Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)
Market Currents

Three JPMorgan (JPM) execs connected to its $2B trading loss will leave the firm this week,...

  • Sunday, May 13, 2012, 4:14 PM ET
    Three JPMorgan (JPM) execs connected to its $2B trading loss will leave the firm this week, according to the WSJ. Bruno Iksil - "The London Whale" - will be stripped of trading duties.
Track new comments on this story

This news story has 50 comments:

  • At a minimum, it makes sense for Dimon to resign from the NY Fed if not from JP Morgan Chase, as well.

    One would think after the fiasco of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the too-big-to-fail banks would have learned a lesson about risk management --- but, no, here we are again with JP Morgan Chase losing $2+ billion of their "own" money --- and under the leadership of CEO Dimon who is one of those most vocal about limiting the banks' proprietary trading under proposed legislation.

    The shareholders, bondholders and managements of these too-big-to-fail banks should pay the price for "mistakes" such as JP Morgan Chase's recent fiasco. However, the banks are in existence to serve the needs of the general economy and to facilitate the movement of funds between individuals/entities wanting to invest monies (aka, depositors) and those needing to borrow those resources. Proprietary trading of their "own" funds has little place --- those funds should be distributed to the shareholders who can then invest in riskier asset classes under their own decision regimen.

    This approach would take much of the burden off US taxpayers to correct the " sloppy” and “stupid" decisions that have been made by the too-big-to-fail banks in the post-Glass-Steagall era.
    13 May 2012, 04:26 PM Reply Like
  • rg

    If this is your sense of appropriate behavior then Obama should resign immediately and refund all his salary of the last 3 years along with any benefits going forward. Along with most members of congress. They wasted Trillions of US wealth. At least JPM is paying it out of their own profits which looks to be less than 3 months of income.
    13 May 2012, 07:49 PM Reply Like
  • Excuse me, but I think JPMC was one of those too-big-to-fail banks that took taxpayers' money in the 2008 financial bailout and they're still efffectively taking it because the Fed is keeping interest rates near zero, which benefits the big banks like JPMC. Also, your comment about Obama is totally off point and inane.
    13 May 2012, 07:53 PM Reply Like
  • All large banks were forced to take the TARP funds. Do some reading.

    The Fed's low interest rates are related to bailing out our massive federal deficits not banking. A steeper yield curve advantages the banks.

    Might as well make a clean sweep............comments about Obama and Congress are dead on. They have squandered Trillions.
    13 May 2012, 07:57 PM Reply Like
  • I definitely am in your corner with this one. It's unfortunate that there's not an IQ filter for posts to this site.
    13 May 2012, 11:05 PM Reply Like
  • i suppose those leaving will get a nice fat severance! Typical Wall Street.
    13 May 2012, 04:57 PM Reply Like
  • JPM cleaning its own house. Who better? and don't say our fumbling, bumbling Government, please.
    13 May 2012, 05:02 PM Reply Like
  • Cut all executive compensation so there is something left for the lowly shareholders like myself. That goes for the other banks as well.
    13 May 2012, 05:52 PM Reply Like
  • Eightball
    Cut all executive compensation so there is something left for the lowly shareholders like myself. That goes for the other banks as well
    ======================...
    You are shareholder, you cut
    14 May 2012, 12:07 AM Reply Like
  • I would love to invest in a bank with a more reasonable compensation scheme - can you point to any?
    14 May 2012, 10:52 AM Reply Like
  • @Eightball
    As customer I like Wells Fargo and Patelco credit union

    As investor I am not investing in banks and rather prefer them out from public and into strong private hands
    14 May 2012, 06:39 PM Reply Like
  • small banks may be an opportunity...
    14 May 2012, 10:40 PM Reply Like
  • when money is created out of thin air can there ever really be a loss?

    when something is worth nothing, how can you consider it a loss when its gone?
    13 May 2012, 06:15 PM Reply Like
  • The Whale hold be harpooned.
    13 May 2012, 06:55 PM Reply Like
  • Stripped of his duties, lol.
    They should strip his balls is more like it.
    13 May 2012, 06:57 PM Reply Like
  • Mr. Dimon:
    If you want to run a hedge fund, move to Greenwich and do so. But you are a banker and you are dealing with tax-payer insured depositors' money. You need to be more responsible in that role.
    13 May 2012, 07:40 PM Reply Like
  • what deposits?
    13 May 2012, 10:04 PM Reply Like
  • You don't think JPM has depositors???
    14 May 2012, 07:40 AM Reply Like
  • No taxpayer monies are at risk at JPM. This is much to do about nothing.
    13 May 2012, 08:20 PM Reply Like
  • Tax payer "insured".....
    14 May 2012, 07:39 AM Reply Like
  • URL: http://1.usa.gov/ITMDX5

    Here is what is and is not allowed.

