<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuecruncher - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Valuecruncher' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher</link>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Looks Expensive At All-Time High </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/176072-amazon-looks-expensive-at-all-time-high?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">176072</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On-line retailer <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon.com</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) closed Monday at an all time high of US$135.91. $AMZN is up 218% in the last 12 months - better than Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) at 122%, Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) at 88% or the broad NASDAQ at 41% [<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=0&amp;chdd=0&amp;chds=0&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=Linear&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1259632096750&amp;chddm=98534&amp;chls=IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC;NASDAQ:AAPL;NASDAQ:GOOG&amp;cmptdms=0;0;0&amp;q=NASDAQ:AMZN&amp;ntsp=0">visual</a>]. It's time to have a look at a superstar performance.</p> <p>See <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/52">Valuecruncher's Interactive Analysts Report For Amazon ($AMZN)</a>.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>On-line retailer <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon.com</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) closed Monday at an all time high of US$135.91. $AMZN is up 218% in the last 12 months - better than Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) at 122%, Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) at 88% or the broad NASDAQ at 41% [<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=0&amp;chdd=0&amp;chds=0&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=Linear&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1259632096750&amp;chddm=98534&amp;chls=IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC;NASDAQ:AAPL;NASDAQ:GOOG&amp;cmptdms=0;0;0&amp;q=NASDAQ:AMZN&amp;ntsp=0">visual</a>]. It's time to have a look at a superstar performance.</p> <p>See <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/52">Valuecruncher's Interactive Analysts Report For Amazon ($AMZN)</a>.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/176072-amazon-looks-expensive-at-all-time-high?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bks">BKS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nflx">NFLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ostk">OSTK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Running the Numbers: The Roller Coaster That Is Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/165483-running-the-numbers-the-roller-coaster-that-is-apple?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">165483</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has been a crazy 15 months for the Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) share price. On the 22 August 2008 AAPL was trading at $176.79. By 16 January 2009 AAPL had dropped to $82.33 - down over half (53% down) in under five months. Today AAPL closed at $190.01 - up over 130% in under nine months. The graph below shows the closing prices over the period. So what do we think about AAPL?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:51:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has been a crazy 15 months for the Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) share price. On the 22 August 2008 AAPL was trading at $176.79. By 16 January 2009 AAPL had dropped to $82.33 - down over half (53% down) in under five months. Today AAPL closed at $190.01 - up over 130% in under nine months. The graph below shows the closing prices over the period. So what do we think about AAPL?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/165483-running-the-numbers-the-roller-coaster-that-is-apple?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/palm">PALM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qcom">QCOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Online Finance: From Brokers to Blogs to Yahoo</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160812-the-future-of-online-finance-from-brokers-to-blogs-to-yahoo?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160812</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>We have been participants and observers of the online finance  space for a period of time now. As part of that we regularly examine our view of the competitive landscape. We have decided to share some of our views on where the very broad industry may be headed. This isn&rsquo;t company specific &ndash; very much the high-level perspective.</span></p> <h3><span>Where We Are Today</span></h3> <p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/10/saupload_new_picture_635x349.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/10/saupload_new_picture_635x349_thumb1.png" alt="new-picture" /></a><br> </span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:41:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>We have been participants and observers of the online finance  space for a period of time now. As part of that we regularly examine our view of the competitive landscape. We have decided to share some of our views on where the very broad industry may be headed. This isn&rsquo;t company specific &ndash; very much the high-level perspective.</span></p> <h3><span>Where We Are Today</span></h3> <p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/10/saupload_new_picture_635x349.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/10/saupload_new_picture_635x349_thumb1.png" alt="new-picture" /></a><br> </span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160812-the-future-of-online-finance-from-brokers-to-blogs-to-yahoo?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/twx">TWX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/schw">SCHW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/etfc">ETFC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amtd">AMTD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Starbucks Looks Too Frothy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/158595-starbucks-looks-too-frothy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">158595</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Starbucks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sbux' title='More opinion and analysis of SBUX'>SBUX</a>) is in an interesting position. You would expect premium coffee purchases to be down in the current economic climate. The company has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/business/21sbux.html?