Tom Lindmark's  Instablog

Tom Lindmark
Send Message
About a year ago, a company asked me to write a daily blog for them. I told them that I’d never read a blog and had absolutely no idea how to write one but sure, if you want to pay me for it, I’ll give it a shot. It was either my good or bad fortune to start at the beginning of the credit... More
My blog:
But Then What
  • Why Do We Have To Go Through This With Each New Supreme Court Justice? 0 comments
    May 31, 2009 12:57 AM

    I'm to the point that I cringe every time a Supreme Court justice retires and a new one is nominated to take his or her place. Whether it's a conservative or liberal nominee, the process of vetting the new candidate is beyond unseemly. 

    So it is already becoming with President Obama's nominee, Sonia Sotomayor. Her remark, probably one she wishes she never made, about being better equipped to render decisions due to her gender and cultural heritage is being used to ramp up the fight. If you aren't familiar with it, here it is:

    “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” Sotomayor said.

    Makes you wince doesn't it. 

    Well today, the White House which has been under attack from the right over the statement started trying to spin it. 

    From Politico:

     

    White House press secretary Robert Gibbs sought to tamp down criticism over controversial comments Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor made in 2001, regarding whether a Latino judge might render “better” rulings than a white judge, saying the judge would choose different words if she could give her speech all over again.

     

    “I think she’d say that her word choice in 2001 was poor,” Gibbs told reporters. “She was simply making the point that personal experiences are relevant to the process of judging, that your personal experiences have a tendency to make you more aware of certain facts in certain cases, that your experiences impact your understanding … and that, on a court that’s collegial, that it can help others that are trying to wrestle with the facts of those cases.”

    The Republicans for their part are painting the remark as racist and comparing her to David Duke. Totally over the top.

    Once upon a time, deliberations of future justices by the Senate were handled seriously and more or less with bipartisanship. Also, once upon a time those who aspired to the highest court were more circumspect in their public comments. We certainly aren't evolving. 

Back To Tom Lindmark's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.