relative to peers / market. Apple uses subscription accounting methods to account for iPhone sales which spreads handset revenues over 24 months by accruing unrecognized revenue in a deferred revenue account that is stated on its balance sheet. Apple's non-GAAP EPS [ttm] is $9.23 which equates to a trailing P/E of 17.6x. That is a stark difference than the misleading GAAP P/E of 28.5x.</div><div> </div><div>Considering that Apple has $34.24/share in cash and securities that could theoretically be distributed to shareholders, Apple trades at even a lower multiple based on non-GAAP EPS ex cash. If we strip out $34.24 cash/share from AAPL's $162.83 share price, we are left with $128.59/share, which essentially reflects the value of Apple's operating assets. In addition, interest income must be stripped out of earnings before calculating a P/E multiple due to the assumption that the cash stockpile would be distributed, hence no longer contributing interest income to EPS. For the trailing 4 quarters, Apple earned 33 cents per share (after-tax) in interest income. Apple is trading 14.4x ex-cash [ttm] based non-GAAP EPS ex-interest income of $8.90.</div><div> </div><div>When there is a large disparity between interest yield (interest income/cash) and earnings yield (EPS/Price or 1/PE), the large cash balances can skew the value of the (non-cash) operating assets. When short-term rates were over 5% (pre-tax) and Apple traded at 20+ multiple, the earnings yield was roughly equivalent to the cash yield. Therefore, there was little or no difference between the standard P/E and P/E ex-cash and interest. Now that current short-term rates are near zero, Apple's cash holdings contribute very little income to total company earnings.</div><div> </div><div> </div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_110.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_110_1.png" /></a></div><div> </div><div><div>If Apple used its $31.1B for a stock buyback, it could reduce share count by 191M to 718M. Non-GAAP EPS (adjusted for interest income) would rise to $11.21 translating into a P/E [ttm]  of 14.5x.</div><div> </div><div>In the past year, Apple's cash position has increased by $10.35B or $11.38/share giving a P/CF [ttm] of 14.3x. Trailing free cash flow was slightly less at $10.26B giving a P/FCF [ttm] multiple of 14.4x. Removing the value of cash and interest income (from share price &amp; FCF), the P/FCF multiple drops to 11.7x.</div><div> </div><div>Recall that this valuation exercise has been based on historical earnings, not expected future earnings which is more appropriate since investors only care about future cash flows. However, I used trailing earnings since those figures are known while future earnings are not. I am confident that Apple's next 4 quarters will be better than its previous four. The economy has been in a deep recession for the past year, but has begun to improve. Apple has managed to withstand the downturn reasonably well; and with the success of the iPhone/App Store, along with the possibility of new products, Apple's growth should accelerate moving forward. Thus, I am reasonably confident that Apple's valuation multiples are even lower on a prospective basis.</div></div><div><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_111.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/8/12/saupload_picture_111_1.png" /></a></div><div><strong><br></strong></div><div><div><strong>Price Implied Expectations:</strong></div><div>Trading for less 15x trailing earnings and ~12x expected earnings, AAPL on the surface appears cheap. Historically AAPL has traded at much higher valuations, yet expected growth was much higher too. In addition, investors are demanding a higher required rate of return on equities by paying lower price multiples. The increase in equity risk premium inherent in all stocks has led to the decline in P/E ratios. Investors perceive greater risks and are less sanguine about the long-run prospects of equity returns. This accounts for a portion of Apple's low valuation relative to its historical premium.</div><div> </div><div>The primary reason why the investors are assigning a paltry price multiple is due to expected declines in Apple's growth rate. In my opinion, the current share price reflects the expectation of Mac growth commensurate with the industry average, declining iPod growth, and iPhone growth that will peak and rapidly decline to the industry average in a couple years. In short, Apple is priced as if its growth is quickly maturing, such as Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) or <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='More opinion and analysis of DELL'>DELL</a> who both saw their margins compress as growth stalled. All firms eventually fall victim to the industry / firm life cycle. However, is this expectation likely for Apple's future? That is the key question.</div><div> </div><div>I don't believe that overly optimistic or unrealistic expectations are priced-in AAPL shares. I believe the current outlook implied by the share price is conservative, but not entirely unlikely. The future of Apple's growth hinges on innovation and new products / services, as it does for most firms. Many firms are unsuccessful at being able to continue to innovate, staying relevant and avoiding being commoditized. In short, Apple's share price doesn't give much value to its ability to innovate and reignite growth. In my opinion, it's the belief whether or not Apple can continue to introduce products that wow consumers that determines if AAPL is over or under valued.</div><div> </div><div><strong>Apple's Record of Successful Innovation and Execution:</strong></div><div> </div><div>1) iPod's Dominant Market Share-</div><div>Apple's unit market share has exceeded 70% in the U.S. for years as it has successfully continued to ward off competition leaving carcasses by the wayside. Many powerful companies such as Dell, Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>), and Microsoft have attempted dethrone the iPod, only to fall short or outright fail. Apple has been able to keep iPod prices relatively high as its revenue share of the U.S. PMP market is higher than 90%.</div><div> </div><div>2) Apple's iTunes store is largest music retailer-</div><div>iTunes surpassed Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='More opinion and analysis of BBY'>BBY</a>) and Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) to take the top spot in sales volume. Apple should increase its lead as bricks and mortar stores cutback on music selection due to high inventory cost and required floor space. Demand for physical music continues to decline as consumers shift to buying digital music online. Competitors have followed with online music download stores, yet they have made little dent in iTunes' market share.</div><div> </div><div>3) Retail stores generate highest revenue/sq.ft. and foot traffic-</div><div>It's quite indisputable that any retail strategy has been as successful as Apple's retail stores. Apple leads in performance metrics such as revenue/sq.ft. and visitors/store etc, but its retail strategy also has been extremely successful in promoting its brand and introducing customers to its products. Other computer makers' retail efforts have failed, such as Gateway and Dell. Many third-party computer and electronics resellers have also disappeared, such as CompUSA and Circuit City. It's quite evident that it's a very challenging environment to navigate. Apple continues to open new stores and is expanding considerably abroad.</div><div> </div><div>4) Turn-around of Mac business and domination of premium segment:</div><div>Mac unit sales increased 38% in FY08 and 40% in FY07, which was more than 3x the PC industry as a whole outpacing the industry in 18 of the last 19 quarters. Even though Mac unit growth has slowed to single-digits, its share of the premium price segment has exploded. According to NPD, Macs made up 91% of sales for PCs priced $1000 and above for June 2009, up from 88% in May. This compares to 66% share Mac had in Early 2008. I believe Apple had about 40% share of the premium market in 2007. It is quite evident that Apple is the only PC manufacturer than can command a premium for its products.</div><div> </div><div>5) Large and increasing share of smartphone market-</div><div>Even with the experience and industry footing incumbent mobile handset makers possessed, Apple was able to enter the market and quickly gain share. According to several surveys, the iPhone has the highest satisfaction rates by a considerable margin. Industry competition is very intense, yet Apple is the one to catch in the smartphone segment.