_r=1">also just raised prices</a> on some beverages. Yet SBUX is currently trading toward the top of their <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:SBUX">52-week range</a> at US$19.35. Time for a look.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1063">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Starbucks</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:31:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Starbucks (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sbux' title='More opinion and analysis of SBUX'>SBUX</a>) is in an interesting position. You would expect premium coffee purchases to be down in the current economic climate. The company has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/business/21sbux.html?_r=1">also just raised prices</a> on some beverages. Yet SBUX is currently trading toward the top of their <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:SBUX">52-week range</a> at US$19.35. Time for a look.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1063">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Starbucks</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/158595-starbucks-looks-too-frothy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sbux">SBUX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/thi">THI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mcd">MCD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Running the Numbers - Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/155647-running-the-numbers-coca-cola-vs-pepsi?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">155647</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Coca-Cola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ko' title='More opinion and analysis of KO'>KO</a>) is an interesting company to look at from a business-cycle and valuation perspective. KO is currently trading toward the top of its <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=NYSE:KO">52-week range</a> at US$49.04.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1124">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Coca-Cola ($KO)</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:54:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Coca-Cola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ko' title='More opinion and analysis of KO'>KO</a>) is an interesting company to look at from a business-cycle and valuation perspective. KO is currently trading toward the top of its <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=NYSE:KO">52-week range</a> at US$49.04.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1124">Valuecruncher Interactive Analysts Report For Coca-Cola ($KO)</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/155647-running-the-numbers-coca-cola-vs-pepsi?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ko">KO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pep">PEP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Looks Correctly Valued; Cheaper Peer Options Available </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/152036-apple-looks-correctly-valued-cheaper-peer-options-available?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">152036</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>After <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/07/running-the-numbers-why-microsoft-msft-is-a-buy/">our recent post</a> on Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), people asked for a quick take on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>). <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Here</a> it is.</p>  <p>We have the comparator group set as Microsoft ($MSFT), IBM ($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Google ($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) and Hewlett-Packard($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>). You can change these peer companies on the site. For example you could add:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:45:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>After <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/07/running-the-numbers-why-microsoft-msft-is-a-buy/">our recent post</a> on Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), people asked for a quick take on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>). <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Here</a> it is.</p>  <p>We have the comparator group set as Microsoft ($MSFT), IBM ($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Google ($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) and Hewlett-Packard($<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>). You can change these peer companies on the site. For example you could add:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/152036-apple-looks-correctly-valued-cheaper-peer-options-available?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/palm">PALM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qcom">QCOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Microsoft Is a Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/150383-why-microsoft-is-a-buy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">150383</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the things that we frequently observe in discussions about stocks is a focus on the qualitative story - &ldquo;I like my iPhone, buy Apple  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)&rdquo;.</p><p>Now the story behind a stock is important. That Apple (or any other company) makes great products that people want to buy is very relevant to the value of the company.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:17:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the things that we frequently observe in discussions about stocks is a focus on the qualitative story - &ldquo;I like my iPhone, buy Apple  (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)&rdquo;.</p><p>Now the story behind a stock is important. That Apple (or any other company) makes great products that people want to buy is very relevant to the value of the company.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/150383-why-microsoft-is-a-buy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great Quarterly Results at IBM</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/149417-great-quarterly-results-at-ibm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">149417</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/technology/companies/17blue.html?ref=business">great quarterly result from IBM</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>).  