The Definition Of Miracle
How do I know? I really do not know, I believe and here is why. As many people have begun focusing on Brilacidin, we have become aware that Brilacidin is a one of a kind compound. If it continues to be successful in FDA clinical trials, there is no other antibiotic that will be able to simultaneously compete with all of B's positive features. I believe that I have previously made a case, that between the human, animal, agricultural and household applications that Brilacidin is potentially a 10 billion dollar drug a year.
However, many of Kevetrin's watchers have begun to pull back from earlier lofty assumptions, which were attributed to Kevetrin. I Hub statements have been made " Do not expect Miracles from Kevetrin". What is a miracle? It is the imposition or application of laws that we do not know, upon laws that we do understand. The laws that we do not know, create phenomena which according to the laws which we do know, we cannot understand or fully explain. One such phenomena is when laws that we do not know are superimposed upon the laws that we do know. People generally call the resulting dynamic a miracle.
One of the purposes of FDA trials is to permit science an opportunity to engage, evaluate and codify the bio physiological and bio chemical phenomena, created by chemical compounds. This is so that they may be made to fit within scientific law as we already know it, or that new laws can be discovered and codified. Whether existing or newly understood law, it explains at least the major portion of what the chemical compound of trial and evaluation, does within the body.
So for a person to attempt to caution others not to expect miracles from a new clinical drug compound, is like someone who says, " Go slowly and walk fast." It is an oxymoron. Oxymoron's tend to be the product of people who are internally conflicted, maybe legitimately so, who allow their mouth to go into motion before their brain is in gear. I have been there myself. However, I do not want to see my fellow shareholders victimized by faulty concepts.
The Teleological Evidence Of Efficacy
One of the most poignant aspects of Kevetrin, that causes me to believe that the drug is going to be a broad spectrum stand alone very safe and powerful therapeutic, is the announcement that Cellceutix made in reference to Kevetrin's projected stage three trial against Retina blastoma. The thoughts were most probably not Mr. Ehrlich's alone. Something that lofty and serious to be discussed while clinical trials were ongoing at Dana Farber, probably involved a discussion between the late Dr Frei, Dr Shapiro, Dr Krishna Menon, and also Mr Ehrlich. If you can buy that good. However, if you cannot buy that, then you would have to say that all four of these of men are just not what they appear to be. In order to involve the sacred lives of virtually hopeless children, and their parents into a scheme that would demonstrate at best a mildly effective chemotherapy that was low to nil in side effects, I for one, would be disappointed to say the least. Remember Pfizer's Sutent was introduced by Beth Israel to Kevetrin, prior to K beginning FDA 1 at Dana Farber. The people involved in these apparent risky lunges did not get to where they are by being hasty or stupid. There are reasons, perhaps that we do not fully understand, that moved scientist's to do the things that have been done with Kevetrin, as well as those that have been planned to do with Kevetrin. Somehow scientific onlookers think that they always have to play skeptical until they know everything. In this case if you do, you will miss the boat. Remember you can have the paralysis of analysis, which I think has set in amongst many Kevetrin watchers.
I for one believe that the four men that I mentioned. In the background of Dana Farber and Beth Israel, during an FDA 1 chemotherapy trial, would only bring babies and toddlers into a serious conversation with Kevetrin, if they had the strongest scientific reasons to believe that Kevetrin was very safe and highly effective in humans. To say otherwise is in my mind to be a quadruple skeptic.
Dana Farber & The Jimmy Fund
Dana Farber is the historic standard bearer for chemotherapy and pediatric oncology, along with the prestigious Jimmy Fund that Dana Farber works closely with. These organizations and people are not wannabe's that are ready to risk everything to make a name. I cannot imagine such an announcement having been made without serious reflection within the minds that harbor what we would properly call "Inside Information about Kevetrin". Simply, if you do not have inside information, then accept the clear choreography and rhetoric of those who do. Say that to yourself ten times.
Of course you can believe the opposite, but if I did, it would severely impact my personal opinion of Cellceutix management. I question those who are projecting Kevetrin, as some mild therapeutic, very safe but small progress compound. I do not believe that they are looking at all the evidence that is available at this time. I believe that Kevetrin is a game changer, a major paradigm shift and I believe that the share price is going to have tectonic shock upwards, after the FDA 1 results come in. At MTD, if theranostics are used to select clinical participants, I expect to see stupendous results from early cohorts in the Bologna trial.
Now turn on the Alfred Hitchcock, outer limits music. These words were spoken by a fallible humanoid, who is often wrong and can mislead people into serious harm and danger. You can loose every penny that you invest in Cellceutix. Now for you statists, go out and make government approved investments, buy lottery tickets. Stand in front of cash registers and call random numbers out of the chaos of your subconscious. I can say the latter without a disclaimer. Why? The government is in charge.
Ella Ruth