I am a retired accountant, having spent the early years of my career in the insurance industry and the later part in the field of accounting. My insurance experience has given me the willingness to accept investment risk if I feel the return justifies it; also, an interest in applying risk... More
- My blog:
- Tom Armistead's Instablog
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
-
Instablogged Stocks
Stocks that instabloggers have most recently written about -
Latest Instablog Posts
- 1 Lithium Drive: Elon Musk: Taxpayers Made Ove...
- 2 FED To Government Sachs Via CNBC. Bernanke: ...
- 3 BEWARE EMPTY SHELVES!!!
- 4 Falcon Oil & Gas Buys Out Australian Business
- 5 Strong Two Way Trade As Correction Unfolds –...
-
Top Instablogs
See all Top Instablogs »









CAPE Since 1987 As A Predictive Tool 3 comments
The following chart demonstrates that CAPE has considerable explanatory power with respect to 10 year returns, provided the data used is from the modern era, which I define as commencing in 1987, the year of the first computerized market crash.
(click to enlarge)
The R2 is 0.78, high enough to get some respect. If data from prior periods is added, R2 declines significantly. I believe the explanation lies in the combination of more stable monetary policy and quicker communication of data.
Disclosure: I am long SPY.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
Share this Instablog
This post has 3 comments:
I also use a logic based method, based on E10, 10 year treasuries, a risk premium, and a growth element. I arrive at 7.69% (again for 10 years) by that method, after looking for earnings on the S&P 500 to reset to $75 per year and then go forward at 6.5% per year from the lower base.
Those who advocate using longer periods of CAPE data, such as from 1871, will accuse me of data-mining, and see much lower returns.
My thinking is, CAPE doesn't adjust for real growth, which is 2% per year, or better, on a long term average. As such, the E10 developed from Shiller's data is extraordinarily conservative. E10 is $62.53, by my calculations the last time I did it, and forward earnings per S&P are $102.62. Under the circumstances, I'm willing to accept a 5% return on the $62.53, plus I will pay up for the growth potential. So CAPE "should be" 20 plus whatever I see for the growth.
I also look at the huge writedowns taken by Citigroup, AIG, et al in the 4th quarter 2008 and again that makes the E10 very conservative, since another epic disaster is unlikely within the next 10 years.
http://bit.ly/MFfl5D
Latest Followers
StockTalks
-
Went 100% cash in discretionary account today. Up 17.5% ytd, that's good enough, tired of market bs
Feb 14, 2013
-
Took up a starter position in $NSC, I think they can compensate for lost coal business with intermodal gains.
Dec 27, 2012
-
Buying OXY, the Jan 2014 55.0 calls. Very good company, owns Oil right here in the USA...
Nov 30, 2012
More »Latest Comments
Most Commented
Posts by Themes