<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>William Kabourek - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'William Kabourek' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek</link>
    <item>
      <title>Bank Dilution Looms for 2010</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/174407-bank-dilution-looms-for-2010?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">174407</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/19/saupload_no_more_handouts_poster_p228264759057898571t5wm_400.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/19/saupload_no_more_handouts_poster_p228264759057898571t5wm_400_1.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a>Investors in financial shares have fared well this year, as almost all are significantly higher than their March lows. Those that bought shares near the lows have obviously fared better than the original owners, But the time has come to be wary. Dilution looms, again, on the horizon.<div> </div><div>Banks have had ready access to capital this year as they attempt to work through their myriad mistakes. First, the Government provided needed support, then hungry investors started lining up to buy financial secondary offerings. The result was the same: loans were written off, capital depleted, new capital acquired and original investors diluted. Painful only for the original owners.</div><div> </div><div>While mortgage and credit card loan delinquencies are still at record levels, commercial real estate lending was poorly underwritten and is now showing serious weakness, another capital consuming issue is raising its head. On January 1, 2010, FAS167 will take effect unless delayed. The effect will be that banks must set aside additional capital to support off-balance-sheet credit card receivables and other securitizations. Whether or not the assets are brought back on the balance sheet or not, more capital must be found to support the potential risk of implied recourse. The big credit card issurers -- JP Morgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='More opinion and analysis of JPM'>JPM</a>), Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>), Wells Fargo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc' title='More opinion and analysis of WFC'>WFC</a>), Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='More opinion and analysis of BAC'>BAC</a>) and Capital One (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cof' title='More opinion and analysis of COF'>COF</a>) -- will be affected <span>to varing degrees</span>. Since current capital isn't plentiful, they will sell more shares and dilute the current base.</div><div> </div><div>Several days ago, First National Nebraska, a moderate sized regional bank with a large credit card operation, filed to sell $250 million of new common and preferred securities. The major reason given for the decision was the need to support off-balance-sheet credit card securitizations. The decision to sell new shares was a difficult one for First National, as it is owned, almost exclusively, by one family. They felt the need, and pressure, to dilute themselves to comply with FAS167. What do you think the professional, non-owner, managers will do? Yes, sell new shares to whom ever will buy them, Government or public.</div><div> </div><div>Setting aside concerns about the remaining potential loan losses and adequacy of loan loss reserves, capital raising is coming again to the banks courtesy of the accountants and transparency. Bank shares will be worth less in 2010.<br><br><strong><em>Disclosure: </em></strong><em>William Kabourek has no ownership positions in the above named companies</em><br> </div></span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:29:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/19/saupload_no_more_handouts_poster_p228264759057898571t5wm_400.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/19/saupload_no_more_handouts_poster_p228264759057898571t5wm_400_1.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a>Investors in financial shares have fared well this year, as almost all are significantly higher than their March lows. Those that bought shares near the lows have obviously fared better than the original owners, But the time has come to be wary. Dilution looms, again, on the horizon.<div> </div><div>Banks have had ready access to capital this year as they attempt to work through their myriad mistakes. First, the Government provided needed support, then hungry investors started lining up to buy financial secondary offerings. The result was the same: loans were written off, capital depleted, new capital acquired and original investors diluted. Painful only for the original owners.</div><div> </div><div>While mortgage and credit card loan delinquencies are still at record levels, commercial real estate lending was poorly underwritten and is now showing serious weakness, another capital consuming issue is raising its head. On January 1, 2010, FAS167 will take effect unless delayed. The effect will be that banks must set aside additional capital to support off-balance-sheet credit card receivables and other securitizations. Whether or not the assets are brought back on the balance sheet or not, more capital must be found to support the potential risk of implied recourse. The big credit card issurers -- JP Morgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='More opinion and analysis of JPM'>JPM</a>), Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>), Wells Fargo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc' title='More opinion and analysis of WFC'>WFC</a>), Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='More opinion and analysis of BAC'>BAC</a>) and Capital One (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cof' title='More opinion and analysis of COF'>COF</a>) -- will be affected <span>to varing degrees</span>. Since current capital isn't plentiful, they will sell more shares and dilute the current base.</div><div> </div><div>Several days ago, First National Nebraska, a moderate sized regional bank with a large credit card operation, filed to sell $250 million of new common and preferred securities. The major reason given for the decision was the need to support off-balance-sheet credit card securitizations. The decision to sell new shares was a difficult one for First National, as it is owned, almost exclusively, by one family. They felt the need, and pressure, to dilute themselves to comply with FAS167. What do you think the professional, non-owner, managers will do? Yes, sell new shares to whom ever will buy them, Government or public.</div><div> </div><div>Setting aside concerns about the remaining potential loan losses and adequacy of loan loss reserves, capital raising is coming again to the banks courtesy of the accountants and transparency. Bank shares will be worth less in 2010.