    Forget about Dimon's role as JPM Chrm, & CEO

    As Chrm on the Federal reserve Bank of New York, he is in violation of Conduct for Directors of Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.

    See:
    URL: http://1.usa.gov/ITMDX5
    14 May 2012, 09:32 AM Reply Like
  • If this wasn't such a political hot potato, nobody would be fired for taking a 2% loss on a hedge gone bad. Lots of hedges fail for various reasons, and people learn from their mistakes.

    And I agree, Obama should resign because he cost thousands of auto industry workers their jobs and scared employers into not hiring during the recovery. He's made a trillion dollar mistake on ObamaCare. If that isn't enough to get you fired, what is?

    Also, the CEO of Yahoo is being fired for lying on his resume.

    Obama, the Divider in Chief, has lied on his resume every day he's been in politics. Time for him to go, too.
    13 May 2012, 08:27 PM Reply Like
  • You are such a biased AS$.
    13 May 2012, 10:49 PM Reply Like
  • Loss of 2000 MILLIONS is no big deal to you. I guess you're speaking from personal experience. How much severance pay did you get. As far as your other statements , I did not realize hedgies or repubs like you are also perverted or perverts. You are right and I don't care that Obama is a divider in-chief. I'll take the 99 percent side versus the evil 1% side.
    13 May 2012, 10:51 PM Reply Like
  • Anyone every consider that not even close to 99% of the population even works. And are the 1% people working or just sitting on wealth in the Cayman Islands?

    Who are all these people as I need to categorize people and pick an enemy and I don't know where to turn.
    13 May 2012, 11:07 PM Reply Like
  • Right on that one. My guess is no more than 60% of the population works.

    The 60% prop up the rest of them.
    13 May 2012, 11:12 PM Reply Like
  • It's not about the money, rather the liability.

    Chain of custody issues, as Chrm & CEO, Dimon is responsible.

    $4 Bil USD in expected revenue doesn't matter, that's a weak argument. For that matter you could also say, you borrowed $2 Bil USD form the bank without permission, and returned ALMOST all of it before anyone noticed, (fill in any random reason).

    That is what this is about.

    Even more damaging than that:

    As Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, he has lost credibility. That means weakness in a time they wish to project strength, Dimon becomes the variable in the equation.

    Should be a conflict of interest anyway, being Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank which governs the investment bank you are also Chairman of?

    That almost sounds Germany, nu?

    Looks like that US Treasury seat they've been holding for him is in the crapper as well.
    14 May 2012, 03:42 AM Reply Like
  • It's not about the money, rather the liability?

    By that logic a small bank or CU that makes a bad investment (i.e. loan or hedge) should fire their CEO because chain of custody leads to the CEO.

    This is nonsense.
    14 May 2012, 09:18 AM Reply Like
  • Exactly.

    That's called accountability, right? Used to be, I am old.

    Sorry, what's that word again for "taking responsibility for your own actions as well as having total control over your Managers and subordinates?"

    Yeah, accountability.

    100% TOTAL CONTROL, THAT IS THE JOB.

    Even more so in a small bank, sack the CEO, ASAP!

    It's all about containment, and what the shareholders want, it's their ship, he's just the guy at the helm.

    Pick your battles I guess?
    15 May 2012, 07:54 AM Reply Like
  • DV

    We have structured our banks, bankruptcy laws, accounting codes and tax code to take losses to encourage some risk taking. If you want zero losses then prepare for less loans and a smaller economy. Never mind that shareholders will also lose.

    Our economy has not done bad over many decades with this approach. If you have a case study of an alternative approach that is better then bring it on.
    15 May 2012, 08:22 AM Reply Like
  • You are 100% correct.

    Our system is specifically structured to support and encourage risk taking. Other countries dream of such a market. The volume in opening 5 mins. on NYSE is higher than most European Market volumes for a month, combined.

    Of course their is risk taking, but.... there are also stop / loss settings on most investment software, right?

    You are correct, our economy in the US is very resilient, more so than Europe.

    2 Billion USD @ JPM Chase, is the tip of the iceberg.

    When they whip out the exposures to Greece, you will fall out of your chair. I will say 100 BIL USD MINIMUM will be the fallout ALONE.

