Seeking Alpha

Edward Vranic, CFA's  Instablog

Edward Vranic, CFA
Send Message
I am a private investor based out of Toronto, Canada. I have been investing since 2003, first with a focus on mining and resource stocks but more recently I have focused on tech stocks and deep value stocks, usually trading in small caps listed on the TSX exchange in Canada. Since 2006 I have... More
My blog:
Stock Talk on Mobio Insider
  • How To Jump On The Marijuana Investment Bandwagon 16 comments
    Mar 22, 2014 2:12 AM | about stocks: NLPXF, FITX, ERBB, STRRF, THVDF

    These guys are the most in-demand skilled labour force in Canada right now. Every failed TSXV mining company or near-bankrupt OTC stock would love to secure their services:The most in-demand skilled labour force in Canada right now. Every failed TSXV mining company or near-bankrupt OTC stock would love to secure their services

    The marijuana industry pump has been particularly lucrative for many traders recently. The first companies in the door have experienced tremendous growth in stock price. Companies on the TSX Venture with cute symbols like Satori Resources (NYSE:BUD) and Thelon Capital (NYSE:THC) have seen stock price increases in excess of 10x since the start of the year with even greater gains on the OTC markets in the US from companies like Creative Edge Nutrition (OTCPK:FITX) and Tranzbyte Corporation (OTCPK:ERBB).

    The success with these companies has led to many more trying to jump on the bandwagon and pump their shares prices at the mere mention of looking into the industry. Thus far it has worked with great success for companies like Windfire Capital (WIF) and Terra Firma Resources (TFR) among several others.

    While traders have made a lot of money with these companies, I believe buying into them now represents a poor risk-reward speculative investment proposition even when doing just a cursory amount of research.

    Just because they have the inside track to producing and selling marijuana legally in their various jurisdictions of focus does not mean they will instantly become successful companies overnight. FITX's income statement shows a loss of $6.3M for 2013 while the balance sheet shows a mere $19K in cash and $859K in total current assets against $4.6M in total current liabilities. ERBB is in even more of a desperate state with just $38K in total current assets to its name against $3.6M in current liabilities. As in other words, these companies WILL need to finance in order to start operations and fix their balance sheets. That financing will put a damper on the price of each stock, particularly if it is quite dilutive.

    The companies trading on the TSX Venture aren't in such desperate shape as they generally have positive (albeit small) working capital and much lower cash burn rates. But THC has a negative working capital with minimal cash just like its counterparts south of the border. BUD has $320K in current assets compared to $187K in current liabilities. But that has come on the heels of financing at very low prices of 15.5M shares at a price of 1 cent for $155K in cash in September. The kicker is those 15.5M shares also got warrants with a strike price of 5 cents to buy the stock. With a stock price over 15 cents those warrants will certainly get exercised and provide the company with $775K, but it's a near certainty that exercise of the warrants will be accompanied by sales of the stock purchased at 1.5 cents to fund the proceeds of the warrant exercise. The people who made the most money on BUD were the ones who participated in the private placement or otherwise bought near 52-week lows.

    The companies who are bandwagon jumpers are an even worse buy after the stock price has already popped. Let's take WIF as an example. Today's news release about the company evaluating the agriculture sector comes with this caveat:

    "While the company has been in discussions, no agreement in principal has been entered into with any parties and there is no assurance that the company will acquire any agriculture related assets, directly or indirectly."

    Not only that, the company just closed a private placement of 4.4M shares at 5 cents on March 13. The stock closed at 18 cents on Friday. So an investment in WIF gets you a company that just closed a secondary at a deep discount to the price today and the company doesn't even guarantee you a slice of the medical marijuana pie. It's companies like these that offer the worst risk-reward speculative opportunity because you are paying a high price for the shares with no guarantees of success of even getting into the industry let alone figuring out how to profit from it. It's not so easy to snap your fingers and start making money growing pot. You have to get the license to become a legal commercial producer in Canada first.

