Seeking Alpha

Jay Norris'  Instablog

Jay Norris
Send Message
Jay Norris is a 20-year CBOT floor veteran, author of the Best Seller "The Secret to Trading Forex, Futures, and ETFs: Risk Tolerance Threshold Theory", "Mastering the Currency Market", McGraw-Hill, 2009, and "Mastering Trade Selection and Management", McGraw-Hill,... More
My company:
Trading University
My blog:
Seeking Alpha
My book:
The Secret to Trading Forex, Futures, and ETF's: Risk Tolerance Threshold
  • Fact Based Triggers To Avoid Repaints 0 comments
    Apr 30, 2012 7:28 PM

    One of the biggest problems we see from traders wanting to improve their performance is they are not using fact based triggers, and they don't' know it. A "fact based trigger" is when price "closes" above a specific level, and not just moves above it. Another example would be if you use a moving average for your trigger/signal. It's very different to say "buy when the green line moves above the red line" then it would be to say "if the green line is above the red line on the close of the candle, then buy". It would be the same effect with a momentum indicator. Taking a trade trigger when an indicator such as a MACD crosses is different than taking a signal once the MACD has crossed on a closing candle basis. This "closing basis" is critical because when you look back in time at a chart you are looking at closed candles only; i.e.: fact based signals only. Every candle on the chart other than the current one is closed. There is no way to see how often moving averages and other indicators crossed back and forth, or in programmer jargon "re-painted" before the close of an individual candle. For example using a 4-hour candle the moving average can cross and uncross -- give a signal, take away a signal -- several times, while a MACD screen shot of the same market 2-hours into the candle can look completely different. If you do not account for that "closing" element you take away a key variable and your future performance is less likely to match you're back-tested results. Your forward tests will have false signals, a.k.a. "re-paints".

    The fact based signal to avoid repaints is an important concept in considering a trading methodology. If you aren't using a closing candle signal you cannot measure if your tactic gave signals before the close of the candle, so you're trading results when taking a non-closing candle signal will be different than your closed candle back-test. Without closed candle signals, i.e. fact based triggers, you won't be able to quantify your method, and will have trouble developing the confidence to stick to your trading plan.

    Jay Norris is the author of The Secret to Trading: Risk Tolerance Threshold Theory, and Mastering the Currency Market, McGraw-Hill, 2009 and Mastering Trade Selection and Management, McGraw-Hill, 2011.

    DISCLAIMER: Trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor!

    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Back To Jay Norris' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.