Moon Kil Woong's  Instablog

Moon Kil Woong
Send Message
Moon Kil Woong is currently a VP at a SME. Previously he was a tech stock consultant, VP of Research at ING, and sell side Director at Crédit Agricole Indosuez. Moon Kil Woong has a Masters in Public Administration from SJSU.
  • Derivatives and Securitization: Is your life insurance about to become detrimental to your health? 2 comments
    Oct 7, 2009 11:05 PM
    Take the mortgage derivative game, inject it with criminal organizations and death and you get the new incarnation of mortgage fraud, the life insurance derivative. The derivatives game just got worse, but in a very bad way.
    The basic framework of fraud was set up in the mortgage derivatives game in which people innocuously call unexpected counter party risk. In essence, the creation of companies with little to no assets guaranteeing billions or trillions in order to insure policies so they could be packaged and sold as “risk free” already affords a rich field in which to reap tons of money in derivatives policy fees for years with no expectation of payment. Even with such fiascoes, there is still not substantive policies today to close this loophole or illegalize it. And reserve requirements even at 1% are being balked at (most likely because the people who wrote these contracts don’t have or can’t even afford 1% of what they insured).
    Now inject the grim factor of death. Already the sales and securitization of life insurance policies are getting criminal organizations into the game of life and death. In this system you get people who can’t afford life insurance (eerily just like mortgage home policies) to buy life insurance. Then when they can’t pay you offer to buy them out asking them to switch the beneficiary to you in which you pay them a fee and take over their payments. It is funny how suddenly it pays for you to be dead. It is close to putting a contract out on your own head. I suppose that’s why organized crime likes it so much.
    Of course, the other side of the fraud is giving people you know will die insurance, packaging them, and then asking stupid companies like AIG to buy them. This works especially well when you somehow work out with the beneficiary a commission scheme or pocket the annual income and sales of the policy and then walk away knowing that life insurance claim will fall through. But that is just boring compared fast death payouts.
    You may think you are above being duped into being so foolish as to agree to something in which you know others can benefit off your death. However, the large scale securitization and derivatives premised on life insurance policies allows this fraud to be played on anyone who gets a life insurance policy.
    In essence, once a derivative is sold on your dying the person buying it can either keep it as an insurance against your death thus protecting a policy from early death, or they can sell it if they think they can get more than its worth. Also, the ones issuing death derivatives (derivatives insuring against early death) which is a lot like mortgage defaults, can issue derivative insurance multiple times over against your death if they feel like your risk of death is lower than the premium they receive or they just want the extra fee income (because they are running a ponzi scheme with an intention of going broke before payment). This is what AIG did but with home mortgages. Unfortunately for them, they bet against Goldman Sacs who sold the home mortgage bonds they bet against.
    Anyway, in both cases where the derivative is not being used to hedge against your insurance policy the person buying the insurance is gambling on your death. Or perhaps if something unfortunate has already been planned for you, it isn’t exactly gambling is it? In essence once again you have finance a hit on yourself.
    Since you will never know who wrote the contract, sold the contract, or who really holds your life insurance policy anymore good luck finding out if anyone is benefitting off your death. Since you might not be around there will probably be no one to find out after the fact.
    There is one big difference in mortgage derivative fraud and life insurance fraud. Mortgage derivatives fraud preys on the poor. Life insurance derivative fraud most likely will prey on the rich. In this macabre system the richer you are and the richer your insurance payout, the more profitable it will be for you to meet a bad demise. Thus no longer will criminal organizations need to con little poor old people to make trusts to them as they pay their insurance premiums. They can now go after the wealthy, buying up contracts profiting on their death legally without them even knowing. Likewise, the early demise of a rich payout will skew the value of a life insurance bond package and its derivative much more than a package of loans since larger loans like jumbo loans are usually separated from smaller loans by risk profile (life insurance is separated by life expectancy). Thus they can sell packages of life insurance policies in full knowledge they are getting the better end of the deal (since they might already have bought the derivatives on some people in those packages).
    Sadly once securitization takes hold there is almost nothing you can do to prevent fraud being perpetrated upon you short of cancelling your life insurance policy.
    Since this is such a rich, yet morbid field in which crime of the worst type can occur, the barring of securitization and the subsequent derivatives that follow should not just be regulated but outlawed. Seeking to thwart the criminal organizations that coerce people to buy insurance they can’t afford and then set up trust funds and sell their life insurance to them is just the tip of the iceberg. Even then, since like so many other things, the legal aspects run into multiple legal jurisdictions (trust/inheritance law and insurance law) stopping even this has been impossible up to this day. Can we trust the government to create an overarching death panel to tie all insurance and death benefits law under one roof top prevent fraud and abuse that will undoubtedly plague it? I am guessing not.
    I hope regulators read and become aware of the very large dangers of securitizing life insurance. Thinking insurance companies know better than to engage in shady and unprofitable life insurance and derivatives dealers is laughable (look at AIG for instance). Likewise believing that fly by night companies that engage in selling derivatives are on the up and up is also ridiculous. You are just asking for it when you allow the payout from death to be separated from the liability from death. Especially if you allow it to be sold and packaged in a way in which only the criminal elements misusing them for their own nefarious purposes can quickly and easily figure out who actually owns your life insurance policy and who benefits from your death.
Back To Moon Kil Woong's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • S. A. Boyko
    , contributor
    Comments (3) | Send Message
    Markets are complex systems. If there is complexity, there is uncertainty. In “We’re All Screwed (reference below), I argue against governance policies that conflate “risk” and “uncertainty.” The inability to move away from the risk-uncertainty conflation affects not only capital market governance but the environment, homeland security, education, and healthcare. The gravamen of this problem stems from our policymakers being almost exclusively deterministically trained—law, accounting, and economics. They therefore have difficulty identifying, analyzing, and solving issues that are increasingly becoming more indeterminate.


    What we need now is capital market governance of randomness—a blueprint for fundamental change to the legacy, one-size-fits-all deterministic governance regime. Trying to have a one-size-fits-all governance, is analogous to writing one driving manual for the US and UK. In “We’re All Screwed,” (see my profile page) I describe how to segment the market into predictable, probabilistic, and indeterminate regimes to do the right things for governance effectiveness and how to do things right for governance efficiency.


    The legacy governance system for the US capital market is in disrepair. To achieve real regulatory reform, policymakers have to move beyond form to substantive issues. Unless experimentations to the legacy, one-size-fits-all deterministic regime take place, our capital market will be caught in a recursive loop of errors of commission (boom-bust bubble inefficiencies) and errors of omission (externality market inefficiencies). Such inefficiencies will eventually render our source of economic wealth ineffective.


    If this happens, we’re all screwed.
    22 Oct 2009, 11:26 AM Reply Like
  • suddy
    , contributor
    Comments (28) | Send Message
    Hi Moon,


    I would like to ask you a macro question since I belive with your background and experience you would be a good person to ask. What are your thoughts on the USD to other global exchange rates over a long term time horizon. Specifically I am interested in USD to Indian Rupee INR. Last 10 years range has been 1 USD ~ 36 - 50 INR.


    However, there is a 10% inflation in India, so the real exchange rate has been dropping.


    As an Indian investor in US Stocks , what factors should I keep in mind for long term investing - say 10- 20 years.


    Of course this is also a relevant question for most other basket of curriencies.


    Would you also please be able to provide us with a idea of how did the Korean Won to USD exchange rate play out say between 1960's to 2000 over a 30, 40 year span, after adjusting for inflation ? and ofcourse, the tremendous economic and industrial development in Korea.


    Thanks in advance.


    15 Apr 2011, 11:47 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • MNK is set to make new highs this year. This is one of the few companies I'm not worried about the economy with.
    Jun 7, 2012
  • NXPI is a buy on most of its bad news already priced in. Expectations were overly lofty. Value is good here in the next 12 months.
    Nov 4, 2011
  • I think ISRG has hit a news top and won't hit new highs until the run-up to next earnings. I'm out in the near term.
    Nov 2, 2011
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.