Seeking Alpha

Marc Cohn's  Instablog

Marc Cohn
Send Message
I am a patent litigator with a background in physics and electronics. I enjoy studying quantitative, rules-based investment methods through rigorous backtesting and numerical analysis. I believe that patterns exist in the market that benefit trading -- the challenge is finding them!
  • My Version Of Grossman's GMR -- 42% CAGR With 16% Drawdown? 4 comments
    Feb 4, 2014 8:48 PM | about stocks: SSO, FEZ, ILF, EEM, EPP, EDV, SHY

    I am debuting a new system that I have developed based on Grossman's GMR posted here. I wanted to make a similar system for myself that was easier to implement. I don't have fancy trading tools like Quantshare -- I just use Yahoo finance for data and Excel for processing.

    My variation on the GMR is backtested to 2004 with remarkable results. Returns versus the S&P (dividend adjusted) are:

    YearMy SystemS&P (div adjusted)
    200416%11%
    200580%5%
    200619%16%
    200722%5%
    200857%-37%
    200951%26%
    201050%15%
    201177%2%
    201223%16%
    201344%32%

    I have tested a number of systems but this is the first one that (1) beats the S&P every year for at least 10 years (2) does not exhibit diminishing returns in the later years (3) provides market-beating results in bull markets and (4) is practical and can actually be used.

    I am officially going live now. The system sent a cash signal on December 31, 2013. How prescient! January was bad. I'll chalk that up as a win -- not losing is definitely a win when the rest of the market is going down.

    For Jan 31, 2014, the system gave a signal for SSO and we bought at 95.17 on Monday morning, first thing. Well, I should've waited. Anyway most of Monday's loss has been recovered today. And the month is young...

    Some more stats and features of my system:

    - Rotates SSO (27%), FEZ (12%), EEM (6%), ILF (28%), EPP (3%), EDV (19%), and SHY (5%). The percents show the portion of time spent in each position.

    - Uses monthly data only. This makes data management and processing very easy on Excel.

    - 42% CAGR since 2004. Never a down year, always beat the S&P.

    - Maximum drawdown only 16.1% (Apr 2010). Annual standard deviation is 22.5%.

    - Even with a horrible-case 1% slippage per trade, CAGR was still 35.8%. This is because the system doesn't trade all that often: 121 trades since 2004. Thus, you do not need to be so careful about your entry and exit points, and market liquidity problems will not kill you if you accidentally forget to click "limit order." In other words, it is easy to implement.

    - It relies on 6-month volatility, not 20-day volatility like Grossman's system. There is no need to acquire and calculate daily data. Volatility is also a positive correlation in this system -- higher volatility will increase the ranking. I have struggled to explain why this is, but my best guess is that it marks the beginning of an uptrend, rather than the end of one, as you would see with lower volatility.

    - you trade once per month. The signal comes after the close of the last trading day of the month. You can then sell the previous position and buy the new one (if the signal has changed; it doesn't always) at the open on the next trading day. If there is a big gap, you can decide to skip the trade or enter a limit order at the "signal price" or just jump in. I showed above that even a 1% slippage from the "signal" price doesn't do too much harm.

    Disclosure: I am long SSO.

    Themes: Sector, Rotation, Grossman, GMR, GMRE, ZIV, SSO, ETF, FEZ, EEM, ILF, EPP, EDV, SHY Stocks: SSO, FEZ, ILF, EEM, EPP, EDV, SHY
Back To Marc Cohn's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (4)
Track new comments
  • donkrafft
    , contributor
    Comment (1) | Send Message
     
    Did you try higher and lower volatility ranking in your back-testing? The system was originally intended to reward lower volatility and I'm surprised to see this system favoring higher volatility. And do I understand that your volatility is based on end-of-month prices or is it on monthly aggregated candles (using the entire price range for the month).

     

    Your system uses leveraged SSO instead of MDY so it's more like Frank's enhanced GMR (OTCQB:GMRE) system.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Don Krafft
    27 Feb, 09:30 PM Reply Like
  • AlexanderHorn
    , contributor
    Comments (7) | Send Message
     
    Hi Marc, have been following your efforts on the GMR strategy both on SA and your blog.

     

    Currently trying to form a group of people to replicate this and other strategies using Quantshare the tool Frank is also using, actually QS is not to tough (and fancy) to use.

     

    Can find us here, hope you join: http://bit.ly/1t8ULtw
    26 May, 04:31 AM Reply Like
  • rmpalpha
    , contributor
    Comments (50) | Send Message
     
    Hi, Marc. I am having a problem calculating the CashRatio cash signal. My understanding is that the Ratio = (SSO*0.75)/(EDV*0.25); and if the Ratio exceeds 0.75, a Cash Signal is generated. However, my calculations generate Cash Signals every month, so my understanding must be incorrect. Please advise how to calculate and apply the CashRatio. Thanks.

     

    PBrowse
    2 Jun, 11:30 AM Reply Like
  • tmdoherty
    , contributor
    Comments (60) | Send Message
     
    According to my spreadsheet, the strategy selected ILF for September. FWIW, this agrees with the selection of other variations of this TAA strategy.
    29 Aug, 11:56 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.