    I understand there is a gray zone, however we have to etablish a clearer pain threshold, I am sure you will agree.
    15 May 2012, 02:40 PM Reply Like
  • Last night it was reported an addition Billion has turned up missing at JPM.

    Total: $3 Bil in losses and counting.
    17 May 2012, 03:57 AM Reply Like
  • If that is it then all I can say is "YAWN"

    Fix it and move on.

    Jamie tends to over estimate losses anyways so let's see what they really report by August.
    17 May 2012, 02:56 PM Reply Like
  • He's been ordered to testify before Senate Banking Committee, and clearly not the most articulate person in the room.

    Backpeddling before Congress won't cut it, he will need to exercise his rights under the 5th Amendment no doubt, or use a telephone joker if he gets confused again.

    How humiliating to hear silence in a room full of cowardly fellow investors in Tampa, sickening.

    If $3 BIL USD is nothing, fine.

    I have an idea to help Mr. Dimon put it in perspective:

    * Tell the Board of Directors they won't get paid for the next 25 years, to offset that $3 BIL USD, see how important money is to them then.

    Dimon's $23 MIL USD Salary........less than nothing, according to his definition of $3 BIL USD being "nothing".

    Defend them, and him all you want, but it will not change the fact that NO MONEY IS THE "BANK'S MONEY" be clear on that,
    it is "SHAREHOLDERS MONEY", we own that Bank, not the Board.
    17 May 2012, 04:33 PM Reply Like
  • You make me laugh. He will be the most articulate person in the room by far on these issues. What world do you live in?

    You don't understand banking very well and are becoming emotional.
    17 May 2012, 05:02 PM Reply Like
  • I am glad I mad you laugh, that will be my one random act of kindness for 2012.

    Most articulate? Sounds like he has a mouthful of marbles, and due to a low self esteem problem, speaks far too quickly which lends credibility to my observation.

    I understand banking better than most, that you have misunderstood. Their ONLY function, is to accept deposits and make loans, where by they derive a profit from the difference in the interest rates paid and charged, respectively.

    Banks create money in the economy by making loans, and the amount of money that banks can lend is directly affected by the reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve.

    So...........when you are Chairman of an Investment Bank, AND subsequently Chairman of the Fed Reserve Bank which governs it, THAT is a conflict of interest, as the reserve requirement is called into question.

    With $ 2.3 Trillion USD in Assets, ......AND...... $728 BILLION in Debt, one needn't be a financial savant to realize there is a rotting corpse here.

    Read this:
    URL: http://1.usa.gov/ITMDX5

    OR.......... download it from FED website yourself.

    He's been called on the carpet now, and clearly NY Fed (who effectively THE FED) will have to cut him loose as an act of containment, as FED has enough natural enemies. People are ALWAYS expendable.

    His biggest mistake was rushing to do an interview and say "sorry W E were stupid, W E screwed up."

    Always go to ground when confronted or attacked, first page of Standard Operating Procedure, any corporation in the world.

    So....now having flunked breakfast, it looks like "Dimon's ass sandwiches" are on the menu for the next luncheon of the Senate Banking Committee.

    Want to see it? I can get you in.

    DISLAIMER:
    I never mix emotion with business, except on Narcissistic Friday, OR EVERY FRIDAY in my office.

    I remember my Granny used to say:

    "Be ice cold and calculating, kick everyone who is down, that's the nature of the game."
    18 May 2012, 02:56 AM Reply Like
  • JPM's executives may want to forget a bad operating period , such as a quarter or fiscal year, and wash their hands of the whole thing.

    However, the "Retained Earnings Master Account" is there to remind them of past mistakes and the ensuing operating demise, IAW the IFRS.

    Investors and business partners, including vendors and customers, heed retained earnings and shareholders’ equity to gauge the corporate financial standing.

    Think of it as our shovel against their load of crap.
    18 May 2012, 02:58 AM Reply Like
  • Oh, here's their Balance Sheet:

    http://bit.ly/KHkbeX

    See that $728 BILLION USD in Debt they don't want to talk about?


    Assets - Liabilities = ? Net Worth, of course.

    Here's a free lesson:
    * In the 3rd Grade we are taught that, "Net Worth" is the difference between an Corporation's total assets and total liabilities.

    Do the math hero, what does it say?

    BIG TROUBLE is what is says, JPM is teetering on insolvency, and the $2 BIL they dismiss as nothing, is higher than the bank's entire net worth!