<br><br><strong><em>Disclosure: </em></strong><em>William Kabourek has no ownership positions in the above named companies</em><br> </div></span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/174407-bank-dilution-looms-for-2010?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm">JPM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc">WFC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cof">COF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archipelago's IPO Valuation Favors K12</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173981-archipelago-s-ipo-valuation-favors-k12?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/18/saupload_archipelago_letter_header_1.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/18/saupload_archipelago_letter_header_2.png" align="right" style="padding: 5px;" /></a>Archipelago (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ARCL'>ARCL</a>) goes public on Thursday. The company intends to raise $100 Million, with shares coming approximately one-half from the company and the remainder from selling private equity companies. At the mid point of the anticipated offering ARCL will be valued at $400 Million.</span></p> <p>Providence Equity Partners bought the company in January 2007 for approximately $85 million and owns 77 percent. Founded in 2000, the company had sales of $42 Million over the past 12 months. Earnings for the nine months ended September 30 were $6.9 Million while the net profit for the prior year was $1 million. ARCL has been growing their student enrollment and has recently entered the high school market. Their business is basically internet based test preparation.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:04:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><span><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/18/saupload_archipelago_letter_header_1.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/11/18/saupload_archipelago_letter_header_2.png" align="right" style="padding: 5px;" /></a>Archipelago (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ARCL'>ARCL</a>) goes public on Thursday. The company intends to raise $100 Million, with shares coming approximately one-half from the company and the remainder from selling private equity companies. At the mid point of the anticipated offering ARCL will be valued at $400 Million.</span></p> <p>Providence Equity Partners bought the company in January 2007 for approximately $85 million and owns 77 percent. Founded in 2000, the company had sales of $42 Million over the past 12 months. Earnings for the nine months ended September 30 were $6.9 Million while the net profit for the prior year was $1 million. ARCL has been growing their student enrollment and has recently entered the high school market. Their business is basically internet based test preparation.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173981-archipelago-s-ipo-valuation-favors-k12?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lrn">LRN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arcl">ARCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In 2010 It'll Be Jobs, Jobs, Jobs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172767-in-2010-it-ll-be-jobs-jobs-jobs?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172767</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>Soon the Democrats will have their healthcare victory. It may be a hollow victory that barely resembles their initial goals, but it will be declared momentous and beneficial to all Americans. We will have more laws and taxes for the sake of illusive healthcare improvements. Any consequences of the legislation, such as debt, increased taxation and job losses, will be several years away, so the celebration can begin.</span></p><p><span>With some sort of a healthcare victory behind Obama and the Democrats, they can turn their attention to what Americans are really concerned about. That is the economy and job creation. The party in power has been slow to realize that healthcare reform is not the voters' number one priority. In 2010 the Democrats will innundate us with job creation legislation.</span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:40:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><span>Soon the Democrats will have their healthcare victory. It may be a hollow victory that barely resembles their initial goals, but it will be declared momentous and beneficial to all Americans. We will have more laws and taxes for the sake of illusive healthcare improvements. Any consequences of the legislation, such as debt, increased taxation and job losses, will be several years away, so the celebration can begin.</span></p><p><span>With some sort of a healthcare victory behind Obama and the Democrats, they can turn their attention to what Americans are really concerned about. That is the economy and job creation. The party in power has been slow to realize that healthcare reform is not the voters' number one priority. In 2010 the Democrats will innundate us with job creation legislation.</span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172767-in-2010-it-ll-be-jobs-jobs-jobs?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/de">DE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/trn">TRN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmi">VMI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time to Take a Bite of Smart Balance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/166171-time-to-take-a-bite-of-smart-balance?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">166171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span>I've owned Smart Balance (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smbl' title='More opinion and analysis of SMBL'>SMBL</a>) on and off over the past several years. The story hasn't changed, but the share price is inching lower. An opportunity is at hand if you can wait five years. Regardless of the &quot;market's&quot; results, Smart Balance will reach $1 Billion, control a significant share of the dairy case, and sell out for a very nice price.<div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/13/saupload_smbl.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />The story here is one of smart management that has built brands successfully before. Steve Hughes, SMBL CEO, has been the architect of tremendous brand growth at ConAgra (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cag' title='More opinion and analysis of CAG'>CAG</a>), Dean Foods (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/df' title='More opinion and analysis of DF'>DF</a>), and Celestial Seasonings. His team has years of experience and the goal of building SMBL into a billion dollar foods concern. They are currently at the $250MM level after several years of business.