</div><div> </div><div>6) iTunes  App Store-</div><div>One year after launching, the iTunes App Store offers 65K applications and has seen over 1.5B downloads. Other firms have followed with their own mobile app stores, yet haven't been able to duplicate nearly as  much developer and consumer interest. Nintendo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntdoy.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of NTDOY.PK'>NTDOY.PK</a>) mentioned last quarter that Apple's App Store is impacting its handheld gaming business.</div><div> </div><div>These remarkable achievements illustrate a common theme. Apple has been able to enter new product markets and become the leader that others must chase. Even though many competitors have attempted to duplicate Apple's strategy, most have hardly had much success, at least in terms of stealing business from Apple.</div><div> </div><div>A popular concern among Apple investors is the increasing competition from the number of firms following in Apple's footsteps. They believe that others will eventually catch up with Apple (iPhone, App Store, iTunes Music), hence its lead is only temporary. However, this has been a concern for ages and yet to come to fruition. That is not to say it won't happen, as there is a real possibility that it will eventually. But given Apple's proven track record of disrupting, dominating, and defending its new endeavors, it's likely Apple will remain the innovative leader for sometime.</div><div> </div><div>Apple's share price may reflect declining iPod growth and decelerating Mac growth, but it doesn't reflect potential new products which are a certainty. The success of those new products are less certain, but Apple makes products / services that are complementary to its others, rather natural extensions. Basically, Apple products help drive sales of other products as well as increasing switching costs creating customer &quot;lock-in.&quot;</div><div> </div><div>Apple's products elicit the some of the highest customer satisfaction scores for their respective categories which has created immense loyalty and a powerful brand.</div><div> </div><div><strong>Conclusion:</strong></div><div>On a non-GAAP basis ex-cash, Apple is trading at less than 15x trailing EPS. Considering the economy has been going through the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, Apple's trailing earnings are depressed. As the economy turns up, earnings will normalize at a higher level. In addition, iPhone sales should continue to exhibit strong growth and drive free cash flow. Therefore, investors should be highly confident that future earnings will be considerably higher.</div><div> </div><div>On a forward earnings basis, AAPL's price multiple is 10-12x, a valuation representative of maturing growth. However, Apple has a long track record of innovation and using products to promote and attract consumers to its other offerings. Looking at the many remarkable achievements by Apple and the many stumbles by competitors, it can be argued that AAPL deserves a premium multiple, not a multiple reflective of ordinary growth.</div><div> </div><div><em><strong>Disclosure: Long AAPL</strong></em></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/155561-apple-s-current-valuation-is-still-reasonable?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple iPhone's Substantial Impact on Gross Margin</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/152059-apple-iphone-s-substantial-impact-on-gross-margin?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">152059</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><b>Margins held steady Q/Q at 36.3% (down 10 bps) versus expectation of ~200 bps of margin contraction due to mounting headwinds.</b></div><div> </div><div><b>Management issued Q4 GM guidance of 34%, 100 bps higher than Q3 33% GM guidance (which AAPL exceeded by 330 bps).</b></div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Considering the number of challenging cost environment Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) Q3 performance and Q4 GM guidance are huge positives.</div><div> </div><div>(1) Apple was able to maintain gross margins for Q3 and (2) According to Apple's guidance, I expect GM to hold in Q4.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>The past two quarters have seen a significant lift in gross margins compared to the 3 periods prior (3Q08-1Q09) in which GM held steady at 34.7%. The rise in GM has be a major factor in the near doubling of the stock price since the January low. In the 2nd half of FY08, management started a chorus that it expects 30% GM for FY09. Even when GM turned out to be healthy for Q1 &amp; Q2, Apple maintained its 30% GM outlook. This had many analysts and investors worried.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Last October, I reported <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/10/apples-fy09-margin-expectations-too-low.html">Apple's FY09 Gross Margin Expectations Too Low</a> arguing that GM for FY09 will come in way above the 30% guidance. In January, I wrote <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2009/01/apples-fy09-eps-estimate-too-low.html">Apple's FY09 EPS Estimate Too Low</a> stating that the forecasted decline in FY09 EPS by analysts wasn't not going to happen and that earnings should increase by at least 5-10% versus FY08. (For the 3 quarters already reported for FY09, EPS is up ~8% versus the same 3 quarters for FY08.) The main thesis was gross margins would come in significantly above expectations mostly due to high margin iPhone revenue becoming a larger share of total sales.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div><div><b> 1) Mitigated numerous factors pressuring margins. </b></div><ul><li>Transitioned entire notebook line.</li><li>Cut prices across entire notebook line and / or added increased performance.</li><li>Back to School promotion (Mac discounts plus free 8GB iPod touch).</li><li>Revenue mix shifted towards lower margin Macs from weak business spending affecting the Mac Pro line.</li><li>Component prices increased, coupled with higher commodity and energy prices.</li></ul><div> </div><div> </div><div>Apple repositioned its entire notebook line, cutting prices significantly on Macbook air, and on 15&quot; and 17&quot; inch Macbook Pros. Apple also introduced 13&quot; Macbook pros in place of the older aluminum body Macbooks. Macbook prices were cut anywhere from $100-$300. In addition, Apple kicked off its &quot;Back to School&quot; program that offers discounts on Macs plus a free iPod touch valued at $229. As a result, coupled with weak business spending, revenue was skewed towards the lower-margin models.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div><b>2) Guidance of 34% translates into GM likely coming in the 36%-38% range.</b></div><ul><li>Past 4 quarters GM has exceeded guidance by an average of 370 basis points.</li><li>GM guidance has increased sequentially 3 quarters in a row. (2Q-32.5%, 3Q-33%, 4Q-34%)</li></ul><div> </div><div>Apple has routinely sandbagged on GM guidance by an average of 350 bps over the past 11 periods, and 370 bps for the last 4 quarters. In addition, over the past 10 quarters, when Apple has raised guidance sequentially, GM either rose or remained flat sequentially except for one instance. The scatter plot of change in guidance on x-axis versus change in actual GM on y-axis demonstrates managements accuracy in forecasting GM at least with respect to direction. Therefore, we can expect GM will be up or at least flat in Q4 even in light of the challenging headwinds.</div><div><em><br></em></div><div><em>Click to enlarge</em><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_96.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_96_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 53px;" /></a></div><div> </div></div><p><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_97.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_97_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 280px;" /></a><br><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_98.