Seeking Alpha

New Low Observer's  Instablog

New Low Observer
Send Message
As a contributor to the New Low Observer (http://www.newlowobserver.com/about-this-site), we intend to give new insights on a low risk approach to trading in dividend paying stocks for tax deferred accounts. The New Low Observer (http://www.newlowobserver.com/about-this-site) is not intended for... More
My blog:
New Low Observer
  • Crime and Punishment 3 comments
    Jan 9, 2012 6:11 PM | about stocks: MFGLQ
    The state of our financial markets rests firmly on its credibility. However, it would not be surprising if few individual investors felt that there was no credibility in the current system. A perfect example is the recent case of MF Global. MF Global isn’t just a firm that was poorly managed, it also had the misfortune of “not properly segregating client’s accounts.” This means that MF Global mixed their customers money with the firm’s money.

     
    It turns out that MF Global was betting big on European debt at the same time the European debt was imploding. As MF Global files for bankruptcy, a sizable portion of customer funds has gone unaccounted for. However unlikely it may be, the regulators and those in charge of MF Global should be severely reprimanded.

     
    As further proof of the problem we’re faced with, the recent fine levied by the Accountancy& Actuarial Discipline Board, in London, against PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) goes a long way to explain how MF Global and many other investment firms manage to violated seemingly simple rules. PwC was fined $2.17 million for not “…properly segregating an average of $8.6 billion of client funds” as reported by Bloomberg News (article here).

     
    To put this fine into perspective, $2.17 million is 0.03% (3/100ths of 1%) of $8.6 billion. Imagine if the penalty for robbing a bank of one million dollars was $300. There would definitely be much more bank robberies if this were the case. The current maximum penalty for robbing a bank is $250,000 and 20 years in prison. Based on this penalty, the robbers would have to try getting away with a minimum of $833 million before such action seems “feasible.”

     
    Regardless of the amount stolen and depending on the circumstances, convicted bank robbers could easily face the maximum penalties of $250,000 and 20 years in prison. Although there is no accounting for the logic of bank robbers, there appears to be plenty of logic for investment and accounting firms.

     
    This brings us back to those who are responsible for enforcing the rules, the regulators. If the Accountancy & Actuarial Discipline Board(AADB) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) cannot set meaningful penalties for the crimes committed, then such penalties will be considered a legitimate cost of doing business instead of a penalty. So much for the credibility of the markets.
    Themes: macro view Stocks: MFGLQ
Back To New Low Observer's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • untrusting investor
    , contributor
    Comments (9923) | Send Message
     
    Well stated and exactly correct. The fines and enforcement are so relatively mild that it does pay to steal, defraud, misrepresent, etc. And that is exactly why the financial engineers do so, because it pays off. Until they go to jail and lose all their assets, then such crimes will continue.
    10 Jan 2012, 01:00 AM Reply Like
  • New Low Observer
    , contributor
    Comments (2030) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Thank you for reading our Instablog. Although something has to change, we don't suspect that it will be the financial engineers.

     

    Regards.
    10 Jan 2012, 01:37 PM Reply Like
  • untrusting investor
    , contributor
    Comments (9923) | Send Message
     
    NLO,
    Got to agree that such is unlikely to change anytime soon. Sad but true. Financial engineering is a highly lucrative practice and big money always draws lots of participants who are more than willing to pay enablers and protectors. The mafia were masters at paying off politicians and bureaucrats also and it served them well for long periods of time.
    2 Apr 2012, 01:44 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.