</div><div>Smart Balance is a brand. It doesn't own manufacturing or research facilities. It is product, marketing, and people. It makes a little money and generates cash, enough to pay down its acquisition debt to $65MM. They should be debt-free in a year or so. The lack of manufacturing is an advantage in our current tough times.</div><div>At its current share price of $5.90, the stock can be gathered in at a price that is significantly lower than the IPO price, employee options, and the entry points of some of their largest private equity investors. While it isn't at its 2 year low point, it is well off its highs and hasn't participated in the market's run up.</div><div>A reasonable plan is to buy some and tuck it away for 5 years. Forget about what the market price is and let Steve Hughes do his magic. Within that timeframe, he'll sell the company and you'll end up with a boatload of ConAgra (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cag' title='More opinion and analysis of CAG'>CAG</a>), Kraft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kft' title='More opinion and analysis of KFT'>KFT</a>), or Heinz (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hnz' title='More opinion and analysis of HNZ'>HNZ</a>) shares. That's my bet anyhow.<br><strong><em>Disclosure:</em></strong><em> William Kabourek  owns shares of Smart Balance.</em></div></span></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:29:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><span><span>I've owned Smart Balance (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smbl' title='More opinion and analysis of SMBL'>SMBL</a>) on and off over the past several years. The story hasn't changed, but the share price is inching lower. An opportunity is at hand if you can wait five years. Regardless of the &quot;market's&quot; results, Smart Balance will reach $1 Billion, control a significant share of the dairy case, and sell out for a very nice price.<div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/13/saupload_smbl.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />The story here is one of smart management that has built brands successfully before. Steve Hughes, SMBL CEO, has been the architect of tremendous brand growth at ConAgra (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cag' title='More opinion and analysis of CAG'>CAG</a>), Dean Foods (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/df' title='More opinion and analysis of DF'>DF</a>), and Celestial Seasonings. His team has years of experience and the goal of building SMBL into a billion dollar foods concern. They are currently at the $250MM level after several years of business.</div><div>Smart Balance is a brand. It doesn't own manufacturing or research facilities. It is product, marketing, and people. It makes a little money and generates cash, enough to pay down its acquisition debt to $65MM. They should be debt-free in a year or so. The lack of manufacturing is an advantage in our current tough times.</div><div>At its current share price of $5.90, the stock can be gathered in at a price that is significantly lower than the IPO price, employee options, and the entry points of some of their largest private equity investors. While it isn't at its 2 year low point, it is well off its highs and hasn't participated in the market's run up.</div><div>A reasonable plan is to buy some and tuck it away for 5 years. Forget about what the market price is and let Steve Hughes do his magic. Within that timeframe, he'll sell the company and you'll end up with a boatload of ConAgra (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cag' title='More opinion and analysis of CAG'>CAG</a>), Kraft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kft' title='More opinion and analysis of KFT'>KFT</a>), or Heinz (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hnz' title='More opinion and analysis of HNZ'>HNZ</a>) shares. That's my bet anyhow.<br><strong><em>Disclosure:</em></strong><em> William Kabourek  owns shares of Smart Balance.</em></div></span></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/166171-time-to-take-a-bite-of-smart-balance?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/smbl">SMBL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Banks Require Zero Interest Cost for Overnight Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/164417-why-banks-require-zero-interest-cost-for-overnight-funds?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">164417</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/2/saupload_marblebank.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/2/saupload_marblebank_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" /></a>It's well known that commercial banks have faced strong headwinds for the past several years.</p><p>While banking commentators acknowledge that not all of the problem mortgage loans have been foreclosed yet and commercial real estate problems loom, the industry has been saved by the combined action of the Fed and the Treasury. Share prices have moved dramatically upward off the fear induced bottom. Many seem inclined to believe that there is more upside to be had as long as the Fed keeps interest rates near zero.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:45:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/2/saupload_marblebank.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/10/2/saupload_marblebank_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" /></a>It's well known that commercial banks have faced strong headwinds for the past several years.</p><p>While banking commentators acknowledge that not all of the problem mortgage loans have been foreclosed yet and commercial real estate problems loom, the industry has been saved by the combined action of the Fed and the Treasury. Share prices have moved dramatically upward off the fear induced bottom. Many seem inclined to believe that there is more upside to be had as long as the Fed keeps interest rates near zero.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/164417-why-banks-require-zero-interest-cost-for-overnight-funds?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>K12 Could Be a Short Seller's Nightmare</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/159006-k12-could-be-a-short-seller-s-nightmare?