We decided to have a look at the latest numbers for <span>IBM and look at some comparator analysis.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/608">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For <span></a>IBM</p></span></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:35:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/technology/companies/17blue.html?ref=business">great quarterly result from IBM</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>).  We decided to have a look at the latest numbers for <span>IBM and look at some comparator analysis.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/608">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For <span></a>IBM</p></span></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/149417-great-quarterly-results-at-ibm?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acn">ACN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuing Apple by the Numbers </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143441-valuing-apple-by-the-numbers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have not looked at Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) since <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-apple-aapl/">late last year</a>. $AAPL is now trading at US$136.09. We <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">felt it was time</a> to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using in our valuation.<a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82"><br></a></p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$140.57 for $AAPL. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 3.3% above the current share price of US$136.09.  $AAPL appears reasonably valued at the moment.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:18:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have not looked at Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) since <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-apple-aapl/">late last year</a>. $AAPL is now trading at US$136.09. We <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">felt it was time</a> to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using in our valuation.<a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82"><br></a></p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$140.57 for $AAPL. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 3.3% above the current share price of US$136.09.  $AAPL appears reasonably valued at the moment.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143441-valuing-apple-by-the-numbers?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting Times for Cisco; Shares Cheap Below $20</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/128682-interesting-times-for-cisco-shares-cheap-below-20?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">128682</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/" >Cisco Systems</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='More opinion and analysis of CSCO'>CSCO</a>) has traditionally been a designer, manufacturer and seller of network and communications technology and services.  Two weeks ago the company <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123716403483736001.html?mg=com-wsj" >announced a significant shift in strategy</a> by beginning to compete with Hewlett-Packard (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) in the broader server market.  A week earlier CSCO had <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/cisco-buying-flip-camcorder-maker-pure-digital-2009-3" >announced a deeper move into the consumer electronics business with the acquisition of Pure Digital</a>.  Very interesting times for CSCO.  We decided to have a look at some numbers for CSCO to estimate an intrinsic valuation for the shares. (See <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/274" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For CSCO</a>).</p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$20.39 for CSCO. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf" >discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 20.3% above the current share price of US$16.95.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:32:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/" >Cisco Systems</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='More opinion and analysis of CSCO'>CSCO</a>) has traditionally been a designer, manufacturer and seller of network and communications technology and services.  Two weeks ago the company <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123716403483736001.html?mg=com-wsj" >announced a significant shift in strategy</a> by beginning to compete with Hewlett-Packard (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) in the broader server market.  A week earlier CSCO had <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/cisco-buying-flip-camcorder-maker-pure-digital-2009-3" >announced a deeper move into the consumer electronics business with the acquisition of Pure Digital</a>.  Very interesting times for CSCO.  We decided to have a look at some numbers for CSCO to estimate an intrinsic valuation for the shares. (See <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/274" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For CSCO</a>).</p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$20.39 for CSCO. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf" >discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 20.3% above the current share price of US$16.95.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/128682-interesting-times-for-cisco-shares-cheap-below-20?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recrunching Google's Numbers - Cheap Below $370</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127248-recrunching-google-s-numbers-cheap-below-370?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127248</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>We last looked at Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) in <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-google-goog-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong/" >mid-December</a>.  We decided to run some numbers and have a look at the intrinsic value of the company. GOOG is currently trading at US$330.16 - how does this compare with an estimate of the underlying value of the shares?