Seeking Alpha
View as an RSS Feed

Valuentum  

View Valuentum's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Credit Markets Not Too Worried [View article]
    Three short paragraphs and a chart?
    Aug 28, 2013. 04:02 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Ever Wonder What Lululemon Is Really Worth? [View article]
    Hi meta9999,

    Thank you for your response. It is because of the reasons you mention above that this type of analysis IS valuable. It allows investors to really dig into just how volatile and largely unpredictable firms operations can be and just how wide the range of potential valuation outcomes can be, especially for Lululemon.

    The simple answer is that, for Lululemon, it SHOULD have a wide range of ourcomes and, in our view, the stock is neither overvalued nor undervalued if it falls within our fair value range, where the stock SHOULD be trading.

    Also, valuations can and SHOULD change. It should almost be expected that our valuation will change in future updates. As companies collect free cash flow through the year, their values should increase. And our methodology does not suggest that we will even be interested in shares under $53. We'd still demand a strong technical foundation, and even then, we may still have better opportunities in our portfolios. We don't view Lululemon as a core holding by any stretch of the imagination.

    Our website is filled with a wealth of great information. Though we understand you are a professional, it may be worth a look, especially if you're looking for analytics of this rigor on other firms.

    Kind regards,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 28, 2013. 03:57 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • We Like National Oilwell Varco's Long-Term Fundamentals [View article]
    Thanks Jim. Only a select few companies make the grade as it relates to registering a high score on our Valuentum Buying Index, our stock-selection methodology. And even fewer make it into our actively-managed portfolios, which we provide to members. We cover quite a number of equities, so we have the opportunity to comment on a wide variety of firms.

    Kind regards,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 28, 2013. 03:51 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Distribution Coverage Deteriorates At Linn Energy [View article]
    We understand that many of those commenting on this chain are financially tied to LINE. We're sorry it's been a rough ride.

    Unlike Seeking Alpha, we do not want to influence the stock price at all. We really don't care what the stock does immediately after what we say. We genuinely want to help investors.

    And one of the best ways we can do so is to be independent. As we've outlined in the mREIT piece above, you don't have to look far for someone that is financially-tied to the stock to comment and comment favorably while attacking the independent voice.

    We have been so successful not only because we are right more than we are wrong (even though that's the case, too), but because we're here to help others.

    Our subscribers/members appreciate this in a big way.

    All the best,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 27, 2013. 04:05 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Ever Wonder What Lululemon Is Really Worth? [View article]
    Excellent point stabletker.

    Please take a read of the following regarding how we think about our fair value range:

    http://bit.ly/1bmcG74

    Thanks for reading!

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 09:28 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Thanks Nat. The community can largely think of the Dividend Cushion in a similar way as how the credit rating companies look at the ability of a firm to repay its debt.

    Though we make adjustments for different business structures like MLPs, utilities, etc, a systematic ranking is highly valuable across a large swath of firms. So, for example, we're able to compare a firm like ConocoPhillips against a firm like Wal-Mart, much like S&P and Moody's can do across the same firms with their credit ratings.

    For example, a A rating from S&P means (or they try to make it mean) the same across the corporate universe. We take a ranking approach with our Dividend Cushion as well.

    Thanks for adding to the clarification.

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 07:18 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Another way of looking at it Michael is to view our comprehensive report on ConocoPhillips.

    I think you are extrapolating the article you read about ConocoPhillips' dividend to our entire analysis of the firm.

    Pasted below is a link to our valuation analysis of the company, which informs our stock-selection methodology, the Valuentum Buying Index (which is our rating system). This analysis considers the qualitative analysis that we publish on our site (though it is still protected on our site).

    Our Dividend Cushion is an assessment of the long-term dividend health of the company, not an assessment of the attractiveness of the firm's underlying equity. These are and should be two different things.

    We know it's a lot to swallow, but obviously, we're only putting a small snapshot of our work on Seeking Alpha.

    Here's the 16-page report we promised -- it's a pdf.

    http://bit.ly/19IsthS

    Thanks again!
    Aug 26, 2013. 05:18 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Hi Michael,

    It doesn't appear that you are reading our responses. The way to think about it is perhaps this way: a firm can have a poor credit rating (BB-), but investors could still like the stock (its undervalued; strong economic moat, etc.).

    In this case, ConocoPhillips has a poor Dividend Cushion score, but we're not against the fundamentals of the company. We think it's a solid firm that put up a best-in-class second-quarter. However, that doesn't change its Dividend Cushion score. We've outlined above the ways that ConocoPhillips can improve this measure.

    Thanks for the mention!

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 04:43 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Distribution Coverage Deteriorates At Linn Energy [View article]
    Hi demotom,

    Thanks for reading. If you're looking for a higher service level, we are always available via email.

    Here's a good read on the quality of work we do:

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    We cover over 1,200 stocks.

    All the best,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 03:31 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Hi Michael,

    Here's the definition of our ratings:

    "Dividend Safety. We measure the safety of a firm's dividend by adding its net cash to our forecast of its future cash flows and divide that sum by our forecast of its future dividend payments. This process results in a ratio called the Dividend Cushion™.
    Scale: Above 2.75 = EXCELLENT; Between 1.25 and 2.75 = GOOD; Between 0.5 and 1.25 = POOR; Below 0.5 = VERY POOR."

