Mark Anthony's  Instablog

Mark Anthony
Send Message
Mark Anthony, is an IT professional and who had a scientific research background before joining the information revolution. Visit his blog: Stockology (
My blog:
  • Hot Money, Hot Commodities and the US Dollar Carry Trade Part 1 4 comments
    Oct 26, 2009 9:34 AM | about stocks: AMD, AMZN, CAT, CDE, GOLD, INTC, MSFT, PAAS, PAL, SSRI, SWC, UNG

    The collapse of the US dollar has passed the point of no return. An abrupt US currency collapse is now very possible. I hope we can see a gradual and orderly decline of the US dollar. But this best case scenario, as Peter Schiff hoped for, is now not likely. Peter Schiff still believes that there is still something that the FED or the US Government can do, to save the dollar. I disagree with him. Peter Schiff obviously does not understand how free market economy works, nor does Ron Paul, nor does Roubini. Jim Rogers is one of the few who understands and how free market capitalism works, and practices it by moving his family and assets to Asia. (President Obama: You still have two jobs to do: Buy the first lady an Iridium ring; and bring Jim Rogers home using Air Force One. That's all you need to have a strong family, a strong presidency and a strong nation. No kidding!)

    This brings to me the Hot Money problem that China and other countries face. China has a gigantic foreign currency reserve that is composed mostly of US dollar assets, amid a looming prospect of ever falling dollar; China doesn't want to accumulate more dollars. But hot money keeps flowing in from the outside, smuggled in through Hong Kong, forcing China to print more RMB yuans to absorb the inflow of US dollars. China is not alone. Brazil recently slapped a 2% tax on foreign capital entering the nation's stock and exchange market. Australia is worried, too. Read how China's Commodity Carry Trade strategy of divesting the dollar: part 1 and part 2.

    The Hot Money "problem" that China and the world worry about is actually free market principles working at their best. Basic Darwinism dictates that market capital will always go where it wants to go, not where the governments want it to go. Capital wants to get away from the soil that suffocates its growth, and move to fertile lands where it can thrive. Hot money flows out of the developed nations and into developing nations and nations with rich natural resources, because that's where opportunities of grow are.

    Government interventions to stop the free flow of money are futile, fruitless and counter-productive; Government interventions to manipulate currencies and commodity prices are equally futile, fruitless, and counter-productive. Free market capitalism always works.

    Recently Julian Robert thinks that the US faces Armageddon if the Chinese or Japanese stop buying the US debts, and that both countries maybe forced to sell US debts, due to domestic needs. He was right, except for the Norwegian part. The journalist asked: All the rich Norwegians have moved their money out of the country, so why do you invest there?

    Good question! Capital money has its own mind. It wants to escape from hostile environments, and move to lands where it can grow and prosper. Rich Norwegians move their money out of the country because they are taxed to death. There are places where the taxation is less and the opportunity to grow is bigger. Again, government interventions are futile. China's effort to crack down on hot money inflow hardly made a dent. Equally futile was US government's tax cracking down on rich Americans who have foreign bank accounts. Such crack down is futile. If Americans want to move their money out of the country, there are plenty of ways to do it. Voting with feet is more powerful than voting with a paper ballot. But if that's not enough, one could cast the ultimate vote with the US passport as the ballot ticket, at an overseas US consulate.

    Instead of the futile crack down, the US government needs to exam itself in retrospect and ask why Americans are moving money to foreign soil, and what it can do to attract foreign money to come back to US soil. This is the key: When the money is leaving the US soil for foreign land, so are the job opportunities, so are our best investors, our best innovators and our best technical professionals, and so are our nation's future. So what do we have left? A dying US dollar and millions of jobless and hopeless hungry and angry people either sit at home waiting for the government to feed them, or else take to the street.

    Peter Schiff believes that to save the dollar, all we need is the FED dramatically hike up the rate, stop money printing, and the US government massively cut spending and raise tax. The basic ideas are right. But if he believes those are realistic or possible, he really doesn't understand how free market works. What works is not what a government does, but rather what a government does NOT do. In China's history, every dynasty that prospered was only because the emperor taxed little and asserted little control of the society.