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_98_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 303px;" /></a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:36:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><div><b>Margins held steady Q/Q at 36.3% (down 10 bps) versus expectation of ~200 bps of margin contraction due to mounting headwinds.</b></div><div> </div><div><b>Management issued Q4 GM guidance of 34%, 100 bps higher than Q3 33% GM guidance (which AAPL exceeded by 330 bps).</b></div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Considering the number of challenging cost environment Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) Q3 performance and Q4 GM guidance are huge positives.</div><div> </div><div>(1) Apple was able to maintain gross margins for Q3 and (2) According to Apple's guidance, I expect GM to hold in Q4.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>The past two quarters have seen a significant lift in gross margins compared to the 3 periods prior (3Q08-1Q09) in which GM held steady at 34.7%. The rise in GM has be a major factor in the near doubling of the stock price since the January low. In the 2nd half of FY08, management started a chorus that it expects 30% GM for FY09. Even when GM turned out to be healthy for Q1 &amp; Q2, Apple maintained its 30% GM outlook. This had many analysts and investors worried.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Last October, I reported <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/10/apples-fy09-margin-expectations-too-low.html">Apple's FY09 Gross Margin Expectations Too Low</a> arguing that GM for FY09 will come in way above the 30% guidance. In January, I wrote <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2009/01/apples-fy09-eps-estimate-too-low.html">Apple's FY09 EPS Estimate Too Low</a> stating that the forecasted decline in FY09 EPS by analysts wasn't not going to happen and that earnings should increase by at least 5-10% versus FY08. (For the 3 quarters already reported for FY09, EPS is up ~8% versus the same 3 quarters for FY08.) The main thesis was gross margins would come in significantly above expectations mostly due to high margin iPhone revenue becoming a larger share of total sales.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div><div><b> 1) Mitigated numerous factors pressuring margins. </b></div><ul><li>Transitioned entire notebook line.</li><li>Cut prices across entire notebook line and / or added increased performance.</li><li>Back to School promotion (Mac discounts plus free 8GB iPod touch).</li><li>Revenue mix shifted towards lower margin Macs from weak business spending affecting the Mac Pro line.</li><li>Component prices increased, coupled with higher commodity and energy prices.</li></ul><div> </div><div> </div><div>Apple repositioned its entire notebook line, cutting prices significantly on Macbook air, and on 15&quot; and 17&quot; inch Macbook Pros. Apple also introduced 13&quot; Macbook pros in place of the older aluminum body Macbooks. Macbook prices were cut anywhere from $100-$300. In addition, Apple kicked off its &quot;Back to School&quot; program that offers discounts on Macs plus a free iPod touch valued at $229. As a result, coupled with weak business spending, revenue was skewed towards the lower-margin models.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div><b>2) Guidance of 34% translates into GM likely coming in the 36%-38% range.</b></div><ul><li>Past 4 quarters GM has exceeded guidance by an average of 370 basis points.</li><li>GM guidance has increased sequentially 3 quarters in a row. (2Q-32.5%, 3Q-33%, 4Q-34%)</li></ul><div> </div><div>Apple has routinely sandbagged on GM guidance by an average of 350 bps over the past 11 periods, and 370 bps for the last 4 quarters. In addition, over the past 10 quarters, when Apple has raised guidance sequentially, GM either rose or remained flat sequentially except for one instance. The scatter plot of change in guidance on x-axis versus change in actual GM on y-axis demonstrates managements accuracy in forecasting GM at least with respect to direction. Therefore, we can expect GM will be up or at least flat in Q4 even in light of the challenging headwinds.</div><div><em><br></em></div><div><em>Click to enlarge</em><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_96.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_96_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 53px;" /></a></div><div> </div></div><p><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_97.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_97_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 280px;" /></a><br><br><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_98.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/7/29/saupload_picture_98_1.png" style="width: 400px; height: 303px;" /></a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/152059-apple-iphone-s-substantial-impact-on-gross-margin?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Is a Low Cost iPhone in the Works?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/124452-apple-is-a-low-cost-iphone-in-the-works?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">124452</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><b>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</b>. For some time, many have speculated about an arrival of a $99 iPhone. Some analysts expect a low-cost model with scaled back features, such as 2.5G instead of 3G, no GPS, and possibly a smaller form factor. While I believe a lower iPhone price point is possible, I don&rsquo;t expect Apple to go backwards by removing features that reduce device functionality to achieve a lower-cost offering. The price of the handset is much less significant than the lifetime cost of the required $30/month data plan. Therefore, crippling device functionality to lower handset price makes no sense when the primary cost component is the data plan.</p><div>I believe if Apple were to pursue reducing the price of the iPhone to the consumer, it should first explore offering alternative pricing that doesn&rsquo;t necessarily lower selling price and margins. Offering cheaper data plans that coincide with less usage would allow consumers to be able to pay according to usage, rather than being required to pay for unlimited when their usage is actually quite limited. Carriers would apply less subsidy and charge more for the handset, yet consumers would still save over the life of the contract. Carriers would still benefit from increased demand even though ARPU may not be quite as high. Carriers could capture the iPod touch demand that arises from those who wish to avoid the required data plan.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:46:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><b>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</b>. For some time, many have speculated about an arrival of a $99 iPhone. Some analysts expect a low-cost model with scaled back features, such as 2.5G instead of 3G, no GPS, and possibly a smaller form factor. While I believe a lower iPhone price point is possible, I don&rsquo;t expect Apple to go backwards by removing features that reduce device functionality to achieve a lower-cost offering. The price of the handset is much less significant than the lifetime cost of the required $30/month data plan. Therefore, crippling device functionality to lower handset price makes no sense when the primary cost component is the data plan.</p><div>I believe if Apple were to pursue reducing the price of the iPhone to the consumer, it should first explore offering alternative pricing that doesn&rsquo;t necessarily lower selling price and margins. Offering cheaper data plans that coincide with less usage would allow consumers to be able to pay according to usage, rather than being required to pay for unlimited when their usage is actually quite limited. Carriers would apply less subsidy and charge more for the handset, yet consumers would still save over the life of the contract. Carriers would still benefit from increased demand even though ARPU may not be quite as high. Carriers could capture the iPod touch demand that arises from those who wish to avoid the required data plan.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/124452-apple-is-a-low-cost-iphone-in-the-works?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snapshot: Apple's Cash Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/122050-snapshot-apple-s-cash-growth?