Seeking Alpha
View as an RSS Feed

Zachary Scheidt  

View Zachary Scheidt's Comments BY TICKER:

Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Obama's Budget and Healthcare Stocks Mix Like Oil and Water [View article]
    468559 - I wonder if you will share this feeling when there is significantly less drug discovery, poor physical therapy, and hospitals that offer sub-standard care. This is what happens when there is no profit potential in ANY economically sensitive industry.

    If there is no chance at making a good living in medicine, students will not altruistically pursue the profession en mass, and over time the technology and advancements which have made care standards so much better over the last 10 years will simply disappear.

    You NEED to have a safety net for those who cannot afford care. I embrace that and totally agree with that. But taking an entire industry and making it subject to a socialist agenda in the name of helping a few who are not currently covered will simply bring down care for EVERYONE - it will not improve care over time.

    Why not develop a more comprehensive program for those who truly cannot afford health coverage, and let those who can continue to operate in a free market environment?
    Aug 10, 2009. 12:38 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • A Stock Market Rally Does Not a Recovery Make [View article]
    Banks are certainly still sitting on toxic waste which could cause considerable losses in the coming quarters. But CIT showed us that liquidity is at least temporarily available as the industry appears to believe that the Fed will STILL step in and support. That expectation can help grease the wheels and add private liquidity, but the precident is dangerous.

    Essentially, the loose monetary policy is "giving a drunk another drink" and while it may alleviate the headache today, it does little to reform the long-term addiction to excessive debt which is so ingrained in both the consumer and business markets. Whatever happened to expanding your net worth or business based on hard work and conservative fiscal discipline - instead of excessive borrowing?
    Aug 10, 2009. 12:13 PM | 5 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • News Corp. Seeking Salvation in Paid Content [View article]
    It does appear that charging for all online content would only give competitors an additional edge. For instance, if it cost just $1 per month for myspace, I'll bet a portion of the 123 million users would simply migrate to facebook.

    There may be other ways of driving revenue (outside advertising) besides simply charging for all online content. For instance, there could be free and premium levels of content. Maybe a basic myspace page is free but to add certain applications you pay a small nominal fee. The Financial Times offers something like 10 free articles a month and then if your computer looks at more, you have to get a subscription.

    Now of course there are ways to work around that, but the bottom line is that SOME users will finally opt to get the premium subscription in order to avoid the hassle. And in the mean time, the free content to start with will help the company reach a broader audience.

    Murdoch should be careful not to extrapolate a few quarters worth of data (especially in this environment) and expect it to pertain to all future revenue. The better choice would be to focus on high quality content and some more creative ways to keep readers involved and paying for certain premium products.

    I've been reading the Chris Anderson book "Free" and it gives a lot of interesting thoughts behind the concept of free media and the new era of how content is distributed. I would definitely recommend the book for a quick weekend read.
    Aug 7, 2009. 08:17 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Genco Shipping: Coming Out of Hibernation [View article]
    TheHague - if you're investing for the emotional high and low - basically for the action and the rush - you should probably move to LasVegas and find a great craps table to stand next to. While I certainly love this business and enjoy the dynamic of finding opportunities and following the swings, at the end of the day you have to have a system, discipline, and risk control to stay alive.

    The quote "you have not lost anything until you sell" is quite misleading. Maybe we should rephrase - you don't know how much you have lost until you sell. The stock you own is worth less - now of course it could rebound tomorrow, but for now you have lost. If the original reasoning you used to get involved is no longer valid, you should go back to cash and evaluate what happened.

    Dividends are great, but only if you can maintain the capital balance you start with. If you receive a 10% yield and lose 15% of the value, that hardly does you any good.

    Please be careful and don't believe all the "prases" you hear. Successful investing is 90% damage control.
    Aug 5, 2009. 02:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • GDP Report Offers Positive Headline, But Negative Details [View article]
    Sr. EM - sometimes fewer words can yield greater wisdom. Yes I think you're right.

