Seeking Alpha

Joseph L. Shaefer's  Instablog

Joseph L. Shaefer
  • on Portfolio Strategy & Asset Allocation
Send Message
Joseph L. Shaefer is the CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Stanford Wealth Management, LLC, a Registered Investment Advisor. Joe retired as a senior executive at Charles Schwab and Co. to found Stanford Wealth Management, LLC, in 1990. He also spent 36 years in active and reserve military... More
My company:
Stanford Wealth Management LLC
My blog:
The Investor's Edge
My book:
Bringing Home the Gold
  • "CO-MINNOWs:" Formerly Great States Doomed To Shrink 1 comment
    Feb 13, 2010 11:51 PM | about stocks: CMF, CXA, INY, PZT

     

     

    There are states whose population and/or individual tax base and/or corporate tax base have been shrinking for years, formerly great states doomed by their decision to buy votes via social programs that unfairly tax the middle class.  To me, there are social programs like school breakfasts and lunches for kids who wouldn’t get one at home, aid to the disabled, and other programs for those currently or permanently unable to enjoy the same opportunities others of us enjoy.

     

    Then there are what I call social (or anti-social) pogroms because they do what all pogroms are intended to do: persecute one particular group, in this case the top 50% of Americans who work hard and pay 97% of all taxes.  Pogroms are characterized by being officially encouraged and I have not seen a time in the USA where this thinking is more officially encouraged than it is today.  “We need to spread the wealth” is the excuse to engage in all manner of social pogroms that benefit one (usually large) bloc of voters at the expense of another (usually more fragmented) which embraces many issues rather than the single, “Who will offer me more money?”

     

    The states that have engaged in this kind of thinking are numerous -- but six to rise to the forefront when we analyze who is most adept at over-taxation, ridiculous fines and licensing fees, using corporations as whipping boys, and taxing them into leaving for other states.  I call them the minnows.  Once mighty fish, they know flop about like minnows out of water.  They are:

     

    Michigan

    Illinois

    New York

    New Jersey

    Ohio and

    Wisconsin 

     

    These states were always known to feature cold winters and high taxes.  But they coulda done somethin’.  They coulda been somebody.  They coulda’ been contendas if only they had done something different instead of giving all their tax dollars to social pogroms and driven more and more of their tax base out of state.  More and more taxes on fewer and fewer residents is not a recipe for long-term survival. 

     

    Hawaii is in dreadful straits, too, but they at least have weather that people flock to so their incredible government mismanagement is masked by new tax revenue coming in from those escaping the harsh weather of the upper Heartland and the Northeast.  When you’re #2 in weather, you have to try harder.  The MINNOWs don’t.

     

    For instance, New York once held more Fortune 500 companies than any other state.  Now that honor goes to no-personal-income-tax Texas.  New York’s response?  Raise taxes on those people and corporations that haven’t yet left!

     

    Of course, not all went to Texas right away.  That’s a long way away and you have to own a car if you live there.  How uncivilized.  Haven’t those people heard of Carey Limousine?  So initially a huge number of those dispossessed by New York state and city taxes, regulations, licensing fees, etc. went across the Hudson to New Jersey.  A nice easy commute to The City or, if you relocated your company to Hoboken or Jersey City, you could still maintain an office downtown or in mid-town for client PR and be there in 30 minutes. 

    From 1999-2003, New Jersey got most of the benefits of people and companies leaving New York.  It enjoyed a $98 billion net wealth inflow during those 5 years!  So what did they do to encourage more of this easy largesse?  Why, they created more social giveaways and taxed the hell out of the newcomers.  In the five years from 2004 to 2008, New Jersey suffered a $70 billion net outflow in wealth due to a huge drop in the number of wealthy households entering the state and an increase in the number of wealthy households leaving.
     

    New York, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and Ohio, here’s a news flash for you: there is no law that requires people who are being mistreated to stay in your state!  Money goes where it is treated best. 

    If you hate “rich” people, even though that upper 50% of taxpayers pay 97% of all your taxes, just keep doing what you’re doing and pretty soon you’ll enjoy the same worker’s paradise that the USSR did and Venezuela et al are careening into today.  If you don’t hate them, but merely consider them yours to pluck money from to dispense to others…well, the result is the same.  They vote with their feet.
     

    When I was young, I embraced the first part of the hoary old dictum, “If you are not a socialist when you are young, you have no heart.  If you are a socialist when you are old, you have no head.”  I just didn’t have the luxury of staying young long enough to remain a socialist; I had to work for a living.  Doing that will quickly disabuse you of the notion that everyone works equally hard or equally smart.  There are some lazy, smarmy, nasty, malingering, brutish people out there. 

    Now a good socialist will tell you they had a tough childhood or came from a broken family or didn’t get enough vitamin D as a kid and, if only we will recognize that and treat them special, they can be Just Like Us. 
    Duh.  Never Gonna Happen!  If a tough childhood, broken families and too little vitamin D cause people to become criminals, perverts, crackheads and sociopaths, then why do 80-90% of the people growing up in those same situations become law-abiding citizens???!!!

