Seeking Alpha

Stone Fox Capital's  Instablog

Stone Fox Capital
  • on Technology
Send Message
Stone Fox Capital Advisors is a registered investment advisor founded in 2010. The firm offers portfolio management with a focus on opportunistic stocks providing secular growth trends at an affordable value. An emphasis is placed on fundamental analysis though charts are used for timing entry... More
My company:
Stone Fox Capital
My blog:
Out Fox The Street
  • The Alpha Wildcatter 2 comments
    Oct 7, 2011 11:51 PM | about stocks: CHK
    Forbes has a fascinating story about Chesapeake Energy CEO Aubrey McClendon. His risk taking has made Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) into the 2nd biggest producer of natural gas in the US and the largest land owner in the prolific shale plays in the US.

    Unfortunately his level of risk taking has made investors shy away from the stock. Reading the detailed Forbes article makes a normal investors head spin. All the joint ventures, hedging, VPPs, and oil services make it very complex for an investor to understand the risks involved in an investment which will likely depress the stock in the future.

    As skeptics point out, this all sounds eerily close to Enron though probably not fair. CHK is just the opposite in that it is actually hedging and selling production it owns. Building up land positions in shale areas and selling a portion for a profit is very smart. Sure beats the majors sitting around and missing the opportunity completely.

    What actually scares me is that McClendon appears a lot more like WorldCom's Bernie Ebbers. Always wheeling and dealing whether within the business or outside via farmland, wine, or art. As a WorldCom employee that lived through the rise and fall of Bernie, the similarities are stark. The ultimate similarity was the willingness to take huge risk of buying the companies stock with borrowed money. Both seem to think the business can grow forever that they don't know when to stop. Why would anyone take such risks as a billionaire is beyond me?

    McClendon has become so successful that he is forcing natural gas prices too depressed levels in the US. Sure it will spur demand, but at what price and when? CHK has all these leases to drill now and demand might be years away. Has CHK just pushed up acreage prices while pushing down nat gas prices? If it finds another nat gas shale play should it pounce on the opportunity or just keep it quiet hoping to buy cheaper later. After all, it isn't likely that gas pries rise until 2013 or 2014.

    Whats so great about the Marcellus Shale at $3.5 nat gas? It can't be shipped to foreign markets to collect much higher prices and nat gas apparently is abundant now. The liquid plays like the Eagle Ford shale and potentially the Utica shale hold immense value now. CHK should've kept all the Eagle Ford assets and avoid a partner in the Utica shale as oil prices are likely to stay high for a long time as the global demand for oil increases.

    Read the article for now. The stock on the other hand needs more research. CHK is a fascinating story on value creation, but the riskiness of the assets are concerning. Ultimately the success of McClendon might be his undoing as demand might never grow with the supply creation. This is a potentially bad situation for a risk taker being ahead of the market.
    Themes: Energy, Oil Services Stocks: CHK
Back To Stone Fox Capital's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • dingojoe
    , contributor
    Comments (223) | Send Message
     
    CHK isn't liquid enough to keep it all to themselves. Tons of debt and covenants to meet means it needs JV partners. Many of the partners it's had it the last few years have been foreign companies wanting to learn how to frack so they can take the technology back home. Not sure how many of those are left.

     

    If your looking for where the shutins will occur, Aubrey himself states that Marcellus is still profitable at 3.50. Louisiana and Texas not so much. How Chesapeake navigates this or is capable of navigating I have no idea, hence my unwillingness to mess with the stock.
    8 Oct 2011, 10:52 AM Reply Like
  • Stone Fox Capital
    , contributor
    Comments (6190) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Good point on the JV wanting to take the technology back home. That is a huge mistake if they are giving up secret facking techniques.
    9 Oct 2011, 01:14 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.