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">122050</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $91.21</span>- Here's a quick snapshot of Apple's cash holdings over the past 9 quarters. In the case of Apple, it's extremely important to focus on cash flow opposed to accounting [GAAP] income due to the massive build of deferred revenue on its balance sheet. Total deferred revenue is $9.7B, $7.3B of which is iPhone related.</p><p>Accounting EPS is often a poor gauge of a firm's actual earning power due to the many ways to legally (and illegally) inflate, obscure, or mislead actual performance. However, all one needs to do is follow the cash. The concept of investing is inserting cash into a vehicle that will return a larger cash amount back in the future. Cash flow, not earnings, best reflects a firm's investment prospects.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:37:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $91.21</span>- Here's a quick snapshot of Apple's cash holdings over the past 9 quarters. In the case of Apple, it's extremely important to focus on cash flow opposed to accounting [GAAP] income due to the massive build of deferred revenue on its balance sheet. Total deferred revenue is $9.7B, $7.3B of which is iPhone related.</p><p>Accounting EPS is often a poor gauge of a firm's actual earning power due to the many ways to legally (and illegally) inflate, obscure, or mislead actual performance. However, all one needs to do is follow the cash. The concept of investing is inserting cash into a vehicle that will return a larger cash amount back in the future. Cash flow, not earnings, best reflects a firm's investment prospects.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/122050-snapshot-apple-s-cash-growth?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authentidate: Investors Unaware of Stock's Significant Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/119030-authentidate-investors-unaware-of-stock-s-significant-opportunity?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">119030</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Authentidate Holding Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adat' title='More opinion and analysis of ADAT'>ADAT</a>) $0.27</span>- Authentidate is attractively positioned to benefit from the expected flood of spending aimed at modernizing healthcare IT. Remote patient monitoring, also known as telehealth, is one area where Authentidate stands to capitalize due to its unique and superior product solution. Patient home monitoring is expected to be a $12 billion industry by 2012.</p><p>ADAT will earn $120M in revenue if it achieves just 1% penetration. This compares to $6M in revenue Authentidate earned last fiscal year. There are a decent number of patient monitoring devices deployed currently, yet very few have actual &ldquo;telemedicine&rdquo; functionality, whereby a patient&rsquo;s vitals are electronically transmitted to the healthcare provider coupled with any patient instructions subsequently relayed back to the patient. According to an InMedica study, there were less than 1 million telehealth subscribers in 2008, yet that number is expected to climb to over 55 million by 2016.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:55:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span>Authentidate Holding Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adat' title='More opinion and analysis of ADAT'>ADAT</a>) $0.27</span>- Authentidate is attractively positioned to benefit from the expected flood of spending aimed at modernizing healthcare IT. Remote patient monitoring, also known as telehealth, is one area where Authentidate stands to capitalize due to its unique and superior product solution. Patient home monitoring is expected to be a $12 billion industry by 2012.</p><p>ADAT will earn $120M in revenue if it achieves just 1% penetration. This compares to $6M in revenue Authentidate earned last fiscal year. There are a decent number of patient monitoring devices deployed currently, yet very few have actual &ldquo;telemedicine&rdquo; functionality, whereby a patient&rsquo;s vitals are electronically transmitted to the healthcare provider coupled with any patient instructions subsequently relayed back to the patient. According to an InMedica study, there were less than 1 million telehealth subscribers in 2008, yet that number is expected to climb to over 55 million by 2016.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/119030-authentidate-investors-unaware-of-stock-s-significant-opportunity?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adat">ADAT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's FY09 EPS Estimate Is Too Low</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114134-apple-s-fy09-eps-estimate-is-too-low?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114134</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span>- Apple&rsquo;s FY09 EPS estimate continues to be revised downward and now stands at $5.08, a level Apple should easily exceed. The consensus FY09 estimate represents a 5.2% decline from FY08 $5.36 EPS, although revenues are forecasted to increase 11.8%, or $3.8B to $36.3B. Thus, analysts are expecting significant margin compression. Specifically, the consensus estimates for EPS and revenue imply net margin will be 12.8% in FY09, a decline of 2.1% from 14.9% recorded in FY08.<br><br>It&rsquo;s not that I don&rsquo;t believe the recession will take a major toll on Apple, it will. Instead of achieving 35%-40% earnings growth likely to occur in a normal economy, Apple&rsquo;s EPS should increase at least 5%-10% in FY09. Due to deferred revenue recognition and upward margin pressure, it&rsquo;s very unlikely Apple&rsquo;s earnings will decline, certainly not to the 20%-30% magnitude some analysts predict.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:13:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span>- Apple&rsquo;s FY09 EPS estimate continues to be revised downward and now stands at $5.08, a level Apple should easily exceed. The consensus FY09 estimate represents a 5.2% decline from FY08 $5.36 EPS, although revenues are forecasted to increase 11.8%, or $3.8B to $36.3B. Thus, analysts are expecting significant margin compression. Specifically, the consensus estimates for EPS and revenue imply net margin will be 12.8% in FY09, a decline of 2.1% from 14.9% recorded in FY08.<br><br>It&rsquo;s not that I don&rsquo;t believe the recession will take a major toll on Apple, it will. Instead of achieving 35%-40% earnings growth likely to occur in a normal economy, Apple&rsquo;s EPS should increase at least 5%-10% in FY09. Due to deferred revenue recognition and upward margin pressure, it&rsquo;s very unlikely Apple&rsquo;s earnings will decline, certainly not to the 20%-30% magnitude some analysts predict.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114134-apple-s-fy09-eps-estimate-is-too-low?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recession Presents Challenge to Apple's Mac That Competes on Features, Not Price </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/111759-recession-presents-challenge-to-apple-s-mac-that-competes-on-features-not-price?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">111759</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>MAC DEMAND CONCERNS:</span><br> For the past couple months, Wall Street&rsquo;s concern du-jour for Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) has been Mac demand. No PC / consumer electronics firm is immune to this economic downturn, but many analysts believe there is substantial downside risk for Mac sales.</p> <p>Analysts claim the contracting economy is causing changes to the complexion of industry demand that could have further negative implications for the Mac segment. Specifically, the slowdown in consumer spending will cause industry demand to contract, and within the computer industry, demand will shift away from Mac to lower-priced PCs.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:17:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span>MAC DEMAND CONCERNS:</span><br> For the past couple months, Wall Street&rsquo;s concern du-jour for Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) has been Mac demand. No PC / consumer electronics firm is immune to this economic downturn, but many analysts believe there is substantial downside risk for Mac sales.