Seeking Alpha

George Fisher's  Instablog

George Fisher
Send Message
I am the author of My Investment Navigator monthly newsletter, focused on timely dividend paying stocks. In addition, my services include a review of individual portfolios along with education of portfolio management techniques. I have been a Registered Investment Advisor, financial author, and... More
My company:
My Investment Navigator
My blog:
My Investment Navigator
My book:
All About DRIPs and DSPs
  • Boycott Canadian Oil Sands? I Think Not. 0 comments
    Sep 3, 2010 3:32 PM | about stocks: GPS, TBL, WAG, PTR
    It seems there is a movement afoot to pressure Fortune 500 American businesses to stop using petroleum from Canadian oil sands production. Since Feb of this year, the American activist environmental group Forest Ethics, and its sister organization Rethink Alberta, have been attempting to line up support for programs designed to eliminate mainly diesel fuel to power fleets of corporate delivery trucks that is refined from synch fuels using the oil sands.

    Last week, Forest Ethics announced it had signed up four additional American companies for this effort. They are: The Gap (GPS) including Old Navy and Banana Republic; Timberland (TBL); Levi Strauss; Walgreen’s (WAG).

    In Feb, Forest Ethics announced they had signed on Whole Foods (WMFI) and Bed Bath and Beyond (BBBY). BBBY later clarified their position saying it requested its logistics suppliers to “give preference to fuels with lower greenhouse gas footprints where feasible.”

    There has been a call from some Canadians to reciprocate by refusing to do business with these firms. Mr. Ed Stelmach, Premier of Alberta, is writing the companies involved to voice his objections.

    Since the announcement by Forest Ethics, three of the four US firms have also clarified their positions. According to the CBC News organization:

    The Gap:
    “A spokesman for The Gap said the company is not boycotting the oil sands. ‘It's absolutely untrue and inaccurate to portray it that way,’ Bill Chandler, the clothing retailer's vice-president of corporate communications, said Monday from San Francisco. In Canada, The Gap has asked potential transportation contractors for more information about the fuel they use, but it has not said how this will factor into company decisions — if at all, Chandler said.”

    Levis Straus:
    " ‘Levi Strauss & Co. supports the development and use of clean and renewable fuel sources, but we do not take a position opposing or supporting any fuel or energy source from any country or geography,’ Levi Strauss spokeswoman Genevieve Sexton said in an emailed statement. ‘We expect our transportation service providers to demonstrate a similar commitment to environmental sustainability and emissions reduction, and have made these expectations part of our contracts with transportation providers. We have not stated any requirements for how our transportation contractors will achieve emissions reductions or put stipulations on where they source their fuel.’ ”

    Timberland:
    “A spokeswoman for Timberland, Robin Giampa, told CBC News in an email that the company has asked its transportation contractors to show how they have increased their use of ‘low carbon fuels and avoiding carbon-intensive sources’ but that does not mean the company is boycotting a ‘type or source of fuel.’ "

    Canada has become an important source for US imported oil with Canadian imports increasing by 61% over the past decade. Sixty-five percent of current oil sands production goes to refineries in the Midwest. However, in addition to Forest Ethics wanting to eliminate oil sands imports, there are Congressional leaders who are actively attempting to block a proposed pipeline from Alberta to New Orleans.


    Waiting stage right are oil-thirsty consumers in China, India, South Korea and Japan. 


    The Chinese are current developing several properties in the oil sands, and probably won’t be sending any of their production to US consumers.  PetroChina (PTR) has taken a 60% stake in two new tar sands projects due to start production next year. These projects combined anticipate producing 35,000 barrels a day within 3 years, and eventually producing up to 500,000 a day.

    It would be just as feasible to build a pipeline from Alberta to waiting Chinese oil tankers off British Columbia as it would be to build one to New Orleans. 

    It seems obvious that there exist multiple long-term competitive buyers of current and future oil sands production. If it won’t be the US and our consumers, it will be our Asian partners. 
     
    Is boycotting Canadian oil sands production in our country’s best interest?   I think not.


    Disclosure: No Positions in the listed companies, but long SU since 2009
    Themes: Energy, Oil, Canadian Oil Sands Stocks: GPS, TBL, WAG, PTR
Back To George Fisher's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • ABB is reported to be buying ABB for $65-$75/shr. Been a shrholder since 2006. Great co and should go for this premium
    Jan 29, 2012
  • Dems want to bring back Windfall Profits Tax on oil. That is what I call a national energy policy - NOT - http://bit.ly/zs005J
    Jan 20, 2012
  • Hillbilly - ever look at NFG? Goobs of gas, pipeline & uts. My thoughts http://seekingalpha.com/a/6v0u
    Jan 17, 2012
More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.