    FB5000 your points are well taken - although not necessarily agreed with. I don't think the economic indicators are as clear as you make them out to be. I'm not the "gold gun and grub" guy in a bunker, but I do think it pays to understand that this is not an ordinary recession that works its way out in a few quarters. There are serious issues we need to grapple with and until we are willing to actually FIX problems and not try to re-inflate another bubble, we will continue to have unsustainable recoveries and then crashes.

    You can bash Fox and I'll bash CNN and maybe the two of us can end up somewhere in the middle...

    To use your line, that's all
    Aug 5, 2009. 02:39 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Gold Could Hit $1,300 This Year [View article]
    I think gold could certainly have a strong run, but actually have more confidence in Silver. The dual purpose metal (both an industrial metal as well as a precious metal) is facing production shortages at a time when inflation could add sharply to demand. On top of that, the industrial uses for Silver could compete with inflation hedges to push Silver past $20 fairly quickly (that's 36% from here and it actually could go much higher).
    Aug 5, 2009. 01:06 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • GDP Report Offers Positive Headline, But Negative Details [View article]
    Mad HFT - I like your analogy of taking money out of one pocket, putting it in the other, and calling it a profit. The statistics show significant weakness - as a whole - and in specific areas. While we may not be falling at the same rate as the first quarter, *falling* still means that the trend is lower.

    Thiazole - I suppose there is a chance that Q3 shows growth, but it seems highly unlikely. Even if we DO see GDP tick slightly higher in Q3 it will only be as a result of higher government spending which in the long run will come back to bite us. That's not an increase to our true domestic product - it's an accounting gimmick - like many corporations have been punished for using.

    Monthly reporting may be helpful to see what is going on in a bit more detail, but remember that the more often you take samples, the more "noise" or statistical irrelevant information you must sort through. I personally think it's better to use quarterly reporting but then to look at some of the monthly figures such as retail sales, unemployment levels, etc to see what is going on on a shorter-term basis.

    ETF desk - very good point. How bad would consumer spending be without Uncle Sam shoving future taxpayer money into the retail pocket and then begging him to spend it?

    Thanks for the good comments guys - keep em coming!
    Aug 3, 2009. 01:33 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Fundamental Misconceptions in the Speculation Debate [View article]
    wow - so those who believe that the futures markets fall outside of normal capital markets "merely reveal their ignorance"?? That's a bit extreme don't you think?

    My article on position limits ( inspired a lot of comments on both sides of this argument, but I would always consider opinions with respect even if they didn't match my own.

    The futures market is part of capital markets and is vital for the functioning of the cash markets. An active and broad assortment of traders (both speculators as well as commercials) will give us the best price discovery. We SHOULD act to keep large players from manipulating markets but there's less evidence of this type of activity than many realize.

    What worries me is that limiting position sizes is just one of many steps away from a free capitalistic market and towards one where the government influences prices. That's manipulation from a player that is MUCH larger than any Goldman or Morgan Stanley trading desk.
    Aug 3, 2009. 11:04 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • First Solar's Great News...No, Terrible News...Wait... [View article]
    While the dynamics are changing for FSLR (and the margin compression is certainly disappointing), the stock still trades at an attractive multiple considering both historical and future growth. I think FSLR will end up as one of the "surviving giants" and the lower price may offer a buying opportunity.

    However as you state, the volatility in these names is tremendous as evidenced by the stock now 25% below the May high, but also 50% above the March low. It may make sense to hold a reasonably sized "core" position in FSLR and then use some additional capital to trade around the position - buying fear and selling greed.

    It's too soon to jump in and buy the fear after only one day of selling, but sometime in the next week or two, it probably makes sense to begin dabbling in this industry leader once more.
    Aug 3, 2009. 08:24 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • More on Capital Ratios of U.S. Banks [View article]
    One of the biggest dangers to the capitalization rates (and ultimately to the banks survival) is the commercial real estate market. Many loans to developers and builders on the commercial side have not taken the hit that residential mortgages have. But the losses could simply be the next step of this ugly economic cycle.