</p> <p>Analysts claim the contracting economy is causing changes to the complexion of industry demand that could have further negative implications for the Mac segment. Specifically, the slowdown in consumer spending will cause industry demand to contract, and within the computer industry, demand will shift away from Mac to lower-priced PCs.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/111759-recession-presents-challenge-to-apple-s-mac-that-competes-on-features-not-price?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Calculating Q4 Gross Margin for the iPhone</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/108240-apple-calculating-q4-gross-margin-for-the-iphone?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">108240</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>APPLE INC (Nasdaq:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) </span>According to my calculations, deferred revenue booked from Q4 iPhone sales carries a 55.5% gross margin. Gross margin on the deferred revenue [DR] booked from the first generation model averages about 29%. The average gross margin for total booked DR is 47.8%.<br><br>I derived this number from the &ldquo;deferred expense under subscription accounting&ldquo; that Apple disclosed in its annual filing (10-K) in conjunction with the deferred revenue (under subscription accounting) also reported. I used some rather extensive math to come up with the 55.5% number which I discuss below.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:16:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span>APPLE INC (Nasdaq:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) </span>According to my calculations, deferred revenue booked from Q4 iPhone sales carries a 55.5% gross margin. Gross margin on the deferred revenue [DR] booked from the first generation model averages about 29%. The average gross margin for total booked DR is 47.8%.<br><br>I derived this number from the &ldquo;deferred expense under subscription accounting&ldquo; that Apple disclosed in its annual filing (10-K) in conjunction with the deferred revenue (under subscription accounting) also reported. I used some rather extensive math to come up with the 55.5% number which I discuss below.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/108240-apple-calculating-q4-gross-margin-for-the-iphone?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analyzing Apple's iPod Business</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/104872-analyzing-apple-s-ipod-business?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">104872</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Slowing iPod sales growth has been one of the chief concerns among Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) investors because the iPod has historically been a major contributor to Apple&rsquo;s overall revenue growth. The concern stems from the belief that the PMP market is becoming saturated.</p> <p>With 175 million iPod units sold, finding new customers is becoming more difficult. However, the iPod is becoming less of a revenue contributor, hence Apple is less dependent on the iPod for its sales growth. <a href="http://bullcross.blogspot.com/">Andy Zaky</a>, a highly accurate AAPL analyst <a href="http://bullcross.blogspot.com/2008/10/ipod-sale-made-up-only-142-of-apples.html">addressed the iPod&rsquo;s shrinking importance</a> with regards to Apple&rsquo;s corporate revenues. In addition, If Apple reported iPhone sales as part of the iPod segment, this wouldn&rsquo;t be much of a concern, because the iPhone would have reaccelerated sales growth in the iPod segment. I recently <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/11/taking-alternative-perspective-on-apple.html">discussed that scenario</a>. Yet, Apple reports the iPhone separately. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the traditional iPod product line and its growth outlook.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:12:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p>Slowing iPod sales growth has been one of the chief concerns among Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) investors because the iPod has historically been a major contributor to Apple&rsquo;s overall revenue growth. The concern stems from the belief that the PMP market is becoming saturated.</p> <p>With 175 million iPod units sold, finding new customers is becoming more difficult. However, the iPod is becoming less of a revenue contributor, hence Apple is less dependent on the iPod for its sales growth. <a href="http://bullcross.blogspot.com/">Andy Zaky</a>, a highly accurate AAPL analyst <a href="http://bullcross.blogspot.com/2008/10/ipod-sale-made-up-only-142-of-apples.html">addressed the iPod&rsquo;s shrinking importance</a> with regards to Apple&rsquo;s corporate revenues. In addition, If Apple reported iPhone sales as part of the iPod segment, this wouldn&rsquo;t be much of a concern, because the iPhone would have reaccelerated sales growth in the iPod segment. I recently <a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/11/taking-alternative-perspective-on-apple.html">discussed that scenario</a>. Yet, Apple reports the iPhone separately. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the traditional iPod product line and its growth outlook.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/104872-analyzing-apple-s-ipod-business?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Alternative Perspective on Apple's iPod Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/103841-an-alternative-perspective-on-apple-s-ipod-growth?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">103841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="Apple-style-span">Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span> analysts and the media have regularly cited slowing iPod sales as a major headwind for Apple shares. The iPod has been a major force in Apple&rsquo;s total sales growth since it has been such a large percentage of Apple&rsquo;s overall revenue. A common claim is that the iPod has been so successful, that everyone has one.</p> <p>A seemingly positive statement, some choose to take a negative point of view. For example, &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not good for future growth because Apple is running out of new people to sell iPods to. Basically everyone who wants an iPod, already has one. While there will be sales resulting from the replacement cycle, it certainly won&rsquo;t generate the magnitude of growth exhibited in the past. Therefore, iPod sales will significantly deteriorate.&rdquo;</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:37:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="Apple-style-span">Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span> analysts and the media have regularly cited slowing iPod sales as a major headwind for Apple shares. The iPod has been a major force in Apple&rsquo;s total sales growth since it has been such a large percentage of Apple&rsquo;s overall revenue. A common claim is that the iPod has been so successful, that everyone has one.</p> <p>A seemingly positive statement, some choose to take a negative point of view. For example, &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not good for future growth because Apple is running out of new people to sell iPods to. Basically everyone who wants an iPod, already has one. While there will be sales resulting from the replacement cycle, it certainly won&rsquo;t generate the magnitude of growth exhibited in the past. Therefore, iPod sales will significantly deteriorate.&rdquo;</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/103841-an-alternative-perspective-on-apple-s-ipod-growth?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's FY09 Gross Margin Expectations Are Too Low</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/102550-apple-s-fy09-gross-margin-expectations-are-too-low?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">102550</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Apple Inc.'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span> FY09 gross margin should well-exceed management&rsquo;s guidance of 30%. There are multiple factors that will support FY09 gross margins. 1) As iPhone&rsquo;s revenue contribution to total company sales increases, overall gross margins will rise since the iPhone carries a very high GM. 2) There will be a more favorable component price environment created by plunging commodity and energy prices. 3) As production volume rises for the iPhone and MacBooks, scale effects and cost efficiencies will benefit drive down product costs. 