    Clearly the people who have won the most on the companies above are the ones who bought at the low prices and are selling or holding at these higher ones.

    If you want to win like the early investors who have won on the companies above, the best way to play the marijuana industry is to try to guess which company would be a likely suspect to convert their business and who would be capable of executing on said change in business. Here's a checklist of what I think would be valuable to go through when evaluating a company's propensity to change its course of business to "agriculture".

    1. A failed resource company that still owns property and has a desire or need to change its business.

    2. That property is in Canada or in a jurisdiction which supports the development of marijuana both from a legal perspective and an agricultural one (so if your property is located in the Nevada/Arizona desert, no such luck for you).

    3. They have people who are experienced and licensed in the commercial production of medical marijuana.

    4. They have money to hire the people in point #3 like the Trailer Park Boys and/or acquire those licenses as well as start up money to begin its production or buy a plot of land that can grow marijuana if anything they already own doesn't suffice.

    5. The company has a small float of shares to maximize the stock price pump it will see by releasing a press release saying it will try to get into agricultural ventures.

    One company that immediately comes to my mind which I have talked about before is Noble Mineral Exploration (OTCPK:NLPXF), symbol NOB on the TSX Venture. My article "Noble Mineral Exploration Demonstrates How To Run A Profitable Junior Exploration Company" gets into some detail over a recent sale of the company's surface to Block A of Project 81. The sale is scheduled to close on March 31 so the company will soon be getting plenty of cash. I estimate well over $1M will remain after NOB discharges its liabilities and buys out the rights of the previous landowner. That would be plenty of cash to pursue opportunities in agriculture, more cash than any of the companies listed above.

    As NOB intends to sell the remaining surface rights to Project 81, that land will be eligible for mineral exploration only. But NOB still has full access to land in Northern Ontario and Saskatchewan. I'm not sure if that land can be used for agricultural as well as exploration purposes. But if not the former, NOB still has plenty of money to find and purchase one. The only negative against NOB is that the float is fairly large - 155M shares - but NOB doesn't have a cheap recent PP weighing down the stock either.

    I have no idea if NOB's management team has any desire to get into the marijuana game. But what I do know is that if they did, they would have a lot more ability to execute on those plans based on the cash that the company will have soon than WIF, and is trading at a lower market cap to WIF too.

    NOB is not the only company out there which could capitalize on this industry while it is hot. There are many other undervalued mining companies that may pursue this opportunity. It makes a lot of sense that if the market is not properly valuing their exploration potential, why should these companies spend money on something that's not going to get a return right now? It's better to sit on the properties and wait it out while we are in this exploration bear market. The minerals which are underground are not going to go anywhere, but in the meantime some of these companies may be able to use some of the surface land for agricultural purposes and garner cash flow that way.

    This Excel file list will give you a bunch of names with very low market caps and floats which have the potential to pop 100% or more just by announcing a change in business to agriculture. You can evaluate which companies have the best ability to execute on that change in business and who might want to go through such a change. It's a lot of work to find a diamond in the rough but if you call it correctly you will make a lot more money on the initial pop in my opinion than by chasing the companies which currently claim to be looking into pot. And if you call it wrong but follow the rules of investing into a good company with cash, you will still have a company with a lot of exploration potential and the money to execute on a business plan without the threat of dilution or delisting.

    Disclosure: I am long NLPXF.

    Stocks: NLPXF, FITX, ERBB, STRRF, THVDF
Back To Edward Vranic, CFA's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (16)
Track new comments
  • ftfan35
    , contributor
    Comments (57) | Send Message
     
    It is always a sign of a poor article when you feel the need to point out the past year's financials of what is essentially a brand new company (ERBB, FITX). Especially when you don't mention the upsides such as, FITX building a 12 million dollar facility in Canada capable of growing 1.3 million pounds of marijuana annually (which is supposed to be completed in a month).

