As far as I can tell, there is only a minute difference between the fed controlling the funds rate via #1 bond sales (i.e. mopping up liquidity) and via #2 internal interest rate controls.
To the external borrower, whether it be the treasury or the public, the result of using either tool is the same: higher interest rates. Given the political pressure to get the economy 'booming' again, we're essentially propping up industries that need to and would otherwise shrink given a higher cost of borrowing (housing for instance). Therefore, whether the fed controls interest rates via open market operations or via internal deposit interest, Bernanke risks choking off the growth fueled by his inflation and causing another nasty recession. This would include raising borrowing costs for the massive federal deficit, a political move that would probably get the fed's charter revoked.
I think the problem with an exit strategy using bond sales is that the bonds he has to sell are junk and he probably can't sell them on the open market for their balance sheet value -- so if he gets $0.1 on the dollar he can't soak up the extra money he sent out paying par for them. The fed therefore creates a back door for soaking up liquidity -- competing with private borrowers on excess reserve loans -- which will keep the fed balance sheet permanently expanded and hopefully draw a 'pig pen' around the excess reserves so they can't escape. The problem with this is that the higher the interest rate goes, the more money Bernanke has to print to pay interest on the reserves, which is essentially going to create a compounding of excess reserves, a runaway problem. In fact, it seems possible that the banks will lend to noone, with Bernanke paying the bank operating costs through inflation, if he sets the interest rate high enough.
The only way out is to actually DESTROY the excess reserves, through bond sales (which he can't) or via the hand of god (a large fee), which would anger his banking constituents since they wouldn't be getting bonds out of it (it would be like the bank just whimsically lowering your checking account balance).
My conclusion, therefore, is that this is no exit strategy at all, but just another layer of confusion slapped on the public to allow for backdoor inflation and deficit financing.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha
community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors,
in contrast to contributors' articles.
There is only one policy that functions in Capitalism. We must manage effectively on every level of this economy. That means failure on all levels must be a normal event. Even if labeled as "to big to fail", we must return to a "buyer beware", where we are all responsible for our investments.
If AIG went under, who really would have suffered? We hear we all would have. But, it's likely we all will anyway. Spending makes the future worth less, if not worthless altogether.
It's time to let mis-managed companies, households and political groups fail. Both the Republicans and Democrats are a failed system. It's time to move away from a "party" in the political system. We must all once again become "independent", not a party, but as a voter. Good people will need to step up. Americans will need to make their own judgements, and base their views on a view suggested by a television report. We must once again think for ourselves. We need to become "thinkers" again, and seek the truth ourselves. We, as a People, have been lead astray, like "dumb" sheep, right into the "wolves den"......
Step our of your lives, review where it is that your family came from and how we got to where we are. Someone in your family worked hard for you to be successful. Was it you?
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Can the interest rate payments on reserves mop up liquidity? 1 comment
In response to the following article:
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
This post has 1 comment:
If AIG went under, who really would have suffered? We hear we all would have. But, it's likely we all will anyway. Spending makes the future worth less, if not worthless altogether.
It's time to let mis-managed companies, households and political groups fail. Both the Republicans and Democrats are a failed system. It's time to move away from a "party" in the political system. We must all once again become "independent", not a party, but as a voter. Good people will need to step up. Americans will need to make their own judgements, and base their views on a view suggested by a television report. We must once again think for ourselves. We need to become "thinkers" again, and seek the truth ourselves. We, as a People, have been lead astray, like "dumb" sheep, right into the "wolves den"......
Step our of your lives, review where it is that your family came from and how we got to where we are. Someone in your family worked hard for you to be successful. Was it you?
Latest Comments
Most Commented