4) Higher revenues supply leverage by spreading fixed costs across a higher revenue base.<br /><br />Apple&rsquo;s guidance is way too conservative; yet considering the economic landscape, management is exercising prudence. This cushion should help Apple exceed earnings expectations even if the economy adversely affects its business. With gross margin expectations so low, Apple&rsquo;s revenue growth could turn out worse than expected and still match/beat EPS estimates. Alternatively, Apple could use the gross margin cushion for lowering prices to boost demand if warranted. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:03:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Apple Inc.'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span> FY09 gross margin should well-exceed management&rsquo;s guidance of 30%. There are multiple factors that will support FY09 gross margins. 1) As iPhone&rsquo;s revenue contribution to total company sales increases, overall gross margins will rise since the iPhone carries a very high GM. 2) There will be a more favorable component price environment created by plunging commodity and energy prices. 3) As production volume rises for the iPhone and MacBooks, scale effects and cost efficiencies will benefit drive down product costs. 4) Higher revenues supply leverage by spreading fixed costs across a higher revenue base.<br /><br />Apple&rsquo;s guidance is way too conservative; yet considering the economic landscape, management is exercising prudence. This cushion should help Apple exceed earnings expectations even if the economy adversely affects its business. With gross margin expectations so low, Apple&rsquo;s revenue growth could turn out worse than expected and still match/beat EPS estimates. Alternatively, Apple could use the gross margin cushion for lowering prices to boost demand if warranted. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/102550-apple-s-fy09-gross-margin-expectations-are-too-low?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iPhone Sales Drastically Surpass Q4 Consensus; Apple Reaches 10m Goal </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/98619-iphone-sales-drastically-surpass-q4-consensus-apple-reaches-10m-goal?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98619</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span xmlns="" /></p><p><i><b>This article was co-authored by Seeking Alpha contributor </b></i><b><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/10/apple-to-surpass-its-iphone-sales-goal.html"><i>Turley Muller.</i></a></b></p><p><span xmlns="">Based on the <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=69155">tremendous joint efforts by members at Mac Observer's AFB</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;and <a href="http://www1.investorvillage.com/viewprofile.asp?m=0C3AD3E58421858D">Investor Village's AAPL Sanity Board member howlongtoretire</a> (aka HLTR)&nbsp;to track <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pUwZATIrXuTeCVdJHkQY1Zg">IMEI iPhone numbers</a>, we have determined that Apple has drastically surpassed analysts' Q4 iPhone sales estimates, and that Apple has reached its goal of selling 10 million iPhones in 2008.</span><span xmlns=""> The consensus estimates for iPhone sales figures for Apple's Q4 (calendar Q3) were calling for approximately 4 million units. It now appears that Apple has sold at least 7 to 7.5 million iPhones in Q4&mdash;that's nearly 80% above consensus. Apple has far surpassed even Gene Munster's bullish estimates of <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/09/22/piper_jaffray_raises_estimates_for_apples_sept_quarter.html">5 million iPhone</a> sales in Q4 according to the data.</span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:51:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://bullcross.blogspot.com/'>Andy Zaky</a> submits:</strong><p><span xmlns="" /></p><p><i><b>This article was co-authored by Seeking Alpha contributor </b></i><b><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/10/apple-to-surpass-its-iphone-sales-goal.html"><i>Turley Muller.</i></a></b></p><p><span xmlns="">Based on the <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=69155">tremendous joint efforts by members at Mac Observer's AFB</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;and <a href="http://www1.investorvillage.com/viewprofile.asp?m=0C3AD3E58421858D">Investor Village's AAPL Sanity Board member howlongtoretire</a> (aka HLTR)&nbsp;to track <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pUwZATIrXuTeCVdJHkQY1Zg">IMEI iPhone numbers</a>, we have determined that Apple has drastically surpassed analysts' Q4 iPhone sales estimates, and that Apple has reached its goal of selling 10 million iPhones in 2008.</span><span xmlns=""> The consensus estimates for iPhone sales figures for Apple's Q4 (calendar Q3) were calling for approximately 4 million units. It now appears that Apple has sold at least 7 to 7.5 million iPhones in Q4&mdash;that's nearly 80% above consensus. Apple has far surpassed even Gene Munster's bullish estimates of <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/09/22/piper_jaffray_raises_estimates_for_apples_sept_quarter.html">5 million iPhone</a> sales in Q4 according to the data.</span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/98619-iphone-sales-drastically-surpass-q4-consensus-apple-reaches-10m-goal?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/andy-zaky">Andy Zaky</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's 3G iPhone: Q4 Sales Estimates Are Encouraging</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/95123-apple-s-3g-iphone-q4-sales-estimates-are-encouraging?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95123</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $152.65 - Apple introduced the new 3G iPhone model on July 11th, and sales thus far look to be impressive. Using the OS market share data from Net Applications and the IMEI tracking data from the Mac Observer&rsquo;s Apple Finance Board, iPhone sales appear to have approached 6 million units since launch.</p><p>By the end of this quarter [Q4], I predict iPhone sales will reach 7-8 million. Most estimates on the Street are calling for unit sales to come in under 5 million units. Perhaps the most important aspect is the effect on cash earnings. Since Apple spreads iPhone revenue over 8 quarters, reported EPS will see little effect. However, cash earnings should increase more than $2.00.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:15:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p>Apple Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) $152.65 - Apple introduced the new 3G iPhone model on July 11th, and sales thus far look to be impressive. Using the OS market share data from Net Applications and the IMEI tracking data from the Mac Observer&rsquo;s Apple Finance Board, iPhone sales appear to have approached 6 million units since launch.</p><p>By the end of this quarter [Q4], I predict iPhone sales will reach 7-8 million. Most estimates on the Street are calling for unit sales to come in under 5 million units. Perhaps the most important aspect is the effect on cash earnings. Since Apple spreads iPhone revenue over 8 quarters, reported EPS will see little effect. However, cash earnings should increase more than $2.00.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/95123-apple-s-3g-iphone-q4-sales-estimates-are-encouraging?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Valuation Multiples With Respect to Cash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/92753-understanding-valuation-multiples-with-respect-to-cash?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92753</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">A common mistake people often make refers to how a firm&rsquo;s cash stockpile is treated in the valuation process. Specifically, Investors err when they subtract cash from market value before calculating an earnings multiple that includes interest income. P/E multiples are calculated using EPS, or net income per share. This figure includes interest income that is generated from a firm&rsquo;s cash investments.