     

    The title of the article is kind of a joke as well, you even mention that you have no idea if Noble would even be interested in getting into the marijuana market. Under this vein of thought I could write an article about the potential of Tesla or Apple getting into the marijuana market because they happen to own land, and impeccable financials to boot!
    22 Mar, 02:42 AM Reply Like
  • mr.investor
    , contributor
    Comments (61) | Send Message
     
    I'm not a fan of this article either but please get your facts straight. ERBB is not a new company and has been around since early 2000's. They just weren't in the marijuana business. FITX is not growing 1.3 million lbs of marijuana annually. Bill Chaaban, FITX CEO has stated this numerous times.
    22 Mar, 09:07 AM Reply Like
  • Edward Vranic, CFA
    , contributor
    Comments (202) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » You make a fair point about Apple (not Tesla their cash is clearly tied up). Apple has a much greater capability to get into the marijuana industry than WIF. And yet WIF's stock price moved up on a simple news release stating they WANT to get into the industry.

     

    My point about Noble was to use it as an example of a company that could release an NR like WIF just to get a spike in the stock price but at least they would be more capable of execution. I'm going to use an example of a stock that I own and I'm familiar with, but there are many companies in better shape and cheaper than WIF and the other companies that have hopped on the bandwagon lately.

     

    My article title was somewhat facetious and I thought I that point would be apparent given my sentence and picture at the top of it. I guess my serious response would be, I wouldn't buy any of the crap companies I listed as an investment in this article because they all have their own set of issues. I have bought and sold TFR as a short term trade and that's it.

     

    I assume people who buy into FITX are just trying to day trade it or hope it becomes the next ATTBF with no real analysis on how it will do so. It has a long hard road ahead of it and a LOT more shares outstanding. FITX has gotten financing to build out the facility but those NR are very vague on details. How much of a stake in the potential future earnings power did they give up? Private equity funding doesn't come without a cost. Then the company still has the poor balance sheet issues at the corporate level to deal with.

     

    At this stage of the game the risk-reward speculative potential of all these companies is out of whack. FITX and the ones actually in the industry could still move up 10x in price. I'm not a seer so I don't want to say they can't. But my guess is they are much more likely to go down in price from here. If the stock price retreats as the day traders exit but the business gains traction THEN it may be worth another look as the risk-reward potential realigns itself.

     

    Then the pretenders like WIF and TFR are almost certain to go down. Chances are the vast majority of them won't get any traction into the weed industry. If you want to trade those plays you truly are better off with ones like NOB and then call up the management team and try to convince them to get into "agriculture".
    22 Mar, 11:12 AM Reply Like
  • Edward Vranic, CFA
    , contributor
    Comments (202) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Mr Investor, thanks for the clearing up those points.
    22 Mar, 11:14 AM Reply Like
  • ftfan35
    , contributor
    Comments (57) | Send Message
     
    Mr. Investor, that is why I said 'essentially' a new company. Both have been around for a while but they have dedicated a ton of effort recently the build entire brands from the ground up.

     

    And you are right that FITX is not growing 1.3mlb, they aren't growing anything and may never in Canada. But the CEO has said they would have the capability of growing that much (and that was his goal). And to clarify for you Edward, PHOT put up the full $12MM for them to build the facility for a 25% stake in the FITX subsidiary of of CEN Biotech.
    22 Mar, 01:30 PM Reply Like
  • Matthew Finston
    , contributor
    Comments (735) | Send Message
     
    I get the humor. It does make the industry look like a joke with the ridiculous valuations. I do think there are some legitimate companies. I wish investors would just focus on their energies to find those.

     

    Although, I wasn't sure how serious you were by comparing fitx and attbf. saying fitx should go up to .20 right now would be the equivalent of saying attbf should be at a $7. here is why:

     

    1)attbf has 57m shares outstanding versus fitx 3.5 billion, 2) 114m market cap versus 350m market cap 3) attbf fully reporting fitx non-reporting.

     

    FITX had its day in the sun. It is already nearly valued 3x that of ATTBF. Fitx just looks cheaper because it trades between .05 to .10 cents

     

    by any mode of comparison attbf is cheaper, better managed, diversified, and hedged. There are some warning signs that it isn't perfect. and if this industry wasn't so hot it might have a lesser valuation. not saying go out and buy attbf. I like the valuation where it is right now. possibly higher. but these stocks are definitely in a bubble
    23 Mar, 02:08 AM Reply Like
  • belgium
    , contributor
    Comments (1037) | Send Message
     
    "And to clarify for you Edward, PHOT put up the full $12MM for them to build the facility for a 25% stake in the FITX subsidiary of of CEN Biotech. "

     

    This is not correct:

     

    1) They didn't put up anything yet, because it was dependent on getting a license.

     

    2) It's not PHOT that will own 25% of Cen Bio, it will be OGI that will own 25% of Cen Bio. PHOT will own 45% of OGI.

     

    So PHOT will own 45% of 25% of Cen Bio.

     

    3) Check the latest Private Funding PR from FITX. That is the money for the conversion.

     

    But let's see how all this will play out, because FITX and it's partners started a lawsuit against PHOT/CANX.
    23 Mar, 09:28 AM Reply Like
  • valuefinder
    , contributor
    Comments (91) | Send Message
     
    So one goes through a long list of 300 companies and just randomly bets on which one will announce plans of getting into growing marijuana ??!! Oh well, I hope you have a better strategy in mind...
    22 Mar, 10:38 AM Reply Like
  • Edward Vranic, CFA
    , contributor
    Comments (202) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Hey I didn't say it was going to be easy ;)

     

    Or you could find a few favorites and give management a call to get some feelers on where they are headed. What would you do for a 100-200% spike in the stock price?

     

    Or if you don't like that idea you could write an article totally ripping on all the problematic companies in the marijuana industry as well as the pretenders, create a lot of attention and mention one of your choices as a far superior investment option.

     

    Both are valid courses of action imo. Chasing companies with NR's stating "While the company has been in discussions, no agreement in principal has been entered into with any parties and there is no assurance that the company will acquire any agriculture related assets, directly or indirectly" is not.
    22 Mar, 11:23 AM Reply Like
  • user21998591
    , contributor
    Comments (5) | Send Message
     
    fitx long
    22 Mar, 11:57 AM Reply Like
  • Edward Vranic, CFA
    , contributor
    Comments (202) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Good luck. I can't say I will ever be the same (maybe upon pullback in the stock price AND real traction in the business AND clarity in the recent financing) but I don't wish people any ill-will. My advice would be to take profits when you have them. Or if you're really in the money take profits on half and let the rest ride as free shares.
    22 Mar, 12:09 PM Reply Like
  • Matthew Finston
    , contributor
    Comments (735) | Send Message
     
    Fitx long? I'm bullish on the industry, but fitx might be the lehman bros. to this whole game. I really hope people don't use fitx as the benchmark. There are legitimate companies out there (few and far between) but FITX is not it (yet). Maybe fitx long into the future? but FITX now? no. too much costs, no disclosures.
    23 Mar, 01:58 AM Reply Like
  • Econ Student
    , contributor
    Comments (211) | Send Message
     
    If you want Canadian plays here they are. (OTCPK:ATTBF) (OTCPK:EAPH) (OTCQB:ENRT) (OTCPK:FITX) (OTCQB:LXRP) (OTCPK:MDRM) (OTCPK:NXTTF) (OTCQB:PMCM)
    23 Mar, 01:32 AM Reply Like
  • greenleaf1962
    , contributor
    Comments (157) | Send Message
     
    Here is my pick Latf and PMCM and FITX
    25 Mar, 08:46 AM Reply Like
  • basshunter
    , contributor
    Comments (6) | Send Message
     
    Any good info on ERBB, thinking on jumping on.
    31 Mar, 08:34 PM Reply Like
  • ftfan35
    , contributor
    Comments (57) | Send Message
     
    You better do it quick, their vending machine is being unveiled on the 12th.
    1 Apr, 12:40 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.