Seeking Alpha

Econ Base's  Instablog

Econ Base
Send Message
Global political and economic events influence financial markets over the long term. The downturn of March 2009 should convince everyone that professional money managers cannot do the job for you. You have to stay informed of key events and have a significant role in the management of your... More
My blog:
Portfolio For Life
  • The case for GNMA's for fixed income  1 comment
    Aug 13, 2009 10:07 PM
    Bonds, GNMA vs. DJI for 52 weeks
    Recap of the 2 major downturns:

    In the past 52 week period, we went through 2 major fear periods causing stock market corrections: 1st was in November 2008 when Dow Jones Industrial Index (DJI) went to 8000 range and the second one even more severe in early March 2009, when the DJI went into the 6000 range! As I wrote earlier, everything sold off including bonds.

    Correlating fixed income vs. stocks:

    I have plotted DJI as a proxy for the stock market vs a number of ETF's or mutual funds as proxies of the fixed income intruments: VFIIX (Vanguard GNMA), BSV (Short Term Bond), BLV (Long Term Bond), BIV (Intermediate Bonds), BND (Total Bonds), TIP (Inflation Protected Bonds), PEMDX (PIMCO Emerging Market Bonds) and PHIYX (PIMCO High Yield Bond, aka US Junk Bonds). I wanted to see the correlation of the fixed income market versus the stock market in the 2 fear periods and the subsequent bull market since March lows.

    Observations and the case for GNMA's:

    1. The highest correlation was of the Emerging Market Bonds and the US Junk Bonds. This shows the Emerging markets are not as decoupled to the US as people make out to be. Also not surprising is that the corporate junk bonds fell in value. As confidence in a company drops, its stock drops and so does its bonds.

    2. All the other Bonds (with GNMA's showing lowest correlation), fell during the October-November 2008 fear period. The stock market kept dropping every day. Once stocks sold off sharply in November, people started running towards safety, buying back US treasury bonds in December perhaps creating a bubble in the treasury bonds.
    3. The second fear period of March 2009 showed bonds selling off, but not quite as much as fall 2008. This may be due to the fact that the Fed had started buying treasury bonds. In other words the US government was printing dollars to keep the bond market steady. It succeeded.

    4. GNMA's did not sell off. In fact they are up 5% in price over the last 52 week period. The Vanguard GNMA VFIIX is also yielding a healthy 4.61%. This is the biggest revelation. GNMA's do not fluctuate to interest rate changes nearly like other bonds. They depend upon the mortgage rates of the underlying paper. Consequently they provide a steadier return than bonds. More importantly there is no default risk, as the underlying paper is guaranteed by the government.

    Disclosure: hold position in GNMA and other fixed income instruments mentioned
Back To Econ Base's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • Plant the seeds
    , contributor
    Comments (227) | Send Message
    When fear is everywhere, correlations go out the window. I think markets have come back to more rational valuations of investments and their outlooks.
    4 Sep 2009, 01:55 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments

Most Commented
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.