Seeking Alpha

David White's  Instablog

David White
  • on REITs
Send Message
David White is a software/firmware/marketing professional and a long time investor. He has worked in the networking field, the semiconductor equipment field, the mainframe computer field, and the pharmaceutical/scientific instrumentation field. He has bachelor's degrees in bioresource sciences... More
  • Performance Claims 2 comments
    Jun 8, 2014 6:53 AM

    I have heard some rumors asserting I may make false performance claims. however, the only claims I can remember making on SeekingAlpha were the following:

    1. I entered a CNBC contest (a 10 week contest) a few years ago. For the first several weeks, my main portfolio was up by more than 30%. This put me in the top 0.25% of contest entrants at that time (slightly better than that). The first few weeks results were then cancelled due to a bug in their program that allowed some unscrupulous people to rack up big gains in currency trading. I did very little currency trading. Virtually all of my gains were from stock trading; and I did not take advantage of any bugs in the CNBC program. Most of my gains were from either Basic Materials stocks' gains or from ETFs that short the overall market. These results were all publicly available online; and at that time could have been publicly verified. After CNBC cancelled the first few weeks results due to the error, I did not really participate in the end of the contest. First it was much shorter than I wanted. Second I felt cheated out of my completely legitimate results to that date. Third I was not getting paid for the contest.

    2. I have also claimed some results from a tracking portfolio. In that portfolio I have bought or shorted stocks based on some of the recommendations I have made in SeekingAlpha articles. Sometimes I used options strategies. The results cited were those the tool I was using told me I had. These results were from 2012 and 2013. They were good, even though I was not putting a lot of effort into maintaining my tracking portfolio. This was a paper trading portfolio.

    3. I have sometimes cited good results from a particular article. For instance, I called the gold downturn well to a large degree. I called a possible Patriot Coal downturn/bankruptcy, which occurred within a year of my article if memory serves. You should have heard the strident objections at the time of the article. I called a short of LULU at about $80 per share. I again called for a short in the $60's. I have recommended many stocks that have done well such as CLR. I have also recommended many high dividend paying stocks. I believe these have in general done well, although I don't have specific data to cite.

    4. On the negative side, I have been both right and wrong about a number of momentum stocks. I confess to having been frustrated in some of my calls on some hugely overpriced momentum names by a combination of the momentum/HFT people and the QE policies of the Fed and other central banks. My long calls have generally been good ones. My short calls have improved over time. However, they have been more of a mixed bag. Since a lot of long/short hedge funds significantly underperfomed the overall market in 2013 (and possibly in other big QE years), I believe I had a fair amount of company in being wrong in some of my short calls. I believe shorts, even when hugely fundamentally sound, have generally suffered from the Fed "easy money" policies and the consequent success of the momentum/HFT traders in pushing over valued momentum stocks upward.

    5. I have also on occasion cited the number of people and the quality of the people following me. This information is actually made available by SeekingAlpha to all subscribers. I cannot have "faked" any of these claims. Any claims I have made in this area can still be easily verified in a gross sense. I do not think there have been any gross changes, although the number of my followers has generally been increasing over time. That number is currently at approximately 55,000. I am followed by more than 3000 investment advisers, more than 3000 analysts, more than 9000 traders, more than 1000 fund managers/partners, more than 3000 corporate executives and IR people, etc. I am proud of both the number and the quality of my followers. I think I am deservedly proud. I am also aware that these numbers can vary considerably for a variety of reasons from author to author. I generally feel authors are worthy of respect once they have reached 1000 followers. I don't really decry anyone based on this. For instance, some authors do not write many articles. Hence they would likely not have many followers; but they might still be great authors to follow.

    I hope I have clarified for people any claims I have made. I do not think I have made any false claims. I am aware that the SEC in general does not like people to promise future results; and I don't believe I have done this.

    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Back To David White's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • David White
    , contributor
    Comments (4443) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » There have also been some comments that I am conceited. Perhaps I am a bit. However, most would concede that I have a genius IQ. Some have at times called me the smartest guy in the state I currently live in. I did not call myself that; and in fact I know other smart people. The debate would seem to be about what kind of genius I am. It is also my impression that a number of the top economists know who I am. This is at least partially due to my economic opinions, which seem to be well regarded. I have a large following on SeekingAlpha, which includes many knowledgeable market people. I learned from some of the best at Cal and Stanford. I have made a large number of good market calls. Sometimes these have been calls that the vast majority saw going the other way. Some have said I do not have a high enough opinion of myself. Am I conceited? It may depend on your view. However, my impression is that this comment is an attempt to underhandedly insult my abilities. Many people seem to prefer an insidious attack to a direct one. That way they cannot be as easily attacked themselves, especially if their specific comments are proved wrong. If most people seem to think you are a genius and highly knowledgeable, how conceited can you really be?
    10 Jun 2014, 07:14 AM Reply Like
  • David White
    , contributor
    Comments (4443) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » Now people are speculating about exactly what my IQ is. My answer is that I a relatively sure that it is a genius IQ. However, I would not like to put an exact number on it. I often do better when I am motivated to do so. Also I have a blood vessel in one eye that was supposed to disappear after development; but it did not. Instead it floats around in the fluid of that eye. If it floats around more in front of my vision in that eye, it can significantly impact how I do on a test. If it does not, I will usually do better. I believe I am more than smart enough for most intellectual jobs that I may wish to pursue. Other than that, I do not like to put a number on it. Partly I just don't like making that kind of comparison, as I seem only likely to alienate people. Partly I do have an actual physical problem with one eye that seems to me to have an impact on my performance sometimes.
    11 Jun 2014, 05:20 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • Those taking psychiatric drugs are probably not much better risks. They could stop anytime. Also misdiagnoses are a huge problem.
    5 days ago
  • However, there are a lot of NUTS out there. Many have or have had drug problems. There is no telling what they will do or when.
    5 days ago
  • We need a better system for treating and monitoring the mentally ill. If people buying guns have to pass a mental health test, that'd be OK.
    5 days ago
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.