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">159006</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>I've thought that internet learning was destined to be a significant component of educational spending since 2000. That was the year that K12 Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lrn' title='More opinion and analysis of LRN'>LRN</a>) was founded. That was also the year that I put money into a private placement of Class.com equity. The companies are very similar as they deliver distance learning content over the internet, except that Class.com limits itself to grades 9-12. The similarity also departs in revenue production as K12 generates sales of $32oMM while Class.com is much smaller. After long gestation periods, both started making money several years ago. <p>In addition to my stake in the private company, I've put together a position in K12 as well. Like many stocks, it has made a nice recovery from its lows. I think it will continue to do well as it is in the sweet spot of education. It can save school boards brick and mortar expenses, enhance charter school curriculum, and remains popular with home schoolers. It works for remedial as well as advanced placement. Since a teacher is involved, even the teachers unions aren't adamant about killing the process.</p> <p>With tight school budgets, short sellers identified LRN as a candidate for decreased funding and resultant revenues. That hasn't happened, but the short interest is still present. And what a presence-it's huge! At mid month, there were over 7.5M shares borrowed and sold short. That is 39% of the float. At present volume levels it would take 63 days to cover those shorts. Take a look at the following table:</p></p></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:57:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><span>I've thought that internet learning was destined to be a significant component of educational spending since 2000. That was the year that K12 Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lrn' title='More opinion and analysis of LRN'>LRN</a>) was founded. That was also the year that I put money into a private placement of Class.com equity. The companies are very similar as they deliver distance learning content over the internet, except that Class.com limits itself to grades 9-12. The similarity also departs in revenue production as K12 generates sales of $32oMM while Class.com is much smaller. After long gestation periods, both started making money several years ago. <p>In addition to my stake in the private company, I've put together a position in K12 as well. Like many stocks, it has made a nice recovery from its lows. I think it will continue to do well as it is in the sweet spot of education. It can save school boards brick and mortar expenses, enhance charter school curriculum, and remains popular with home schoolers. It works for remedial as well as advanced placement. Since a teacher is involved, even the teachers unions aren't adamant about killing the process.</p> <p>With tight school budgets, short sellers identified LRN as a candidate for decreased funding and resultant revenues. That hasn't happened, but the short interest is still present. And what a presence-it's huge! At mid month, there were over 7.5M shares borrowed and sold short. That is 39% of the float. At present volume levels it would take 63 days to cover those shorts. Take a look at the following table:</p></p></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/159006-k12-could-be-a-short-seller-s-nightmare?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lrn">LRN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Geithner Plan Calls for Outrage, Not Celebration</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127541-the-geithner-plan-calls-for-outrage-not-celebration?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/24/saupload_gander.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/24/saupload_gander_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"  /></a>Yesterday was day of celebration in the market as investors took comfort in the government's latest plan. It should have been a day of outrage toward government bureaucrats and politicians that have now blessed the very actions that they demonized over the past two years and crippled the world's financial industry.</p><div> </div><div>Bank earnings, capital ratios, and stability have been destroyed by mindless adherence to mark-to-market accounting. Despite the pleas that there was not a functioning marketplace and that the cashflow value of the securities, when held to maturity, was greater than their distress value, regulators turned a deaf ear.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Now with the financial industry in disarray, the government is performing a rescue. <strong>They are rescuing an industry that would not need rescuing had there been leniency early on</strong>. Banks asked for permission to mark illiquid assets at a value determined by likely cashflows since they would hold 'till maturity or until prices recovered. What is the government's plan? Buy the securities and hold till maturity or until prices rebound! The government doesn't mark-to-market because they set the rules. Banks had to reduce leverage and maintain capital ratios throughout this debacle. The Feds have embraced leverage that would make a hedge fund manager quake in his boots, but that's OK. Capital ratios also are of no importance since they are the saviors from our government.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Some serious thought and forbearance from regulators could have allowed the banks to accomplish the same thing that the Geitner plan is attempting, but two years ago with much less pain and anguish. A half a decade ago, Wall Street bankers ran into trouble and ample embarrassment when they peddled securities by &quot;putting some lipstick on that pig.&quot; Now our government has dressed up our gander in top hat and tails two years late. It's not time to celebrate, it's time for outrage.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:25:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/24/saupload_gander.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/24/saupload_gander_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"  /></a>Yesterday was day of celebration in the market as investors took comfort in the government's latest plan. It should have been a day of outrage toward government bureaucrats and politicians that have now blessed the very actions that they demonized over the past two years and crippled the world's financial industry.</p><div> </div><div>Bank earnings, capital ratios, and stability have been destroyed by mindless adherence to mark-to-market accounting. Despite the pleas that there was not a functioning marketplace and that the cashflow value of the securities, when held to maturity, was greater than their distress value, regulators turned a deaf ear.