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" /></span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:52:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">A common mistake people often make refers to how a firm&rsquo;s cash stockpile is treated in the valuation process. Specifically, Investors err when they subtract cash from market value before calculating an earnings multiple that includes interest income. P/E multiples are calculated using EPS, or net income per share. This figure includes interest income that is generated from a firm&rsquo;s cash investments.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" /></span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/92753-understanding-valuation-multiples-with-respect-to-cash?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple &amp; Google: A Detailed Comparison</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/91633-apple-google-a-detailed-comparison?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">91633</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><span class="Apple-style-span"><p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">I&nbsp;have been coming across many comparisons between&nbsp;</span></span><strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span></span></strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span></span><strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Google (GOOG</span></span></strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">) lately, especially given that Apple&rsquo;s market cap surpassed Google&rsquo;s last week. A recent example is Felix Salmon, who doesn&rsquo;t think Apple should be worth more than Google as he argues in &ldquo;</span></span><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/08/14/apple-vs-google" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204);" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple vs Google</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">.&rdquo; Mark Krieger compares Apple to Google and concludes&nbsp;</span></span><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/91409-apple-great-company-with-lofty-valuation-due-for-pullback" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204);" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple&rsquo;s valuation is lofty and due for a pullback</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">. </span></span></span></p><p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">The authors do make some great, valid points, yet their conclusion is ultimately flawed due to the failure of comparing on a free cash flow basis. Cash flow, not accounting earnings, determines an asset&rsquo;s value. For the matter of an Apple-Google comparison, there are significant differences in free cash flow production, hence return on invested capital [ROIC].</span></span></span></p></span></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:33:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">I&nbsp;have been coming across many comparisons between&nbsp;</span></span><strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</span></span></strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">&nbsp;and&nbsp;</span></span><strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Google (GOOG</span></span></strong><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">) lately, especially given that Apple&rsquo;s market cap surpassed Google&rsquo;s last week. A recent example is Felix Salmon, who doesn&rsquo;t think Apple should be worth more than Google as he argues in &ldquo;</span></span><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/08/14/apple-vs-google" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204);" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple vs Google</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">.&rdquo; Mark Krieger compares Apple to Google and concludes&nbsp;</span></span><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/91409-apple-great-company-with-lofty-valuation-due-for-pullback" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204);" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">Apple&rsquo;s valuation is lofty and due for a pullback</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">. </span></span></span></p><p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">The authors do make some great, valid points, yet their conclusion is ultimately flawed due to the failure of comparing on a free cash flow basis. Cash flow, not accounting earnings, determines an asset&rsquo;s value. For the matter of an Apple-Google comparison, there are significant differences in free cash flow production, hence return on invested capital [ROIC].</span></span></span></p></span></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/91633-apple-google-a-detailed-comparison?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Are Investors Overlooking Cash Earnings?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/88008-apple-are-investors-overlooking-cash-earnings?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88008</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) currently at $156.63:</strong> I believe investors have become overly fixated on Apple&rsquo;s expected accounting income, while ignoring Apple&rsquo;s impressive free cash flow generating ability. Free cash flow, not earnings reported in the accounting statements, determines the true value of a firm. AAPL&rsquo;s high margins, coupled with minimal capital investment needs, enables it to produce robust free cash flow. Another issue is the iPhone accounting treatment, which conceals the true magnitude of its cash generation. According to my estimations, the 3G model&rsquo;s cash flow per unit is higher than its predecessor. In addition, Apple receives these cash flows much sooner compared to the old model. Not only will Apple sell many more 3G models, the per-unit impact on cash earnings will be much greater. Therefore, when shifting focus to cash earnings, as opposed to accounting earnings, AAPL looks attractive at current levels.<br /><br /><strong>Earnings Expectations:<br /></strong>At the Q3 <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/86056-apple-f3q08-qtr-end-6-28-08-earnings-call-transcript">earnings call</a>, Apple guided well below expectations for Q4, and gave a weak gross margin forecast for FY09. Shares took a hit and prompted Wall Street analysts to reduce their 4Q08 and FY09 estimates. Consensus estimates for FY08 &amp; FY09 are $5.20 &amp; $6.05, respectively. Early this year, the FY09 estimate was ~$6.50, then drifted lower to ~ $6.35 where it hovered for several months. Since Apple announced its margin guidance, the consensus FY09 EPS estimate has plunged to $6.05.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:17:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><strong>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) currently at $156.63:</strong> I believe investors have become overly fixated on Apple&rsquo;s expected accounting income, while ignoring Apple&rsquo;s impressive free cash flow generating ability. Free cash flow, not earnings reported in the accounting statements, determines the true value of a firm. AAPL&rsquo;s high margins, coupled with minimal capital investment needs, enables it to produce robust free cash flow. Another issue is the iPhone accounting treatment, which conceals the true magnitude of its cash generation. According to my estimations, the 3G model&rsquo;s cash flow per unit is higher than its predecessor. In addition, Apple receives these cash flows much sooner compared to the old model. Not only will Apple sell many more 3G models, the per-unit impact on cash earnings will be much greater. Therefore, when shifting focus to cash earnings, as opposed to accounting earnings, AAPL looks attractive at current levels.<br /><br /><strong>Earnings Expectations:<br /></strong>At the Q3 <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/86056-apple-f3q08-qtr-end-6-28-08-earnings-call-transcript">earnings call</a>, Apple guided well below expectations for Q4, and gave a weak gross margin forecast for FY09. Shares took a hit and prompted Wall Street analysts to reduce their 4Q08 and FY09 estimates. Consensus estimates for FY08 &amp; FY09 are $5.20 &amp; $6.05, respectively. Early this year, the FY09 estimate was ~$6.50, then drifted lower to ~ $6.35 where it hovered for several months. Since Apple announced its margin guidance, the consensus FY09 EPS estimate has plunged to $6.05.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/88008-apple-are-investors-overlooking-cash-earnings?