Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)
Market Currents

QE3 may be "QEternal" to some, but perhaps not "QEnough" for others, quips CNBC's Jeff Cox....

  • Monday, September 24, 2012, 6:13 PM ET
    QE3 may be "QEternal" to some, but perhaps not "QEnough" for others, quips CNBC's Jeff Cox. Morgan Stanley's Adam Parker agrees, saying that "although QE3 is open-ended, the currently announced pace and program of purchases is much smaller than previous QE programs," and "will likely be insufficient to significantly boost equity markets." Parker says he wouldn’t be at all surprised to see the Fed dramatically augment this program before year-end.
Track new comments on this story

This news story has 4 comments:

  • *rolls eyes*

    Election day, 6th November. I guess we'll need to see some weakness from around this time to the end of the year to help make the case for further QE.
    24 Sep 2012, 06:32 PM Reply Like
  • You'll probably see it in the unemployment reports. QE3 was supposedly implemented to help the unemployed. I still have not figured out how buying mortgage backed securities from banks, thereby transfering the risk from banks to the taxpayers helps unemployment.
    24 Sep 2012, 08:05 PM Reply Like
  • Keeps interest rates, specifically mortgage rates, low. Allowing the real estate industry to continue it's recovery, which produces jobs, particularly construction jobs which can't be outsourced or offshored.
    24 Sep 2012, 09:20 PM Reply Like
  • But mortgage rates HAVE been low... and for a good period of time now. What you are talking about is perhaps a 50-60 bps benefit at best (and right now, banks are even reluctant to pass-though those compressed spreads to the mortgage buyer because they're getting all the volumes they want).

    Even if another round of QE moves the employment needle (which it hasn't yet to a significant degree), it's a very poor transmission mechanism because it only potentially benefits a very narrow segment of the long term unemployed. Hell, I wish we could all be very well paid construction workers... but even construction workers on average are not that well paid. And as is probably more relevant, I wouldn't be qualified.

    The Fed is using blunt tools to solve an employment problem that's inherently much more complex that it appears. We are going to be figuring that out very soon as the transportation and financial sectors (for starters) start laying off people.
    25 Sep 2012, 02:30 AM Reply Like
Other date
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)