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/514" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For GOOG - New Format</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We last looked at Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) in <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-google-goog-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong/" >mid-December</a>.  We decided to run some numbers and have a look at the intrinsic value of the company. GOOG is currently trading at US$330.16 - how does this compare with an estimate of the underlying value of the shares?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/514" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For GOOG - New Format</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127248-recrunching-google-s-numbers-cheap-below-370?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raytheon: Undervalued Below $45/Share</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/125328-raytheon-undervalued-below-45-share?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">125328</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Aerospace and defence contractor <a href="http://www.raytheon.com/" >Raytheon</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtn' title='More opinion and analysis of RTN'>RTN</a>) has seen it&rsquo;s share price drop from a 52-week high of US$67.37 to close to a 52-week low at US$34.61.  At Valuecruncher we decided to have a look at the company&rsquo;s financial and put together an estimate of intrinsic value. (See the <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/945" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $RTN (New Format)</a>.)</p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$45.87 for $RTN. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf" >discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 32.5% above the current share price of US$34.61.  $RTN is currently well below our estimate of intrinsic value.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:22:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Aerospace and defence contractor <a href="http://www.raytheon.com/" >Raytheon</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtn' title='More opinion and analysis of RTN'>RTN</a>) has seen it&rsquo;s share price drop from a 52-week high of US$67.37 to close to a 52-week low at US$34.61.  At Valuecruncher we decided to have a look at the company&rsquo;s financial and put together an estimate of intrinsic value. (See the <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/945" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $RTN (New Format)</a>.)</p>  <p>Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$45.87 for $RTN. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf" >discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 32.5% above the current share price of US$34.61.  $RTN is currently well below our estimate of intrinsic value.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/125328-raytheon-undervalued-below-45-share?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rtn">RTN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Johnson &amp; Johnson: Undervalued Below $55</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/124880-johnson-johnson-undervalued-below-55?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">124880</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29242870" >news</a> (via a <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000095013409003064/v51307e13fvhr.txt" >13F</a> release) that Warren Buffett&rsquo;s Berkshire Hathaway (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>) had significantly reduced its holding in <a href="http://www.jnj.com/connect/" >Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='More opinion and analysis of JNJ'>JNJ</a>) has added to the existing pressure on the $JNJ share price.  $JNJ has dropped 33.6% in the last six months.  At Valuecruncher we decided to have a look at the intrinsic value of $JNJ.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/641" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $JNJ (New Format)</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:48:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29242870" >news</a> (via a <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000095013409003064/v51307e13fvhr.txt" >13F</a> release) that Warren Buffett&rsquo;s Berkshire Hathaway (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>) had significantly reduced its holding in <a href="http://www.jnj.com/connect/" >Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='More opinion and analysis of JNJ'>JNJ</a>) has added to the existing pressure on the $JNJ share price.  $JNJ has dropped 33.6% in the last six months.  At Valuecruncher we decided to have a look at the intrinsic value of $JNJ.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/641" >Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $JNJ (New Format)</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/124880-johnson-johnson-undervalued-below-55?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a">BRK.A</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj">JNJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b">BRK.B</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM Is Still Undervalued After Strong Result</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/116430-ibm-is-still-undervalued-after-strong-result?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">116430</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&ldquo;In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine.&rdquo; &mdash; Benjamin Graham, <a href="http://www.fishpond.co.nz/Books/Business/Money_Investment/Finance/product_info/31571/" >The Intelligent Investor</a></p></blockquote> <p>That is the best analysis we can find about the current market.  We believe there is an <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intrinsicvalue.asp" >intrinsic value</a> for shares and our analysis attempts to calculate this. But in the short-term market sentiment is a key factor and at the moment the votes are primarily negative.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:05:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&ldquo;In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine.&rdquo; &mdash; Benjamin Graham, <a href="http://www.fishpond.co.nz/Books/Business/Money_Investment/Finance/product_info/31571/" >The Intelligent Investor</a></p></blockquote> <p>That is the best analysis we can find about the current market.  We believe there is an <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intrinsicvalue.asp" >intrinsic value</a> for shares and our analysis attempts to calculate this. But in the short-term market sentiment is a key factor and at the moment the votes are primarily negative.