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's 3G iPhone Appears Profitable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/85165-apple-s-3g-iphone-appears-profitable?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85165</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Apple&rsquo;s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) 3G iPhone appears to be quite profitable. The fully subsidized price from AT&amp;T (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t' title='More opinion and analysis of T'>T</a>) is $199/$299 for the 8GB/16GB models, respectively- requiring a 2-year contract. If a current AT&amp;T customer has recently purchased a discounted phone, then the price may increase up to $399/$499, depending on how much subsidy AT&amp;T needs to recover on the old phone. Without a 2-year contract from AT&amp;T, the iPhone will cost $599/699. <br /><br />The actual amount Apple receives per iPhone is uncertain. Wall Street analysts estimate AT&amp;T is paying a $300-$350 subsidy. The AT&amp;T pricing scheme suggests the subsidy may be as high as $400 per unit. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:12:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p>Apple&rsquo;s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) 3G iPhone appears to be quite profitable. The fully subsidized price from AT&amp;T (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t' title='More opinion and analysis of T'>T</a>) is $199/$299 for the 8GB/16GB models, respectively- requiring a 2-year contract. If a current AT&amp;T customer has recently purchased a discounted phone, then the price may increase up to $399/$499, depending on how much subsidy AT&amp;T needs to recover on the old phone. Without a 2-year contract from AT&amp;T, the iPhone will cost $599/699. <br /><br />The actual amount Apple receives per iPhone is uncertain. Wall Street analysts estimate AT&amp;T is paying a $300-$350 subsidy. The AT&amp;T pricing scheme suggests the subsidy may be as high as $400 per unit. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/85165-apple-s-3g-iphone-appears-profitable?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Regions Financial Due for a Bounce?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/81930-is-regions-financial-due-for-a-bounce?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81930</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Regions Financial (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rf' title='More opinion and analysis of RF'>RF</a>)</strong> has plummeted to $11.40 from its July 2007 levels of $32. For most of 2008, RF traded in the $18-22 range, but since May, RF has been on a pronounced downtrend. It&rsquo;s also important to note, that the regional banking group as a whole, has been extremely weak for the past several weeks.</p><p>Regions fell 7.4% on Tuesday, June 17th, and then fell 10.4% on Wednesday. In the last 30 days, RF has plummeted 45%. Also under pressure are Suntrust (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sti' title='More opinion and analysis of STI'>STI</a>), Key Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/key' title='More opinion and analysis of KEY'>KEY</a>), Fifth Third (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fitb' title='More opinion and analysis of FITB'>FITB</a>), BB&amp;T (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbt' title='More opinion and analysis of BBT'>BBT</a>), and Wachovia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wb' title='More opinion and analysis of WB'>WB</a>). Looking at the table, most of the 3 &amp; 6 month cumulative losses occurred just in the last month.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:04:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><strong>Regions Financial (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rf' title='More opinion and analysis of RF'>RF</a>)</strong> has plummeted to $11.40 from its July 2007 levels of $32. For most of 2008, RF traded in the $18-22 range, but since May, RF has been on a pronounced downtrend. It&rsquo;s also important to note, that the regional banking group as a whole, has been extremely weak for the past several weeks.</p><p>Regions fell 7.4% on Tuesday, June 17th, and then fell 10.4% on Wednesday. In the last 30 days, RF has plummeted 45%. Also under pressure are Suntrust (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sti' title='More opinion and analysis of STI'>STI</a>), Key Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/key' title='More opinion and analysis of KEY'>KEY</a>), Fifth Third (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fitb' title='More opinion and analysis of FITB'>FITB</a>), BB&amp;T (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbt' title='More opinion and analysis of BBT'>BBT</a>), and Wachovia (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wb' title='More opinion and analysis of WB'>WB</a>). Looking at the table, most of the 3 &amp; 6 month cumulative losses occurred just in the last month.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/81930-is-regions-financial-due-for-a-bounce?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rf">RF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Apple's Stuck in the 180s: What Can Push Shares Higher?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/80980-apple-s-stuck-in-the-180s-what-can-push-shares-higher?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80980</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</strong> has surged to $180 from $120, where it was trading back in February. Of course, Apple was trading near $200 at the end of December 2007, but sentiment turned and Apple&rsquo;s shares plummeted January through March before reversing, and staging a rally in April. Shares have been stuck in the $180s since May. The pivotal question becomes: &ldquo;what can/will push shares higher?&rdquo;<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_chart_9m_061108_1_thumb1.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_chart_9m_061108.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_2m_price_061108_1_thumb1.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_2m_price_061108.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />Apple&rsquo;s stock may have gotten ahead of itself at the end of last year (2007), when it hit $200. Analysts were bullish and nearly all had a price target above $200. Then January arrived, Apple provided weak guidance and the Street flipped out. Sentiment quickly turned negative, and heavy selling drove Apple lower. A couple of analysts downgraded the stock, and most revised their price targets lower to the $150-175 range.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:42:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Turley Muller</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/turleymuller2.jpg' title='turley muller' alt='turley muller' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/">Turley Muller</a> submits: </strong><p><strong>Apple Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</strong> has surged to $180 from $120, where it was trading back in February. Of course, Apple was trading near $200 at the end of December 2007, but sentiment turned and Apple&rsquo;s shares plummeted January through March before reversing, and staging a rally in April. Shares have been stuck in the $180s since May. The pivotal question becomes: &ldquo;what can/will push shares higher?&rdquo;<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_chart_9m_061108_1_thumb1.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_chart_9m_061108.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_2m_price_061108_1_thumb1.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/6/12/aapl_2m_price_061108.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />Apple&rsquo;s stock may have gotten ahead of itself at the end of last year (2007), when it hit $200. Analysts were bullish and nearly all had a price target above $200. Then January arrived, Apple provided weak guidance and the Street flipped out. Sentiment quickly turned negative, and heavy selling drove Apple lower. A couple of analysts downgraded the stock, and most revised their price targets lower to the $150-175 range.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/80980-apple-s-stuck-in-the-180s-what-can-push-shares-higher?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/turley-muller">Turley Muller</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
