Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)
Market Currents

The JPMorgan loss prompts the Senate into action, where Banking Committee Chairman Tim Johnson...

  • Monday, May 14, 2012, 2:56 PM ET
    The JPMorgan loss prompts the Senate into action, where Banking Committee Chairman Tim Johnson says he will hold additional hearings on Wall Street reform. The hearings will include representatives from the SEC, CFTC, and the FDIC, and, presumably, Jamie Dimon, among others from JPM.
Track new comments on this story

This news story has 11 comments:

  • It would be real easy...bring back Glass-Stegall.....easy
    But this is for some last minute campaign donations I am sure.....and JPM is writing the checks as we speak..
    14 May 2012, 03:00 PM Reply Like
  • Exactly...just a big blow and show in the Senate as usual...with arm-twisting for campaign contributions going on the back rooms while the testimony is happening in front of the cameras.
    14 May 2012, 03:03 PM Reply Like
  • Hmmm, Maybe they will get around to indicting Corzine while they are at it and firing the limp dicks at the CFTC.
    14 May 2012, 05:02 PM Reply Like
  • They will slice and dice Jamie for cannon fodder and votes in the Senate he is intensely disliked by Dems and #1 CEO against fed
    regs.Worse than MF Global we think.Hope he survives we think the board may throw him under the bus,Giving INA a golden parachute and early retirement bad looks like hush money will not be enough probably bigger heads will have to roll. He would be wise to give back his Bonus at a minimum and start admitting his own personal responsibility.Using "we" all the time is blame shifting actually makes him look deceptive. APD
    14 May 2012, 06:37 PM Reply Like
  • Thank God!!! The Senate is investigating.... All hope is not lost.... I thought they were still on the Barry Bonds Steroid investigation...death where is thy sting
    14 May 2012, 07:24 PM Reply Like
  • @ remd ~ The Senate is a dull knife. The funny part is Jamie IS a DEM. No one at MF Global knew where the money was or at the least would admit they knew. Jamie knew and said they were stupid. The Senate hasn't had a budget in forever and it is questionable if they know what the word "budget" means. THese investigations are laughable when those questioning don't know the right questions to ask and can't comprehend the answers. It will be another session of a CEO explaining "Investing 101". When the circus comes into session there are only so many times you want to see the clowns. Once is to much - Perhaps this is why clowns terrify so many children.
    14 May 2012, 08:08 PM Reply Like
  • In agreement with daro, that the two prior comments, Todd Johnson's humorously ironic "Thank God. The Senate is investigating.." and jdhd's incredibly well put "the senate is a dull knife" and then "no wonder children are afraid of clowns" perfectly express how badly our "public servants" have failed us.

    Bringing back Glass-Steigal is not the answer as G/S never prevented the treasury department at every money center commercial bank from doing both hedges and proprietary trades. The main gist of its repeal was to allow commercial banks to underwrite public debt offerings, which in many respects has been a huge help for the economy.

    What really changed was that, before late 2007, when the treasury group put on a hedge or a prop trade, the outcome was strictly a matter for management and shareholders to live with. The problem post 2007 was not with the banks, many of which perhaps should have been allowed to fail in 2008, but the US government which told the taxpayers to bail them out.

    I am guessing that everyone who is reading this understands this logic, but, like me, Todd Johnson, jdhd and daro, we are all wondering why our elected officials don't understand, or even worse, why they won't.

    FAMCO
    14 May 2012, 11:14 PM Reply Like
  • Politics aside, I can NOT even fathom why Dimon is in the crosshairs while Corzo the clown brushes the food out of his beard and polishes his bald dome while "layin low."

    Unlike MF Bozo, the money didnt "disappear." The other side of the trade Received the 2 billion.
    14 May 2012, 11:57 PM Reply Like
  • I only hope they call Jamie to testify. He will make them look incompetent if they take him on with respect to knowledge of the industry. He knows more about banking and investments than all of them put together. My sense is that they will ask him questions but avoid trying to take him on with the facts because many of them struggle with simple math as evidenced by our federal debt never mind hedging strategies.

    Any bank CEO who has an almost 20 year run managing a bank like Jamie with only a small % loss needs a statue out front of the bank. Two billion sounds like a lot but not relative to the size of JPMC.

    If banks don't hedge the US taxpayer is going to be exposed to massive losses across all the banks.
    15 May 2012, 12:00 AM Reply Like
  • always after the fact non-sense
    15 May 2012, 02:03 AM Reply Like
  • I did mention at the time that it really looks like this minor loss for JPM (when taking their overall profits this year into account) might be enough to cause fear, which would lead to some new legislation. Now the question is, who loses so JPM benefits?
    15 May 2012, 02:21 AM Reply Like
Other date
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)