Seeking Alpha

Jim Trippon's  Instablog

Jim Trippon
Send Message
Jim Trippon is an Amazon.com bestselling business and finance author, a practicing CPA, and a fee based investment advisor. His portfolio of companies includes J.M. Trippon & Company CPA, Trippon Wealth Management & Trippon Financial Publishing. Jim has dedicated his business career to... More
My company:
Trippon Financial Research, Inc.
My blog:
Global Profit$ Alert
My book:
Stay Rich Forever: Retirement Planning Secrets of Millionaires and How They Can Work For You!
  • ETFs And The Correlation Conundrum 1 comment
    Jul 18, 2011 9:54 AM
    In this era of previously seldom-used financial market lingo such as "black swans" and "flash crashes," exchange traded products get plenty of blame place on their doorstep for myriad market problems. If you invest in ETFs, but have some kind of aversion to market correlation, then the cascade of reports over the past couple of years blaming ETFs for rising correlations may leave you feeling torn.

    First, I'll attempt to simply define market correlation. Using the S&P 500 as the benchmark, a stock or ETF with a correlation of one essentially has a perfect correlation to the broader market. XYZ Corp. goes up 10% in a year and the S&P 500 does the same and we have perfect correlation, excluding fees and commissions. The problem with correlations is that periods of low correlations are a sign of structurally sound markets while high correlations mean the opposite. Hence why there are plenty of doubters regarding the late June/early July rally we just saw: Sector correlations to the S&P 500 were quite high during that move higher.

    Regarding ETFs and correlation, at least in my humble opinion, this is a tricky debate. Do ETFs foster more intense market correlation? Probably. Are they are entirely to blame for the phenomenon? No. Here's a great explanation about higher correlations from JPMorgan Equity Derivatives Strategy:

    A significant driver of correlation between stocks is the prevailing macroeconomic environment. During periods of high macro uncertainty, stocks prices are largely driven by macro factors such as economic growth, unemployment, interest rate changes, inflation expectations, etc. Therefore, during changes in macroeconomic regimes, stock prices tend to move in unison leading to a high level of correlation.

    Sound familiar? Markets hate uncertainty and we live in very uncertain times thanks to Europe's sovereign debt crisis, anemic job growth in the U.S. and emerging markets inflation. All of those factors would exist even if ETFs did not. Put another way, we all know that Greece has extraordinary fiscal problems that have contributed to the high correlations recently. That said, there is not one Greece-specific ETF available to U.S. investors. The correlation conundrum would exist regardless of a Greece ETF being around or not.

    Look at correlation on a historical basis, prior to the highs we've seen in 2010 and 2011, the previous high for the phenomenon was 1987 around the time of Black Monday. The first U.S.-listed ETF made its debut in 1993. Correlation proceeded to be fairly benign for most of the 1990s (with a hiccup late in the decade) up until the financial crisis as more and more ETFs were being introduced, as the chart below indicates.

    etf,leverage etf,exchange-traded fund,etfs,exchange-traded funds,etf profit report,global profits alert,jim trippon

    So I'll give the critics this much and say "Yes, ETFs have contributed to correlation." That said, I'm not convinced the asset class needs to be convicted of a felony when it's hard to prove even a misdemeanor has been committed. Since no one can prove that correlation would fall by 50% or any other substantial number tomorrow if every ETF in the world suddenly disappeared, I'm apt to keep investing in ETFs, correlation or not.


    Click HERE to learn more about the ETF Profit Report - An ETF Trading Service For Serious ETF Investors
    How To Profit From "Quick Strike" ETF Trading

    We recently bagged gains of 16.2%, 6.78%, 1.34%, 5.85%, 7.77%, and 10.7% for our subscribers.

    In today's low interest rate backdrop, those gains would not be bad if they were annual.

    But these happened in the last three weeks.

    Click HERE for more details.


    For more information and archived issues, visit http://www.globalprofitsalert.com

    Global Profits Alert (GPA) is published by Trippon Financial Research, Inc. a financial media organization with offices in the United States, Hong Kong and Mainland China. GPA is written by Jim Trippon in conjunction with George Wolff, Sunny Wang, Todd Shriber, Kelley Damiani and J. Daryl Thompson.

    Would you like to republish this article? Global Profits Alert issues can be republished, as long as the republished issues contain the name of the author(s) and the following short paragraph:

    This information was brought to you by GlobalProfitsAlert.com, a publication of Trippon Financial Research, Inc. GlobalProfitsAlert.com publishes information on Investing in the China stock market and emerging markets, dividend stock and income investing, exchange traded funds (ETFs), green energy stocks, technology stocks, global market trends and other investment information. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.globalprofitsalert.com

Back To Jim Trippon's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • talld
    , contributor
    Comments (527) | Send Message
     
    Hi Jim,

     

    I enjoyed your article and found your quote to be exceptional. I slightly disagree though, as I dont think the market is significantly far from the 70/30 split that Portfolio Theory claims is normal (70 from macro and 30 from individual.) though we may be at 80/20 or perhaps even 85/15 this is probably not that far from "normal" for a market that is primarily driven by algorithms.

     

    At the time Portfolio Theory was developed it was thought that 70% of a tickers price should come from "the market" or macro forces. Now this number is at probably 85, but this is very likely the new normal given the computerized trading that is the vast majority of trading today.
    There was no such thing as market neutral for example.
    31 Jul 2011, 12:26 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.