Market Currents
Three Dell (DELL +0.7%) investors owning a combined 3.3% of the company - Harris Associates,...
-
Friday, February 8, 6:44 PM ETThree Dell (DELL +0.7%) investors owning a combined 3.3% of the company - Harris Associates, Yacktman Asset Management, and Pzena Investment Managment - have joined Southeastern Asset Management (8.5% stake) in opposing the Dell LBO, Reuters reports. Dell ticked higher to $13.63 today, putting it within a hair's breadth of its $13.65/share LBO price. For now at least, the LBO consortium isn't budging.
Other date
TECH ETFs IN FOCUS
Latest Tech Articles
This news story has 17 comments:
DELL needs to make changes to reinvent itself imo
Regardless, I don't see why anyone thinks that Dell will do any better as a private company than it did as a public one-- after all, it isn't as if Michael Dell hasn't been able to do pretty much whatever the hell he wants all the years that the company has been public.
First, they'll evict Michael from his job. Next, they'll bring back Steven the Dell Dude for advertising and rename the company Dude Computers. Then they'll partner with another over-the-hill tech company, Blackberry, to co-release a line of branded smart phones aimed at urban customers. Steven the former Dell Dude will wear gangsta clothing and do hip hop rhymes as he hypes up the new bling-encrusted BlackDudeBerry phones.
Michael Dell would probably be so horrified that he'll pressure his buddies at Microsoft to come up with another few billion dollars to make Southeastern go away.
I agree, Mr Dell should not get away with this.
If the SEC will do Zero, it is up to the Shareholders.
I good Start for Legal Action is here:
http://bit.ly/XUtKLH
What a rotten trick!
If you take in to consideration the speculation that Dell is going to announce a significant decrease in Y/Y earnings over last year - why would the stock be valued higher than $13.65? If it is truly worth $24 or $25 a share, why is it not trading there now? Pure speculation? Wishful thinking over a bad investment? Or, maybe it's just pure greed driving individuals to squeeze a successful businessman for every penny they can because it's easier than mimicking Michael's own success. What would the price of the stock be if Michael and Silver Leaf pull their offer off the table entirely, and kept the company public? Would it magically jump to $25/share, and wipe a sweaty brow after narrowly missing a fast moving LBO? Or... would it tumble past it's pre-LBO announcement price, well into the single digits? That may be a tougher question than it seems... at least, as tough as someone is willing to make it. But, if it were my money, I would get out of the way and pick up a well performing stock that doesn't have all the drama attached to it. I like life simple like that though... may not be for everyone.