Living4Dividends'  Instablog

Send Message
Living4Dividends is an individual investor.
  • Buffett: Deal with deficit after U.S. economy recovers 2 comments
    Nov 16, 2009 4:33 PM

    Buffett: Deal with deficit after U.S. economy recovers

    • By Hibah Yousuf, staff reporter
    • On 9:10 pm EST, Friday November 13, 2009

    Billionaire Warren Buffett offered some advice to Uncle Sam on Friday: Time it right, but tackle the nation's enormous federal deficit.


    In an interview with Charlie Rose, Buffett said if the United States keeps flooding the world with its debt, countries will eventually notice that U.S. fiscal policies are "out of control" and become "less and less and less enthused" about lending to it.

    But the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway added that though the United States will want to act "fairly soon" to cut the deficit, it has to wait until the economy comes back.

    "We want to put out the fire," he said. "Then we want to quit squirting water on those buildings. We have to know when the fire's out."

    And how will we know?

    "Well, it will be retail sales. It'll be automobile sales. It'll be when home construction starts coming back," Buffett said, adding that the signs might not be recognized until three or four months after the fact. Still, it could happen in the next two years.


    Buffett said that while unemployment might stabilize later, it will also come down to a normal rate.

    "We'll create new jobs," has assured Rose, explaining that the United States has created millions of jobs since the unemployment rate was last above 10% in the 1980s and it will do the same this time around.

    "Who would have thought that when Paul Allen and Bill Gates were down there in Albuquerque eating pizza and drinking coke at two in the morning, that they were a big part of our future?" Buffett asked. "The American economy will come back. And it won't be tomorrow, and it won't be exactly the same, but in the end, we have not changed the American people and their capacity to innovate or their excitement about becoming more prosperous and coming up with new ideas."

    And as far as China beating and growing faster than the United States? Buffett said while China's population is four times larger and will thus grow faster, its economy is still much smaller overall.

    "I'll meet some guy on the street today whose net worth will be growing faster than mine on a percentage basis. But if I start with a big enough number, it'll be a while before he catches me," Buffett said, adding that it's a "long way off" for China's economy to be larger per capita than that of the U.S.

    'I want to make it painful for them'

    While Buffett said Washington came together to respond to the financial meltdown "like they should" have, the government should have been more aggressive in dealing with bank executives at too-big-to-fail institutions that needed government intervention.

    "If you run a financial institution that, in effect, can bring down the system unless the government steps in, I think something very bad should happen to you," Buffett said. "I want to make it painful for them."

    Buffett said while he's "not for shooting them," the executives should not be able to walk away with even 10% of their previous net worth and the directors who hired them should also be punished.

Back To Living4Dividends' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • optionsgirl
    , contributor
    Comments (5202) | Send Message
    I am amazed by Buffett's proposed punishment. Either these guys are crooks, in which case they should be brought to justice and serve jail time, or they are not guilty of a crime, and no one has a right to renegotiate their compensation plans.
    If there is no crime, iIt should be up to the shareholders and Board of Directors to decide what is fair compensation, imo-- the government grasp is too large already. Buffett wants it to reach out even further, even though he has benefited precisely because the government gave him guarantees, so that he stepped in and purchased these assets.
    I think Buffett is disengenuous (spelling?).
    14 Jul 2010, 10:54 PM Reply Like
  • dfbell
    , contributor
    Comments (1462) | Send Message
    Buffett has been inconsistent on so many things lately.


    "If you run a financial institution that, in effect, can bring down the system unless the government steps in, I think something very bad should happen to you." Except for Goldman Sachs, where he is a key investor?


    And Moodys? he argued at the Senate investigation committee that they did nothing wrong and were a good thing for the market. huh?


    Derivatives are incredibly dangerous. Except when he puts on a monster derivative position on long term s&p futures, with no layoff. That's different?


    Boards should be independent. Except his BoD?


    Jobs will come back because they have in the past. Except after the tech bubble and after 911. 2000-2009 was ten years of no job growth. Perhaps things are different now than the Berkshire glory years of the 80s and 90s?


    He is not much of an oracle anymore, imho.
    15 Jul 2010, 06:57 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • GBP/USD 1.6473
    Dec 6, 2009
  • EUR/USD 1.4872 + 0.0015
    Dec 6, 2009
  • Dow 10,388.90 +22.75 +0.22%
    Dec 6, 2009
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.