Seeking Alpha

Tim Davis'  Instablog

Tim Davis
Send Message
Excelerant is spearheaded by Tim Davis, a 25+ year Wall Street veteran. He has worked as a sellside analyst with such firms as Lazard Frères and HSBC, a buyside analyst with a start-up hedge fund, and an institutional salesperson with firms including Salomon Brothers and ABN Amro. In recent... More
My company:
Excelerant Financial Medial
My blog:
Excelerant Financial Media
  • Oz Economics: The Economic Twister And The Fed Response 0 comments
    Feb 11, 2014 12:11 PM

    A Fed of a Different Color

    The Great Wizard of Oz would have you believe: Following the 2008 crisis, the Fed did what it had to, and its actions have been measured in their scale and fiscally responsible to the nation in light of economic conditions.

    The Reality back in Kansas is: At a time when the US could not pass a budget much less get to a balanced one, the Fed ballooned the country's balance sheet beyond what should have been necessary. And the vast majority of these funds sit idle at the country's private banks.

    Coming into 2008, the country's monetary base had been swelling along just fine. Clearly, the banks were lending aggressively (and repackaging loans) in ways that regulators did not understand, and this was ultimately the root of all the issues. But, then again, everyone was making money; we suppress naysayers who try to upset apple carts, and then we identify martyrs to sacrifice in the aftermath of apocalypses. Such is human nature. Everybody's bad.

    Then, the crisis happens. Taking a lesson from the pages of Great Depression history, Ben Bernanke forces the banks to take money and starts to stimulate the heck out of the economy through them. The opening move is to double the monetary base to $1.7B in one shot. Well, THAT should be enough to get the system flush! And at least a liquidity crisis is averted…

    As to restarting the economy, the banks don't want to play ball, though. They pay back the TARP funds (with interest) in short order. Then, they stop lending in large part (as is demonstrated by the M1 Money Multiplier). They have not re-opened their doors since 2008. "Congress has been wrapping us on the knuckles for years for taking undue risks over the mortgage stuff, old chap. Not going to do it again. Unh-unh. Only those that don't need money need apply." The effect of the banks' halving the multiplier effect cancels out the doubling of the monetary base in one fell swoop.

    Sadly, the dysfunction did not stop there. In what would seem to be a bizarre and surreal disconnect, the Fed has kept attempting to inject liquidity into the system through the banks time and again through the course of multiple quantitative easing programs. What has happened to that money? The banks have stuck in in their own vaults in the form of 'excess reserves' - a column of assets they had never heretofore presented on their balance sheets.

    (click to enlarge)
    Quantitative easing was designed to be a one-time shot in the arm to reignite the economy but became an ongoing way of doing business. The true travesty in this case is that the proceeds of 85% of the $2.8 trillion (or $2.4T) of quantitative easing since 2008 is now held on the balance sheet of private banks. "Ok, banks, if you won't pass the money through to the broader economy if we throw $1T at you, how about $2.4T?" If it is not actual stimulus, what is it? Window dressing? At what cost? By way of context, $2.4T could purchase the world's gold reserves >2.5X over at current prices or all US farmland >5X over (according to the Wizard of Omaha's 2012 estimate).

    This is to say nothing of the additional $4T balance sheet of Treasury and agency securities that the Fed will have accumulated between 2008 and the end of this year. These have been purchased in an attempt to stimulate the economy by keeping borrowing costs down, at a time when, in reality, we very much need to borrow a whole lot more! What happens to interest rates when the Fed needs to unload these at the same time as we need to sell a whole lot more to fund our deficit, pay out interest costs, etc.? Uh oh.

    If the Fed were doing this at a time when our books were in order, that would be one thing. However, we struggle to pass a budget and can't balance one to save our lives. Our revenues as a sovereign nation can cover our entitlement obligations (social security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) but nothing beyond that. That means we go deeper into the red for the cost of government, national defense, or interest on our national debt. Is this a time for the Fed to unnecessarily increase our debt by $2.4T to have it sit idly in private banks' excess reserves? Does this make sense? Is it responsible? Toto, I don't think we are in Kansas anymore. And it will take a lot more than throwing a bucket of water on this Wicked Witch of Debt to kill it.

    (click to enlarge)

    Themes: Economics, Fed
Back To Tim Davis' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.