    If losses begin to mount on the commercial real estate portfolios the capitalization rates could evaporate and it wouldn't surprise me to see TARP #2 (or #3). This would be very troublesome for not only the banking industry but for the overall economy (and ultimately the broader equities market). Risk control is still necessary although the current market would lull many investors to a false sense of security.

    Aug 2, 2009. 09:45 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • eBay: Still Clouds over Skype IPO [View article]
    Interesting to see eBay as the feature story on barron's this weekend. Some speculation that the spinoff would unlock value but no significant discussion of the legal issue... Seems like this would be pretty relevant for the discussion!
    Aug 1, 2009. 12:04 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Two Stocks to Short: Marriott, Green Mountain [View article]
    Can't agree with you more, although I was early to the game on GMCR ( - It's certainly over-valued and prone to a "fad" crash. But timing is very difficult in these situations.

    Playing with options like you suggest certainly helps cut back on some of the risk.
    Jul 30, 2009. 04:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • The Proposal to Limit Commodity Positions Will Hurt Free Markets and Economic Growth [View article]
    well obviously this is a highly debated topic and I'm glad we could discuss in a (somewhat) orderly fashion.

    We talk about the "real" market as if there were two different forces at work. In actuality, the market is made up of buyers and sellers - plain and simple. The oil market is just too big and fluid for anyone to "corner" or artificially move prices to any significant degree. Producers and consumers need speculators to offer liquidity. If the price is "artificially" high, you will see speculators "regulate" the market by selling. And I don't hear anyone complaining about prices being too low in the early part of this year.

    One thing that always drives me nuts is that Goldman gets so much criticism even though they are a publicly traded company... Sure, their executives and traders are richly rewarded. But so are their shareholders. And who are these shareholders? The Investing Public! If you're jealous of the profits Goldman is booking - go buy their stock! Then they can be YOUR profits.

    For whatever it's worth, and as an aside note, I may pull in six figures, but that only happens when I'm providing seven for my investors. I'm a big fan of the "eat what you kill" setup which is why I have my own company and live and die by my ability to keep my clients happy. It's more risky, yes - but then so is counting on an employing firm to stay in business and continue making payroll...

    I appreciate the spirited debate, and I'm sure I'll get dinged on the "positive / negative" comments for this one, but honestly I can't make an argument against a freely operating market. Manipulation by the Government, Goldman Sachs, LTCM, or any other institution should be fought. Unfortunately, few see this move towards stiffer regulation as the manipulation that it truly is.

    Jul 29, 2009. 11:35 AM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Blackrock's Toxic Asset CEF: Buy in Post-IPO After-Market [View article]
    241885 - excellent analysis! And you're right, the investment bankers will likely support this IPO in particular because if it trades successfully, they will want to roll out several more just like it.

    Ultimately, the chances are very high that the fund price will dip below NAV (over the next 6 months). But NAV will be VERY difficult to determine as the assets being bought are not necessarily easy to price.

    If run well, the NAV should have much less risk based on the fact that the assets are being picked up at pennies on the dollar. However, the public perception of this strategy will swing wildly based on economic reports, unemployment, housing sales etc. I would expect the security to be extremely volatile even though the published NAV will not likely move significantly for the first several quarters.

    Jul 29, 2009. 10:30 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Housing: 'Invest at the Point of Maximum Pessimism' [View article]
    It looks as if many of these charts are running up into and possibly stalling at key resistance points. Also, how can we expect housing to turn when unemployment is still growing? Even if employment stabilizes, that still leaves us with too many who are out of work...

    But unfortunately, we are STILL heading down and jobs are still being lost. As fewer and fewer people are bringing in paychecks, it's hard to imagine any sustainable rebound in real estate.

    Jul 28, 2009. 10:33 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment