Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)
Market Currents

If the NAAIM Survey of Manager Sentiment was "off the charts" bullish in the high 80s, what is...

  • Friday, February 1, 10:52 AM ET
    If the NAAIM Survey of Manager Sentiment was "off the charts" bullish in the high 80s, what is it now? The index rises to the unheard of level of 104.25, meaning the average respondent is now leveraged long. The most bearish manager is 60% net long - the most bullish position for the most bearish respondent ever.
Track new comments on this story

This news story has 97 comments:

  • The market is about to dip.
    1 Feb, 10:54 AM Reply Like
  • Paulo, would you short the market? Why not buy SPRO if you know the market is about to dip?
    1 Feb, 12:59 PM Reply Like
  • I'm not in a shorting mood with the Fed printing willy-nilly. If I were to short, however, I'd use mini-futures (ES, NQ).
    1 Feb, 01:09 PM Reply Like
  • Why are you not in a shorting mood when you know that the market is about to dip?

    Or is it that you know very well that the market is not about to dip, hence you won't short?
    1 Feb, 01:14 PM Reply Like
  • The problem is that an entity capable of buying every asset at any price with newly-minted money is buying the equivalent of $1 trillion in assets per year. While usually we'd get the dip, this can distort the market to the point where we don't get it.
    1 Feb, 01:44 PM Reply Like
  • So a dip is not coming?
    1 Feb, 02:12 PM Reply Like
  • A dip should be coming. But with one player sitting at the table which can change the cards at will, I am not willing to bet on it.
    1 Feb, 02:13 PM Reply Like
  • Got it. A dip should be coming, but it likely won't, so you wouldn't short. That's better. I thought you were sure that a dip was coming.

    Did you cover Amazon?
    1 Feb, 02:34 PM Reply Like
  • No, why would I?
    1 Feb, 02:51 PM Reply Like
  • Have you been trading the markets for long, MI?
    1 Feb, 02:58 PM Reply Like
  • Oh and another thing. When our punts go wrong, we should just admit that we made a bone headed move instead of calling the market irrational or manipulated.
    1 Feb, 06:56 PM Reply Like
  • Well, the Fed buying to take the market higher the the very definition of what a manipulated market is.
    1 Feb, 07:11 PM Reply Like
  • Ok, go ahead and complain about it then, but shorting in the face of QE still qualifies as a bone headed move. Anyway, if you do not have the guts to short the market, don't say that a dip is coming. Put your money where your mouth is, or your mouth where your money is. Either is fine.
    1 Feb, 07:25 PM Reply Like
  • Whatever, your posture strikes me as being rather immature all the same.
    1 Feb, 07:38 PM Reply Like
  • How so?
    1 Feb, 07:54 PM Reply Like
  • You simply seem not to have been around long enough, with all those certainties, and with not declining the use of a strategy able to produce 99% drawdowns, etc.

    I'd hazzard you're 25 or younger and don't really have much direct experience with the Street.
    1 Feb, 08:00 PM Reply Like
  • So, in my mind the real question is "what could cause the dip we all know should be coming?" There are a few possibilities beyond QE-infinity being halted by the Fed (a near impossibility at this point). 1) The upcoming (March 1) automatic spending cuts that were halted by the Jan 1 "agreement". At most a 10-percenter and hardly worth worrying about. 2) The "great debt ceiling debate." Clearly there will be much drama but both parties have proven themselves by recent past actions to be gutless defenders of fiscal responsibility - maybe good for a short 10% drop, but who believes the histrionics anymore. 3) A S&P or Fitch downgrade of US credit as punishment for Congress' profligacy. 4)The end of earnings season when, in spite of many "beats", the algos realize that the absence of news is boring and start a profit-taking sell-off for unknown (and unfathomable) reasons. Maybe good for a 5% drop. 5) The end of the huge influx of the small investor into the market and the realization that, in the absence of new suckers, er buyers, it's time for the smart money to take its profits so it can start the cycle again. Also only a 5-10% drop. 6) Some nearly unforeseeable black swan event that cascade through the bond markets into stocks. The overly-rapid devalution of the Yen if it gets out of control could lead to this as could the sudden unwillingness or inability of the ECB to backstop the bonds of Italy, Spain or France with real money (instead of Mario Draghi's threats). These could cause a real problem but are relatively low probability (at least in the eyes of the market today). So, what have I missed? And what are the odds of them happening? Will there be any early warning signs or are we walking blindly and eagerly towards a cliff we can't avoid? Or is there just no point in trying to prognosticate the future and we should just stay nimble? What's your advice?
    1 Feb, 08:14 PM Reply Like
  • I see. That's neither here nor there though. Do you agree that commentators should either align their money with their mouth or shut their mouths?
    1 Feb, 08:18 PM Reply Like
  • There is one and only one thing that will make the rally stop. Fed stops QE. Nothing else. If you disagree, ask Paulo. Even he wouldn't show the market when QE is ongoing.

    When QE stops I will be long 3x leveraged inverse ETFs.
    1 Feb, 08:20 PM Reply Like
  • Hey macro what are you doing? Leveraged to gills long? short?
    1 Feb, 10:23 PM Reply Like
  • Leveraged to gills long for 80% of portfolio with about 150% leverage. That 80% has been buy and hold for a long time now. I typically don't touch it except to sell in the summer months and then buy it back again in late fall. It's very passive.

    10% in cash should I need some emergency money for real life.

    10% more in cash but I trade options with it. That's my fun money.
    1 Feb, 10:30 PM Reply Like
  • when qe stops? amateurish move. market discounts boy.
    1 Feb, 10:34 PM Reply Like
  • Is that like, down boy!? :-)

    If you can predict market tops, then you must be that one monkey who produced a Shakespearean play when given a typewriter. I am just an ordinary monkey. I can predict nothing, except that 99.99%+ of people trying to predict market tops and bottom usually fail. So I am always late, I never catch the bottom nor the top.

    But that also means I am rarely wrong.
    1 Feb, 10:50 PM Reply Like
  • This is correct.

    The media's response is the most alarming. You'd think we have hit escape velocity and are now entering the most exuberant growth phase in U.S. history. It will be quite shocking for so many when this doesn't come to pass but is actually the opposite outcome.

    Panic. Shock. Anger.
    2 Feb, 12:46 AM Reply Like
  • ...Or a disconnect between real economic fundamentals and stock prices and QE that is no longer effectively halting a recession and a contraction in profit margins. Added to that the excess of margin debt coupled with prices near all-time highs in the face of a recession that is now underway. The great gap between the perception of a nascent recovery and the reality of a contracting economy will quickly close and stock prices will recalibrate to reflect reality.

    The loss of confidence in QE will lead these markets to selloff steeply and quickly.
    2 Feb, 12:55 AM Reply Like
  • The price of gasoline can correct this market in a hurry.
    2 Feb, 01:43 AM Reply Like
  • I put my money where my mouth is, shorting MCD, PEP and SAP currently.
    2 Feb, 09:46 AM Reply Like
  • what have u been long for a long time now?
    what is long time?
    4 Feb, 09:30 AM Reply Like
  • This is simply a realization that there is no point in fighting the Fed and that the markets cannot go down as long as the Fed's manipulative hand is at play. I agree with Paulo Santos that the market is about to go down... right after it goes up some mor. But the question is when and what will be the catalyst? So far Central Bank intervention the world over has refused to allow the market to be ruled by fundamentals. What is going to change and when?
    1 Feb, 11:04 AM Reply Like
  • Yes, it will probably keep going up even with all the margin debt, but even during interventions sometimes there are small dips.
    1 Feb, 11:06 AM Reply Like
  • "No point fighting the fed" might become the same truism "house prices never fall" became.
    1 Feb, 11:41 AM Reply Like
  • "This is simply a realization that there is no point in fighting the Fed and that the markets cannot go down as long as the Fed's manipulative hand is at play."

    Exactly!

    The sooner investors realize this the better. Do not fight the Fed. You will get crushed, as well you should.

    "But the question is when and what will be the catalyst?"

    It's very simple. QEternity stops and the Feds start to raise rates. It's really that simple guys. That's when you short the market and make out like bandits both on the way up and the way down.
    1 Feb, 01:01 PM Reply Like
  • Yes!
    2 Feb, 12:57 AM Reply Like
  • Having a dip here and there makes things more realistic. Less Zimbabwe-like.
    1 Feb, 11:08 AM Reply Like
  • Agree it is healthy and needed. Bubbles go straight up.
    1 Feb, 12:23 PM Reply Like
  • But, there's nothing healthy here. It is a cocaine gorilla bubble and it's going to be an interesting year.
    1 Feb, 06:19 PM Reply Like
  • Whether it be bull or bear, whenever I've followed the herd mentality in the past, I got trampled to death. Time to protect profits and not be greedy. I'm sitting on the sidelines this quarter. But, your bet is as good as mine in this economy.
    1 Feb, 11:22 AM Reply Like
  • I am not so sure... The only time I have made money is being with the crowd & prevailing sentiment... whether it was 1999 or 2008 or 2009..

    Whenever I try to anticipate (what do I know really, given all the high-powered HFTs and big-wig hedge fund poker players & big boys...) I lost money or the opportunity to make money.

    I would try to stick with the crowd & main trend rather than guessing the minor dips here and there to time... My 2 cents
    1 Feb, 04:59 PM Reply Like
  • This is true 9 out of 10 times.
    1 Feb, 07:29 PM Reply Like
  • "This is ture 9 out of 10 times" but that 1 time it is not true can be a real killer. Even the bulls know this is BS - they are just riding the Bernanke train for all its worth.

    Pressing your bet at the crap table as the shooter makes one point after another can seem a very rewarding proposition for a while but when that inevitable 7 rolls the stick man sweeps all the money off the table and into his stack and it happens in an instant.

    Same with this market - it is manipulated. It isn't a bubble so much as an attempt to corner the market and no attempt to corner a market has ever succeeded in the end. What happens when no one and I mean no one wants to buy what you have to sell. That day is coming at some point and getting stuck long is not going to be a good thing.

    JS
    2 Feb, 09:12 AM Reply Like
  • That's why god gave us puts, Joseph. They are also called insurance in many circles.
    2 Feb, 09:54 AM Reply Like
  • JS, there is this thing called stop order. I hope you use it. If you are aggressive, use puts as hedges.
    2 Feb, 10:52 AM Reply Like
  • I'm bullish, rightly or wrongly, but mainly because of Fed intervention.

    However, it does seem the Masters of the Stock Market Universe are preventing a move above S&P 1510 for now.

    My longer term target is still 1615 but unless we get a strong move above 1510 I think a pullback is at hand.
    1 Feb, 11:32 AM Reply Like
  • We got it.
    1 Feb, 07:30 PM Reply Like
  • 1513 blow off top.
    2 Feb, 01:02 AM Reply Like
  • I think just enjoy the party and keeps eyes on the existing door.
    1 Feb, 01:07 PM Reply Like
  • Exactly. That's the name of the game.
    1 Feb, 07:31 PM Reply Like
  • Better safe then sorry, I'm thinking. Cashed out this week of most of my holdings, save for the stuff I'm way up on and plan to hold for a LONG time - BK, INTC, AAPL, SAN, BP, WFC. I'm now about 50% cash. Keeping a sharp eye on my current biggest holdings - MA, BRK.B; PNC and WFC warrants - to sell when/if they meet my price targets (almost there).

    With where the S&P 500 p/e ratio, Shiller p/e ratio, etc. are right now, I'd rather preserve capital and miss out on whatever market increase may be to come...and SWAN (sleep well at night) ;)
    1 Feb, 02:54 PM Reply Like
  • Short the market the day before a non-POMO day. /sarc

    P.S. I made money shorting the Russell this past week, so it can be done. Those who can't trade, put all your money in and go off to "safely graze." We'll take care of it for you.
    1 Feb, 08:31 PM Reply Like
  • You like to earn money the hard way, eh?
    1 Feb, 08:32 PM Reply Like
  • Who said hard? Speak for yourself.
    1 Feb, 08:38 PM Reply Like
  • It would be nice to have the markets back, instead of this Fed-induced coma.
    1 Feb, 08:39 PM Reply Like
  • Well, you could have just bought and held URTY.
    1 Feb, 08:40 PM Reply Like
  • This is not an investor's market, and hasn't been for quite some time.
    1 Feb, 08:44 PM Reply Like
  • So you like to earn money the hard way, by trading. Got it.
    1 Feb, 08:46 PM Reply Like
  • Don't know why I'd "hold URTY." I made thousands more shorting the Russell IFs in a 24 hour period than if one held URTY all week, or even from the optimal entry-exit points.

    Perhaps you get commissions from ProShares, BlackRock or Direxion to pump these creatures to retail investors. I'm not your audience.
    1 Feb, 08:52 PM Reply Like
  • What was your percentage return for the week?
    1 Feb, 08:59 PM Reply Like
  • Why is it that whenever I ask someone of their performance vis a vis index ETFs they never reply?
    1 Feb, 10:51 PM Reply Like
  • Paulo

    We seem to be in agreement of late. This is not at all healthy. Stock prices should reflect the real economy. This is not supposed to be a casino game but that is what it has been turned into.

    JS
    2 Feb, 09:37 AM Reply Like
  • It's breeding a new type of investor, the "you just have to go long with leverage" genius.
    2 Feb, 09:39 AM Reply Like
  • You sound sore, Paulo.
    2 Feb, 09:54 AM Reply Like
  • Joseph, Stock prices should reflect supply and demand for stocks, like anything else. QE has lit a fire under demand. Supply is constrained, unless we allow massive naked shorting, which is not going to happen.

    Why treat investing as a morality game? It is anything but.
    2 Feb, 09:55 AM Reply Like
  • Macro Investor: You said "Why treat investing as a morality game? It is anything but." Certainly true but there is a good reason to have rules that make the game slightly fair and more than a simple zero-sum game. The why is because our pension plans depend to a great deal on decent returns from investments, be it interest, dividends or capital gains (the latter is a zero-sum game across all investment classes for any society). So as the investment market becomes gamed, so do the investments upon which many people's pension plans rely. In the long run, for any society, this is unsustainable (about as unsustainable as the current Ponzi funding of pubic pensions and Social Security). So it is in society's interest to provide rules and guidelines that recognize the seriousness of the investment community and make it somewhat less of a "game". To some people, life is a serious matter. To many others, it's "each to their own and to bad for you if I can get a bit more than you can." Ultimately, people pick up on this attitude and soon it pervades society. At that point we get Greek-like tax evasion (if we're lucky) or a break-down into an Afghanistan-like system of protective warlords. This might be departing a bit from the usual selfish fun-and-games that passes in the commentary section of Seeking Alpha, but if we don't realize soon where we are headed, the consequences (beyond the obvious financial implications) might be stunning.
    2 Feb, 10:09 AM Reply Like
  • Pension funds should invest in index ETFs and forget about it.
    2 Feb, 10:10 AM Reply Like
  • No, MI. I'm just calling it as I see it. That the present attitude by the Fed is, indeed, breeding the "you just need to go long with leverage" genius investor.

    This is reflected both in the margin debt statistics and historically (as you might have guessed, periods where the central bank decides to print willy-nilly are followed by an attempt by many to lever themselves up, hoping that the leverage will be inflated away at the same time the assets they buy are also inflated).
    2 Feb, 10:15 AM Reply Like
  • Paulo, That was a very good point. Wouldn't you agree that it is the only rational thing to do under the circumstances?
    2 Feb, 10:16 AM Reply Like
  • Yes, the rational thing to do under these circumstances is to be long at all times.

    That doesn't mean one has to defend these circumstances. This will end up having consequences at some point - money and trade are the very foundations of our society. Degrading those foundations might have unpredictable consequences, on a par with what happened to the communists.
    2 Feb, 10:18 AM Reply Like
  • Paulo, Investing is about making money given the circumstances. Politics is about having an opinion about the circumstances. Too many people confuse the two and hence underperform. Don't fall into that trap. Investing is not a morality game.

    When the bubble collapses - and ALL bubbles collapse - THEN AND ONLY THEN go short. Bubbles are wonderful things, you make money on the way up AND on the way down. Why short on the way up and go long on the way down just to feel that you are smarter than the rest. Hasn't Apple and Amazon taught you anything?
    2 Feb, 10:22 AM Reply Like
  • A bubble usually doesn't have a set time to blow up. The reason why the AMZN bubble is amazing, is because fundamentals have turned south 2 years ago. Usually the bubbles grow on seemingly better fundamentals, not on fundamentals which are already collapsing.

    MI, again, you have too many certainties. You haven't been long in these markets for sure. You haven't seen enough yet. Were you already trading during 2007/2008? (that's STILL quite recent, just asking).
    2 Feb, 10:27 AM Reply Like
  • Macro Investor - you're not thinking very macro but only small "s" selfish. Consider your answer in the context of all investors in the world and all their pension funds and in the context of capital gains in the equities market. For every pension plan (or indexed ETF) that wins, someone, somewhere loses. This makes a pretty scary basis for long term planning especially when demographics are against almost everyone. So, while some individuals can win, society as a whole cannot in an unstable, volatile and gamed investment universe such as we now have. Eventually the suckers catch on.
    2 Feb, 10:29 AM Reply Like
  • Paulo, I really don't trade. I buy and hold with 80% of my portfolio. I trade options with 10% and keep 10% in cash should I need the money for real life needs. I have been trading options since 1995. I mostly buy straddles right before earnings to profit from implied volatility explosions.

    How long have YOU been trading?
    2 Feb, 10:29 AM Reply Like
  • Professionally, since 1995, as an individual since 1989, for myself in an organized manner, 2002.

    You don't sound like you trade since 1995...
    2 Feb, 11:17 AM Reply Like
  • Paulo, You don't sound like you have learned anything from your AMZN experience.
    2 Feb, 11:24 AM Reply Like
  • MI, If I hadn't learned a lot BEFORE the AMZN experience, I would never have been able to go through it relatively unscathed by it ... that's pretty obvious.
    2 Feb, 12:25 PM Reply Like
  • Paulo, if you learned anything before your AMZN experience, you wouldn't have shorted a bubble stock. I really doubt if you were around in the late 90s. I have seen many, many traders completely blow up shorting story stocks then.

    Anyone who still invests based on FA after the manic 90s learned nothing from the 90s.
    2 Feb, 12:33 PM Reply Like
  • What you learned in that bubble is that it always blows up but risk control when facing those things needs to be very tight. The main lesson was perhaps in how far things can go.
    2 Feb, 01:36 PM Reply Like
  • What did you learn? That the easy way to make money is to short story, bubble stocks, and keep complaining about market manipulation as the market moves away from you?

    How long have you been short AMZN Paulo? I think you simply refuse to learn from your experiences. You seem like a very idealistic kid to me. You are sure you have been trading for this long? Where's the cynicism?

    Nothing wrong with being an idealistic kid, incidentally. The world needs more folks who are not cynical like me.
    2 Feb, 01:39 PM Reply Like
  • I've been short AMZN for more than one year, though I covered it a few times and reshorted higher using options, and also traded around it many times.

    If all goes right, that will end up producing return for me, so no worries there.

    ---

    I am not complaining of market manipulation - I am simply stating as a fact that the market is being openly manipulated by the Fed, who is buying assets with the stated intent to inflate the market, to induce the wealth effect.
    2 Feb, 01:43 PM Reply Like
  • Paulo, if someone indeed has traded for as long as you claim to have, then they would know two things.

    1) The Fed always manages the market. Openly.
    2) People love to take credit when they are right, but raise the issue of the Fed when they are wrong, and that's exactly what complaining about market manipulation is all about.
    2 Feb, 01:56 PM Reply Like
  • No, the Fed has taken one step that it didn't take before, in buying risk assets. And the Fed says openly that the objective is to generate the wealth effect by taking assets higher. And Bernanke even indicated the Russell 2000 as proof that the policy was working.

    What the Fed managed before, short term interest rates, although it influenced the stock market, didn't do so as directly and mechanically.
    2 Feb, 01:58 PM Reply Like
  • It hardly matters what assets the Fed buys Paulo. What matters is whether they are transparent about it, and the Fed indeed has been transparent about it. People who learn from past experiences immediately adjust their investing style to account for such Fed proclamations instead of trying the same old FA models that you try to keep using and losing.

    Like I said, you haven't seemed to learn much. I really doubt how long you have been trading.
    2 Feb, 02:02 PM Reply Like
  • Actually the assets the Fed buys are VERY important, because the transmission mechanism is through what the sellers of those assets turn around and buy, themselves. What they substitute the assets for.

    If the Fed was buying short term money market loans, it would have almost no effect on the overall risk markets. If the Fed was buying shares directly it would have a monstrous effect. Since the Fed is buying MBS and long-dated treasury bonds, it has an intermediate effect.
    2 Feb, 02:05 PM Reply Like
  • Paulo, Paulo, Paulo. You know what assets the Fed is buying. Therefore you should think how you should change your strategy. Do you agree?

    If you are not adjusting to the change in Fed behavior which by the way is public, then you have not learned anything from your claimed experience.

    Let's say the Fed starts to buy shares directly tmrw and announces that. Will you still short shares then? If think you will - you will run your FA models and complain about manipulation as you lose money shorting.

    That's my point. I learned from my experience. You either didn't learn from your experience, or you do not have the experience that you claim to have.
    2 Feb, 02:08 PM Reply Like
  • Well, but I am adapting. Usually I'd short. Now I don't (except for AMZN, that is). Usually the market would fall here. Now maybe it dips 2-3 days. Usually with this kind of leverage the market would actually drop quite a bit once it fell ... now it probably won't.
    2 Feb, 02:09 PM Reply Like
  • That's good. It may have taken you more than 20 years, but at least you are adopting. I hope that pretty soon you understand that when the entire market is drowning in liquidity, trying to be smart about stock picking is actually the dumb move. But at least you are learning, which is very encouraging.

    I learned this pretty fast. I guess that's the difference between you and me, and why we clash so much on investing philosophies.
    2 Feb, 04:05 PM Reply Like
  • And you are right - bubbles do not have a set time to blow up. So wait and enjoy the ride up.
    2 Feb, 10:30 AM Reply Like
  • Bubbles produce more losses than gains (because usually the float increases on the way up), and the losers are choosen amongst those that participate. On average, participating should be a losing strategy (though obviously there will be winners, even HUGE winners, which is what makes the bubbles so attractive, much like gambling).
    2 Feb, 11:18 AM Reply Like
  • Only those that watch stock prices and not macroeconomic conditions lose in a bubble. Unfortunately, 99% of bubble watchers only watch stock prices - bulls and bears both. They should watch things like money flow instead. Then it is quite simple to make money from bubbles.
    2 Feb, 11:26 AM Reply Like
  • The heated debate is interesting with good arguments on both sides.

    I think when this market does turn and go south the drops will be brutal and so rapid that.those on margin will be slaughtered... that stops will not be honoured as the markets will simply drop way below many people`s stops before the trades can be processed\executed. That is the danger.

    I have no idea how long this can keep going up - perhaps Bernanke's ego has the DOW all time top of 14.165 in his sights. The US fiscal cliff has been conveniently forgotten - will it return.

    At this rate of climb we could see 15,000 on the DOW by May - is that a healthy market? Is it manipulated? Yes, IMPO it is manipulated and that means they can crash it when they like... but why would they?
    2 Feb, 12:37 PM Reply Like
  • The question as to whether it is a healthy market is the wrong question to ask. The market is what it is. It is fueled by QE. If a patient recovers after being given antibiotics, do you ask if it is a healthy recovery? Recovery is recovery. There is nothing healthy or unhealthy about it.
    2 Feb, 01:04 PM Reply Like
  • MI -- my concern is your investment belief; has become the total norm. It is the popular view. Turn off the brain; close eyes and buy.

    Dude; I think when this thing turns; you and the crowd that thinks like you will get hammered. If and when it turns; there will be no buyers on the way down. None. No bid for anything. Consider this.
    2 Feb, 01:23 PM Reply Like
  • Dude, consider this. What do you think the Fed would do if that happens? What did they do last time? Then what happened?

    See, the thing is, we got god on our side. Aka the Fed.

    I joke, but only partially. I have lived through two crashes by now. First time I didn't trust the Fed. I was wrong. Second time I did. I was right. In Fed I trust.
    2 Feb, 01:26 PM Reply Like
  • @MI, you should just stop defending your position. We need the other doubters on the other side of the trade! If you convinced everybody to join our side, there won't be anybody left to make money from (and then it will really crash).
    2 Feb, 01:36 PM Reply Like
  • Good point. I am sorry.

    OK, I am off to go see Zero Dark Thirty.
    2 Feb, 01:41 PM Reply Like
  • Macro - I've enjoyed your commentary and the lessons it contains. Do you see ANY limit to the power of the Fed in its ability to keep pumping up the market (I mean the economy)? Apart from their own baseline, is their any externally-imposed condition that might force the Fed's hand and take policy out of their control?
    2 Feb, 05:59 PM Reply Like
  • Well, the two classic things are the dollar crashing (external) and inflation spiking (internal) of course, and the two are related. The first is not going to happen as all the Central Banks seemed to have stacked hands here and all are pumping like Arnold in his prime. But the second worry is very real. It is not happening now because of the ever decreasing velocity of money. But that will change once unemployment drops to 5-6% and people get more optimistic. That's when inflation will come, and the Fed I am sure will start to drain liquidity from the market as a preemptive measure. That's when I plan to short. The beauty these days is that the Fed makes its minutes available immediately and gives long term guidance too. This is not like the stupid 90s where Greenspan watching became a black art on mushrooms.
    2 Feb, 06:36 PM Reply Like
  • If Bernake ends the QE's, will that impact the economies of south east Asia? That is where my money is invested.
    3 Feb, 05:00 PM Reply Like
Other date
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)