    Read it again.

    We know what a Balance Sheet is and is not, never 100% accurate, (point taken), but offbook debt, will make these figures far worse.

    JPM Chase is obviously being kept alive through the actions of Dimon as Chrm of NY FED, making money available for JPM Chase where he is also Chrm. This point has been raised and will be addressed in Washington when he appears in June.

    Get your track shoes on, Bank Run pending.

    Moooah ah ah!
    18 May 2012, 04:41 AM Reply Like
  • DV

    Appears to me that Equity is just shy of $200 Billion and their earnings are around $4 Billion plus per quarter.

    Want to place any bets on the Senate hearing?
    18 May 2012, 10:05 AM Reply Like
  • Sorry, TVP

    I forgot to mention the $190 Billion USD exposure to Greece.

    Have to admit though, that Balance Sheet was a surprise, nu?

    And London is reporting losses are now up to $5 Billion USD for the CDX IG9 transaction executed by the CIO Office in London.

    As far as Senate Hearing, I think we both know it's a slap on the wrist that's being planned, (some may have accounts with JPM or a Mortgage), so they will have a pre-scripted dialogue.

    I do enjoy your comments, it shows your concern, and that is always a good thing. At least we are checking if nobody else is, right?

    DISCLAIMER:
    My comments are meant with good natured sarcasm, and are in no way representative of my "true" narcissistic nature.

    Good Luck on markets to day.

    Good business!
    18 May 2012, 03:15 PM Reply Like
  • Nothing on their B/S was a surprise.
    18 May 2012, 05:58 PM Reply Like
  • What do you think of the loss in Market Cap?

    The CDX IG9 disaster has wiped out more than $25 Billion USD of JPMorgan’s Market Cap so far. Shares of the bank slid 0.45% to $33.78 Friday morning, leaving them up less than 2% on the year.

    He (Dimon) is on his way out, no other alternative. Not knowing is not a defense, rather an example he has lost oversight and therefore, control.
    19 May 2012, 04:33 AM Reply Like
  • Stock price down with no long term damage to the company can be a great buying opportunity. I like drops like this when everyone is having a hair on fire moment. Irrationale people bring great opportunity for the rationale person.
    19 May 2012, 12:37 PM Reply Like
  • All those comments about banks,obama.what they have done and what they should do is all bla bla bla...

    The only important question is why JPM risk management has failed to realize that the market position involved was not manageable.
    I think this has to do with illiquid tradable assets that should be regulated differently forward
    14 May 2012, 01:12 AM Reply Like
  • From a retired banker's perspective, losses (even big ones, on occasion) are part of the job. If management resigned every time a loss or adverse event arises, there would be no continuity. And, there will be no fallout, from this loss, to the taxpayer as JPM has substantial capital.

    Dimon is well respected. This loss will cost him some of his outsized reputation but he is still regarded as America's top banker.

    At the end of the day, this event is not that big a deal.
    14 May 2012, 05:42 AM Reply Like
  • As far as TBTF 2007-2008 , JPM didn't ask for or want money from the Treasury ... it was forced upon them by Paulson

    The hedge still leaves a long $7B gain in its AFS book , even after the $2B loss . Will be interesting to see how FAS 157 mark -to-market will be received if this turns into a gain .... will all the hand-wringers shut up then ? ? ?
    14 May 2012, 05:45 AM Reply Like
  • Well, the prop trade, I mean hedge (no), has moved again. I don't know the exact position and details but given what has been published in the press + the market moves, it is save to assume that they are down another $3 billion or so since the conference call on that prop (not hedge) trade.
    14 May 2012, 10:05 AM Reply Like
  • At the end of the day, I just think that banks have to act like banks and not hedge funds. Large risky bets (and that's all they really are) with complicated derivatives and other instruments, couched as "hedging" but fooling no one in that regard, are simply not appropriate for a bank. Criticism of JPM is not about their taking a loss--of course that happens--but about the kinds of activities that they are engaged in that led to the loss.
    15 May 2012, 10:56 AM Reply Like
  • actually , the hedge has profited this week as the yield curve has flattened and the IG 9-18 has changed drastically ... but who cares about facts ???
    17 May 2012, 09:31 AM Reply Like
  • US government loses $3 Billion per day ,

    yet Congress forces Dimon to brief them , instead of their telling the US taxpayer what they're losing money on

    another diversion from our idiotic representatives
    30 Jun 2012, 04:04 PM Reply Like
Other date
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)