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/116430-ibm-is-still-undervalued-after-strong-result?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft Represents Value Below $20 a Share</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/112611-microsoft-represents-value-below-20-a-share?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">112611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) continues to trade under US$20 a share.  We have <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/09/running-the-numbers-a-five-minute-valuation-of-microsoft/" >previously looked at $MSFT</a> and felt it was undervalued in the US$20-25 range.  We decided it was time to revisit our valuation.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/valuations/491265/edit" >Valuecruncher valuation model of $MSFT with interactive assumptions</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:08:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) continues to trade under US$20 a share.  We have <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/09/running-the-numbers-a-five-minute-valuation-of-microsoft/" >previously looked at $MSFT</a> and felt it was undervalued in the US$20-25 range.  We decided it was time to revisit our valuation.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/valuations/491265/edit" >Valuecruncher valuation model of $MSFT with interactive assumptions</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/112611-microsoft-represents-value-below-20-a-share?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: When Top-Down Analysis Goes Wrong</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/110721-google-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">110721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week a <a href="http://www.globalequitiesresearch.com/index.html">Global Equities Research</a> analyst Trip Chowdhry put out a research note laying out his argument for Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) posting negative revenue growth in the current 2008 year.</p> <p>Chowdhry&rsquo;s analysis (and we have not seen the original full research note) has GOOG posting revenues of US$15.71 billion in 2008 (5% below actual 2007 revenues of US$16.94 billion), US$15.23 billion in 2009 (3% below his 2008 projection) and US$14.57 billion in 2010 (4% below his 2009 projection). This analysis was picked up by a range of commentators that we really respect. These included analysts like <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/01/google-could-they-have-two-down-rev-years-ahead/">Barron&rsquo;s Eric Savitz</a>, <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/analyst-google-revenues-will-shrink-till-2010">Silicon Alley Insider</a> and <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/02/can-google-really-see-a-decline-in-revenues/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan.</a> <strong>The only problem is that the analysis is deeply flawed</strong>.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:53:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week a <a href="http://www.globalequitiesresearch.com/index.html">Global Equities Research</a> analyst Trip Chowdhry put out a research note laying out his argument for Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) posting negative revenue growth in the current 2008 year.</p> <p>Chowdhry&rsquo;s analysis (and we have not seen the original full research note) has GOOG posting revenues of US$15.71 billion in 2008 (5% below actual 2007 revenues of US$16.94 billion), US$15.23 billion in 2009 (3% below his 2008 projection) and US$14.57 billion in 2010 (4% below his 2009 projection). This analysis was picked up by a range of commentators that we really respect. These included analysts like <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/01/google-could-they-have-two-down-rev-years-ahead/">Barron&rsquo;s Eric Savitz</a>, <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/analyst-google-revenues-will-shrink-till-2010">Silicon Alley Insider</a> and <a href="http://watchmojo.com/web/blog/index.php/2008/12/02/can-google-really-see-a-decline-in-revenues/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan.</a> <strong>The only problem is that the analysis is deeply flawed</strong>.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/110721-google-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Trading on the Cheap</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/109860-apple-trading-on-the-cheap?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">109860</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have looked at Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) twice over the last six-months.  <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/getting-apple-to-200-a-share/" >In June</a>, with the $AAPL share price at US$186.10, we produced a valuation of US$146.70.  Then <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/09/running-the-numbers-%E2%80%93-apple-aapl-looks-cheap/" >in September</a> with the $AAPL share price at US$131.05 we had a valuation of US$163.98. </p><p>We are now in early-December and $AAPL has continued to head south - with the market generally. $AAPL is now trading at US$94.00 - just over half the price we first looked at in June. We felt it was time to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using. We have also completed some high-level comparator analysis looking at the current price of $AAPL against some broad peers using a range of metrics.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:25:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have looked at Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>) twice over the last six-months.  <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/getting-apple-to-200-a-share/" >In June</a>, with the $AAPL share price at US$186.10, we produced a valuation of US$146.70.  Then <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/09/running-the-numbers-%E2%80%93-apple-aapl-looks-cheap/" >in September</a> with the $AAPL share price at US$131.05 we had a valuation of US$163.98. </p><p>We are now in early-December and $AAPL has continued to head south - with the market generally. $AAPL is now trading at US$94.00 - just over half the price we first looked at in June. We felt it was time to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using. We have also completed some high-level comparator analysis looking at the current price of $AAPL against some broad peers using a range of metrics.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/109860-apple-trading-on-the-cheap?