Market Currents
Barclays investigates possible overvaluation in MLPs and thinks “the sector does not...
-
Thursday, October 11, 2012, 7:15 PM ETBarclays investigates possible overvaluation in MLPs and thinks “the sector does not screen as cheap and will widen if the market gives up recent gains," advising investors who are overweight in EPD, PAA and KMI to moderate their positions. It's OK to add to ETB, EPB and DPM, the firm says, but reduce exposure to BPL, EEP and BWP.
Other date
Latest Energy & Materials Articles
This news story has 25 comments:
However, MLPs have done fairly well in the current environment because they are dividend vehicles. And, these are mostly midstream cash-cows.
This is a classic flight to safety during a time of low interest rates and a crazy energy markets. I wouldn't trust Barclays on this at all.
Also, their paper is good because they have tangible, reliable, cash producing assets. You know like real things, instead of some dweeb fresh out of yale in a Manhattan basement dreaming up intangible financial pie-in-the-sky products.
By holding MLP units in an IRA I suppose you avoid possible tax from the partnership, however, most of my MLPs generate taxable losses due to the heavy depreciation charges so it has never been a big deal.
I hold all my MLPs in taxable accounts and in my Roth IRA I hold securities that generate cash that would otherwise be taxable, like NLY. That way I avoid ever paying tax on those gains and income.
You may want to consult your tax advisor on your current strategy of holding MLPs in an IRA, you may also want to discuss the topic with an estate planner. Under current practice if you happen to die, I believe your investments reset to market which in the case of an MLP would be a big advantage as the basis in the partnership would be reset to market on the date of death. Thus giving your heir a big tax benefit as distributions would be shielded from tax that much longer.
Maybe, that is what Barclays wants to do too.
Time to sell or stay put with the high dividend?