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Now with the financial industry in disarray, the government is performing a rescue. <strong>They are rescuing an industry that would not need rescuing had there been leniency early on</strong>. Banks asked for permission to mark illiquid assets at a value determined by likely cashflows since they would hold 'till maturity or until prices recovered. What is the government's plan? Buy the securities and hold till maturity or until prices rebound! The government doesn't mark-to-market because they set the rules. Banks had to reduce leverage and maintain capital ratios throughout this debacle. The Feds have embraced leverage that would make a hedge fund manager quake in his boots, but that's OK. Capital ratios also are of no importance since they are the saviors from our government.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Some serious thought and forbearance from regulators could have allowed the banks to accomplish the same thing that the Geitner plan is attempting, but two years ago with much less pain and anguish. A half a decade ago, Wall Street bankers ran into trouble and ample embarrassment when they peddled securities by &quot;putting some lipstick on that pig.&quot; Now our government has dressed up our gander in top hat and tails two years late. It's not time to celebrate, it's time for outrage.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127541-the-geithner-plan-calls-for-outrage-not-celebration?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Banking Should Be Boring</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127254-why-banking-should-be-boring?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127254</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_bank_02.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_bank_02_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px;"  /></a>Banking should be conservative and rather boring. It shouldn't be a place for extraordinary returns and aggressive risk taking. There should be more thinking and less algorithms in bank credit decisions. If our current credit meltdown doesn't teach us a long term lesson our future will evolve into a very unstable, rough ride.</p> <p>The old banking saw was the 3-6-3 rule: pay depositors 3%, lend the money out at 6%, and be at the golf club by 3 o'clock. That 3% net interest margin, more like 4% in recent decades, didn't allow for many lending mistakes. Significant losses were hard to make up when you only earned 3-4% NIM. Bankers knew this and behaved. Earnings came slowly and incrementally. Mistakes caused an increase in loan loss provisions, greatly reduced net profits, and several years of pain and stagnation. Bankers said NO to questionable deals.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_bank_02.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_bank_02_1.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px;"  /></a>Banking should be conservative and rather boring. It shouldn't be a place for extraordinary returns and aggressive risk taking. There should be more thinking and less algorithms in bank credit decisions. If our current credit meltdown doesn't teach us a long term lesson our future will evolve into a very unstable, rough ride.</p> <p>The old banking saw was the 3-6-3 rule: pay depositors 3%, lend the money out at 6%, and be at the golf club by 3 o'clock. That 3% net interest margin, more like 4% in recent decades, didn't allow for many lending mistakes. Significant losses were hard to make up when you only earned 3-4% NIM. Bankers knew this and behaved. Earnings came slowly and incrementally. Mistakes caused an increase in loan loss provisions, greatly reduced net profits, and several years of pain and stagnation. Bankers said NO to questionable deals.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127254-why-banking-should-be-boring?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Long Case for Waste Management</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/124792-the-long-case-for-waste-management?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">124792</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/8/saupload_waste_management_truck.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/8/saupload_waste_management_truck_1.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></a>I like Waste Management (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmi' title='More opinion and analysis of WMI'>WMI</a>). It makes sense as a use for new money, but don't buy now. It's apt to go down like all securities in the current market. Good companies that continue to throw off good cashflow returns go down along with the poor earners. Study WMI, but be patient and buy it later. You will be rewarded.</p><p>Waste Management is a great company with a huge moat around its franchise. It is the nation's largest garbage company and now operates as almost a douopoly now that Republic Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsg' title='More opinion and analysis of RSG'>RSG</a>) has acquired Allied Waste. These two companies now control over 40% of the country's waste business. They have the ability to influence prices and I anticipate that they will, to the stockholders advantage.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:25:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/8/saupload_waste_management_truck.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/8/saupload_waste_management_truck_1.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></a>I like Waste Management (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmi' title='More opinion and analysis of WMI'>WMI</a>). It makes sense as a use for new money, but don't buy now. It's apt to go down like all securities in the current market. Good companies that continue to throw off good cashflow returns go down along with the poor earners. Study WMI, but be patient and buy it later. You will be rewarded.</p><p>Waste Management is a great company with a huge moat around its franchise. It is the nation's largest garbage company and now operates as almost a douopoly now that Republic Services (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsg' title='More opinion and analysis of RSG'>RSG</a>) has acquired Allied Waste. These two companies now control over 40% of the country's waste business. They have the ability to influence prices and I anticipate that they will, to the stockholders advantage.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/124792-the-long-case-for-waste-management?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsg">RSG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wm">WM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aaron's Rents: Rare Opportunity for Share Price Appreciation in 2009</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/119333-aaron-s-rents-rare-opportunity-for-share-price-appreciation-in-2009?