Market Currents
It's happening again. Facebook (FB -7%) dives in early trading to $31.65 - shares are now down...
-
Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 9:43 AM ETIt's happening again. Facebook (FB -7%) dives in early trading to $31.65 - shares are now down 17% from their $38 IPO price, though the company's multiples are still high. If Facebook doesn't soon reverse course, class-action suits over last week's increase in its offering price may just be a matter of time. (also)
Other date
TECH ETFs IN FOCUS
Latest Tech Articles
This news story has 11 comments:
According to Renaissance Capital (IPO Tracker):
http://bit.ly/MDwgns
Morgan Stanley:
Number of IPOs:27
Total Proceeds Raised:$23,814.4 mm
Average Return:5.1%
Average First Day Return:15.4%
I am guessing that trades now will consist of underwriters dumping their shares to retail and will then by them back when the stock is low enought to purchase and then run it up again. They need to make up for the losses and the only way to do it is through the retail route. I predict that this will continue to sink until the it is low enough for for MS (and all the 33+- other banks) to begin to buy back creating another artificial market for retail to get pulled into thinking there is a bull in the area!
Huh??? Cool, my DECK I bought really dropped in price, maybe all us shareholders should file a lawsuit?
Were people forced to buy IPO at gunpoint? Just because these shareholders thought they would get a 100% pop on opening day and didn't doesn't mean they can sue, it means they didn't actually do some investigating into FB's numbers.
The "trade" had nothing to do with numbers/analysis, it had to do with the intangible name FACEBOOK. Hence way Beta does not necessarally work all the time, but we are "seeking Alpha" what is that factor that quantifies this process (sorry it is the professor in me)
They can sue and I am sure that there is are class actions beginning to form in discussion (that is the CFO in me). Just like Vonage, they will find something to latch on too. I would say that just the Instagram announcement/deal during the quiet period plus the announcement about hiring engineers to focus on mobile would be enough for a basis of complaint. With the cash in the bank, a settlement would be the most likely scenario, just like in Vonage case.
I am not an attorney, nor did I buy shares, these are just general observations (this is the Red Herring in me, don't take what I say as anything but general discussion points, not worth a thing)! I am a GURU (Generally understanding, Relatively Useless). HAHA
I will rewrite the law, and do it with two words.
Emptor Caveat. (Buyer, beware.)
There, done.
Just because one paid high does not mean that one would get higher value