    Great Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said that governing a great nation is like cooking a small delicacy: You cook just enough so all the original flavors are preserved. If you over-cook then what comes out is anything but a delicacy. Sure America is a melting pot. But President Obama is cooking this melting pot way too hard that not only there is lots of capital spill over, but the melting pot itself is melting!!! Just ask the first lady how to cook!

    Peter Schiff believes the FED can still dramatically hike up the rate and stop money printing, and the government can dramatically cut spending and hike tax, in order to save the US dollar. If it was that easy, if a government has the power to salvage its own currency, then why didn't Zimbabwe's President Mugabe do it? Did he not raise interest rate of Z$ dramatically? He has the money printer so he can afford to pay any high interest, right? Higher interest is meaningless if the principal itself, the value of one dollar drops even faster. The FED stops printing money? Who is going to buy our mountains of new issue US treasury bonds, if the FED doesn't print money out of thin air to buy our own debt?

    How about the US government dramatically cut spending and hike up tax rate? You can't collect more tax from business that are not profitable, and hence has no tax to pay. Higher tax will force the profitable businesses to move to overseas, reducing, instead of increasing tax revenue. Cut spending? Which part do we cut? I think we should first cut the all the bailouts to the big banks and let them fail? But then do we want a nationwide bank runs and bank failures, and watch FDIC to go bankrupt? How about cut welfare and cut unemployment benefits. Then all the desperate people deprived of livelihoods probably will siege the White House, bringing their empty pots alone, banging and singing, until the resident has to get away on a helicopter.

    Let's face reality, Mr. Peter Schiff. When you see the melting pot itself is melting and there's lots of boiling spill over, you are going to tell people that we can still have a great dinner if we do the right thing? NO! You should honestly tell the people that there is no more delicacy for dinner. The people HAVE to go to sleep with an empty stomach. What we can still do, is not to try save the delicacy, but to save the pot, so we can still cook a good meal tomorrow. Of course, Peter, you can not win votes by telling people they will be hungry. But that's the reality.

    There is no salvation of the US dollar. But the US economy itself can survive and prosper. There are certain elements of the US economy, no, not the banks, not the Wall Street, but the real productive sections of the US economy, that will survive and prosper. American farmers will continue to produce food that the world needs. Intel (INTC), AMD and Microsoft (MSFT) will continue to produce computer hardware and software that the world needs. Catepillar (CAT) will continue to produce great construction machineries that China and the rest of the world wants. My most favorite mining company, Montana's Stillwater Mining Company (SWC), one of the world's only two primary palladium producers, will continue to produce palladium because the rest of the world still needs palladium, even though the bankrupt GM doesn't want to buy from SWC. Not to mention we have so many of America's world class science and technology products that the world needs from us. Not to mention our best treasure, the US constitution, one of the most beautiful constitution and the envy of the world's poor, tired, suppressed and desperate people.

    Yes, the US dollar, a fiat currency, will collapse; No, the US economy itself will not collapse. A good historical precedence is hyperinflation Weimar Germany did not destroy Germany: It still had enough economic and military power to allow Hitler to launch World War Two.

    Yes, the US Federal government is bankrupt, as is the FED; But No, the American nation, as well as individual states, will not go bankrupt. California will not go bankrupt. It has a constitution mandated balanced budget until recent years, and it is trying very hard to return to balanced budget, amid the difficult environment of tax revenue short fall and spending needs. It's heart breaking to see people start to talk about the possibility of session of individual states from the nation. But unless the federal government realize its own limit, and live within its limit, I think as we raise to the USSA we could well become the next USSR one day. The US government itself needs a bailout, not just the dollar.

    I will discuss in the next part of this article how individual investors can protect themselves and make profit from the downfall of the dollar. Specifically I will talk about equities, commodities and US dollar carry trades, as well as how to use leverage to increase your gain.

     Full Disclosure: The author is long precious metal palladium and silver, hold big positions in palladium mines SWC and PAL, as well as SSRI and CDE. I hold shipping stocks like EXM, EGLE, TBSI, DRYS, and natural gas fund UNG. I short the US dollar by holding some long positions in margin brokage account.

Back To Mark Anthony's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (4)
Track new comments
  • aarc
    , contributor
    Comments (3753) | Send Message
    There is still a good chance the US dollar can recover on the long run if not the short run.