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">119333</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tough times are prosperous times for rent-to-own companies. Rent-to-own companies are low-end banks. They provide furniture, appliances, and electronics to those that have credit issues or are turned off by the established credit industry.</p><p>Customers are generally lower income earners that know that they will get into financial difficulty, again, at some time and like the flexibility of returning the merchandise that they are renting as opposed to the embarrassment  and frustration of suits and repossessions. They are willing to pay higher prices for flexibility, such as the return privilege, weekly payments, and the possibility of eventual ownership if they can maintain their financial stability.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:30:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p>Tough times are prosperous times for rent-to-own companies. Rent-to-own companies are low-end banks. They provide furniture, appliances, and electronics to those that have credit issues or are turned off by the established credit industry.</p><p>Customers are generally lower income earners that know that they will get into financial difficulty, again, at some time and like the flexibility of returning the merchandise that they are renting as opposed to the embarrassment  and frustration of suits and repossessions. They are willing to pay higher prices for flexibility, such as the return privilege, weekly payments, and the possibility of eventual ownership if they can maintain their financial stability.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/119333-aaron-s-rents-rare-opportunity-for-share-price-appreciation-in-2009?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rcii">RCII</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aan">AAN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expect Rosy Earnings from Flowers Foods</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/117931-expect-rosy-earnings-from-flowers-foods?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">117931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/2/saupload_flowers_foods_merges_1.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/2/saupload_saupload_flowers_foods_merges.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;"  /></a>On February 5th Flowers Foods (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flo' title='More opinion and analysis of FLO'>FLO</a>) will announce their latest quarterly results. I expect the results to be good as the company updated 2008 guidance which was announced as recently as early December, and the company has a good record of managing Wall Street's expectations. In our current environment of lower results and cloudier forecasts, I expect Flowers to be relatively upbeat about their 2009 results.</p> <div> </div> <div>In the interest of full disclosure, and humility, I first became interested in FLO last spring during the rampant increases in commodity prices. Food costs were skyrocketing along with diesel prices and Flowers' competitors were reporting terrible results as input costs were far exceeding the ability to raise prices. Flowers was still selling at an all time high and hadn't seen any impact of the stock market pull back. I expected that increased costs would affect their earnings as they had their competitors and net income would drop below expectations.<p>I bet against Flowers. The company announced record sales, earnings, and raised the quarterly dividend. I lost money. But I was impressed by a management that could outperform an entire industry. I decided to keep watching and waiting for an opportunity to buy FLO and recoup some of my losses.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:32:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/2/saupload_flowers_foods_merges_1.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/2/saupload_saupload_flowers_foods_merges.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;"  /></a>On February 5th Flowers Foods (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flo' title='More opinion and analysis of FLO'>FLO</a>) will announce their latest quarterly results. I expect the results to be good as the company updated 2008 guidance which was announced as recently as early December, and the company has a good record of managing Wall Street's expectations. In our current environment of lower results and cloudier forecasts, I expect Flowers to be relatively upbeat about their 2009 results.</p> <div> </div> <div>In the interest of full disclosure, and humility, I first became interested in FLO last spring during the rampant increases in commodity prices. Food costs were skyrocketing along with diesel prices and Flowers' competitors were reporting terrible results as input costs were far exceeding the ability to raise prices. Flowers was still selling at an all time high and hadn't seen any impact of the stock market pull back. I expected that increased costs would affect their earnings as they had their competitors and net income would drop below expectations.<p>I bet against Flowers. The company announced record sales, earnings, and raised the quarterly dividend. I lost money. But I was impressed by a management that could outperform an entire industry. I decided to keep watching and waiting for an opportunity to buy FLO and recoup some of my losses.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/117931-expect-rosy-earnings-from-flowers-foods?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flo">FLO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Vulcan's Managers Know What They're Doing?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/117761-do-vulcan-s-managers-know-what-they-re-doing?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">117761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Is Vulcan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc' title='More opinion and analysis of VMC'>VMC</a>) run by managers that understand business or kids playing in a big sandbox? For shareholders' sake, I hope management isn't just a feel good bunch, but logical thinkers that will do what is right for the company. You can't fix a company by avoiding tough decisions.</p> <p>Thursday, VMC filed a SEC document detailing $400M of new long term debt. The bonds yield 10.375% and 10.125%. That's about 8% more than Treasuries. The rates are punitive. The proceeds will be used to repay short term debt and maturing long term debt. Since they're paying 10+%, rather than using internally generated funds, for the funds necessary to repay debt,  I assume that cashflow hasn't been robust.