Seeking Alpha

Living4Dividends'  Instablog

Living4Dividends
Send Message
Living4Dividends is an individual investor.
  • Bloomberg: Unemployment at 10% to Depress Consumer Spending, Survey Shows  2 comments
    Jun 10, 2009 7:46 PM

    Unemployment at 10% to Depress Consumer Spending, Survey Shows

     

    By Bob Willis and Alex Tanzi

     

    June 10 (Bloomberg) -- Surging unemployment in the U.S. will delay a recovery in consumer spending and mute the rebound when it does materialize, according to a Bloomberg News survey.

    The jobless rate will climb to 10 percent by the end of 2009, 1.6 percentage points higher than projected at the start of the year, according to the median forecast of 62 economists surveyed from June 1 to June 8. Household purchases will drop this year more than previously estimated.

    Fewer jobs, lower home values, limited credit and shrinking retirement funds will prompt Americans to save, blunting the Obama administration’s stimulus efforts. Still, government infrastructure projects, smaller stockpiles and stabilization in residential construction will help the economy start growing in the second half of this year.

    “Consumer spending will come back grudgingly, slowly,” said John Lonski, chief economist at Moody’s Capital Markets Group in New York. “The unemployment rate should continue to rise and remain stubbornly high.” Lonski forecast the jobless rate will reach 10.2 percent in early 2010, higher than he previously estimated.

    Personal spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the economy, will fall at a 0.6 percent annual pace in the current quarter and rise at an average 1.1 percent pace in the last six months of the year, down from last month’s projections. For all of 2009, purchases will drop 0.7 percent, the worst performance since 1974.

    Spending ‘Muted’

    “Consumer spending does look to be more muted in this recovery than typically after a deep recession,” said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “We would attribute that to the negative wealth effects from housing and stock market declines. There will only be a modest rebound in the next couple of quarters.”

    The world’s largest economy will contract at a 2 percent pace this quarter, before growing 0.5 percent in the July-to- September period and 1.9 percent in the final three months of the year, according to the survey. For all of 2009, the economy will contract 2.7 percent, the biggest drop in the post-World War II era.

    The jobless rate will average 9.2 percent in 2009, higher than the 8.9 percent worst-case scenario the government used in tests to determine whether a deteriorating economy would require the 19 largest banks to boost capital. The results last month showed 10 of those firms needed more funds. Unemployment climbed to 9.4 percent in May, the government reported last week.

    The survey also showed unemployment will average 9.8 percent in 2010, compared with the 10.3 percent the government used in its stress test.

    Stress Tests

    The weakening in the labor market is one reason the panel overseeing the financial bailout yesterday said regulators should repeat the tests.

    Restructuring efforts in the auto industry mean more job losses are on the way. AutoNation Inc., the largest U.S. new- vehicle retailer, plans to close seven showrooms, while Visteon Corp., the former parts-making unit of Ford Motor Co., and chassis manufacturer Metaldyne Corp. have joined General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC in declaring bankruptcy.

    “Businesses have been very aggressive in cutting costs relative to declines in output,” said Robert Mellman, an economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. “It could be because of financial difficulties and uncertainties about access to capital and unwillingness to borrow.”

    Stimulus Plan

    Already, the economy has lost 6 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007, the most of any slump since the Great Depression. That’s nearly double the 3.5 million jobs President Obama seeks to save or create with the $787 billion recovery plan passed in February.

    The president last week announced 10 projects, including improvements in parks, highways and veteran medical facilities, intended to save or create more than 600,000 jobs over three months in an effort to stem the damage. “We have a long way to go on our road to recovery but we are going the right way,” Obama said in a statement.

    The jump in government spending will cause the budget deficit to swell to 12 percent of gross domestic product this fiscal year, the highest since monthly records began in 1968, according to the survey median.

    Still, government efforts to thaw credit are starting to pay off, making it easier for companies to borrow.

    “Capital markets have largely healed,” General Electric Co. Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Immelt said at a conference yesterday. “As a company you have to invest now. You have to invest when things are darkest.” Still, the economic recovery will be slower than that following the 1982 recession, he added.

    A subdued expansion means Federal Reserve policy makers will hold the benchmark interest rate near zero until the second half of 2010, according to the survey median.

    To contact the reporters for this story: Bob Willis in Washington at bwillis@bloomberg.netAlex Tanzi in Washington at atanzi@bloomberg.net

    Last Updated: June 10, 2009 00:00 EDT

     

Back To Living4Dividends' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • Living4Dividends
    , contributor
    Comments (1220) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Usually ETFs are a sound investment vehicle. They are superior to mutual funds for theit tax efficiency. As well, most ETFs are passive. Not all ETFs are the same:

     

    Exotic ETFs make lousy long-term investments: leveraged and inverse ETFs are a bad idea. ETFs holding futures (Commodity ETFs) are IMHO a bad idea due to their high turnover and reliance on derivatives.
    Some ETFs are too tiny. This lack of liquidity makes the ETF have higher spreads - you lose money when trading into them and out of them (if you can sell). As well, many tiny ETFs can get liquidated by the sponsor, causing you headaches.
    ETNs as generlly BAD ideas due to their inherent counterparty risks. ETNs, technically are not ETFs, but are lumped into the same category of consideration.
    Actively managed ETFs are a bad idea. This is because active management, in the aggregate, does not outperform passive management.
    11 Jun 2009, 08:34 AM Reply Like
  • Living4Dividends
    , contributor
    Comments (1220) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » The above was posted in the wrong place. (Wrong article) sorry
    11 Jun 2009, 08:34 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • GBP/USD 1.6473
    Dec 6, 2009
  • EUR/USD 1.4872 + 0.0015
    Dec 6, 2009
  • Dow 10,388.90 +22.75 +0.22%
    Dec 6, 2009
More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.