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Viacom Impacted by Redstone Family Debt Negotiations</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/107811-viacom-impacted-by-redstone-family-debt-negotiations?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">107811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone" >Sumner Redstone</a> is the majority owner of <a href="http://www.viacom.com/Pages/default.aspx" >Viacom</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/via' title='More opinion and analysis of VIA'>VIA</a>).  Last month Redstone <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122731243791749449.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" >sold US$233 million of VIA</a> shares.  VIA appears to be well and truly <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/sumner-s-death-spiral-continues" >caught in the current negotiations between Redstone family interests and creditors</a>.  What does this mean for the current valuation of VIA?  We decided to have a look at the intrinsic value of VIA.  The ongoing negotiations between Redstone family interests and creditors will impact the stock - but does this present a longer-term opportunity if this situation artificially depresses the share price in the near term?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/" >Valuecruncher valuation model of VIA with interactive assumptions</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:46:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone" >Sumner Redstone</a> is the majority owner of <a href="http://www.viacom.com/Pages/default.aspx" >Viacom</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/via' title='More opinion and analysis of VIA'>VIA</a>).  Last month Redstone <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122731243791749449.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" >sold US$233 million of VIA</a> shares.  VIA appears to be well and truly <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/sumner-s-death-spiral-continues" >caught in the current negotiations between Redstone family interests and creditors</a>.  What does this mean for the current valuation of VIA?  We decided to have a look at the intrinsic value of VIA.  The ongoing negotiations between Redstone family interests and creditors will impact the stock - but does this present a longer-term opportunity if this situation artificially depresses the share price in the near term?</p> <p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/" >Valuecruncher valuation model of VIA with interactive assumptions</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/107811-viacom-impacted-by-redstone-family-debt-negotiations?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/via">VIA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Mills Trading Higher Than 12 Months Ago, In-Line with Intrinsic Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/106806-general-mills-trading-higher-than-12-months-ago-in-line-with-intrinsic-value?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">106806</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/index.aspx">General Mills</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gis' title='More opinion and analysis of GIS'>GIS</a>) the manufacturer and marketer of <a href="http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/brands/index.aspx">branded consumer foods</a> (such as Cheerios, Betty Crocker and Hamburger Helper), is one of the rare stocks trading higher today than 12 months ago. How does the current share price of GIS look from an intrinsic value perspective?</p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/valuations/384421/edit">Valuecruncher valuation model of GIS with interactive assumptions</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:37:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/index.aspx">General Mills</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gis' title='More opinion and analysis of GIS'>GIS</a>) the manufacturer and marketer of <a href="http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/brands/index.aspx">branded consumer foods</a> (such as Cheerios, Betty Crocker and Hamburger Helper), is one of the rare stocks trading higher today than 12 months ago. How does the current share price of GIS look from an intrinsic value perspective?</p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/valuations/384421/edit">Valuecruncher valuation model of GIS with interactive assumptions</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/106806-general-mills-trading-higher-than-12-months-ago-in-line-with-intrinsic-value?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gis">GIS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nike: Just Do It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/106320-nike-just-do-it?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">106320</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/nike/language_select/">Nike</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nke' title='More opinion and analysis of NKE'>NKE</a>) is a global leader in sporting footware, apparel and equipment. We have always been fans of their advertising - especially the one below. The visuals are now dated, but the music from John Lennon is just brilliant.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><object height="344" width="425" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qG1uUiCrsPA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="src" /><embed height="344" width="425" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qG1uUiCrsPA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:07:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Valuecruncher</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/nike/language_select/">Nike</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nke' title='More opinion and analysis of NKE'>NKE</a>) is a global leader in sporting footware, apparel and equipment. We have always been fans of their advertising - especially the one below. The visuals are now dated, but the music from John Lennon is just brilliant.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><object height="344" width="425" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qG1uUiCrsPA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="src" /><embed height="344" width="425" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qG1uUiCrsPA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/106320-nike-just-do-it?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nke">NKE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/valuecruncher">Valuecruncher</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