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:22:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p>Is Vulcan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc' title='More opinion and analysis of VMC'>VMC</a>) run by managers that understand business or kids playing in a big sandbox? For shareholders' sake, I hope management isn't just a feel good bunch, but logical thinkers that will do what is right for the company. You can't fix a company by avoiding tough decisions.</p> <p>Thursday, VMC filed a SEC document detailing $400M of new long term debt. The bonds yield 10.375% and 10.125%. That's about 8% more than Treasuries. The rates are punitive. The proceeds will be used to repay short term debt and maturing long term debt. Since they're paying 10+%, rather than using internally generated funds, for the funds necessary to repay debt,  I assume that cashflow hasn't been robust.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/117761-do-vulcan-s-managers-know-what-they-re-doing?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc">VMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mergers and Acquisitions: 2009's Only Positive?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/115272-mergers-and-acquisitions-2009-s-only-positive?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">115272</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/18/saupload_m_and_a_handshake.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/18/saupload_m_and_a_handshake_1.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;"  /></a></p> <p>The economic horizon appears bleak. Yet many money managers reassure us that the the market is a discounting  mechanism and will turn upward six months before the economy improves. At some point these optimists will be proven correct. But I fear that the second half of 2009 will not produce the market wide results they forecast.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:49:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/18/saupload_m_and_a_handshake.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/18/saupload_m_and_a_handshake_1.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;"  /></a></p> <p>The economic horizon appears bleak. Yet many money managers reassure us that the the market is a discounting  mechanism and will turn upward six months before the economy improves. At some point these optimists will be proven correct. But I fear that the second half of 2009 will not produce the market wide results they forecast.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/115272-mergers-and-acquisitions-2009-s-only-positive?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/laz">LAZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Will Happen to Berkshire Hathaway Post-Buffett?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114651-what-will-happen-to-berkshire-hathaway-post-buffett?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The legendary investor, Warren Buffett, when asked what will happen when he is no longer at the helm of Berkshire (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>), always is quick to assure us that he has identified qualified successors to run the company and manage the investment portfolio. Besides, he feels fine and his doctors proclaim him in good health.</p><p>I believe Warren. He has a plan and who am I to possibly criticize the individuals that he selects as his heirs apparent? Additionally, his diet is similar to mine, lots of cheeseburgers and steaks and, best that I can tell, his exercise routine is as infrequent as mine. So, I'm not worried about Warren's imminent demise or his designation of successor management.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:25:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p>The legendary investor, Warren Buffett, when asked what will happen when he is no longer at the helm of Berkshire (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a' title='More opinion and analysis of BRK.A'>BRK.A</a>), always is quick to assure us that he has identified qualified successors to run the company and manage the investment portfolio. Besides, he feels fine and his doctors proclaim him in good health.</p><p>I believe Warren. He has a plan and who am I to possibly criticize the individuals that he selects as his heirs apparent? Additionally, his diet is similar to mine, lots of cheeseburgers and steaks and, best that I can tell, his exercise routine is as infrequent as mine. So, I'm not worried about Warren's imminent demise or his designation of successor management.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114651-what-will-happen-to-berkshire-hathaway-post-buffett?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a">BRK.A</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b">BRK.B</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uncle Sam Needs a Taste of His Own Medicine</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114337-uncle-sam-needs-a-taste-of-his-own-medicine?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114337</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_dees_unclesam.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_dees_unclesam_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="178" /></a>Once upon a time, when banks were run by bankers that had their net worth at risk, the cardinal rule was: &quot;don't borrow short and lend long.&quot; The Savings and Loan industry never learned that maxim and it has since disappeared. Regulators, in response to the S&amp;L crisis, put renewed emphasis on Asset/Liability Management and hoped to prevent timing mismatches in bank funding and investments. To some degree that has worked and bankers have found other ways to roll the dice and risk stockholder money.</p> <p>But the regulators, Fed, OCC, and FDIC know better. Since they are the government, you would think the Treasury would consult their experts. If bank examiners are knowledgeable enough to advise and punish banks, then you would assume that they should be consulted regarding the U.S. government's funding. But, alas, Treasury doesn't seem to be asking for advice.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:35:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_dees_unclesam.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_dees_unclesam_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="178" /></a>Once upon a time, when banks were run by bankers that had their net worth at risk, the cardinal rule was: &quot;don't borrow short and lend long.