    Most US manufacturing companies had been transfering their operations to the developing countries during the early 2000 before the global economy collapsed caused by the "Made in the USA" financial crisis.


    Now that the whole world realized that the financial crisis in the US is not necessarily their own financial crisis; the whole world can recover even if the US does not.


    But then if the whole world can recover; those global companies that the US has relocated into China, India, Brazil, etc. will start making considerable profits as they become able to get out of the high labor cost shackle of the United States and compete effectively all over the world.


    What happened to those global companies once they start amassing massive profits with low labor costs of the developing countries and expanding their export operations all over the world but funnel most of their profits back to the US of A when the global economy finally recovers and turned into progressive mode (sans USA?)?


    Foreign investors will keep buying them and they will most likely buy them from the NYSE.


    Then money will flow back to the US.


    Will that not make the US$ start appreciating again?


    Not today, not next month, but next years and decades ahead as more of global consumerism keep following the footsteps that US consumers have thread during the last two decades and start funneling their hard earned money to US global manufacturing companies and into the coffers of the US government.


    China and Japan are spearheading their economic independence from the US consumers by developing their own consumer-based economies. The whole developing world will follow suit and and in less than a decade, consumerism can bloom all over Asia, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and most others countries who have not yet developed their local consumer-based economies.


    US global companies will then reap massive profits out of global-based consumers and the US government will become a wealthy entity despite spiralling unemployment.


    Thus, the US government will have to work like a commonwealth to spread the "future" wealth.


    Again not today, not next month, maybe not next year but definitely into the years ahead as global consumerism replaces US consumerism.
    29 Oct 2009, 09:54 PM Reply Like
  • Gary A
    , contributor
    Comments (3154) | Send Message
    China wants to limit hot money. It isn't capitalism. It is an artificial bubble based upon artificially low interest rates in the US. Hot money is mercantilism, not capitalism.
    21 Nov 2009, 03:29 AM Reply Like
  • quercus
    , contributor
    Comment (1) | Send Message
    I own palladium. But why are you so bullish on palladium ? You don't bank totally on cold fusion do you ? You have to face the drawbacks too. Electrical cars won't use much palladium, and catalytic convertors is the main source of demand right now.
    15 Dec 2009, 11:07 AM Reply Like
  • Mark Anthony
    , contributor
    Comments (3595) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » No, not at all. I do not put all the eggs on the bet that Cold Fusion will become a commercial reality any time soon. I hope it does, for my own profit and for the good of humanity's future.


    But there are many many very bullish factors in palladium besides Cold Fusion. The most imminent one is the end of the decade long Russian Government palladium stockpile sale, because they simpley have depleted the stockpile. This is a gigantic bullish factor in palladium supply/demand, because the Russian stockpile sale accounts for 1 to 2 million ounces per year, compare with mine production of only 6.5 million ounces per year, and industrial demand of roughly 8 million ounces per year.


    A false rumor of Russia temporarily suspending the palladium stockpile sale in 2000 drove the price from $300-ish to $1100 in a few months. Today we have a reality, not a rumor, that the Russian palladium stockpile is depleted.


    More over, you have Norilsk Nickel production drop, because they choose to mine the ores that are nickel rich and palladium poor. You have South Africa PGM production drop due to the on-going electricity crisis. And then you have strong investment demands in precious metals.


    There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that palladium price should exceed platinum price in the near future. This makes SWC and PAL the brightest star in mining stocks.


    On Dec 15 11:07 AM quercus wrote:


    > I own palladium. But why are you so bullish on palladium ? You don't
    > bank totally on cold fusion do you ? You have to face the drawbacks
    > too. Electrical cars won't use much palladium, and catalytic convertors
    > is the main source of demand right now.
    18 Dec 2009, 02:06 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • Jim Rogers favors water investment! California is in a water crisis. Cardiz (CDZI) is up almost 50% today on news:
    Jun 5, 2009
  • China is still buying US T-Bonds and Yuan is pegged to dollar. WHY? Read my shocking discovery: Enjoy!
    Jun 4, 2009
  • PEIX, a once hot ethanol play, goes Ch.11 today, as expected. Recent unusual price moves must lured speculators in. Good lesson learned.
    May 18, 2009
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.