    I guess we can add another bucket below 'Very Poor', perhaps something along the lines of 'Imminent Cut Expected,' a bucket that we don't expect ConocoPhillips to fall in. This bucket would be the firms that fall on our 'Dividend Yields to Avoid' list, which ConocoPhillips is not on:

    http://bit.ly/17flpsW

    We'll look into clarifying the subjective aspect of our definitions but the analysis remains unchanged. Again, it's perfectly fine to have one opinion of a firm's dividend and another of the firm's intrinsic value. Pasted below is answers to other FAQ:

    http://bit.ly/MtrQwH

    Thanks again for highlighting our work!

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 03:27 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Some Investors Fail And 3 Top Stock Ideas [View article]
    Hi ChuckXX,

    We just recently added TEVA to our Best Ideas portfolio. Once concerns regarding Capaxone pass (maybe late 2014, early 2015), the sell side will be forced to remove "sell" ratings. We like the risk-reward at current levels, though it may be a few years before we see price-to-fair value convergence.

    All the best,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 26, 2013. 09:53 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Hi Michael,

    See above. Thanks again.

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 25, 2013. 06:29 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Hi Michael,

    Excellent response.

    It's important to note that the analysis of a company's dividend has little to do with the analysis of a firm's equity value. If ConocoPhillips' slashed its dividend to $0 per share today, the firm's intrinsic value would not change. Yes, many income investors would sell shares, but the composition of the firm's equity value has not changed -- its future free cash flows.

    So, while we like ConocoPhillips, we can also have an opinion that its dividend is not as strong as those of others in our coverage universe. But again, we're really not disagreeing on anything here. We fully expect ConocoPhillips to continue raising its dividend through the course of the energy up-cycle.

    That said, ConocoPhillips can improve its Dividend Cushion score with better than expected future cash flow from operations and the retirement of debt. The firm can also improve its Dividend Cushion if the proceeds from asset sales come in better than expected. The Dividend Cushion is not a static figure. If ConocoPhillips continues to execute, we could see improvement in the measure over time.

    Keeping a close eye on changes to the measure is one of the more attractive attributes of our research offering for income investors. For example, the Dividend Cushion not only ranks the strength of firms' dividends, but also shows how the strength of the dividend is progressing over time. The Dividend Cushion is similar to a company's credit rating in this respect. For example, a firm can have excellent future prospects, awesome cash flow, but so much debt that its credit rating is junk. We're not at all saying ConocoPhillips ability to pay back debt is junk. However, we are saying that through the course of the energy cycle, its ability to keep RAISING its dividend is not as strong as others in our coverage, including Chevron.

    We'll also consider making some refinements with respect to our Dividend Cushion, and thank you very much for the suggestion. We're always looking to get better. As of today, however, the Dividend Cushion hasn't yet missed predicting a dividend cut in our universe (it even caught EXC, a steady eddy utility). We're not saying ConocoPhillips is going to cut its dividend. At its core, the Dividend Cushion shows the strongest firms on the basis of their future free cash flows relative to dividend payments, after considering their capital structure. All else equal, the larger the score, the stronger the cash flow relative to dividends and the stronger the balance sheet. ConocoPhillips' score is 0.2. Based on our ranking scale, this is 'Very Poor.' We like scores above 1.

    We'll continue to publish on Seeking Alpha for the time being, though we may not do so on Conoco for several quarters or next year. You can always visit our site to view the updated Dividend Cushion score on ConocoPhillips.

    Again, we fully expect ConocoPhillips to sustain its dividend. We're saying its dividend is not as strong as others on the basis of its free cash flow generation, capital requirements and balance sheet. It's also important to note that the board can really keep raising the dividend for a long time, as technically the board can raise it a minuscule 1/100 of a penny each year. But throwing that scenario aside, the Dividend Cushion tries to show just how much further capacity the company has to continue RAISING it after considering debt obligations.

    We're not that enthused by the capacity to keep raising it through the course of the economic cycle. But by no means does it mean the firm will cut the dividend. Our rating system highlights its safety as 'Very Poor'. Several firms with 'Very Poor' ratings have cut them, but not everyone of the firms with 'Very Poor' ratings have. We cover over 1,200 companies.

    Thanks again for your time Michael.

    All the best,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 25, 2013. 06:27 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Yes, we want readers to come to our site. We want them to learn about our processes and the rigors that go into our analysis. We're proud of what we do, and we want to share it.

    Our president Brian Nelson has taught hundreds of equity and credit analysts across several continents, both independent and buyside. Why would we not stand by our work and encourage others to take a look?

    But most importantly, we want Michael to know that we appreciate his work and efforts in this article. It is not easy to put an article together. We also appreciate him mentioning our Dividend Cushion. However, we would have liked it even more if he would have shot us an email first before publishing on it.

    For example, we could have shown how it has an excellent yield (meaning only that it is above average), but not a safe long-term payout as explained in our future assumptions w/r/t COP versus CVX:

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    But, in any case, thank you for the mention.

    All the best,

    The Valuentum Team
    Aug 24, 2013. 08:42 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • ConocoPhillips: Investor Update On The Safe Dividend, Venezuela, Libya, And More [View article]
    Please read below. Thanks!
    Aug 24, 2013. 02:30 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
1,366 Comments
505 Likes