&quot; The Savings and Loan industry never learned that maxim and it has since disappeared. Regulators, in response to the S&amp;L crisis, put renewed emphasis on Asset/Liability Management and hoped to prevent timing mismatches in bank funding and investments. To some degree that has worked and bankers have found other ways to roll the dice and risk stockholder money.</p> <p>But the regulators, Fed, OCC, and FDIC know better. Since they are the government, you would think the Treasury would consult their experts. If bank examiners are knowledgeable enough to advise and punish banks, then you would assume that they should be consulted regarding the U.S. government's funding. But, alas, Treasury doesn't seem to be asking for advice.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114337-uncle-sam-needs-a-taste-of-his-own-medicine?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bil">BIL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gka">GKA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gkb">GKB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gkc">GKC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gkd">GKD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gke">GKE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iei">IEI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ipe">IPE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ite">ITE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/shv">SHV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/shy">SHY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tip">TIP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlh">TLH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlo">TLO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlt">TLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vulcan Materials: Dividend, Share Price Not Solid as Rock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114322-vulcan-materials-dividend-share-price-not-solid-as-rock?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114322</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_vulcan_materials_sack_head.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_vulcan_materials_sack_head_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="113" /></a>Vulcan Materials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc' title='More opinion and analysis of VMC'>VMC</a>), the country's largest aggregate company, is like an easy first date. It's easy to get interested as it is going to make you feel good, but it is also really ugly. The whole experience is a one bagger.</p> <p>This company, and industry, is fundamentally sound. It makes money year in and year out. It can do extremely well when construction is on a roll. It has even done well the past several years when construction has been constrained. But it didn't do well by selling more rock, gravel, cement, concrete and asphalt. While volumes were decreasing, the industry had the pricing power to increase prices. Rare, but factual. Can that phenomenon continue in 2009?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:51:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_vulcan_materials_sack_head.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/12/saupload_vulcan_materials_sack_head_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="113" /></a>Vulcan Materials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc' title='More opinion and analysis of VMC'>VMC</a>), the country's largest aggregate company, is like an easy first date. It's easy to get interested as it is going to make you feel good, but it is also really ugly. The whole experience is a one bagger.</p> <p>This company, and industry, is fundamentally sound. It makes money year in and year out. It can do extremely well when construction is on a roll. It has even done well the past several years when construction has been constrained. But it didn't do well by selling more rock, gravel, cement, concrete and asphalt. While volumes were decreasing, the industry had the pricing power to increase prices. Rare, but factual. Can that phenomenon continue in 2009?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114322-vulcan-materials-dividend-share-price-not-solid-as-rock?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmc">VMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Case for Lazard: Vive La France </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/113951-the-case-for-lazard-vive-la-france?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">113951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/9/saupload_6a00d8341d19f453ef00e554039c8d8834_800wi.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/9/saupload_6a00d8341d19f453ef00e554039c8d8834_800wi_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="157" height="195" /></a>Of late I've felt as if I was Beldar Conehead. Over the holidays I consumed &quot;mass quantities&quot; of food and swallowed beer by the six-pack. Additionally, I'd feel comfortable saying I too was from France, as Beldar regularly answered, since our politicians are inserting the government into more and more aspects of  corporate America. We may soon be more French than the French.</p><p>During this period of uncertainty, social change, and paralysis, I've put some money into an American investment bank with a strong French heritage. Egads! An investment bank?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:27:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>William Kabourek</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://thecrustycreditanalyst.blogspot.com/'>William Kabourek</a> submits:</strong><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/9/saupload_6a00d8341d19f453ef00e554039c8d8834_800wi.jpg" ><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/9/saupload_6a00d8341d19f453ef00e554039c8d8834_800wi_1.jpg" align="right" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer;" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="157" height="195" /></a>Of late I've felt as if I was Beldar Conehead. Over the holidays I consumed &quot;mass quantities&quot; of food and swallowed beer by the six-pack. Additionally, I'd feel comfortable saying I too was from France, as Beldar regularly answered, since our politicians are inserting the government into more and more aspects of  corporate America. We may soon be more French than the French.</p><p>During this period of uncertainty, social change, and paralysis, I've put some money into an American investment bank with a strong French heritage. Egads! An investment bank?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/113951-the-case-for-lazard-vive-la-france?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/laz">LAZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/william-kabourek">William Kabourek</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