     

    I digress, but it was worth it…  Anyway, back to the above states, these were Great States before they embraced the leavening effect of “spreading the wealth” rather than responsible government.  Equal opportunity is a laudable goal of social programs; equal dispensation of the fruits of the work of the ants to the grasshoppers is insanity.

     

    It would be bad enough if there were just MINNOWs – but now we have a codependency on the part of two states that once smugly derided these others.  California and Oregon, two of the most beautiful states with the most extensive natural resources and exceptional farm land in the country, who used to attract much of the money fleeing cold winters and high taxes, have now devolved into a sad imitation of the other MINNOWs. 

     

    I and others have written extensively on the demise of the Golden State.  I was born there.  I worked there for a number of years.  I visit friends, family and the exceptional geography there regularly.  You’ve heard of all the other idiocies in California.  Let me now recount the latest.  This is so egregious that I assumed it was one of those E-mail Urban Legends until I actually went to the California State website http://www.dbw.ca.gov/PDF/LawEnforc/2009bail.pdf. 

    There I discovered that California, wisely afraid to “raise taxes,” is elevating revenue instead by raising every traffic fine across the board.  Effective January 6, 2010, it will now cost you $328 if you are ticketed for driving 16 miles over the speed limit; $214 for failure to notify DMV of address change within 10 days; $950 to buy a device that obscures your license plate from the Big Brother cameras; and $950.00 plus $50 “security and conviction fees” to park in a bus loading zone.  Hey, that’s nothing --   there’s a $380  fine for “Littering Within 150 Feet of a Body of Water” and  $57,000 for “Unlawful Sale or Purchase of Abalone.”  Sounds like a bad time to be a driver or a diver in California (but a great time to be an abalone or some other favorite of the environmentally chic…) 

    Oregon has the same loony outlook on business, chasing many of its entrepreneurs to Nevada, Arizona, Idaho and other more business-friendly states.  Oregon trumpets that they have no sales tax as an enticement to attract new residents.  (I liked Oregon better when they had a sign at the California border: “Welcome to Oregon.  Now Go Home.”)  Of course, they don’t mention that to make up for that
    they have an 11% tax on personal incomes.  People in Vancouver, WA love it.  They pay no income taxes and can do all their shopping in Portland, OR, 5 minutes away.  What’s Oregon’s response?  Try to get retailers to only sell to those with an Oregon residency?

     

    It’s a sad “state” of affairs.  My best investment advice?  Sometimes advising what I wouldn’t be buying is even more important than what to buy.   So – I’d avoid the public debt of most every one of these states and most of their municipalities as well. 

    If you must buy them, stick only with something rated AAA on its own (not because of some “insurance” from an unstable insurer.)  Or forsake high yield and buy “pre-refunded” or “escrowed to maturity” bonds. You’ll earn less with this money-in-the-bank-to-pay-at maturity kind of bond but, as I’ve written before on this subject, you should be every bit as concerned this year about the return OF your principal, not just the return ON your principal.
     

    Finally, if you are willing to short municipals, here is a list I published a few weeks back of, in my opinion, ETFs that buy bonds exclusively from the two dumbest states whose problems are entirely of their own making and which, again, in my opinion, are hiding their heads in the sand (or somewhere): California and New York.

    • CMF – iShares S&P California Municipal ETF
    • CXA – SPDR Barclays Capital California Municipal ETF
    • INY - SPDR Barclays Capital New York Municipal ETF
    • NYF - iShares S&P New York Municipal ETF
    • PWZ – PowerShares Insured California Municipal ETF
    • PZT - PowerShares Insured New York Municipal ETF

    Misery must love company, ‘cause there are other great fish even now preparing to join the CO-MINNOWs club…

     

     
    Author's Disclosure: We do not own bonds of any of these states.  We are looking for a good short-sale entry point for ourselves and those clients for whom it is appropriate in the ETFs above.

    The Fine Print: As Registered Investment Advisors, we see it as our responsibility to advise the following: We do not know your personal financial situation, so the information contained in this communiqué represents the opinions of the staff of Stanford Wealth Management, and should not be construed as personalized investment advice.

    Also, past performance is no guarantee of future results, rather an obvious statement if you review the records of many alleged gurus, but important nonetheless – for example, our Investors Edge ® Growth and Value Portfolio beat the S&P 500 for 10 years running but did not do so for 2009. We plan to be back on track on 2010 but then, “past performance is no guarantee of future results”!

    It should not be assumed that investing in any securities we are investing in will always be profitable. We take our research seriously, we do our best to get it right, and we “eat our own cooking,” but we could be wrong, hence our full disclosure as to whether we own or are buying the investments we write about.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Themes: US Markets, Municipal Bonds Stocks: CMF, CXA, INY, PZT
Back To Joseph L. Shaefer's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • GotLife
    , contributor
    Comments (1339) | Send Message
     
    Illinois is truly a pathetic mess. To get things moving, Guv Quinn wants to borrow 30B, work on capital projects and pay for it with video poker. Why not throw in legalization of drugs and prostitution then borrow another 30B?

     

    Suppliers are starting to fret (sue) for payment. Governor says they will be able to pay their 5B in payables as soon as the financing comes through. What?

     

    Of course, only 18% of the voters turned out for the primary. The apathy in Illinois is asstounding!
    16 Feb 2010, 10:21 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.